Comments by "MacAdvisor" (@MacAdvisor) on "DownieLive" channel.

  1. 288
  2. 52
  3. 40
  4. 35
  5. 31
  6. 28
  7. 25
  8. 19
  9. Normally, Mike, your videos leave me with a smile. Today, I was crying at the end. I miss my father so much. He's been gone five years now and I have just barely leaned to bear the loss. The happy time with your dad brought back with full force how big a hole his death left in my life. He was a train buff, with an amazing model RR in his garage (it even went across the garage door, which could still rise up and let the cars in by a special disconnect system he created), and his real life train adventures. When he visited Promontory Summit where the Golden Spike was driven in, his buddies from the train club told the managers there he was the President of California's Golden State Railroad Club. That was true, but it only had five members and they were all with him. Still, because of his "prominence," the park people let him drive the train for a bit. He favorite train was the Skunk Train in Fort Bragg, one you should consider (the steam train there reminds me of the Hogwarts Express (https://www.skunktrain.com/days-of-steam/ )). I've ridden with him four or five times and he's ridden at least 100. My favorite times were just sitting in the door of the garage in these two big, green LazyBoy recliners he had there, watch the world go by, and just talk. This is in Sacramento, so this was almost always AFTER the sun goes down. You think Texas was hot, pshaw, that's sweater weather to us Sacramentans. He'd done so many things in his life and he was a great, loving, wonderful father. Please, do enjoy all the time you can with your mom and your dad while you can. Each second is precious. Thank you for one more train ride with my dad would have felt like. Based on the name of the local paper, The Normalite, (see: http://www.normalite.com), I believe there are called Normalites. The collective noun for a group of Normalites is Normals.
    13
  10. 11
  11. 9
  12. 8
  13. 7
  14. 6
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. What is the Canadian term for boondoggle or scam? First, hydrogen is all-but universally made not from electrolysis (the process of breaking water into its component hydrogen and oxygen with electricity, NOT combining them back together as stated in the video), but is a byproduct of oil. Hydrogen puts the hydro in hydrocarbon.Thus, in widespread use, hydrogen is a carbon fuel. It just doesn't release the carbon at the point of use, but during creation during distillation. Second, Mike, while there may be a company in Quebec that makes hydrogen through electrolysis to supply this train, it is doing so at a greater cost than the hydrogen from oil. The needed electricity is much more expensive. Taking that electricity and storing it in a battery is vastly more efficient. So, the use of hydrogen costs more money, making the train more expensive to operate. Third, hydrogen is wildly difficult to store. Moving it about, from where the hydrogen is created to storing it on the train likely involves significant loss and very expensive tech. Again, moving the electricity from the dam to the train is so, so much easier by wires, most of which already exist, than building new distribution tubes for volatile hydrogen. Again, not cost effective. Fourth, hydrogen is VERY explosive. The tiniest spark can cause big explosions. Think Hindenburg. Think of that train burning in but a few minutes thanks to the hydrogen on top. A rail accident with that train could be disaster of unimagined proportions. Think of terrorists getting ahold of that much hydrogen and fashioning bomb. So, this train uses an expensive, oil-derived fuel, that is expensive to make, inefficient and dangerous to move about, and adds unnecessary and extra layers of unneeded tech. It is a Rube Goldberg train. Hydrogen is the fuel of the future and always will be. It is too impractical to be used. You got punked by some PR person.
    4
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87.  @davecooper3238  Other than the US, I have ridden trains more in the UK than any other country in the world. I love the UK. I love the people, the food (yes, I love British cooking), and the country side. I don't drink coffee, even, but tea (Constant Comment is my favorite) and I have Brown Betty under a tea cozy on my desk. Most of the HSR rail tracks I've observed in the UK travel along already established corridors. Some have replaced the tracks entirely, some have not. Given how well established British trains are, I wouldn't be surprised if there are now entirely new and previously unestablished right-of-ways being created as you have likely used up reasonable existing paths. However, they would be the exception not the rule. However, GB is only some 700 miles long and my state of California is 760. No part of GB is more than 75 miles from the sea (or the Channel). We have cities longer than 75 miles. California is only one of fifty states and not even the largest geographically. There are some 10,000 miles of rail track in the UK and it provides for extensive coverage (at the systems height in 1914, there were 20,000 miles, so there may well be right-of-ways without tracks available for expansion all over the place). That would allow for two sets of tracks from Juneau, Alaska, to Miami, Florida, but not much else. The distances in the US are much more suitable to private cars and planes than in the UK (private cars are common there, too, but the majority of your cities were really built with them in mind as are many American cities). The UK nationalized the railway system in 1948 and took over all rail right-of-ways through an act of Parliament in 1947 after having taken physical control in 1939 as a war measure. The best the US managed was to take over passenger service without the right-of-ways in 1970 after the system had mostly fallen apart.  What I am trying to make clear is your extraordinary and wonderful system is due in large part to decisive actions taken early and created circumstances that are not reproducible here. Not at all. We couldn't pass a nationalize the military bill through our Congress even though the Federal government already owns the military because the word, "nationalize" is in it. You DID nationalize the railroads (though it was a Labour government). Suggesting the US could use GB as a model is like suggesting I follow in Pavarotti's footsteps for a singer career though I sing like a wounded duck. Can you find some similarities? Yes, he and I were/are fat. There are many similarities between the GB and the US, but none that matter here. I don't think you are lying, but I think you are wrong about the central question in this very, very long debate. There cannot and will not be a HSR train between Seattle and Portland. There are a couple of good spots for them in the US, but not many and not out here in the West. Look at California's HSR and tell me if you and I will EVER be able to board a HSR train in San Francisco and ride it to LA, though that is the plan (you can't even board a slow train from SF to LA, but must cross The Bay to Emeryville to get to LA). We won't. China does not need to worry about paying for existing right-of-ways as they are not required to pay compensation nor do they in most circumstances. That is not an option here in the US or the UK.
    1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. Except this is a route of about 180 miles that would be 2-½ hours by autonomous vehicle and relatively easy and far less costly road improvements. Autonomous vehicles will be here in five year, ten at the most, while the train upgrades are 20 years off. An average of 274,000 vehicles per day already travel on I5. Even assuming only ONE passenger per car, far lower than the actual usage, that means 274,000 people per day travel I5. Amtrak single most used route is the NortheastDirect with about 24,000 daily passengers. That is not even 10% of the automobile traffic on the I5 route currently. Dollar for dollar we get far better increase in carrying capacity by improving auto lanes that train tracks. Plus, autonomous vehicles leave when you want from where you want, go to where you want, bring far more stuff with you, including passengers that add directly to carrying capacity. We could have autonomous buses on this route far sooner and for far less money than trains. There are already fabulous buses available between NY and DC for as little as $22 (please see: https://www.washny.com ). Make them autonomous and you have all the aspects of the train for little more than the rolling stock, plus it is far more scalable. Sorry, HSR, or even higher speed rail, isn't going to happen. There is not the political will or the demand and the alternatives are vastly better. This is sad, but facts are facts. Not. Going. To. Happen. Here. Not. Mike can answer this, but I think this is the longest single thread on DownieLive ever. What do you have to say, Mike?
    1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1