Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Russian forces storm Ukraine's Crimea bases" video.

  1. Didn't most Ukrainians living there protest and did not vote .but still even if it was 95% the annexation was still illegal under international law
    15
  2. Not 97% of the population 97% of the people who voted . didn't most if the Ukrainian population there protest against the referendum .
    7
  3. Rt isn't reliable
    4
  4.  @ИринаЛукьяненко-ь3ъ  the opinions of Crimeans don't matter . What matters is that Russia signed agreements forbidding it from taking Crimea no matter what the locals thought . Also you'd make more money and be materially better off as a Russian than as an Ukrainian . Its a simple decision
    2
  5.  @Mar-bh7uj  oh like abkazia and ossetia aren't on russian life support .they cant even repair buildings damaged 28 years ago.abkazia and ossetia have very high corruption rates and low standard of living . The thing with the kosovo situation is basically somewhat the georgian situation inverted . abkazia can barely even take care of patients . abkazian patients lots of time have to be taken care of by georgia.those states are barely functioning
    2
  6. Ooga booga is do bad mean me do good .
    1
  7. Well 67% of crimea was russian but still they didn't have the right to use military force they needed to negotiate with Ukraine or with the un to get support . By that logic so was Caucasus mountain peoples Republic and the chechen republic and the numerous other independence movements in the north Caucasus legal so you have to give up those lands
    1
  8. Yes absolutely flawless logic. Us do bad . Ooga booga . Russia do bad .ooga booga .russia not bad .*extreme ooga booga*
    1
  9.  @maxspirin3945  its more like 65%
    1
  10.  @KLEOMEjeans  28%
    1
  11. You really want to start a nuclear war ?
    1
  12.  @yurilemming4130  if Ukraine was a part of nato it wouldn't have gotten into this mess because russia wouldn't have attacked it . Say whatever you want but nato still protects countries from russia.
    1
  13.  @yurilemming4130  firstly the coup wasn't unconstitutional and secondly even of it was you still needed to negotiate with the legitimate government of Ukraine and get their permission .also this breached the black sea partition treaty and the 1997 Bucharest treaty . If Ukraine had been a part of nato russia would've minded its business and acted like a normal nation and negotiated with Ukraine . Also the point still stands that nato protected countries in eastern Europe from russia.
    1
  14.  @yurilemming4130  also you should know that the ussr also killed millions in Afghanistan
    1
  15.  @yurilemming4130  despite being supported by the majority of people in Kiev ? Even if it was illegal russia still broke international laws and didn't negotiate with the government.
    1
  16.  @yurilemming4130  well i am not Russophobe but you are russophile . Also the are you talking about the Afghanistan government which was placed in power by the ussr coup ? Btw you lost the Crimean war 1853 . What russia did in crimea is illegal it attacked another internally recognised country . Btw legally the people of crimea didn't have the right to use force against Ukrainie . They either should've gotten an un mandate or permission from Ukraine .
    1
  17.  @yurilemming4130  nato would flatten Russia . Also nazi group mate Russia is no better than nato .
    1
  18.  @yurilemming4130  still Illegal the in also found that it was ilegal and an attack on Ukraines sovereignty
    1
  19.  @yurilemming4130  the un isn't just the west also even if they were all the worst it doesn't excuse what Russia did . Attack another nation
    1
  20.  @yurilemming4130  it was a military take over . Also the un did find the annexation ilegal
    1
  21.  @yurilemming4130  ooga booga us do bad mean russia do good . Ooga Booga * starts jumping up and down *.
    1
  22.  @yurilemming4130  ok get over a violation of international law ?
    1
  23.  @yurilemming4130  what Russia did wasn't self-defence it was an attack also Ukrainians aren't nazis .
    1
  24.  @yurilemming4130  out of thousands of people like couple hundred died at the hands of a minority . That wasn't self defense that was just a straight up attack
    1
  25.  @yurilemming4130  great argument there . Just one word and the whole attack on Ukraine is justified . Too much rt is bad for you . Also the un did find it illegal and russia broke multiple treats
    1
  26.  @yurilemming4130  ok tell that Abkhazia and south ossetia with very high crime rates and the continued kidnapping of Georgians . Tell that to chechnya one of the most unstable regions in the world tell that to Tajikistan rulled by a dictator tell that Armenia and Azerbaijan tied up in a bloody conflict tell that to Afghanistan which collapsed as country in the 90s and suffered millions dead at the hands of the ussr and also indirectly resulted in the creation of multiple extremist groups . Russia is no better than the us . It doesn't really have the moral high ground here .
    1
  27.  @yurilemming4130  look at what happened in Abkhazia durring the 90s when russia arrived . A borderline genocide and russia supported it . I get if you're proud of your country but to deny the crimes it has committed and say that you're above anyone is frankly delusional.
    1
  28.  @Mar-bh7uj  won't work
    1
  29.  @Mar-bh7uj  Germany after 28 was functional state which was self sufficient and had good standard of living . I would get this if it was the year 2000 but now its just embarrassing .
    1
  30.  @piontropechetrini5640  russia bombed gori sokhumi and ochamachire and other cities in georgia durring the 90s and 2008 its just as bad as the us is .
