Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Theresa May slams Boris Johnson's Government over Tory sleaze scandal" video.

  1. It's appropriate to maintain standards and impersonal.
    5
  2. Nothing wrong with some fascism. Stopping illegals landing on our shores and sending them back is pure Fascism, "Britain for the British"
    5
  3. She has a very lucrative career as a speaker, didn't you know ?
    2
  4. So no different from the heads of every large corporation. Nice people don't get to the top of anything.
    2
  5. Then leave or is it that you jealous that they have made more of themselves than you ?
    2
  6. May now has a lucrative career as a speaker.
    2
  7.  @mustafa1name  He didn't commit fraud thats why. Parliament is no more than a refection of society at large.
    2
  8. All that interests me is an MP's ability to do his job within the rules. If they have a second job, or any other sources of income it's irrelevant. Politics needs clever successful people.
    1
  9. He's the most brilliant person in politics and it needs people of his calibre.
    1
  10. Politics reflects society at large. An MP's salary is only £82,000 and wouldn't attract anyone of sufficient calibre unless they were already wealthy and the money didn't matter. An MP's ability to do the job whilst acting within the rules is far more important than how many sources of income they have.
    1
  11. It's an impossible job for anyone and Boris has done a decent job. Rather him than me. Anyone with the benefit of hindsight could have acted differently. Whatever he does is supported by some and rejected by others. Just look at the anti vaccine / lockdown protests.
    1
  12. If a customer buys you lunch or gives you a bottle at Xmas, is that sleaze ? Are they doing that because they like you or what they feel you may do for them ?
    1
  13. Just like society at large, so why expect any different from our politicians.
    1
  14. They don't exist, unless you recruit them from a children's nursery.
    1
  15. It's little more than a reflection of wider society. An MP's salary, even the PM's is far too small on its own to attract people of a sufficiently high calibre.
    1
  16. She now has a very lucrative career as a speaker, did you know ?
    1
  17.  @piccalillipit9211  She now has a very lucrative career as a speaker, did you know ?
    1
  18.  @gingerbaker4390  I have no problem with MP's having outside interests, private investment incomes, well paid partners as long as they do they do their jobs, which in itself highly subjective. I have 2 pensions and investment income from several sources, does this make me corrupt ?
    1
  19. Nothing wrong in that as long as she acts within the rules. She probably has investment income and pensions and a husband who is a big earner. Being successful and clever seem like excellent qualities in an MP.
    1
  20. Not really they just reflect wider society. Labour aren't exempt, they have the support of the Trade Unions.
    1
  21. She has a very lucrative career as a speaker, didn't you know ? I have no problem with them having multiple income streams as long as they do their job.
    1
  22. No, they reflect wider society. Don't for one moment think the same isn't true of the Labour Party with its huge Trade Union support.
    1
  23.  @pauln6803  Just look at the Labour front bench if you want proof.
    1
  24. I have no problem with MP's having multiple income streams as long as they do their jobs, which is highly subjective. Mogg does his brilliantly. For a man whose worth over £100m an MP's salary is insignificant.
    1
  25. An MP's salary (£82,000) is just too little to attract people of the right calibre and bribery and corruption would multiply 10 fold. How would you then treat those who have private incomes, highly paid or wealthy partners, will you exclude them as well ?
    1
  26. Politics is just a reflection of society at large why is anyone surprised.
    1
  27.  @raymondwebb2029  Obviously you didn't and have a chip on your shoulder. It's not too late to take an Open University Degree if you are prepared to work for it.
    1
  28.  @desperatelyseekingrealnews  So no different from society at large ? Where does honesty end and corruption begin ?
    1
  29. So you don't want a government with highly intelligent ,successful people. I do, the alternative are the Dianne Abbots of this world.
    1
  30. The government or any of the political parities are just a reflection of society at large. I want to vote for clever, successful people, don't you ?
    1
  31. He more than clever enough to do both and a huge asset to the Conservative party. How could a tiny MP's salary attract someone whose worth of £100m.
    1
  32. She has a very lucrative career as a speaker, didn't you know ?
    1
  33. Rishi is worth @ £200m, his wife £400m +. A very clever man and an excellent Chancellor.
    1
  34.  @pauln6803  Probably true, but as the old saying goes, "The Buck Stops Here". Can't believe he didn't know, just pleased not to get involved.
    1
  35. Just like society at large.
    1
  36. It's what all ex PM's do, just look at John Major.
    1
  37.  @paulwood6048  A knighthood, so much better.
    1
  38. Where does honesty end and corruption begin ? Not sure I know.
    1
  39. Mogg has no need to be an MP, he's worth over £100m. An MP's salary alone would not attract people of sufficient calibre into politics. It needs clever successful people.
    1
  40. Thats exactly what I do. Parliament is no more than a reflection of society at large.
    1
  41. No political party is exempt and I see no problem in MPs having, multiple income streams as long as they do their jobs, which in itself is highly subjective.
    1
  42. He's a hugely clever and successful man which is way more important.
    1
  43. Just a reflection of society and the Labour party are just the same. The last time Labour were in power they bankrupted the country. Given the choice I prefer corrupt to incompetent. One show initiative the other doesn't.
    1