Comments by "Paul Rodgers" (@paulrodgers252) on "Justice Gorsuch warns that an ‘explosion’ of new laws could hinder Americans’ freedoms" video.
-
1
-
1
-
@lennylenny9807 were 1 Parent or both Parents Member of the United States Uniform Military Services at the Time they were born in a foreign Land? If, yes then they are a United States born Citizen; if not: they have to go through the naturalization process to be come a citizen of the United States and cannot be eligible to be the President of the United States;
Article.II.1.5 “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”
Citizen not citizen; Word Form Matters especially with the Constitution, the supreme Law, of the United States of America; Word progression goes: citizen, Citizen, CITIZEN or called: military, military I, military II;
1
-
@bleach219 it natural born Citizen in Article.II.1.5; Word Form Matters since this is the Constitution of the United States; natural at the Time the Constitution was signed meant “with out assistance of Man”; the naturalization process for Citizen would be: citizen, Citizen, CITIZEN: start on the left and go right or military (citizen), military I (Citizen), military II (CITIZEN);
Amendment XIV.1 establish “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
I took the Oath of Office in 85 when I got Commission as an Officer in to the United States Marines as establish in Article.II.3 and in accordance to Article.I.8.16; so I have served the Uniform Military Service of the United States and have an Opinion as establish Article.II.2.1;
All military I Commission Officers, past, present or tomorrow, have Constitution Authority to War (of Numbers, Words, or Violence) in a military Court of Law or the Battle Field to support and defend the Constitution of the United States;
If you did not take the Oath of Enlist or Office or both: do not try to give your in put be cause it more than not will be wrong as were those Court Cases that should have gone be for a military Tribunal as establish in Article.I.8.9 since ‘civil or military’ is establish in Amendment XIV.3;
it supreme Court since supreme is establish in Article I, II, III, VI and require a ratified Constitution Amendment to place ‘Supreme’ in to the Constitution not an illegal Act of Congress such as “Judiciary Act of 1789’; it is ‘bad behavior’ for Judges on the supreme Court to not know this since good Behaviour is establish in Article.III.1 and “and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution” is establish in Article.VI.2;
the Office of the United States inferior Tribunal Courts Judges was establish on 17 September 1787 by ‘We the People’ for military II+ Officers of the United States such as I; kind of like the Inspector Judicial Chief General Tribunal Judge Officers of the United States Government to keep both civil or military Officers in Line or control civil or military, and, or Controul military I Officers of the United States;
1
-
1
-
1