Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Abrams, Leopard and Challenger 2 vs. T-72: How Western Tanks Compare to Russia’s Armor | WSJ" video.

  1.  @ActanonVerba.308  if used by the allied country not the defending one
    2
  2.  @ace_pass  so first chechen war , Afghanistan war , Vietnam war , Taiwan blockade , Afghanistan war again , etc didn't happen
    2
  3. Why do you think they can target the supply routes ?
    2
  4.  @HMASBarbette  easier said than done Russian missiles are notoriously inaccurate so taking out enemie logistics is an issue
    2
  5. Are Russians immortal?
    2
  6. They lost like 1600 as per oryx
    2
  7. The russians needed 6 months just to take soledar a town of 10k people Yeah bro keep dreaming
    2
  8.  @ace_pass  400k ? On RT . 15% of its territory actually
    2
  9.  @ace_pass  which ones exactly?source Sure they will . They lost Kherson and Lyman though
    2
  10.  @ace_pass  in Kherson better logistics , strategy and precision Artillery is a huge part of this war yes but precision, intelligence, logistics matter a great deal too .
    2
  11. Not all bridges
    2
  12. The russians do need practice. They can't seem to hit anything. In makiivka Ukrainian himars fired once and killed 600 troops In Kramatorsk Russians fired 5 missiles and ended up missing the entire base
    2
  13.  @bulletinmyleg  any pro Ukrainian news is cnn to you guys Still cnn > Russia today
    2
  14. It's not . Majority of Ukrainian tanks are still there , soviet tanks supplied are still there
    2
  15. They have to get those first
    2
  16. They don't control the air
    2
  17.  @ace_pass  in other news Moskva sails proudly and Kherson still stands
    2
  18.  @ace_pass  you're believing propaganda. The same people who make the claim Ukrainian army is destroyed or NATO mercs are the same people who were initially speaking about how the Moskva sinking was western propaganda, or how Kherson was going to be Russian forever and how Ukrainians were being pushed back and were going to lose mykolaiv
    2
  19. More t-90 have been lost in Ukraine than USA has lost Abrams in every war it fought
    2
  20.  @ivov  oryx
    2
  21.  @ivov  so I'm high iq . I don't actually let RT dictate my thoughts
    2
  22. Only 9 Abrams have ever been lost to enemie fire Tf you on about?
    2
  23.  @rolandb.1866  Saudi Arabia has 23 damaged or destroyed. Pretty good track record
    2
  24. T-72 is 4 million. That's the early model without thermals Also west calculates cost differently , Russian model of calculation would also make Abrams seem cheaper
    2
  25.  @ace_pass  now compare quality
    2
  26. No Kherson and like 2 million people left the country
    2
  27.  @ace_pass  bro Russia has like 200 of them at the start the of the war .
    2
  28. Eagle does too
    2
  29.  @dmitriyshunyayev7571  leave Crimea , zaparozhia, Kherson and donbass and America will leave too
    2
  30.  @dmitriyshunyayev7571  lybia was ordered by the UN , Afghanistan was because of 9/11 USA left Iraq
    2
  31. Quality though ?
    2
  32. Germany was fighting the entire world
    2
  33.  @HMASBarbette  even the russians admit that their smerch is only accurate to within a 100m of the target Khinzal has 50 meters by Russian statements, 300 by battlefield results
    1
  34.  @ace_pass  it cost russians a lot too . Destroyed tank columns in snihulivka, overran battalions in Davidy brid Fact of the matter is Ukrainians fought better
    1
  35.  @ace_pass  its down to 20k shells a day now for Russia . Due to himars logistically 60k shells a day isn't possible at this stage
    1
  36. USA was defending Ukraine
    1
  37.  @anoopnair6927  source ?
    1
  38. Russia's absolute supremacy in the air ?! Bro tf you smoking ? Their own air bases get bombed
    1
  39. Over 341 days 5 tanks is 1805 tanks by now Ukraine only had 1000 and received 300 older soviet ones from Poland Where are you getting these numbers from
    1
  40.  @jennybrucks2215  for turret tossing
    1