Comments by "Conor." (@conor.3875) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. I don't see how #1 qualifies as disturbing... It comes off more like Adam Sandler humor.
    154
  2. The Joker was "the most philosophical baddie on the list". That's what I took issue with.
    46
  3. I don't. I tend to think that if something causes life threatening diseases, it's best avoided altogether.
    36
  4. It wins you the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    30
  5. Why would atheists be butt-hurt by this video, exactly?
    23
  6. There are no "true" religions. This is the point they are making by inventing something utterly ridiculous and showing that no one can give a reason why any mainstream religion is any more plausible.
    16
  7. We have no better legal grounds to call this a joke than we do to call Christianity a joke. The constitution doesn't have a mechanism to distinguish between religions that people actually believe, and religions that're just fucking with us. Batshit demented ideas share a column under the law, whether they're sincere or not.
    14
  8. If God created men and women to be together, what did he create gay people to do?
    7
  9. Kaiser Bob Here's the thing, kid, Christianity and "Pastafarianism", are both just more stupid ideas, and your preferred stupid idea doesn't get special treatment under the law for either its age, or number of sycophants. You aren't making any real points here. This is just you trying to find different ways of saying what you want to say, and actually mean, which is, "Christians are different because we're right."
    6
  10. YunaBug I don't know why you're telling me this...
    6
  11. I'm sorry, what're you bloviating about?
    5
  12. The FSM is no less rooted in reality than your religion by any unbiased standard. This is the point here, and you seem to have had it fly straight over your head.
    5
  13. There is no logic in it. That's the point.
    4
  14. So if I go to New York and find that it's the exact same city as the one that Marvel Comics is talking about, does that mean that Spider-Man is real?
    4
  15. Incorrect. Your logic is that a boat was found where the Bible said it would be, therefore the Bible is true. This is exactly like finding that New York is exactly like Marvel Comics say it is, therefore the Spider-Man comic are true.
    4
  16. The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come. A Christmas Carol (1984)
    4
  17. Two points for you, my dear chap. 1: To view something as silly is not bigotry. 2: Hatred and intolerance are not the same thing.
    3
  18. Kaiser Bob For the third time, the law doesn't distinguish between "real" religions, and ones that aren't. Your preferred stupid idea doesn't outrank any other stupid ideas in the eyes of the law. This isn't difficult to grasp.
    3
  19. "The Ark". You mean the one that was built by a man who lived beyond eight hundred years on the instruction of the god of the Old Testament, housed a male and female of every species in existence, and survived a forty day global flood that eradicated every other living thing on the planet? Did it occur to you to ask how they know this?
    3
  20. "The Bible is true" is the claim that you aren't doing a great job of proving.
    3
  21. 1. Something being written down does not prove that it's true. 2. There being a boat in a place that the Bible said there'd be a boat does not prove that the entire story told about a boat is true. Sorry. I have comprehended your point, and provided a cohesive rebuttal to it. You have ignored the rebuttal, and you've started hurling insults around like a child.
    3
  22. The Bible is an offensive book...
    3
  23. "There's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased Scotsman." - Groundskeeper Willie.
    3
  24. LinkMEP I'm not talking about the members of the FSM church you've allegedly spoken with. You have accused someone on this thread of being bigoted simply for calling religion silly. I quote; "By saying that most reasonable people view religious people as being silly reveals you to be a bigot against religious people."
    2
  25. Gideon Um... Yeah, hi. This might be a little embarrassing, but, I wasn't talking to you.
    2
  26. The butt-hurt guy who knows he's wrong but can't admit it, and so instead tries to threaten other people into silence? Is that the guy you don't want to be?
    2
  27. That still doesn't demonstrate that the boat they found is the one that the Bible story talks about. Nothing you've said proves that the boat we have at any point held two of every species, or that it held the lone survivors of a global genocide. Also, just to be clear, "search it up" is not an argument. Finding something on the internet does not prove that it's true. That's a pretty valuable life lesson.
    2
  28. Did you not read my comment?
    2
  29. I know it doesn't. That's the point. It's the logic you are using, and it does not make sense.
    2
  30. 1. A boat being on Mount Arat proves that the book was right about there being a boat on Mount Arat. Nothing else. 2. Motive for lying is irrelevant. Everything a book says being true, and the author being a liar are not the only two possibilities. That's called a false dichotomy.
    2
  31. Zachary Fillion, I'm not sure if you're actually talking to me or not. I don't see how your comment could be a coherent response to aything I've said.
    2
  32. Um... Craydoug, you are aware that people write fiction, right?
    2
  33. I did also. Not Cinderella, though. I thought that'd have something to do with adultery. "It's midnight... Goodbye!"
    2
  34.  @miss.l.c.minister  Do you ever get tired of trying to threaten people into agreeing with you?
    2
  35. @William Kotheimer It says that anyone who doesn't buy into it deserves to be burned alive. That's pretty tough to top, really.
