Comments by "Beth Bartlett" (@bethbartlett5692) on "Neanderthal Apocalypse: A Journey from Extinction to Genetic Legacy | Extra Long Documentary" video.

  1. ​ @get.factual  Why do intelligent, well studied, educated, minds: 🔹 seemingly set aside the "Standards of Science and Research" (excerpts: "Mind fully open, free of any predetermined Beliefs, Theories, Opinions, allowing the Research Methodologies to extract the greater facts"). The "Standards" are an established guide for the Academic and Researcher to apply for the Purpose of "Self Discipline", to prevent the Human Ego Mind from claiming a subject or point is fact to support a hypothesis or theory, ("that in some fashion is serving their perceived desire, opinion, , and in doing so presents inaccurate information as accurate, as fact, thereby offering the Academic/Researcher a gain, fame, a variable serving the Ego Mind if the individual, and misguiding others into an area that is not serving actual Science/History facts and advancement.") Therefore theres Value in the opportunities for the Academics/Researchers having "Freedom of Thoughts", "Opportunities to present Hypothesises, Theories, that allows for the forward advancing of Exploration and Discoveries, Advancements, not hindered by bureaucracy, personal/private/group interests. This is at the very foundation of Science, Academic and Research ethics, integrity, the fluid motion towards greater facts findings, allowing for the necessary and desired gains of advancements. 🔹Logic is a center stone of Academia and Research, a Cognitive value and a tool serving to balance direction and give opportunities to alternatives. There's a Flaw in the current "Administration of Academia" and their Camp, the "Mainstream Academics", as they have established their perspective on a "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" (Theory) being used as (Fact) and this is a Fatal Flaw in their Perspective, Paradigm, further it has allowed the (Lower Mind, aka Ego Mind, aka Adolescent Mind) to taint the "Value of the Scientific Integrity" and it has soread throughout the entire scope of the Academic Contents. Countless examples of Academics breaking from the Scientific Standards, in their behaviors, actions, and works, in their ignoring of "Peer Reviewed Science" and their Statements, in Professional settings and Publically. 🏹 Theres an obvious need gor the adding of an exercise of "Academic Higher Minded, aka Mature Minded application of Thought Practice, for the Higher Mind is where Wisdom resides, and behaviir follows Thought and Thought Perspective. During the early 20th Century, someone took the opportunity to redirect Western Academia, on a chiisen Paradigm, although their purpose is yet unclear to me. A forcing of the "Darwinian Model" being used as Fact and the full acceptance then resulting un Teaching the Model as Fact. 🏹 Highly undesirable actions (cause and effect) has resulted, countless Peer Reviewed Findings that do not support their M8del, current finding remain filed that literally prived the Darwinian Midel as inaccurate, most notably those of Genetics/DNA studies/findings. 🔹Studies resulting in finding's statements that include: 🏹 "Modern Humans are a redult if Intervention, rather than linear Evolution". Observing from a Sociological Behaviorist point provides some understanding, but ut leaves much ti be explained, and the 1st area of question to be answered is:. Who? (Who made this decision?) then Why? It is was affected through a University effort and then is observanle as centered around the Smithsonian. The Academics whom adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" are "Authentic Academic". Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian (an "Authentic Academic")
    1
  2. Why do intelligent, well studied, educated, minds: 🔹 seemingly set aside the "Standards of Science and Research" (excerpts: "Mind fully open, free of any predetermined Beliefs, Theories, Opinions, allowing the Research Methodologies to extract the greater facts"). The "Standards" are an established guide for the Academic and Researcher to apply for the Purpose of "Self Discipline", to prevent the Human Ego Mind from claiming a subject or point is fact to support a hypothesis or theory, ("that in some fashion is serving their perceived desire, opinion, , and in doing so presents inaccurate information as accurate, as fact, thereby offering the Academic/Researcher a gain, fame, a variable serving the Ego Mind if the individual, and misguiding others into an area that is not serving actual Science/History facts and advancement.") Therefore theres Value in the opportunities for the Academics/Researchers having "Freedom of Thoughts", "Opportunities to present Hypothesises, Theories, that allows for the forward advancing of Exploration and Discoveries, Advancements, not hindered by bureaucracy, personal/private/group interests. This is at the very foundation of Science, Academic and Research ethics, integrity, the fluid motion towards greater facts findings, allowing for the necessary and desired gains of advancements. 🔹Logic is a center stone of Academia and Research, a Cognitive value and a tool serving to balance direction and give opportunities to alternatives. There's a Flaw in the current "Administration of Academia" and their Camp, the "Mainstream Academics", as they have established their perspective on a "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" (Theory) being used as (Fact) and this is a Fatal Flaw in their Perspective, Paradigm, further it has allowed the (Lower Mind, aka Ego Mind, aka Adolescent Mind) to taint the "Value of the Scientific Integrity" and it has soread throughout the entire scope of the Academic Contents. Countless examples of Academics breaking from the Scientific Standards, in their behaviors, actions, and works, in their ignoring of "Peer Reviewed Science" and their Statements, in Professional settings and Publically. 🏹 Theres an obvious need gor the adding of an exercise of "Academic Higher Minded, aka Mature Minded application of Thought Practice, for the Higher Mind is where Wisdom resides, and behaviir follows Thought and Thought Perspective. During the early 20th Century, someone took the opportunity to redirect Western Academia, on a chiisen Paradigm, although their purpose is yet unclear to me. A forcing of the "Darwinian Model" being used as Fact and the full acceptance then resulting un Teaching the Model as Fact. 🏹 Highly undesirable actions (cause and effect) has resulted, countless Peer Reviewed Findings that do not support their M8del, current finding remain filed that literally prived the Darwinian Midel as inaccurate, most notably those of Genetics/DNA studies/findings. 🔹Studies resulting in finding's statements that include: 🏹 "Modern Humans are a redult if Intervention, rather than linear Evolution". Observing from a Sociological Behaviorist point provides some understanding, but ut leaves much ti be explained, and the 1st area of question to be answered is:. Who? (Who made this decision?) then Why? It is was affected through a University effort and then is observanle as centered around the Smithsonian. The Academics whom adhere to the "Standards of Science and Research" are "Authentic Academic". Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian (an "Authentic Academic")
    1