Youtube comments of RexFx (@RextheRebel).
-
6800
-
2600
-
2200
-
1800
-
1400
-
1200
-
1000
-
711
-
663
-
573
-
518
-
508
-
500
-
494
-
479
-
423
-
414
-
346
-
343
-
329
-
327
-
319
-
300
-
300
-
300
-
296
-
294
-
287
-
261
-
250
-
222
-
214
-
207
-
204
-
192
-
190
-
183
-
183
-
180
-
167
-
164
-
152
-
150
-
148
-
144
-
143
-
140
-
135
-
126
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
119
-
117
-
113
-
113
-
110
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
106
-
104
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
93
-
92
-
92
-
91
-
89
-
88
-
86
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
79
-
76
-
76
-
74
-
73
-
72
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
56
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
51
-
49
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Socialism and communism will never have anything to do with state or national control over the economy. The whole point is to limit classes and central power, instead giving more of that power to the individuals and the people.
Communism doesn't stifle innovation. People have never invented things to make money, they do it to increase standards of living and leisure. Tesla needed money to build and create his inventions , because of the society and the structure that it was built on. But he wanted it to be available to all people, equal access to it's use. Very communist if you ask me.
The standard of living has raised but that doesn't mean people are keeping up with those standards.
I'm a market socialist, cautiously a democratic socialist although I prefer the over arching left wing market libertarian title. I don't like being strapped down. But my point is, cooperation is key, competition is an excuse to outperform the other an focus on profit rater than productivity. The economy isnt a sport. It shouldn't be treated like one. I'm not technically an anarchist, I believe the government is a necessary evil. And some industries, ones that aren't commodities or consumer goods, should be available to all.
The reason taxes exist is to redistribute wealth and provide access to certain services in a capitalist system. Capitalism gets replaced, no taxes are needed. Capitalism has always failed. Socialism failed because the system changed. People began taking power and wanted to maintain it. but some form of socialism has existed since the dawn of man. It is humans natural conclusion. But capitalism has successfully made it so that trying to imagine a world without it wouldn't be a world at all. This is of course false.
As a reformist, I propose a social democracy founded on equal access to health, education, a socal dividend/Ubi and protections for the consumers, workers and the environment. This should then over time allow us to transition into a socialist economy.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Roughly 40% of homeless ppl are too far gone and need to be placed in asylums, which need to make a comeback. The other 60% need to be provided permanent housing. Housing is a necessity, as is eating, sleeping and going to the bathroom, all which can be done in a home. Instead of housing and feeding immigrants, let's house and feed our own ppl and get them eventually into a meaningful job, say a local position cooking, growing food, working as a security officer, cleaning up parks, working as welders etc
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Fewer Rights? Probably because there is a seemingly endless amount of Rights now, most of which just showed up uninvited. Everything is considered a Right, now. It's annoying. Not everything is a "human Right", certainly not everything is a constitutional one.
In my opinion, you have a Right to life, Right to pursue happiness (notice the Right is not to make you happy, that's on you), Right to adequate shelter, Right to healthcare and to get a basic education. Oh, and water is a Right. Anything that is essential to Life and the continuation of it, from a physiological standpoint, is a Right. Anything else? Nope.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
So conservatives complain about false sexual allegations but then do the same thing? Seems like nothing new in the right hemisphere. There are alot of false allegations, but actual rapes are probably much higher and its sad women are afraid to speak up, they shouldn't be.
Im still very weary of religious people, Muslims in particular but i also understand that just like followers of other faiths, not all are oppressive bigots. BUT, i still think religion is stupid and religion distracts us from reality and how to better it. Religion needs to die. But not via killing supporters of certain faiths. How can Jews be liberal but not support gay rights according to their own religion? Im assuming its Orthodox Jews who are more conservative.
Polygamy is illegal unless its under a religious pretense, definitely a separation of church and state... Polygamy is such a gross bastardization of the social bonds between individuals. 200 kids... that is not functional or healthy. How do they repopulate without eventually breeding with a half sibling? Also, consecration is not like communism... that's authoritarianism and state socialism. Neither can be classified under the definition of communism. I'm not a communist btw.
