Comments by "tblbaby" (@tblbaby) on "Dave Rubin on Faith and Critical Thinking | DIRECT MESSAGE | Rubin Report" video.

  1. +No Way I"m agnostic and no fan of Planned Parenthood. I don't like much of what they do and see it as vile. I don't like that they bribe politicians with contributions who vote to fund them. I don't like those politicians who think bringing in massive amounts of illegal aliens to change the voting of the country is ok, it's illegal, and it's morally reprehensible because it's not good for the US, or anyone in the long run. It's about power. Putting Christians in an equal status with Muslims is either extremely ignorant, or just insane. Muslims live with a doctrine of genocide and world domination. Christians is quite opposite. I know often Christians act out of line with their instructions, but they are Christians AND people. People use institutions and whatever they can to manipulate other people, Christianity has been that for sure. Islam if followed is a horrible thing. Christians who lash out and kill are probably also dealing with mental problems. So are Muslims, but those mental problem are taught, brain washed, conditioned neurosis. The thing about people is, there is no moral baseline unless it's taught. Nothing is too ridiculous if it's accepted by those around them ... Bones in the Nose, Sticks on the Dicks is a good demonstration. Progressivism is faith based, on what people who see the leaders in Progressivism as part of their group. Who see the progressive media lines which can be extremely dishonest in material and omission as normal. It's tribal ... like religion it lives on the group think dynamic, mob mentality. That's just how people think, most of them. It's the dynamic the religious have with their leaders and information. Faith, because people mostly don't know except that they've heard it from a trusted authority figure. Would the people in California have been murdered if progressivism wasn't pervasive? Apologizing for groups of criminals and zealots because their leaders were using them as a tool to grab power in the US? Probably not. Bringing people who hate you into your country is just stupid. Bringing in masses of people and giving them special treatment and basically immunity to our laws and money to live on is fucking stupid. The Darkest side of progressivism, dependency. It's the most dangerous situation we face. Such a high murder rate, it makes terrorism so far look like a small problem. Sensational group murders are ugly and catch attention, but the huge mass murder in California is a bad weekend in Chicago. Much or most of the black population were bribed into dependency in the 60s. I contend it was deliberate. Knowing Johnson was a conniving racist son of a bitch bolsters that well backed theory. If it wasn't, the results are one of the most stark contrasts in history that should be studied. 500% murder rate rise from par with the country statistically to now. That is HUGE, more so because the problem is concentrated and many black people are not in that concentration and don't have the same crime rate, so that waters down the dependency stats. Progressivism in the US has such a dramatically higher death toll than religion since the 60s it's not even close. It's many multiples worse. Without the concentrations of dependency included in the equation, the US murder rate would be one of the very lowest in the world. Without just Chicago, DC, Detroit and New Orleans the US would be 4th from the bottom of the list. That is in ratio which is valid, not in totals which Progressives dishonestly use, which is not a valid statistical measure. Would gun control help? Well, Muhammad and Muslims since the 600 somethings had no guns, and they've mass murdered around 200 times more people than the Nazi's and Russian communists combined. politicalislam.com. They didn't need no stinking guns. They massed and wiped out weaker groups. Hard to get away with that against smaller groups armed with fire arms. You'll take heavy casualties probably and make a hell of a racket doing it. But ... guns are the devil in progressive media and entertainment as well as leaders blaming lack of gun control for about anything, that and climate warming or change or whatever twist they're doing with it today. Funny how the heaviest gun control areas is where the most murders are. I know this line of thought will be hated. Hating guns is a progressive holy cow. I however like a chance at self defense because police can't make it in time to save you or your loved ones, usually. An armed public is the most effective weapon against mass murder or invasion as in the case of 200,000 military aged male "refugees" they admit to not being able to vet ... in fact the Obama administration put up road blocks to checking them out. Much like the Clinton administration did using the Clinton Gorelick wall that kept info sharing from probably focusing in on the hijackers who were learning to take off and fly, but not to land. The FFA couldn't tell immigration or the FBI. Were those stupid moves by Progressives and religious dynamic? Just stupid? Or collusion? Sandy Berger's socks know, but after they had them he destroyed the documents, and basically got away with it scott free and never had to live up to his deal by taking a lie detector test. There is a lot to go into, and I focused mainly on what seems to be your religion, Progressivism, because I'm talking to you :) Believe me I've had a lot to say to Christians and Muslims on the subject. Will you think critically about what I've just taken efforts to lay out? Or will your group thinking dynamic dismiss it for you?
