Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "How Ukrainian DIY Drones Are Taking Out Russian Tanks | WSJ" video.

  1. ​ @kuzakani4297 ask Goryachev and Tsokov
    2
  2. 17% of Ukraine and 9% was taken before the war . Ask Goryachev how the war is going
    2
  3. ​ @jinnindo Europe didn't have Russian resources throughout the cold war
    1
  4. None of those were military losses
    1
  5.  @jinnindo  European industrial sector is ok , majority of factories are working
    1
  6.  @jinnindo  because Europeans are sensationalists , Europeans and Americans will admit to a problem no matter how small, russians on the other hand will not admit to a problem until it blows up in their face. German industrial output has only fallen by 1.69% . A war/battle where an enemy force is able to overtake American military positions through force and inflict significant casualties.
    1
  7. ​ @ionisral large war. 1 was bound to get lucky . Similar cases happened to Russia too
    1
  8. ​ @yaya_is_real on RT. Russia managed to take out like 10 leopards and have been recycling that footage for months
    1
  9. Russia has 4 times as much equipment lost as Ukraine per oryx
    1
  10.  @syedfahim6695  no but Ukrainians use 4x as many kamikaze drones and are better at using them
    1
  11.  andreyRUS17  oryx mainly uses era since Ukrainians use oplot and Russians use kontakt or relic , basically if the era follows the curve of the turret it's Ukrainian but if it jolts out and has an angle it's Russian , there are other identifying marks they use like geolocation and the location of the thermals so unless the tank is totally destroyed and rusted out, it's still possible to figure out who it belongs to
    1
  12.  andreyRUS17  more like 25% probably but even burnt it would still have some era and the thermals would remain . even still if you know the location you can guess which side it belongs to based on the direction and surroundings , if there are 5 tanks in the same location and facing the same side and 1 is burned beyond recognition but 4 are identified as Russian , then most likely the 5th tank is Russian too . if you don't like oryx there is also war spotting
    1
  13. The 16 leopards Russia destroyed combined would cost something like 130 Million USD . The 2000 Tanks visually confirmed to have been destroyed by Ukraine would cost around 8 Billion dollars
    1
  14. Depends , those drones mostly attack from the top down where the armour is relatively thin , so they can penetrate most of the time
    1
  15. ​ @svaneman1 an RPG hit on the top armour can penetrate and do a lot of damage and since Russians have been using a lot of their older tanks in the war they're reasonably effective
    1
  16. 15 leopards destroyed visually confirmed and 50 Bradley 2000 Russian tanks destroyed
    1
  17. ​ @Constantin_91 15 leopards (2a6 and 2a4) and 50 Bradleys destroyed by Russia, visually confirmed Vs 66 T-90 ( T-90M and T-90A) and 929 BMP 2k destroyed . Who's doing better ?
    1
  18. Any citations?
    1
  19. ​ @akshittripathi5403 Lancet is decent but They're not doing that much more work than fpvs. Also because of the distance it operates at the lancet has a lower kill percentage. Because the fpvs operate basically on the front line of they disable a tank it's much harder for the enemy to retrieve the tank and take it safety since follow up strikes happen a lot of the time , while lancet operates at intermediate distances and if they don't take out the equipment on the first hit they're much easier to retrieve and tow to safety .
    1
  20. ​ @JohnNjengaCOCO the drones go for the engine and after that other drones finish off the tank
    1
  21. 10 leopards destroyed in total . 49 Bradlies. How many Russian vehicles destroyed
    1
  22. Why cannot they ? Also Russia holds 17% of Ukraine, not 20%, and that's including Crimea and pre 2014 donbass which made up 9% of occupied territory
    1