When i first started watching the anti SJW channels i thought Gavin was funny, though he would go a bit too far even for me, i just thought he was trolling. I don't think he is. He does say some truthful things but that doesn't make him a good person or someone to listen to. His Proud Boys are pieces of shit. They talk about how Antifa are libtards and pussy beta soyboys yet they feel so strong when they beat up these beta soyboys. And they beat them up by ganging up on them. I don't think Facebook should ban them though. I don't think that is the answer. The Proud Boy who recorded that video was black btw, and Tiny (their version of Captain America or Ares) is not white. Many members arent. I dont think they are racist, but they definitely have some closed minded views and shame people who are failing because of the rigged system, yet they are doing the same thing but for a different reason. Its dumb. They are sexist though, and they do support an unnatural and dangerous hierarchy in society.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
None of this matters, family, exclusion, loneliness, depression, social interaction, community involvement; none of that matters if the material conditions do not improve. Don't get me wrong, hook-up/social media culture has ruined the dating market, feminism has made vvomen compete with men for power rather than collaborate with men to maintain function and stability in society, we live in a far too permissive culture where we seek constant open mindedness at the expense of letting our brains fall out. But if the material conditions do not improve for the average person, especially the average man, hypergamy w ill continue, the delay of pair bonding/marriage will continue to fall, people will continue to check out of society and "go their own way" with the claim that "i don't need no man" and "my wallet my choice".
Men and women are better when working together but right now we are working against one another in both economic and segsual antagonism between the gnders.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I have spoken to this at length with others online. Im honestly tired of this story. Its not border securities fault. Its her parents fault. There is no getting around that. You will try, you will fail. It is an issue that Border control overlooked her illness and didn't recognize it. She received medical attention and procedures that i wouldn't have access to, as a citizen without paying thousands of dollars. If we as citizens don't have that, i have an issue with illegal immigrants getting it. Though im not saying they shouldn't.
The separation of parent and child is simple, adults go into adult facilities. Children who cannot be confirmed as the child of these adults will NOT and SHOULD not be held with them nor in an adult facility. Its not a fucking immoral system. Im against for profit systems and cheap immigrant labor, i think those businesses should be fined for hiring them and i don't want them here anyway. I don't understand the issue with this!
The parents should be blamed, and the children are victims of it but that is not an excuse to let these illegal immigrants off the hook. "Oh your kid died, im so sorry... oh wait, this is your fault. Time to go to jail now, you piece of shit." We need to reform ice and Border control, help it work with immigrants but not without losing their toughness, we should be tough on immigration, especially now. When we fix our own shit and help the millions of people who don't have healthcare or adequate shelter who are citizens, THEN we can focus on immigration. Until then, immigration is a distraction, its hurting us more than we already are or at least not making matters better and it needs to stop being prioritized. A child died, im sorry. I realize the horrible fact that she will never be able to experience anything ever again, it bothers me. But that is not an excuse not to be tough on illegal immigrants and give them any leniency. We need to stop everyone else trying to come in. SHUT DOWN the borders for now. And lets focus on the assholes here and see if hey should be given a path to citizenship or not. Lets make the legal process quicker and easier. But after we get a handle of our own shit.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Tim Pool focuses on SJWs and thinks they are left. SJWs are not typically socialist, which is usually what people think of when you hear the term "Left". They don't have very many leftist economic policies. I personally, am a socialist; market socialist. I believe in some government but not much, mostly with energy and basic utilities. That the government should help out with preserving the welfare of its citizens (not illegal immigrants like we keep focusing on) and that since we dont have a communist Marxist society where its "To each according to their ability, to each according to their need" the government has to be the one to ensure a minute version of that system. Where everyone can truly to free and equal to pursue their own interests and have their basic needs met. My point is, im a Leftist, im an actual person who genuinely supports a post capitalist society. But i hate SJWs, why? Because while they complain about "the white man" i complain about the rich man. I complain about those with power, those who make it so hard for people to succeed, for people to pursue their own dreams. What if my pursuit of happiness is not making a lot of money? What if its backpacking through Europe? I need money to do that. If i don't have enough money to travel then i'm not free because someone or something is preventing me from doing that which is not naturally occurring. Money equals access, access equals freedom and if people don't have money then those people don't have freedom. I support worker cooperatives, small businesses, entrepreneurship and community organizing. SJW's don't fight for these things, the regressive left as Tim calls them don't care about these things. They complain about band-aids not matching their skin tone and that there arent enough female construction workers... Its annoying and its stupid. They believe in infinite genders and demand they have their own gender neutral bathrooms, ignoring that these have existed for years, they are called family restrooms. They call everyone sexist and racist and anti-semetic and anti-Islamic over everything. They have this victim hierarchy of oppression that makes everyone be content with their struggles because this one person might be a Mexican woman but this individual is a queer, black, physically disabled trans person with down syndrome... This list goes on and on and it pisses me off. I focus on class and alienation, they focus one gender and race. It pisses me off.
