Comments by "Sababugs112" (@sababugs1125) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. + 50 rubles
    2
  2. Yeah go through Chernobyl . That'll work out great .
    2
  3. Compared to Russia yes
    2
  4. Any day now
    2
  5. They remember world war 1 too
    2
  6.  @johngeier8692  sure they are . That's why they lost their best tanks
    2
  7. 429 air craft ? How ?
    2
  8.  @mikhailalmaz  ahh yes my favourite russian dish the t-72
    2
  9. Proximity artillery is actually quite good against trenches.
    2
  10. There are a lot of power lines in Donetsk so unlikely
    2
  11.  @Feffdc  pantisr got destroyed I Syria and doesn't work
    2
  12.  @Feffdc  cope . Russian defence systems are all talk no bite
    2
  13. The ukrainians didn't run out of tanks Also Russians lost 4x the amount of tanks
    2
  14.  @y-h-z5587  to protect Ukraine
    2
  15. Nato didn't conquer anyone . People willingly joined .
    2
  16.  @grandemperorputin5992  they overall control less territory now than a week ago .
    2
  17. Fictional advance
    2
  18. What advances ? Advancing on RT ?
    2
  19. Ok and?
    2
  20. Sure it will
    2
  21. Why not ? Russian troops bleed to . Give Ukraine weaponry until Russia can no longer fight
    2
  22. Russians shot down this one
    2
  23. USA took Baghdad a city of 6 million with only 30k men in 6 days
    2
  24. Appeasement doesn't work
    1
  25. Large country, many bridges
    1
  26.  @craigzinkta3988 more amusing will be to see them pick russians off
    1
  27. So will nato missiles
    1
  28.  @michaelfrancisjose1382  or Russia should be forced to demilitarise
    1
  29. It has been about to fall for 2 months now
    1
  30. *Russia
    1
  31. ​ GT500  like they did in Kherson or Kharkiv?
    1
  32.  GT500  Russians aren't bulletproof
    1
  33.  @Hikoplouyr  very different thing . Also russians do that too .
    1
  34.  @nickwannabe1878  no bridge ?
    1
  35.  @nickwannabe1878  no depos ? No generals ?
    1
  36.  @nickwannabe1878  least butthurt russoid
    1
  37.  @margelatu79  when did the USA interfere?
    1
  38.  @margelatu79  really? As I recall the Ukrainian parliament voted to remove yanukovich. Well guess all the parliament members were CIA
    1
  39.  @margelatu79  parliament was elected by the people and acted according to the Ukrainian constitution. The Supreme court removed Nixon, why should the rada be able to control its leaders without fear of Russia
    1
  40.  @user1qaz2wsx3edc  that's concerns Russia because?
    1
  41.  @Muirton66  why not . So far Ukraine's been advancing
    1
  42.  @hermanwooster8944  heros*
    1
  43. Well who took Izium back ? Who took Lyman back ?
    1
  44. They probably knew . There is a stream of recruits
    1
  45. So far they've taken over - 9000 square km of Ukraine. At this pace by 2024 will be in control of exactly 0% of Ukraine
    1
  46. If it falls The perpetually imminent fall of Bakhmut
    1
  47. ​ @ciaranryan5265  wasn't dyatlov a Russian?
    1
  48. Take your pills
    1
  49.  @greyside1696  Poland hates Russia so much it won't assist it a bit
    1
  50.  @wildlands9044  Scot Ritter is a twice convicted pedo . He isn't a reliable source
    1