Comments by "iggle" (@iggle6448) on "Russell Brand Video REACTION" video.

  1. Good points. Having watched some of Brand's output, I can say that all his opinions were based on or in reaction to published news reports, often from well respected outlets. I'm not a supporter of his.
    3
  2. Sober-minded, neutral, law abiding people would say so. But here there is very little of that law-abiding going on.
    3
  3.  @londonerwalks  JC is retired, he can afford to allow himself to take the red pill.
    3
  4. Well said. Thank you. I find it somewhat perturbing that the founding law and the letter's construction have not been contextually examined on this channel. But we have been advised not to make comment on the case because the Attorney General put out a memo invoking two forms of contempt of court. Neither of which apply given that there are no court proceedings.
    2
  5.  @bojnebojnebojne  Indeed. It's staggering that a) we now have governments that are pursuing policies which have been demonstrated to lead to civil unrest and even wars; and b) that the governments of English-speaking nations appear to be in lockstep.
    2
  6.  @alicemilne1444  Monetisation/demonetisation is indeed directly linked to visibility.
    2
  7. Well said. We know where this leads....
    2
  8. The king won't refuse to sign. This law suits his purposes too.
    2
  9. Given habitual mission creep, this will be used to take down many 'non-approved' news outlets. It'll leave a small Pravda cohort.
    1