So that's what Tim talks about, Jimmy. Self righteous and annoying gender nonconforming and PC "dont insult me or else" assholes who think they are oppressed when really they are the most privileged people ive ever met and seen.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
As someone who is without question more conservative on cultural/social issues, i have been stating for years now that we need 2 new parties to take over the discussion. Both need to be economically left (social democratic or democratic socialist) but the two can differ on their social policies. I dont think we should force progressive or conservative cultural norms onto anyone, i think states should decide this (as well as counties) and allow people to move where they feel like they belong. Conservative and progressive views on behavior and day to day activities simply cannot coexist, especially when they attack the very foundations of the other, say the view on gender roles or example. But if enough conservatives can say, "hey, im no feminist and never will be, my daughter and my son are going to be raised as nature/god intended and what some academic stooges think, but in order for that to happen we all need healthcare, housing, good jobs and good wages." If more progressives can say, "hey, my grandparents may be rahcist but i shouldn't be able to deny them care based on that and we shouldn't try to get young people fired who say things we dont like" then i think we'd be in a better place socially.
You don't need to be progressive to be socialist. I for instance, view the family as the root foundation of decentralized planning models socialism is based on. Even conservatives have acknowledged this, though for them they viewed it as a bad thing ironically. There are Christian socialists, which i am not, but plenty of conservatives in the modern era are both irreligious or atheist and have market skeptical views on Capitalism. Progressives can have their cities and conservatives should have theirs. Call it segregation of you like, i dont care. Conservative values impede progressive values of decorum and progressive values break down conservative values of decorum. So they should not intermingle on a regular, permanent basis. It just can't coexist. But it will be easier for everyone, no matter your stance on romantic relationships, duty, freedom, work ethic etc, if everyone supported UBI, unions, single payer healthcare, socialized housing and green infrastructure. Idk what any of what i just listed has to do with anyone's opinion on gender. It shouldn't. They aren't related. Socialism is all about the workers having control. Conservatives like work ethic, which i believe will improve under a more worker oriented economic model. Like famileis as much as i do? Dont price them out of the housing market, outsource their career, automate it away, higher cheap foreign labor and don't incentivize single parenthood, give assistance like child investment services (TANF, WIC, Universal Childcare, paid leave) to families. And invest in a Family Partnership Program that pairs single adults and single parents together to increase the stability of society and the individuals living in it.
The only war that matters is the class war and subsequently the war on poverty. All other identitarian bourgeois distractions are just that; distractions. What separates us by race, gender, orientation etc is nothing compared to what unites us; shared experience as wage slaves and as members of the proletariat.
Edit: id like to add that Libertarians (American capitalist ones, not socialists) are Right wing and largely progressive on social issues. What makes someone Right wing or Left wing is their opinon of Capitalism. If you think the answer is more Capitalism aka deregulation and lower taxes, then you are Right wing. If you are at the very least, skeptical of capitalism's effect on the populace, you are left leaning. If you seek to move beyond capitalism entirely you are Left. You support communism? Far left.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This is something the Left needs to understand. The majority of the working class are conservative by nature. Supporting local farming, being in fraternities (aka unions and cooperatives, creating self sufficient communities where everyone works in trades or sells goods in the communal main street market... These are all conservative beliefs. And it's predicated on discipline, family, duty, honor, gender roles and restraint from indulgence.
