Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "JDAM "Smart Bombs" are Better Than You Think" video.

  1. not really , the problem is more of opportunity to strike , Ukrainians mostly use their aircraft to launch missiles against high value targets like ships , AD sites ,depos and airfields. using a Jdam on a convoy of Russians may help but it would risk losing an irreplaceable plane which could do much more damage against Russia through other means Storm Shadow/Scalp uses GPS and it has no trouble with dealing with GPS jammers. Same goes for HIMARs and GLSDB. With the supply of f-16s , Jdam Strikes will probably increase in Ukraine but even then that depends on the number of planes sent
    2
  2. it can use ins and against country with HARM it is not the best idea to blast a powerful jamming signal
    2
  3.  @benoithudson7235 a couple were sent to Ukraine already and did hit some targets but not at range yet
    1
  4. USA used an f-16 with an experimental missile to take out a satellite in low earth orbit but GPS is like 20k km away and with Russia's rather poor space programme as of recent , its unlikely they can take them out efficiently
    1
  5.  @leojohn1615 with 20k distance it isn't that easy
    1
  6.  @leojohn1615 as far as i understand they've not taken out anything at 20k km
    1
  7.  @leojohn1615  yeah but GPS is at 20k km
    1
  8. Gaza is very densely populated though
    1
  9. Their Hi-tech countermeasures are working so well drones hit St Petersburg and Tsokov is dead.
    1
  10.  @robjmck  when did western tech fail ?
    1
  11.  @robjmck  Bradley's ? I mean , they have losses but so do the Russians, specifically what kind of a failure are you talking about? Combined 30-40 western tanks have been lost Vs Russia who has lost 2400 , what's your point exactly? Not a single instance of a destroyed HIMARs , even if there was you gotta admit that HIMARs seriously stacked Russia . It was super effective. Brits lost a civilian oil tanker , I mean as far as threats they're more or less in the clear. I mean, most western ships are just hard to sink even if they just sit there
    1
  12.  @robjmck  no there haven't, like two himars had their paint scratched Considering HIMARs basically doesn't miss it's very cost effective for the damage it inflicts Successful hits ? That drone with the 55kg war head isn't going to sink an aircraft carrier . It's not that big of a threat How do you know when Ukraine deploys its tanks ? Also in the same time span Ukrainians lost 2 Abrams russians have lost like 20+ tanks Even if say you're right , wouldn't it be the time to ramp up production? Do you think we cannot beat Russia ? Wouldn't it make more sense to ask for more spending instead of giving up ?
    1
  13. Iraq is more densely populated than Ukraine with it being lead by Saddam , USA also won in Iraq , It destroyed the Iraqi army and hanged Saddam , Russia has yet to win in Ukraine
    1
  14. the frontline hasn't changed for a year straight
    1
  15.  @hyokkim7726 so far the west is down 30 tanks and Russia lost 2400 , not a great trade
    1
  16.  @belliduradespicio8009 PAC-2 is quite long ranged
    1
  17. more or less exaggerated , the issue is with supply and opportunity of use
    1
  18. you can't do recon with Artillery
    1