Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Starmer taunts Rees-Mogg for acting like an ‘overgrown prefect’" video.

  1. A windfall tax on energy companies would raise @ £3bn, which equates to @ £120 per household and whilst welcome isn't very much. It's not the bonanza that some people think.
    2
  2. There is a strong case for its removal from domestic fuel and then an across the board reduction to 15%, leaving the option to cut if further open.
    1
  3. Starmer has neither the intelligence or debating ability to go head to head with JRM.
    1
  4. I think the government will introduce a number of measures to help with the increasing cost of living including tax cuts. The windfall (one time only) tax suggested will raise @ £3bn which equates to @ £120 per household, which although welcome isn't very much. Did you realise it was little ?
    1
  5. The energy companies are already taxed, a windfall tax is in addition and is supposed to be a one time only tax. This would raise @ £3bn which equates to @ £120 per household which although welcome isn't very much.
    1
  6. Its difficult to take your comment seriously when you can't spell BRITAIN correctly.
    1
  7.  @JodyHwd  Do you know anyone earning this sort of salary that doesn't vote Conservative ?
    1
  8. I think you would find that Labour would be the biggest loser. Only those to whom the salary wasn't important because of additional incomes would want the job and those tend to be Conservatives.
    1
  9. Starmer is a tool, that's undeniable.
    1