Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Could Russian army hold on against an united Europe?" video.

  1. India wouldn't fight in the side of china . It would probably stay neutral or go with the west to attack Pakistan and screw over china .
    2
  2. Lego mines . Delete the russian feet
    2
  3. Is the russian tank going super sonic
    2
  4.  @VolnovodDobra  no one would win Russia would loose the majority of its population at least 70 million people if not 100 milion
    2
  5.  @VolnovodDobra  people would still survive in Europe also but they would loose around 80% of their population.
    2
  6. Hittler was outnumbered . Russia all talk no bite . It's only effective against smaller countries
    2
  7. No
    2
  8. Japan would stand with the us not china
    1
  9. Didn't the russians invade your brethren in Moldova
    1
  10. Europe 3 times
    1
  11.  @jessythomas7284  most European nations were created around the same time as russia
    1
  12. How would russia win with out using nukes?
    1
  13. Neither would win cause both of them couldn't really reach each other
    1
  14. Then Russia can have a jolly old time when it also get nuked
    1
  15. Eu would use nukes too
    1
  16. Satiates could detect a missile launch . So so would russia be destroyed
    1
  17. Most of the russian population lives in Europe so more than likely 100 million russians would die just from the bombs .
    1
  18. ww 2 was a war of annihilation and this would be a war of defence . So europe could win but no really destroy russia
    1
  19. Even if russia defeats Europes military they still would loose as Europe has a population of 400 million .when the ussr invaded Afghanistan they couldn't defeat a nation of 25 million despite sinking a huge part of their economy in it so yeah russia would not win
    1
  20. Uhh I am not really sure Europe would want to be annexed
    1
  21.  @glorytoserbia4018  india and china hate eachother . Also the eu has America so it would equal . In terms of nukes no nation can survive around 80 nukes let alone 400 or even 5k so if we include nukes everyone losses
    1
  22.  @glorytoserbia4018  romania wouldn't join they are eu . Also india and china hate eachother no way they would collaborate with this .
    1
  23.  @glorytoserbia4018  also the eu contains tons of nations .
    1
  24. If they are defending they could stop russia
    1
  25. Also Nazi EU . The eu has done more good for the world than Russia has
    1
  26. What did you even watch the video ?
    1
  27. Of Russia attacks Europe . Than it would unify and also in iraq they deposed the government and put new people incharge .
    1
  28. Well the thing is that resistance groups would be hard to create when you represent a minority in a territory and the eu probably wont push into the hart land of russia .also 40 million mate ? You still need to equip and train those men .also russia isnt Undefeatable as it lost crimea war during the 1850s russia lost ww1 lost the russo Japanese war and lost in Afghanistan. You can win against russia but it would be very hard to destroy it due its sheer size .
    1
  29. Also Germany had population of like 60 million durring ww2 if i am not mistaken and the ussr had 150 million and at that time Germany was also fighting the usa and the British also they were fighting resistance movements in Poland,france, Belgium, the Netherlands Luxembourg and Yugoslavia
    1
  30. How are you going to feed 70 milen and pay them and give them ammo and equip them?
    1
  31.  @jameslegrand848  well legally its recognised as Ukraine .
    1
  32. Eu has its own nukes about 600 and is protected by us nuclear umbrella so at that point it's full-scale nuclear war .
    1
  33. They are normal people . Also they wouldn't be fighting with children
    1
  34.  @nikolabozic7744  European children are normal . They have the same rate of diseases and disabilities as the rest of the world
    1
  35.  @nikolabozic7744  gm food is considered safe . Also kids in russia also use computers . Drugs wise the rate there is normal not to high (hee hee) .
    1
  36.  @nikolabozic7744  there is an alcoholism problem in eastern Europe and also most scientific studies show that gm food is very safe.
    1
  37.  @nikolabozic7744  alcohol can damage you liver and in some cases cause cancer
    1
  38.  @nikolabozic7744  typically in eastern Europe much more potent things are drunk with higher alcohol concentration .while in western Europe its more wine and beer also all foods have hormones .
    1
  39.  @nikolabozic7744  ever eaten a banana with a brown spot on it . Thats because of hormones
    1
  40.  @nikolabozic7744  uhh yes because vodka contains as much alcohol as beer . Also i am not from the west and most of Eastern Europe is capitalist
    1
  41.  @nikolabozic7744  i dont drink but you do have to admit that the amount of alcohol concentration in drinks is higer in the east
    1
  42. Ukraine Afghanistan Baltics Georgia Chechnya Tajikistan Ect
    1
  43.  @PrimoOrb  Ukrainie Yes Afghanistan a civil war which started after a soviet coup Baltics attacked both in 1920 and 1940 Georgia War in abkhazia Abkhazian forces somehow from somewhere get mig and su-27s to carry out airstrikes Tajikistan Russian entry due to the civil war
    1
  44. Yes because you could evacuate like 100 something million people in hours from cities .
    1
  45. Well russia lost on Afghanistan and finland also lost the first chechen war .
    1
  46.  @ildaribragimov2602  Google 1856 Crimea and 1917 brestletovsk
    1
  47. If a nuke war stared millions and probably the majority of the russian population would die so nobody would win
    1
  48. Usa + Europe+ india could
    1
  49. The russians there represent a minority and where would the russian migrants get their weapons from? they couldn't do shit to europe because they most likely wouldn't have weapons
    1
  50.  @marcschepers8144  balisitc missles would end all life probably
    1
  51. ?
    1
  52. He said that the moral of both countries was the same . This is a hypothetical
    1
  53. You dont have a great grasp of reality do you?
    1
  54. They have what 1 million men ? Europe could mobilise way more
    1
  55.  @kotrolss2_0  sure Russia can
    1
  56. This video was hypothetical if nuclear war starts russia wouldn't survive
    1
  57. The crieman war in the 1850s also had an eu army
    1
  58.  @IMPERATOR-EL  because thats a war crime
    1
  59.  @IMPERATOR-EL  no but shooting civilians is .
    1
  60.  @IMPERATOR-EL  weren't you responding to dominic?
    1
  61.  @IMPERATOR-EL  well you also replied to him
    1
  62. ?
    1
  63. What about Afghanistan Poland Estonia ww1 first chechn war ect?
    1
  64. 1856 Europe wins 1917 Europe wins
    1
  65. Fun fact both of those times the side attacking Russia had a smaller population
    1
  66. If Russia launches nukes then Britain and France would launch their own ones
    1
  67.  @salavat294  and so will the Kremlin and the red square .
    1
  68.  @salavat294  then the Europeans will go down with the russians and noone wins
    1
  69.  @salavat294  ok then why isn't Russia attacking china or the us or India . They all are as strong or stronger than Russia .
    1
  70. If you attack them they'd unify against russia . Eu has a population of like 500 million people Russia can at most mobilize 3 million people while Europe would mobilize around the same and use its economic advantage to simply out produce Russia and then go on limited offensives to take back lost land and strike against important russian targets .
    1
  71.  @alikdeda8207  uhh attacking a nation doesn't really cause them to become pacifistic just look at pearl harbor or the Falklands war
    1
  72.  @alikdeda8207  do you know what happened to Japan after pearl harbor or what happend to the Argentines after they took the Falklands ? They all think that they were cowards so they attack them
    1
  73. Yes he said they would join/be defeated by russia
    1
  74.  @4sit860  this is a situation of all out war in which russia would've have more tanks planes and men . Guerilla forces may inflict losses but normal military operations in that situation would be suicide.
    1