Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Lex Fridman" channel.

  1.  @BenAlmond69  "Ukraine could never win the war" Vietnam could never win against the USA
    117
  2.  @CarlFGauss-qn2cq  name an us president in the past 40 years which has deported 15 different ethnic groups (keep in mind these deportations typically had a death rate of 40-50%)
    32
  3.  @mihailomiodrag7257  ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia was done by the republics themselves . As million dead Iraqis is only when you consider all the wars since 1991 . The Iraq war killed 200k which compared to something like the Chechen ingush deportation is a tea party
    8
  4.  @tuks1131  he was comparing them to Stalin
    5
  5. imprisons who ? Porohsenko is free
    4
  6. not everyone in Ukrainian army is conscripted
    3
  7. @xryakyabun7457  Poland took like 10 sq km
    3
  8. That was a miss translation
    2
  9. Source ?
    2
  10. Who killed the Bosnians and Albanians?
    1
  11. She didn't pick the next prime minister she read the room . Look up article 111 of the Ukrainian constitution . Ynakovich basically committed treason , got voted against by the parliament then refused to acknowledge the vote
    1
  12. How aggressive is the conscription ?
    1
  13. How aggressive is the conscription?
    1
  14. @hawkeyemihawkgettingmoneylord  probably USA has a good logistics network so supplies weren't the reason the USA lost
    1
  15.  @dopecat15  so you're essentially saying Ukraine can't win the war because we are not going to support them enough for it ? USA didn't lose because they lacked supplies
    1
  16. @ccdsds3221  well eventually they achieved their goals
    1
  17.  @toxa35  is Russia invincible ?
    1
  18. KGB
    1
  19. Europe and America make their own food . Energy wise it's a quite competitive market
    1
  20. ​ @maxbounce until December of 2014 Ukraine was neutral
    1
  21.  @maxbounce  Ukraine was constitutionally neutral until December 23rd , as long as this held Ukraine was fulfilling all of its obligations Russia had taken Crimea long before that in march Also if this about neutrality, why annex the land instead of putting Yanukovich back in charge ?
    1
  22.  @maxbounce  discussions were a problem because? Ukraine was still constitutionally neutral when Russia attacked There is no way you can square this circle
    1
  23.  @maxbounce  except that doesn't work 1.We have documented evidence of members of the Russian armed forces who were present in the Donbass during the war 2. Ukraine's constitution requires that all changes to the border must be approved by the Rada , thereby Crimean secession was illegal as it wasn't approved by the Rada 3. Russia failed to guarantee the agreement as it took no punitive measures against the LDPR in fact it quite obviously continued to support them
    1
  24. ​ @maxbounce  1. "The presence of Russian volunteer soldiers is not equal to the presence of the regular Russian army" I mean you can check out the vice documentary where it is pretty clear many members of the Russian army were fighting in the Donbass , this is different from an American civilians going as a volunteer to Ukraine. Also , really ? do you think I am stupid ? where the hell would the LDPR milita's between Ukraine and Russia have gotten the needed supplies to wage the war from ? not to mention point 10 of MINSK 2 was "Pullout of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, and also mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under OSCE supervision. Disarmament of all illegal groups." . Khodakovsky openly stated that Russian forces had saved the Separatists 2. Yes they did , for Russia Chechen secession was unacceptable so why is Crimean secession acceptable ? only difference between those 2 was 1 didn't benefit Russia and the other did. Ukraine doesn't have a federal government , it's not a federation , it's an unitary state. Ukraine didn't violate the constitution as the Rada technically had the right to declare Yanukovich unfit to rule 3. Ukraine for the most part is far less guilty of voiding the Minsk agreement. Minsk 2 was signed on February 12th 2015 , on February 15th 2015 a ceasefire was supposed to come into effect , on February 18th 2015 LDPR forces took over the town Debaltsevo in violation of the ceasefire. Ukraine until 2021 was barred from buying German arms , until 2019 from American arms (keep in mind USA wasn't a part of MINSK) , France even quite famously cancelled multiple orders of ships to Ukraine (which had been made prior to 2014) and still continued to sell thermal and night vision to the Russian army until 2022. Ukraine still implemented much more of the agreement than LDPR did (for instance even passing the law on autonomy) 4. Merkel was part of the "change through trade" movement , she was quite clear on her position at the time that if the west simply just worked with Russia and more or less appeased Russia , Russia would reform itself into a liberal democracy. Merkel's statements about MINSK came in December of 2022 , after the Ukrainian victories. She was just trying to save face because anyone with a decent enough understanding of this conflict can easily say she was played like a fool by Putin and she left Ukraine basically on its own
    1
  25.  @maxbounce  alright , I worte out a big response but Youtube is deleting it
    1
  26. On what basis was he analogy bad ?
    1
  27.  @QuadRomb  well is it ok to rape a woman who has shoplifted or committed tax fraud ? Not to mention there are just as many Nazis in Russia . Wagner and Sparta battalion guys are no better than Azov ( fun fact Azov had/has 50 Russian nationals fight for it ) Not to mention Ukrainians never left their own borders , if Ukraine in 2014 quickly had joined nato before Russia could do anything what would have been the terrible which would've occured ?
