Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Labour conference votes to reverse cut to winter fuel allowance in blow to Keir Starmer" video.

  1. Wrong, he accepted the use of accommodation worth £20,000 if he had to pay for it, which he didn't. Boris excepted several luxury holidays paid for by donors.
    16
  2. The unions need Labour to enact workers rights reforms.
    5
  3.  @Sam88-l4k  Those that rent are the ones that didn't have the sense to help to themselves. Some people just don't deserve help.
    5
  4. As there are many Union members who are also Pensioners, obviously they would vote for it.
    1
  5. He didn't spend any money. He was given the use of accommodation that had it been paid for on the open market would have cost £20,000.
    1
  6. The Unions want the promised workers rights legislation from Labour.
    1
  7. Reverse the Tories NI cuts and that will bring in another £20bn.
    1
  8. So are Energy companies annual dual fuel standing charges which are far more than the WFP. Why don't they scrap them for pensioners ?
    1
  9. Spot on.
    1
  10. Accommodation worth £20,000 if he had to pay for it on the open market, which he didn't.
    1
  11. WFP should be restricted to pensioners living in properties in Council Tax Bands A to C. As a Pensioner I consider this fair.
    1
  12. As it didn't cost the taxpayer a penny, I don't care if he had the use of Buckingham Palace.
    1