    2
  2. No Way [+tblbaby  "I"m agnostic and no fan of Planned Parenthood. I don't like much of what they do and see it as vile" Well, one of two things here.  Either you've fallen for right-wing Faux News propaganda, or you're the vile one.] Wow! O_O, lol, what a perfect demonstration of faith based thinking (group think on your part) displacing critical thinking. I'm pro choice, up to the point a baby could live outside the womb. I see the freedom of ownership of ones body as vital in principal. Killing a baby would be a personal choice not to provide life support in ones own body. After the baby could live outside the womb with some care, I see it as clearly murder. Location doesn't reasonably establish status of life, of a sentient being. PP also gets money from government and gives money in donations to bribe officials. This is fact, whether you hear it on your favored sources of propaganda or not lol. The absolutism involved in labeling Fox news valueless as an information source isn't rational either. They provide information you can't get on the networks or progressive sources which more and more filter information as well as put a slant on information which is disinformational. Even entertainment is involved here in a type of Goebbels style propaganda in entertainment system. They come out often with a cohesive push on a certain theme, which happens to be the same theme news programs are pushing. To take the information given by any of those in exclusion to other varied sources is extreme idiocy. Blind faith if you will ;) I like to understand what's going on, so I check out varied sources and investigate myself using material facts involved to see if reports jive with them. I understand why I must seem vile to you. Same principal as why Muslims see gay people as vile enough to warrant stoning, tossing off roofs, burning, etcetera. Planned Parenthood which was created by a racist genocidal nutbar to help eliminate black people from the population, has never been a decent organization. Always corrupt. Now they sell baby parts which is illegal. Most reasonable informed people wouldn't be a big fan, BUT they are a big focus of progressives. A large block in the construction of the institution. Eugenics, vile as it is, is a foundational block of progressivism as it was Nazism. Nazi's actually got the book, along with the book Propaganda, from Progressives who were huge fans. Nazi's were progressing far beyond what they could get away with in the US. Is it reasonable to consider planned parenthood vile? Without the influence of religion or what hard line Progs consider the devil's messenger, FOX NEWS! O_O (because it distributes information they'd like to see shut up forever). Yes, it's very reasonable to see Planned Parenthood as vile on many levels, and I do. Fox News has better quality and diversity of news than any of the Networks judged at an unbiased level. It's far from perfect or even good, and it does have it's biases though they are much less complete than the networks and CNN. I doubt, judging by your statement that you're even educated personally about what is on Fox, beyond what you hear in propaganda about Fox. I check out everything from Brietbart to Mother Jones, a Soros influenced publication as is CNN in fact influenced by Media Matters and the networks have that smell as well. I check out Media Matters, it's a great source to see the tone and paradigms the uber wealthy super corrupting forces in the world are trying to push on the mushrooms. I go beyond what's said, to why was it said? What was the purpose of certain propaganda themes? What are they working to accomplish? I have to admit to baiting you with topics and information I knew would be offensive to you, so see how you'd react :) I didn't expect such a hard line group thinking product from you, but kind of expected portions of it. I deliberately attacked the Holy Cow Planned Parenthood. Sources of contributions to the cause (corrupt politicians) is sacred to the Prog cult ;).
    1
  3. No Way ["I don't like those politicians who think bringing in massive amounts of illegal aliens to change the voting of the country is ok" Ok, we've established it's both.] Established that bringing in illegal aliens to change the voting pattern in the country is ok? Is that what you're saying? It's illegal on one hand. On the other it's extremely immoral to cherry pick influence to illegally bring into the country to over whelm the citizenry in attempt to get support to go around their constitution. To lay the bill of favorable treatment of those illegal aliens on the citizens you're basically invading, attacking. To allow them to violate laws and regulations, to not have increased penalty for multiple offenses. To obstruct validation of legal status to vote so they can vote illegally, that's ok? I don't think it is. I'm pretty sure that falls under the definition of treason. It's also destructive to the lives and well being of the citizens of the US. That's against what voters in the country hire politicians as leaders to accomplish. They owe loyalty, or prison time or possibly, their lives.
    1