    1
  31. No . Before russia it was ruled by nomads, Greeks,romans ,goths ,tatars then russia then Ukraine
    1
  32. Ok then why aren't you giving the north Caucasusians a state
    1
  33. Actually 67% were russians
    1
  34. And the gross violations of international law
    1
  35. 67%
    1
  36. How ?
    1
  37. Uhh no
    1
  38. Well no matter the ethnic makeup of crimea the russian takeover was still a gross violation if international law
    1
  39.  Axios .king  you're*
    1
  40.  Steve Arthur  no one was forcing russia to take land . If they really wanted independence of those countries they could have done it through peaceful means .
    1
  41.  Steve Arthur  crimea For example .they basically set up puppet states in Georgia and Ukraine.
    1
  42.  Steve Arthur  also i asked Ukrainians and no they didn't .
    1
  43.  Steve Arthur  we don't need to ask everyone . Let's take 16 people would more less enough as most of them would average people who would have agreed with the revolution
    1
  44.  Steve Arthur  also russian pupets in georgia . Abkazia and south ossetia
    1
  45.  Steve Arthur  also under international law the annexation of crimea was deemed illegal
    1
  46.  Steve Arthur  also crimea returned to russia by being attacked first . Also didn't documents come out which found that referendum was faked .even then legally russia had no right to take it . It even had recognised it before the war as a part of Ukraine.
    1
  47.  Steve Arthur  no . Also how ? Can you explain ? I mean i think Ukrainians would know if the public supported the 2014 coup or if it was a western back affair.
    1
  48.  Steve Arthur  also under international law the annexation was illegal .
    1
  49.  Steve Arthur  also russia violated multiple international laws and treaties . One of them was they would agree not to attack Ukraine in exchange for the nukes which were in Ukraine .
    1
  50.  Steve Arthur  the presence of military force without the permission of the internationally recognised government can be considered an attack
    1
  51.  Steve Arthur  russian troops . That could considered military force
    1
  52.  Steve Arthur  in crimea . Putin even admitted to that fact
    1
  53.  Steve Arthur  or lugansk or Donetsk
    1
  54.  Steve Arthur  also do you really think Ukrainiane is so incompetent that it wouldn't be able to defend its territories from small uprisings .
    1
  55.  Steve Arthur  really despite having the numbers advantage having the equipment advantage and having the money advantage ? Also there were troops on crimea and lugansk and Donetsk . Putin admitted to that fact. Also even if they didn't russia still wasn't neutral in this war supporting an illegal military action . Which is illegal .
    1
  56.  Steve Arthur  ?
    1
  57.  Steve Arthur  what have i said which is wrong
    1
  58.  Steve Arthur  also the un did find the annexation of crimea illegal
    1
  59.  Steve Arthur  i am from georgia . Also russia is a member of the un security council. The un condemned the us invasion of iraq and un has criticized the us for its conduct of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The un isn't puppet of the us . And please can you explain to me what is so wrong with my statements . I mean russian troops were in there . There is evidence to support that claim.
    1
  60.  Steve Arthur  5 members are permanently in the security council . one of them is russia .
    1
  61.  Steve Arthur  yeah the 1997 agreement which also said that russia wouldn't interfere with the internal affairs of Ukraine and respect its sovereignty.
    1
  62.  Steve Arthur  google it .
    1
  63.  Steve Arthur  so what any member of the security council can veto anything .
    1
  64.  Steve Arthur  ok
    1
  65. Not really .under international law the movement of russian troops in crimea is illegal and an invasion
    1
  66.  @greggemerer8251  Russia is just as bad as the USA . Law over people
    1
  67.  @greggemerer8251  in the last 25 years Russia lost the cold war so it didn't have the capacity to do such actions. Russia is limited by capacity not by conscious
    1
  68.  @greggemerer8251  that's why in the last 15 years Russia hasn't sent its military on ilegal operations in neutrual states . Russia still has 1/20th the GDP of the USA. Russia since independence from the ussr has broken 6 different treaties with georgia and Ukraine alone . Russia is limited by capacity and is just violent as the west is. Russia has too bombed and massacred people . Russia is no better than the west . If Russia had the same GDP that the USA Russia would be doing the same stuff . Not to mention Crimea is unjustifiable no matter what the west does
    1
  69.  @greggemerer8251  GDP PPP doesn't accurately reflect the cost of complex goods . PPP is adjusted for day to day living . A GPU in Russia will cost more or less the same as it does in Europe or USA . Nominal GDP matters when dealing with trade and industry. Trade surplus doesn't automatically mean good economy so does Mexico have a trade surplus and so do many other countries . Syria was started by the Arab Spring a thing which originated in Tunisia . USA had very little to do with the civil war starting in Syria . Not to mention russian defence ministry realised footage of them hitting hospitals so Russia doesn't have a leg to stand on Lybians fought amongst themselves . Granted they intervined but the conflict wasn't solely started or perpetuated by USA . Yugoslavia . Serbian forces were committing a literal genocide so yeah somebody would've intervined Afghanistan happend because of 9/11 granted after Osama should've pulled out but then again that's military industrial complex . Yemen was started by Saudi Arabia. Iraq yeah that was wrong nato should've never went in . Russia is just not as powerful so can't do it . In Ukraine and Georgia Russia has engaged in vicious crimes. In chechnya 80k people died . Grozny was flattened by russian artillery . Russia is just as agressive and Imperialist as the USA
    1
  70. Yes . having military force in another countries internationally recognised and legal territory is considered an invasion
    1
  71. Well relatively all nations are weak
    1
  72.  @indycoon  at the start he did but then when evidence cane out he quietly backed down
    1
  73.  @indycoon  well they were there with permission of the government
    1