Too many leftists today celebrate behaviors that go completely against the beliefs of the working class. The majority of liberals are white collar, tech gurus who have university degrees. The majority of the working class went to trade school, barely passed high school and work for their local store or their families farm. Those people are largely conservative. Conservatives are also more likely to own firearms, have the mental not to mention physical acumen for necessary violence and are steadfast in defending their land and country.
All great revolutions were led by patriotic movements for national sovereignty. Stalin spent a lot of time focused on what makes a nation and why it was important. We need to reread and remember why that was. The cosmopolitan Left which embraces internationalism will always neglect the differences of varying people's with varying circumstances and conditions.
If the Left cannot win over conservatives, they have no hope of ever winning at all. Conservatives build and maintain this nation, most nations in fact. They are the blue collar working man. They are the industrial and agricultural proletarians. Without them, even if the revolution succeeded, maintaining that new socialist nation would fail.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
As someone who grew up in the punk scene from the mid 2000s-2010s i can attest that alot of these people are "normies" in their aesthetic but are actually pretty punk philosophically speaking. And yes, it is a dialectic scenario where punk is opposed to what is "square" and mainstream which is why punk is always changing. When punk, either/both the superficial and the substance became more well established and accepted it lost its edge and therefore its alternative nature. Nowadays people try to revive punk that was seen back in the day (70-80s) because it is a pretty whack scene today and everyone is a raging woke fool who gets triggered by everything, and woke is the mainstream belief system so you cant be woke and punk. But then there are old school conservative (traditionalist) squares that have taken over many parts of the scene too because as Paul Joseph Watson said, "conservatives are the new counter counter culture, the new punk rock" and while that sentence makes me barf its technically true since conservatism has fallen out of fashion for most people, even those who typically identify as Republican or Christian.
But there are many types of punks, both aesthetic wise and worldview wise. You got crust punks (usually anarko punks) who are members of the lower working class and underclass, gutter punks (who abstain from work and contribution altogether towards society in protest), street punks (those you see who usually have spiked hair and exaggerated dress) who are part of the working class and even sometimes lower middle class. Then there are hardcore kids which listen more to metal and beatdown hardcore music, they typically are blue caller workers and small business owners who dress more traditional but have loads of tattoos. You have straight edge punks who don't drink, smoke, do drugs and sometimes are either vegan or dont engage in casual encounters because they perceive self destructive behavior as what the establishment wants and also this overindulgent behavior prevents (in their view) the ability for the proletarian masses to revolt intelligently if not at all. Then you have the mall punks, these are middle class people (usually women) who think they are punk and go to shows and dress moderately "street" but in reality its an excuse to appear cool, to appear unique, to get with bad boys and to do drugs outside the confines of their suburban neighborhoods.
Anyway, thank you for reading and i do hope i was of help in explaining a bit. I actually made a video about punks vs posers a few years ago.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
6:55 see, that's where you lose me entirely. You claim "so long as they dont jeopardize the sustainability of the system as a whole" but that's just it dude, newcomers, immigrants (especially with different cultural values) passer-bys and interlopers do by default jeopardize the system as a whole. You have a wedding with a list of guests and a guest invites more than 1 person, whose guest then invites two ppl. Exchange the wedding scenario for a union; you have a bunch of non union members benefiting directly from the collective bargaining agreement they are not a part of. The nation, the society, the community etc is a country club, it is a union (quite literally) it is a wedding. Outsiders pose an inherent threat to its existence because there are enough problems to deal with even amongst lifetime members of the club...
You can of course pay a yearly fee to be a member of another counties library system.
Btw, "consultative associations" you mean something which can only work and solely is found in homogeneous societies?
