Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "US Army just chose its next (light) tank" video.

  1.  @ljubomirculibrk4097  I think you ment to say nato would need a week to deal with the entire russian army in Ukraine
    5
  2.  @fenrir834  I mean . To train an infantry man to a level which they can go into combat is expensive ,so both sides have to pay the same to counter eachother . Armour on the other hand costs millions while at costs hundreds of thousands
    1
  3.  @fenrir834  sure a bullet is cheap but it's not like you can fire it without your own solders who cost the same as enemie . Having anti tank weapons is vastly cheaper than maintaining a tank fleet
    1
  4.  @fenrir834  sure tanks can do a lot but are they worth it? All the firepower will go to waste if you wage a war and your tanks are blown apart . What on the modern battlefield can do a job of a knight ? Still sending one into modern war is straight up suicide .
    1
  5. The problem with fighting farmers isn't that they win , its that they're stubborn
    1
  6. I think you're quoting an onion article
    1
  7.  @behroozkhaleghirad  you can buy a perfectly fine knife for 5 USD doesn't mean you should
    1
  8. Doesn't javelin use friend or foe identification to know against whom it should fire
    1
  9.  @natetaylor9002  like the missile won't fire against a friendly vehicle
    1
  10. They made that in the 90s . Little something called javelin
    1