Comments by "tblbaby" (@tblbaby) on "Morality, Free Speech, and Cologne Attacks (Pt. 2) | Michael Shermer | FREE SPEECH | Rubin Report" video.

  1. YES! I am completely sick of going into a department store and having some asshole attacking me with Cologne!
    13
  2. Using science and just taking someone with the title at their words is more like religion than using science. Using Titles and assumed credibility are one of the best and most used facilitators of confidence games. Using science means looking into the basis for science. As usual, the highest motivating factor is getting paid, not honor or search for truth. Scientists are just people with titles. Not much different than Religious leaders in the human dynamic of what we buy as truth.
    2
  3. I agree with Michael that the Euro is an excellent facilitation of trade ... but with the EU came a bureaucracy doing more damage and a hell of a lot of probable future damage in areas of corruption than the EU has done good. The EU is pushing the whole refugee thing, that makes no sense as to it's urgency noting what they've ignored in the past, massive death and suffering. There seems to be an ugly agenda behind this, and our ol buddy Soros is up to his eye balls in it much as he was in Libya, Egypt, and so many other situations that turned to shit and hellish consequences for the people. Huge central powers are as much a breeding ground for corruption as a warm moist nutrient rich environment is for bacteria. I do believe Soros and his buddies are banking on just that. Much the same reason he and I'm pretty sure they have been working to compromise the US Constitution, which keeps powers of the central government, and thus the corruption they make huge wealth on, down.
    1
  4. BizarrePower I can have a pretty dry humor and have probably said a few things in humor that may seem just idiotic, lol.
    1
  5. bofbob1 lol, obsess much? While you're pointing out articles that cherry pick acts of humanity in a sea of horrible, understand the media in Germany, and in fact all over Europe and the US is being pressured by their governments to sensor the truth. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3429621/German-journalist-claims-government-tells-media-t-report-following-outcry-Cologne-sex-attack-news-blackout.html
    1
  6. bofbob1 Here is a whistleblower in the US, the Obama administration ordered DHS officials to scrub terrorist ties from "immigrants" records. http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/268282-dhs-ordered-me-to-scrub-records-of-muslims-with-terror?utm_content=buffer52723&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
    1
  7. bofbob1 People like you have BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS, so kiss my ass, you depraved dirt bag. I only hope Karma catches up with you and you are afflicted personally by the insanity you support. Evidence of these things is being wiped from Facebook and YouTube systematically after pressure from governments. Censorship of the truth of it. You're on the side of something very ugly. You should feel proud.
    1
  8. nietzsche77666 Westerners extremists? "driven by hate" ... Against people who are literally genocidal degenerate rapists. Child rapists, woman rapists, man rapists, rapists of the dead, animal rapists. Slavers. Anti progress of any intellectual kind which doesn't include the backwards ass evil Koran. Western "Extremists"? Western "Hate"? because they don't want these scum bags, these worldwide mental disease of mankind spreading violent time bombs living amongst them? Raping their little girls? Wives? Killing and mass murdering? Oh my Gawd ... your head is gone completely up your ass. A notion to completely wipe this scourge from the face of the earth would be a natural and very rational one. Western people are so sweet that they haven't done that. And probably so stupid not to.
    1
  9. Yeah, the religious dynamic I've been talking about. It doesn't require theism. It's the same group thinky dynamic and people's minds work in a way that they accept what's accepted by people important to them by default and it blinds us to truths that don't follow those paradigms. The "God" could be a government or a movement. The Good that group, and the bad those who oppose that group. It doesn't matter what is done (generally) the groups are seen as good or bad in a tribal sort of instinctual way. That's why Bill Clinton gets away with Rapes and Bill Cosby is called out after he steps on the Progs voting block of dependent black people by telling them they should look at themselves and stand up against the bad elements among them in stead of cops working to stand up to the crime so they can be safe.
    1
  10. Orcbanger Yeah, exactly. The ideology can be about anything you get very absorbed into. People at a very high rate choose religion, sports teams, political party depending on what people around them think and do. Group think is pretty much the dynamic in all of it. Mob mentality. That is who people are for the most part. Bones in the nose, sticks on the dicks. For those around thinking I don't crack humorous ever ... this is a whimsical label on a very real dynamic. Comes from the tribe in South America who bungee jump using a vine tied to their feet, and come within inches of the ground. It's all normal to them man!
    1
  11. aurora123borealis Really? lol, do explain why that isn't correct. Sounds like kind of an objection emanating from religious dynamic, as the specifics are obviously accurate. If not then please enlighten me by explaining your problem with the individual points. 
    1
  12. aurora123borealis lol, so because some scientists have helped make advancements anyone with the title should be given God status and never questioned? These are just people. Most scientists aren't even much above average intelligence and there are several areas in the field. Science has a history of shifting and changing with new facts, old ideas being discarded by prevailing opinion, but then coming back. Science is a method, it's not people. People use Scientific method to seek information. People have also often used credibility of accreditation to pull scams. To think because someone said scientists said blaugh blaugh blaugh means blaugh blaugh blaugh is true is naive and ignorant of the history of the subject.
    1
  13. aurora123borealis Treating science as religion is even less logical than treating religion as religion. Religions don't pretend to have proof. Politicians do pretend scientists have proof when they don't for political reasons, which include being paid to push a scam, like anthropologically created global climate change. No one with much of a brain denies it has changed. No one with much of a brain denies it's been changing since the earth had weather. I know you haven't seen conclusive evidence people caused the changes, because there isn't any. There is a shitty poll that was manipulated several times to get a majority, but that's not science. AND the science has been tained by fraud and politicians threats, favoritism in who gets paid. The hockey stick graph which we know was a fraud, the frauds perps were busted in email exchange saying it was fraud ... and the assholes still got paid in the millions, for a known fraud! Kind of like the Dumham bitch who lied about rape and is a hero to the same assholes pushing the climate fraud because it's worth a lot of control and trillions to people they are being given contributions from. The scientific method is non existent. They cherry picked factors that would lead to believe warming could be caused by CO2, but the amounts are less then 1 /1000th of the variable the earth puts out naturally AND they've ignored the cooling effect of CO2 because it increases flora growth which has a cooling effect through respiration. A FACT not even in dispute, a big factor, but it doesn't help the fraudulent case, so they just left it out. Scientists who don't go along are threatened, and a big corp making big money on the scam recently recommended prosecution of "deniers" hello? Sound like the Catholic Church vs Galileo much? Much more than that, but to any reasonably intelligent person checking it out, it's bullshit. There is motive to pull the bullshit. There is a lot more scientific disagreement that is advertised on the issue. It's a scam. Just one example. 
    1
  14. aurora123borealis Yeah, I'm like one of those guys who really thought and believed Galileo that the earth wasn't the center of the universe, because he had good complete information that showed it so. Not the consensus of scientists, which was uniform because the government which used coercion vs reward to influence those trusted to report what they wanted to seem true, and then said "all scientists agree" the earth is the center of the universe ... except the crack pots who are evil or something. Behaviors haven't changed much. People are pretty much majority sheep who follow blindly having faith in those around them to be of the correct opinion. Problem with that, the masses have a rich history of being wrong, fooled. You seem one a them teats ;)
    1
  15. aurora123borealis I imagine that's the most intelligent criteria you can come up with to judge credibility :))
    1
  16. Another great video Dave ... I'm loving your channel.
    1