Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Yes the added firepower range and protection are curial for many operations
    1
  2. Uhh that would end the world and kill like 80-85% of the russian population within months
    1
  3. Huh? While lower frequencies are better at detection they need bigger radar thus they can't fit on planes
    1
  4. Russians do need to practice. They can't seem to hit shit
    1
  5.  @section7173  smashing so badly you guys lost 20+ APCs attacking vuhledar But you're not gonna see those videos on RT
    1
  6. That's a political cartoon from the 19th century
    1
  7.  @molotuppopcorn4315  outside of china neither one of those countries are as valuable as the Nordics
    1
  8. Eu would use nukes too
    1
  9. Russia has debt tho but not as much as china or the USA . Tbh with the way the ruble fluctuates based on oil prices and politics I doubt many investors would take such a high risk
    1
  10.  @henhute6  on RT . Power is back up in Kherson
    1
  11. Satiates could detect a missile launch . So so would russia be destroyed
    1
  12.  @Rainy10-08  oh like russians didnt commit war crimes in Afghanistan like using toy mines and indiscriminate violence killing a million civilians
    1
  13. ​ @treeinafield5022  in theory
    1
  14.  jack sandel  Russia annexed Crimea not the USA Russia didn't send equipment and troops the Lugansk peoples Republic
    1
  15.  jack sandel  USA isn't the one responsible for annexing Crimea or supporting separatists . Russia is at fault in Ukraine . They're the ones who keep the war going and started it
    1
  16.  jack sandel  firstly you do know that the president of Ukraine is Jewish and secondly Yanukovych was removed by the Ukrainian parliament and not through military force
    1
  17. He did say that isreal had us jets
    1
  18.  @tFighterPilot  still if isreal didn't have those jets they wouldn't have won the secret war
    1
  19.  @linhhoang1363  yes I was joking
    1
  20. The rest are prototypes
    1
  21.  @BBRX17  what about the Mongols china UK Japan Russia they have all won wars against china
    1
  22. Depends on the round
    1
  23.  @elgatoconbolas  2003 Iraq . Iraq had one of the strongest armies in the world
    1
  24.  @batslav  the aa would most likely either be destroyed by Japan or hidden until more equipment arrives
    1
  25. Japan is a member of the us nuclear umbrella meaning that an attack with nukes on Japan will be considered an attack on USA
    1
  26. I mean they predicted the invasion and that was correct they predicted Wagner rebellion so idk , they seem to be correct what's the issue with Mediazona ?
    1
  27. Most of the russian population lives in Europe so more than likely 100 million russians would die just from the bombs .
    1
  28. We push the nuclear button too
    1
  29.  @SweatyFeetGirl  the same thing the Japanese said in 1905 or the Germans in 1914 or the British said in 1856 or the chechns said in 1995 or the poles said in 1920
    1
  30.  @vlad_47  British haven't lost a war to Russia tho . And all of these countries despite being significantly smaller won a war against Russia
    1
  31.  @SweatyFeetGirl  excuses excuses
    1
  32.  @vlad_47  Russia lost ww1 on its own territory , so did they loose chechnya and they lost against Japan . Every country that has fought a war against superpower when they are at peak efficiency (ei healthy form ) has won (Vietnam , isreal , England , Poland in their healthy forms have defeated countries which at that time would've been considered superpowers or very strong ) That's just bending time and space to your liking to say that if we were efficient than we'd win .
    1
  33.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  didn't Russia bomb 3 separate countries with no justification
    1
  34.  @vlad_47  Germany lost ww1 to France , not to Russia . And russi withdrew from ww1 because the Germans just straight up fought better than russians did and used intelligence to their advantage Japan was at that time also fighting china and the USA not really a pure soviet victory Chechnya still managed to win the first war, in 1996 chechnya fought better and defeated the russian army the second invasion isn't something to brag about or that impressive considering the odds Russia isn't a special country its subject to the same laws and forces that every other country on earth is .
    1
  35.  @vlad_47  Germany didn't manage to destroy France even with Eastern front closed or when in the beginning they had the vast majority of their troops on the Western front . Still Germans beat russians in their home field The Pacific front was mainly naval action and the Japanese pulled the majority of their best troops air craft and heavy equipment to defend the home islands Russia lost the first chechn war there no way you can say otherwise . Russia got beat on its own territory again
    1
  36.  @vlad_47  also USA killed 250k Japanese while the ussr at most killed 83k Japanese the invasion of Manchuria didn't deal that much casualties for ww2
    1
  37.  @legatvsdecimvs3406  in chechnya Russia lost Grozny to Chechen forces Ww1 was a mistake because Russia wasn't able to win that war Russia has bombed georgia Ukraine Moldova all of them when they were neutrual
    1
  38.  @jirix9924  this video is a hypothetical in a real war they'd just nuke eachother . Also the ground army isnt bad it's a normal but very large . And this arguable but the us army is more experienced a typical us solder has had more deployments and active service than russian solders . Also russia mainly relys in conscripts which have lower moral but the us relys on volunteer which have typically better moral . Also on average us tanks out range russian tanks and have better optics .
    1
  39.  @jirix9924  us troops also train . They dont just sit around . The us spends 800 000000000 $ on its defence and russia spends 100 000000000$ . The us doesn't just burn that money . The us has the largest military industrial complex in the world next 13 countries up combined spend the same . Its not unreasonable to say that they have a stronger army .
    1
  40.  @jirix9924  uhh us makes all its military equipment domestically . It doesn't buy it from other countries . Only thing is like they buy bullets from isreal for the iraq and Afghanistan war . Also us has tons of oil in Arizona Texas and new Mexico. Enough to satisfy its demand
    1
  41.  @jirix9924  they have enough money to start extracting those materials over time they'll also cheapen up and and be at the same level as russia
    1
  42.  @Caktusdud.  Considering that they had a nuclear disater on one of them I disagree
    1
  43. More reliable, more modern , more urganomic etc
    1
  44.  @EEEEEEE354  Saudis had all sorts of stuff . Tech can't make up for corruption and incompetence
    1
  45.  @EEEEEEE354  Saudis couldn't conduct air strike because their command structure required permission all the way from mbs . Yeah I wouldn't trust em
    1
  46. So would Russia
    1
  47.  @ytgfy  because countries around Russia feel threatened .
    1
  48.  @walker68175  yeah but it won't last that long most of the population would be evacuated from there and in a couple of months the city would be taken back
    1
  49.  @walker68175  the Japanese thought by knocking out the us fleet at pearl harbor they'd destroy the us moral .
    1
  50. No we can't . Georgia has a population of 3.7 million people Russia has a population of 140 million . But because georgia is so heavily forested and very mountainous guerilla war fare would seriously damage Russia to a point where Russia may just its not worth it and leave us alone
    1