Comments by "tblbaby" (@tblbaby) on "Critical Thinking, Atheism, and Faith | Peter Boghossian | SPIRITUALITY | Rubin Report" video.
-
1
-
HA, Anthropologically based global warming. I've dug into it and that is religious level belief without basis in fact. The "science" behind it is bullshit, it's not based in sound scientific method. It's cherry picked facts separated from the much larger universe of facts which are discarded. It's a con based on the credibility of "science" which has been reverse engineered to a result that would facilitate massive levels of control. CO2 is produced by about anything life forms do, like breathing, and another gas involved as well, methane, farts n shit, lol.
People listen to the bullshit that sounds convincing that plays on our group think vulnerability ... but they don't look into the complete universe of known facts behind it, which are not really that complex. The Global warming "Science" is much like the Catholic church not explaining the bible or allowing it to be in a language the average person could understand. They didn't want people analyzing for themselves. The people pushing global warming as a means to control are much the same in that regard.
Most people have no clue about the levels they are talking about. Like many false assertions the ratios are left out of the propaganda. The variable in the output of CO2 naturally on earth dwarfs the levels people affect in output. Our output of CO2 and Methane is extremely tiny in ratio to natural output. It's like saying a fart affects wind speed in a hurricane. Does it? Yes, yes it does, but it's not significant enough to matter.
Not only that, but the cooling effect of CO2 is completely dismissed. Why would they do that? It's not like Holdren (Science Czar) doesn't understand it. More CO2 creates more fauna volume in the earth and that fauna mostly works on a respiratory effect where it takes CO2 and converts it to Oxygen and the result is cooling the air around it. That is a massive effect, and the more CO2 is in the air the more plants thrive and the over all volume increases, thus increasing the cooling effect. Why leave that huge factor out? Cause FRAUD. It's a huge control and money grab worth trillions in rip offs of just the US people alone. That's what the Chicago Climate exchange was all about. Funded by who? Joyce Foundation, a Soros org, and the actual work to fund it done by who? Barrack Obama is who. That is fact.
When you can't speak on a subject in depth but have faith in authorities or "experts" version of it ... hey, you're living in about the same dynamic that religious zealots do. Then defend that bullshit like you understand it? Like you KNOW it's fact? Hello?
I mean it used to be global cooling in the 70s, and who wrote about that? How ice would build up on the poles and topple creating tidal waves which would wipe out all life within 200 miles of all coasts? hahaha. What was the solution? Same as with warming, give loads of money and control to government.
Who wrote this crap on global cooling? Global ice age dangers? John Holdren, Obama's "Science" Czar. Imagine that?
We have to look at ourselves like we do others for intellectual defects and conflicts. You guys are sitting there speaking on something faith based as if it's fact and not even seeing the irony.
1
-
1
-
+The Rubin Report I'm beginning to wonder if all of this is genuine, about coming together. Putting forth the dishonest (or extremely naive / ignorant) narrative about Trump as if it's "gospel" while by default, Pushing a corrupt hack like Hillary? An apologist for a rapist husband? She got booted off the Watergate prosecution by a hard line democrat prosecutor, for gross misconduct and fraud? Her BS in Benghazi, which is very real, lies very real, cover up very real, and either she was extremely incompetent, but the most likely scenario by far which doesn't assume so many extremely improbable story lines in a row are true, is that Hillary set up Stevens for murder. The before shows that is most probable, and the during shows that is most probable. The after is a horrendous mess of idiotic lies and cover up. Destroying evidence. Sending witnesses where they can't be interviewed for over a year. All of the other things she did which are so corrupt. There is either gross ignorance and lack of curiosity here, or disingenuous actual motives going on which don't jive with the whole getting together on reasonable ground, thing.
1
-
+deiviance I hadn't gotten to that part at the time, in fact I started the vid again and it came up where they are mystified about how feminists get in bed with Islamists ... but they don't draw a parallel to how feminists support Bill Clinton, a rapist, a man who's been called out by women who he worked with, democrats, who've give accounts of rape, sexual assault without rape but physical attacks with brutal intimidation like Paula Jones who was a loyal democrat and who's harassment trial Bill lied at. How do feminists get in bed with Islam? Easily, because that branch of "feminism" isn't about feminism at all. It's a progressive group that's all about propaganda, using feminism as pretext. They see Muslims as allies to the progressive cause because the progressives put out that message and they don't think in real terms.
And supporting Sanders shows a deep ignorance of economics, but really that's what Universities have been teaching lately on economics, deep ignorance which basic analysis exposes as production creates wealth, not government programs, because you need some products to buy and sell and supply and demand and all that. The more a nation produces the more it get around and the more people can give to help others. The poor in the US are rich by world standards. This is because of freedoms, which drive the ability to gain from work and innovation. Sanders proposals simply can't be paid for, and the effort would over tax and destroy the motivation to produce. Keynes came up with the Laffer curve before Laffer did. He did Keynesian economics from Harvard after he was a mess. A drug addict and a pedophile. Keynesian economics is a con that fits in with the Progressive movement's agenda just as open borders does. To crash the economy of the US, so the country can be transformed. That transformation won't favor the poor, it will give the most wealthy the Oligarchy that is always the end result in collectivism.
I don't see how there can be a knitting of "reasonable people" when those making the attempt, maybe, are so far out of reasonable perspective on so many issues. Who are so far out in a religious level on important components of societal health, but don't probably understand it any more than the theists understand.
I guess I was so hopeful because Dave was seeing past part of this religious level indoctrination to think there could be reasonable conversation on all of it, but O_O holy shit. Mystified how feminists could get in bad with Islamists when it's so obvious that is what progressives do on so many levels. The power of the indoctrination baffles me. That one can see one part of this and not other parts that work on the same basic style of propaganda. That I know by experience that trying to have a reasoned factual conversation about those issues, is like talking to a religious zealot on their problem issues. The possibility of actually having reasoned conversations on important issues suddenly became overwhelmingly remote in a painful epiphany. BUT where the conditioned victims can open their eyes on one subject, maybe there is hope? But this is such a simple obvious subject that jumps right out, and still most progressives don't even get that. Seems the only hope is if it plays through to destruction and people then see the results, but by then a lock on the world by the nasty people paying for and pushing most of this indoctrination will be in lock and oppression the rule world wide as before people woke up and fought for freedom, culminating in the US Constitution and the most successful civilization in known history of the world for the average person in terms of freedoms and life style. Exactly what the Progressive movement (which is why I've for years called that movement regressive) was created by wealthy movers and shakers in the world, to do. That is the big fight. Against the actual cause of the insanity ingrained in so many, through mass propagation and distribution of propaganda and massive reinforcement. Very much like religion does, and just as hard if not harder to undo the conditioning.
Thinking about this as I have been, Dave isn't ingenuine, he's mind fucked on an extreme level much similar to Muslims and hard line Christians. So is Peter, to what total extent it's hard to tell without seeing more. I mean I've been there on certain subjects, and I hope I'm not on others. It's a constant struggle to separate what is real from the bad information tossed at us continually.
1
-
1