    1
  28. Taken over by femenists is when domestic violence banned
    1
  29. He never said Putin killed 15 million people but rather that in character Stalin and Putin were similar
    1
  30.  @jennybrucks2215  they were denied
    1
  31. Dude litterally condemned the Iraq war
    1
  32. Why ?
    1
  33.  @christer-nylander  as in ?
    1
  34.  @christer-nylander  there was no formal treaty with Russia about expansion and Russia even acknowledged the right of eastern European countries to join nato . There was no coup. In the donbass war 3404 civilians died on both sides Russia attacked out of delusion because it's a land grabber
    1
  35. Well you attacked them and they sought NATO, you have backwards. First Russia started the war and then Ukraine went to NATO​ @fransiscocampos976 
    1
  36. Yes because Putin has never done anything wrong
    1
  37. If Russia gives back Crimea , donbass , Kherson , prednestrovie , abkhazia and South Ossetia then sure
    1
  38. What attempted genocide in donbass ? Over the course of 8 years of fighting 3404 civilians died on both sides . Ukraine simply wanted to restore constitutional order Cuba had Russian military bases until 1998, USA was only concerned with nukes , which USA got rid of from Cuba through diplomatic means , even if Ukraine joined nato USA wouldn't host nukes there since only a few nato members actually do , also with nuclear subs that point is quite mut The analogy makes sence Ukraines crime is wanting to be protected from a foreign power
    1
  39.  @QuadRomb  a coup ? Ynakovich got removed because he committed treason . The parliament voted against him and as per article 111 of the Ukrainian constitution had the right to remove him from power , the guy just straight up didn't acknowledge the decision of the parliament. Even if a coup , seccesion is the worse offense
    1
  40.  @QuadRomb  you should've read the end too . People died because somebody started shooting into crowds , still a genocide could've happened doesn't change the fact that the Ukrainian parliament voted against ynakovich
    1
  41.  @QuadRomb  did you finish reading article 111 ? My point is that discussion about corpses is irrelevant since parliament voted
    1
  42.  @QuadRomb  the court was incredibly corrupt thus voiding their credibility . The end of article 111 states how the president should be removed Still that is very much stretching the definition of a coup
    1
  43.  @QuadRomb  when a constitution court judge is corrupt their authority becomes void . Multiple judges were guilty of malpractice . Ynakovich was couped the same way Nixon was . He got removed , but unlike Nixon who just left office the Ukrainian straight up didn't acknowledge the decision and thought he could keep the country through force
    1
  44.  @QuadRomb  it was met . Granted under dire circumstances but still met . Multiple judges in the constitutional court were corrup so their authority was void and the parliament did vote to remove him , therefore it's pointless to argue about a coup because there is legal precedent behind ynakovich's removal
    1
  45.  @QuadRomb  by law if I'm a judge and if I'm corrupt my authority is void therefore my decisions can be disregarded . Euro maiden revoultion.
    1
  46.  @QuadRomb  when did I say the law was violated I said that removed of yanukovich was legal . The reason for him was going back on a treaty
    1
  47.  @QuadRomb  and the decision of the constitutional court was void since it wasn't impartial due to corruption . Article 85/7 also give the Ukrainian parliament powers to call for an election . Ynakovich was removed legally under dire circumstances . To call this a coup is to call Richard Nixon a coup
    1
  48. Serbia committed genocide . Coup is overblown , the guy in charge basically committed treason. 2k pro russian civilians have died .
    1
  49.  @syourke3  source ? You should reeadt article 111 and article 85/7 of the Ukrainian constitution and then realise that the parliament voted to change the president 2k have died since 2024 . 14 is including solder and pro Ukrainian civilians Azov are only 2000 men . They're insignificant
    1
  50.  @syourke3  source ? Zelsnsky is also Jewish so why would Nazis even tolerate him? Russia was giving Nazis recourses , fuel, and help them military before the backstab in 1941 Did you know that the Ukrainian parliament actually voted against yanukovich
    1