    2
  36. Daniel McCauley I'm not hearing you rebut anything Dark Matter has actually said. Snakes don't talk. We can only bat at that "low hanging fruit" because you idiots provide it for us.
    2
  37. Not all atheists did become atheists. I more or less always have been. I wasn't born believing in any gods, and nothing any religion has done so far has made me start. Putting people's atheism down to fear is pretty condescending.
    2
  38. Who is stopping people from believing what they want?
    1
  39. Where the fuck are the Ladies Shiva and Deathstrike?
    1
  40. #1: Hugh Grant
    1
  41. What edge does Blue Eyes have over Slifer or Ra?
    1
  42. The argument has already been won. Comments like this are unnecessary.
    1
  43. LBM/YD Incorrect. As I said, there is no unbiased standard by which Christianity makes more sense, or any sense at all, for that matter.
    1
  44. LBM/YD Until you actually present a way in which Christianity is anymore reasonable that the FSM, I won't be acknowledging you as a participant of this debate.
    1
  45. LBM/YD I actually have read through each of your comments, and, no, you haven't. You've vaguely alluded to unnamed ways that other people are too "stupid" or "ignorant" to see, but that isn't you actually presenting ways. That's you transparently copping out of having to present them. I'm still waiting.
    1
  46. LBM/YD We have equal grounds to say that Christianity was created by man. You don't get to assume that Christianity was created by a god when trying to prove that Christianity is true. That's called a presupposition, and it's a textbook example of a logical fallacy.
    1
  47. LBM/YD I suspect this of being a troll after that comment... I didn't say it was Man - God - Universe. I said it's Universe - Man - God.
    1
  48. LBM/YD "God created the universe." Yeah, remember what I just said about those assumptions you're making?
    1
  49. LBM/YD Argument from ignorance fallacy.
    1
  50. LBM/YD Yeah, no. If we don't know enough about something to draw a conclusion, the answer is "we don't know". The answer is not "let's assume God done did it." You need to read a little more about the burden of proof, and, come to think of it, debate and philosophy in general. You've called other people "too uneducated to have this discussion", and then made logical errors that anyone with an elementary understanding of debate would be above making. You aren't an authority on who is adequately educated to be partaking in this discussion. You're an intellectual kindergartner.
    1
  51. LBM/YD Once again, and argument from ignorance fallacy. "I can't think of anything better" is not a valid argument. I find it strange that you've moved from "we don't know enough about the universe's origins", to "I know what the likelihood of the universe arising was." The reality is that we have no idea how likely the universe was to come into being. Nevertheless, even if I grant you that its odds are inconceivably slim, this only does you any good at all if you can demonstrate that an interdimensional architect creating the universe is more likely, and you're not going to be able to do that. You aren't going to win the god debate by bringing probability into it.
    1
  52. LBM/YD I've already responded to this. You clearly haven't read my response from the time it took you to respond.
    1
  53. LBM/YD You realize that my response was twelve lines long, don't you? In those twelve lines I point out that we actually have no idea how likely the universe was to arise. You have completely ignored this point.
    1
  54. LBM/YD No you don't. You've been saying this entire time, and your entire argument is founded on "the universe was unlikely to arise." My point is that you do not know that.
    1
  55. LBM/YD All possibilities? According to you there are only two, and God is clearly the right one because the other is unlikely. This is what you have spent the discussion saying.
    1
  56. LBM/YD And God is the better explanation, how...? By the way "God" is not a concept in science.
    1
  57. SomeRandomHarambe Is that the opposite of shut up?
    1
  58. About...?
    1
  59. "People are willing to believe in them selves more than god or whatever." - Craydoug. 2017.
    1
  60. +MetaKnight964 And might the prideful also block people so that they may have the last word? Might the prideful also move to argue against people who can't argue back, having failed miserably to surmount someone who can, hmm?
    1
  61. MetaKnight964 Lol. I'm not a sycophant, you fucking moron. No one cares that you block people you can't argue with. It shows you to be fragile little coward, and you are being duly laughed at for it.
    1
  62. MetaKnight964 Denial and petty insults? Your lack of self-awareness could quite easily see you thrive as a circus act. Lol. You make rabid accusations towards other people, and deem them "slander" when the same ones are made to you. You're a self entitled child. Get over yourself, dear.
    1
  63. MetaKnight964 Yes I do. After that, I don't think you quite realize what self-awareness is. LMAO. And threatening to kill people marks you having gone full internet thirteen year old. No one takes you seriously enough to be intimidated, or upset by you. You are a jumped up simpleton who is being laughed at like he deserves.
    1
  64. MetaKnight964 That's very good. You've totally threatened people into submission before! You're very good at being a thug, kiddo. You get a cookie!
    1
  65. MetaKnight964 You really are a devout projectionist aren't you? "Also I can see you're butthurt"? I haven't blocked anyone. "killing anyone that opposes your idol"?? YOU have threatened to kill people, kid. Not me. No one finds an obvious thirteen year old threatening to kill them over the internet intimidating. Sorry.
