Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1. Our delay in weaponry gave Russia time , not Bakhmut
    1
  2.  @shaheemek3834  they didn't defend Bakhmut or Avdiivka with everything they got
    1
  3. Treason voids rights .
    1
  4. ​ @galimbertino4939  zelensky is a comedian and Putin is the joke
    1
  5. ​ @itsallminor6133  zelensky ran into Kherson Putin ran away from Kherson
    1
  6.  @operator9858  this being a kinetic war doesn't necessarily mean this is a conventional war . There are partisans in Russian occupied territory. There is also a difference in priority , Ukraine doesn't have to worry about Syria , Georgia, chechnya or anything like that , Russia does
    1
  7. 10 leopards destroyed in total . 49 Bradlies. How many Russian vehicles destroyed
    1
  8. Japan did it , chechnya did it , Finland managed it
    1
  9. Why cannot they ? Also Russia holds 17% of Ukraine, not 20%, and that's including Crimea and pre 2014 donbass which made up 9% of occupied territory
    1
  10.  @jennybrucks2215  for turret tossing
    1
  11. Why not ?
    1
  12. ​ @LongDefiant collaborators will be prosecuted and sentenced to life in prison probably because of treason Rest of them will face varying punishments but 90% of the locals would have nothing to fear
    1
  13. Borders over people
    1
  14.  @gusgone4527  look at how ww2 started, hittler took ethnic German lands from the most part before . What does the creation and changing the borders of states on the basis of ethnicity lead to ? It doesn't create freer societies , it doesn't create better countries . It often times just satisfies the fantasies of irredentists . Western European nations aren't exactly ethnically homogeneous . There are Germans in Belgium , French in Switzerland , Austrians in Italy . Yet if we apply the Crimea precedent all these places should be torn away. Only through outmost and absolute respect of defined state boundaries is it possible to achieve peace . Giving everyone their own little ethno republic serves no other purpose than to satisfy some nationalists dream. It is not the Ukrainians who are unreasonable here . They simply want what they have legally the right to . No state should have the right to change another's territory without the consent of the other state . All states have the right to defend their legal borders be it with or against the wishes of the locals . There was just as much of a moral issue with Crimeans being forced to live under an Ukrainian flag as there was with Albanians who are forced to live under a Macedonian flag . It's better in the grand scheme if Crimeans starve under an Ukrainian flag than live like kings under a russian one because allowing the changing of borders without concent gives a free hand to nationalists.
    1