General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Sababugs112
HistoryLegends
comments
Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Were Years of NATO Training Effective?" video.
Sure "civilian milita" , no russians here
7
A war with nato would involve a technologicaly advanced air force and a lot more heavy equipment like himars mlrs . Currently Russia has resorted to trying to drown the enemie in shelling . Against Ukraine which doesn't have a great air force that would work but against nato ? Himars has been targeting russian depos with reasonable success , imagine what a squadron of f-35s would do .
5
@bigboi7817 I mean Russia couldn't defend Belgorod and snake island from the Ukrainian air force . What hope does it have of stopping a western air force
4
@davidgmillsatty1900 a) neither has Russia destroyed a 40 km convoy . B) you don't send your best troops on a deception mission
4
@bilic8094 problem is with accuracy . Also a lot of the times you wouldn't know where exactly the enemie is
3
@hordynighthawk325 And airforces are constantly improving no army is purely an airforce but getting air superiority wins wars . Russian artillery tactics wouldn't work against the west .
3
@davidgmillsatty1900 a) so which big arrow are you talking about B) deception , fake movement . An actual feint would be sending units to the north but not actually attacking to keep the Ukrainian army busy without taking casualties. Also you don't use your best units . Which feint in history has been like the Kiev "feint"
3
Intialy russian support and leadership (credit were credit is due girkin seems competent) . In 2014 Ukrainian army was fighting basically armoured battalions with light infantry . Currently is the russian artillery . DPR and LPR are often under equiped . Without russian backing they would've been destroyed in 2014 . Almost were in the begining.
3
@bigboi7817 when was the last time AA actually managed to stop a western style airforce ? Israel bombed Syria which had Russia AA, azerbaijan did the same to Armenia , Iraq had top of the line AA but didn't manage to stop Israeli air strikes Neither is a modern air force something to scoff at . Imo AA is a reactive measure which means that it really can't decide when a battle takes place , it is useful against Ukraine and its cost effective but in reality a modern air force would sead and dead aa
2
Doesn't work like that
2
How many nato jets were involved in this ? Nato definitely has the air force to deal with as
2
@davidgmillsatty1900 if Russia couldn't defend Belgorod from Ukraine planes what makes it think it can defend Moscow from modern jets
2
@davidgmillsatty1900 Kyiv was a big arrow .
2
@Trompicavalas majority of the voter base for zelensky was from the east . Majority of the locals in those provines were pro Ukrainian . Only pro russians stayed in the regions . For instance out of 95k people in lisichanask only 15k stayed
2
@suburbanyobbo9412 I mean there is a big difference between sending equipment and fighting
2
@nledaig zelensky is Jewish . Ukraine cannot be Nazi
2
@chilldoggy4721 one side had tanks and the other didn't
1
@chilldoggy4721 afu wasn't the side with tanks . DPR and LPR were on the russian border before mysteriously Ukrainian forces started facing tanks
1
@LtKeyser ya scoot . I don't think it would be that dangerous
1
@LtKeyser I'm not gonna stick around am I ? In the 3-6 seconds I can jump in a ditch and scoot .
1
@LtKeyser it takes at least 3 minutes for light artillery to start shooting . By that time the enemie is long gone . Russians shell proactively
1
Trenches and dug outs and bunkers exist which save lives .
1
@bigboi7817 quite long . I mean if you're purely being defensive eventually the enemie will hit you but if you have your own ways of responding making the enemie waste ammo and increasing your chances of survival is a good tactic
1
@bigboi7817 still . Better to have than to not . Imo people like to call artillery the king of battle I think that age is over now . Air superiority is much more useful .
1
@gothamgoon4237 it minimises the area the enemie has to hit
1
@Jolly_Rodger how would treat a Confederate?
1
@charlesiragui2473 I think Putin didn't do for startegy but popularity
1
@davidgmillsatty1900 a) Russia still lost a ton of men ultimately for a failed attempt to Kiev b) he is also a twice convicted pedophile . Yeah maybe get another source
1
@AK-kz6wc tbh I think the problem is more with weight . Ukraine simply doesn't have it now .
1
Rico Thampaty and russians never fought western style army .a russian battery cannot do anything to stop themselves from getting air striked
1
@dmitrychernivetsky5876 yes Dimitry
1
@IronWarhorsesFun that's in the case that your enemies cannot deal with your tanks
1
@whiskey_tango_foxtrot__ with russian support That's like saying the French army was effective because the allies took it from the Germans
1
@Michael_Veritas Azov battalion had 50 Russians fighting in it 2015 . They're like edgy teens and less like the second wearmacht Also PMC Wagner is riddled with Nazis too
1
@kaisermarxistdixie6842 correct
1