    1
  66. Because nobody can give a reason why he is. As you neglect to do in this comment. What you are deeming "sad" is the doing of people like you.
    1
  67.  @ciskudrillis2086  Can you speak English?
    1
  68.  @miss.l.c.minister  Whether you were trying to doesn't matter. It is what you did. Intelligent people aren't convinced by threats, so if you hope to convince them, try something else.
    1
  69.  @ciskudrillis2086  Learn the language before you use it to tell others they're not smart.
    1
  70. @William Kotheimer Do you not think Christianity is offensive to anyone?
    1
  71. ​@William Kotheimer Do you not know of anything called artistic freedom?
    1
  72. @William Kotheimer But you don't think Christianity is offensive to any other religions?
    1
  73. @William Kotheimer So what is this film doing that Christianity isn't? They're both offensive.
    1
  74. ​ @moerivera6659  You don't read minds. These are thoughts and motivations you've imagined. You only ridicule yourself when you try to argue by making things up about your opponents.
    1
  75.  @moerivera6659  I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but the scientific consensus is not that the universe was intelligently designed. The arguments for your position aren't so flawlessly convincing that anyone who hears them is immediately convinced. You have a chip on your shoulder that would be worth dropping. Some people really do just disagree with you. You should have the sincerity to acknowledge that.
    1
  76.  @moerivera6659  I don't think I said you were intending to convince anyone. I don't seem to have insulted you, either... Whose comments have you been reading? The conceit you've expressed is that the evidence of your position is so convincing that anyone who isn't convinced by it can only be deliberately avoiding it to serve an ulterior motive. You haven't just shared your thoughts. You've tried to tell others what theirs are. You have a chip on your shoulder, and it has you arguing very dishonestly. We could have a proper conversation if you dropped the chip. Ending your disrespectful comments with a perfunctory "much respect to you" isn't compensating for it.
    1
  77. Did you guys deliberately choose a continuity error as the thumbnail?
    1
  78.  @peggylittledragon7734  There are atheists who've read the Bible...
    1
  79.  @peggylittledragon7734  Why?
    1
  80.  @johnphantom  That would also make you an atheist, according to the definition.
    1
  81.  @johnphantom  "read the definitions and try to understand them." This isn't terribly useful. It's a smug nothing. Perhaps you should instead tell me what it is you think I've not understood, or consider that I might understand something that you don't. Do you think that might be more productive?
    1
  82.  @johnphantom  That's lacking belief.
    1
  83.  @johnphantom  It isn't, though. The definition you just cited makes that clear. "a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods." If they were the same, there wouldn't be a disjunctive between them. What you believe about the possibility is irrelevant. Belief that there is a god, is what we're talking about, and you don't have one of those.
    1
  84.  @johnphantom  That's not what the definition says. You keep coming back to belief in possibility when it's not mentioned anywhere as a qualifier in the definition you cited. Believing it could be true is irrelevant. Unless you believe it is, you're an atheist. That's what the definition says.
    1
  85.  @johnphantom  I could curse you to Hell right now, if it'd put this point to rest. I don't see how it would conflict with my atheism, though, since I'd be using a turn of phrase...
    1
  86.  @johnphantom  That still doesn't stop you being an atheist.
    1
  87.  @johnphantom  Right. Both of those describe you.
    1
  88.  @johnphantom  Pay close attention: I understand what you're saying. It's just wrong. Atheists can curse people to Hell. Also, what do you think an agnostic being a person has to do with this? All three of them say "a person". We're all people, here. This isn't a relevant qualifier.
    1
  89. Duh. Who is death fun for...?
    1
  90.  @Rotisiv  Do you think atheists find death horrifying?
    1
  91. They don't, though.
    1
  92.  @dxsolate  A club telling gay people that they're evil doesn't attract many gay members. Would you expect it to?
    1
  93. This list is way too nostalgically driven. Shows like The Simpsons and Looney Tunes that have shaped cartoons as they are today are all brilliant, but they're not eternal monoliths. There are some modern shows that genuinely have outshined them.
    1
  94. Anti Trump propaganda!!!!
    1
  95. 5:25 That's a Samurai sword, you say?
    1
  96. I's afraid of the dark...
    1
  97. Wwe
    1
  98. I refute him thusly...
    1
  99.  @dxsolate  How would he know, though?
    1
  100.  @Akirex5000  Him not having it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    1
  101. I already knew all of these. Should I be discontent with my life?
    1
  102. Without deleting your browser history.
    1
  103. I'm Welsh and I can't speak Klingon.
    1
  104. Y Marw Pob lwc, i ti.
    1
  105. Why is Watchmojo still wanking Annabelle off? It's awful.
    1
  106. Aren't these mostly just movies that are generally stupid?
    1
  107. Fuck off.
    1
  108.  @bilalk7710  I think what people usually mean by a balanced diet is to consume a variety of foods to get in all the nutrients needed. Not balancing out healthy foods with ones that give you diseases.
    1
  109. We don't believe things just because we want them to be true. That's called "wishful thinking".
    1