"Social and material consequences that will inevitably arise if a person continues to act in a harmful manner" like what though? You've already stated that any real form of punitive measure would supposedly be unproductive and therefore disproportionate. What would be a proportionate penalty? I don't think you are willing to enforce those penalties. Unfortunately, "empathy" is nowhere near tough enough. We need to be strong, disciplined and hard on criminal activity to prevent it in tbe future or else you'll set the precedent that effectively anything goes. So basically you'd be no different than every single Democrat run city where crime isn't ever enforced and when it is, the consequences are so minor that it isn't a disincentive to stop.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I never understood why, as someone on the Left who is opposed to the exploitation of labor and the commodification of people, why others on the Left would support something that is implicitly exploitative, alienating and commodifying. Doesn't make sense to me as it seems to be counterproductive to progress. Hell, Karl Marx himself spoke about the "amorphous blight" that was sx work. He wanted to get rid of it and thought Capitalism was major in why so many vvomen were thrusted into that life. But nope, apparently it's empowering to be reduced to nothing more than an object of some pervs carnal impulsive desire. I thought the objectification of vvomen was bad, until it's all of a sudden empowering, in which case how dare you criticise it!
And because of Capitalism, we view anything that makes money worthy of being considered work. I disagree. People who make money off of renting out properties for instance, that person isn't working for his income. It's unproductive income. People pay money for tons of things that are atrocious or unintelligent. Many people buy exotic pets only to learn how difficult it is to maintain. Which is why there are laws around it.
And yes, Marxism is 100% correct that work today is oppressive and alienating. Not because of the work itself but the workers relation to his/her labor. He has no power over what he creates, he's a cog in a machine told what to make, when to make it, how much to make and for how long. He has no control in the creative process. That's why it's unfulfilling. Marxism is literally about the workers owning their production so that their labor is meaningful.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mortgage/rental assistance, Investment in building housing, limit ownership of residential property to two properties, revoking mandatory minimum parking laws, enforce wages to be tied to productivity by law, fight for labor unions, enforce immigration laws strictly, forbid foreign ownership of land, institute a land value tax, a single layer healthcare system, nationalize the pharmaceutical industry and; universal basic income. Oh an acquisition tax which minimizes merges and business acquisitions.
This is a society I wanna live in.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I watched it but didn't find it convincing since I dumped these childish fantasies when I was 19. Wealth is being concentrated, more and more people live paycheck to paycheck and less own their own home. Wages have stagnated while production have increased exponentially. Capitalists lobby for control over the government and 99% of policies implemented are done so because of powerful interests not the people's interest. Surplus value from a workers labor production is pocketed by the owners of the business he or she works for and in return is given a fraction of the proceeds. Your parents and grandparents made more more than you at the same age. Healthcare, housing and education have increased in price while effective income has not. Workers don't have the ability to negotiate and when they do businesses blame them for being lazy and demanding. There isn't a labor shortage, there is a wage shortage. In true Capitalist fashion, businesses are having t rethink what it'll take to hire or rehire employees because the bare minimum isn't cutting it and the working class has for the first time in a long time a tiny bit of leverage. Government is responsible for any inventions and innovations, beside that, Capitalism has only been around a couple hundred years but that never stopped innovations from happening before. We have phones now, so what. Our grandparents had busses and railways their grandparents didn't have. So what? Those great great grandparents didn't have sewage systems but they did have electricity. Before that they had horses and buggies to get around. Before that they hadn't even domesticated horses. So what? Poverty and a lack of access to resources exists regardless of what those resources are and what they can produce. We mix natural resources with labor to invent a product. Money comes into play when the business owner extracts the value of that labor and the product itself to "earn" a profit. The business owner owns the materials, the property and the individual laborer. They have all the power. If you quit you're merely exchanging one overly powerful stooge owning your labor to another one. Rich people like musicians and athletes are profiting the most off their labor due to market forces but they still don't own anything other than their labor and maybe a house. The stadium, the equipment etc is all owned by someone else and the money these athletes make by drawing in viewers still primarily goes to those owners. That's why income taxes don't work to redistribute wealth because it's not wealth that's being targeted but income. Income is what you make for your labor contribution, wealth is what you own, land, property, stocks, labor etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Really? You going down that route? LGBT isn't a choice? Then why are more and more identities being made up everyday to fit into that group? How are people changing their shrexuality based on their mood? That's a choice. Full stop. I used to believe it was ingrained but now they say being straight isn't inherent, that it's taught. Then so is being gaye.
Also, children raised by single mothers are weaker. I can attest to that personally and refusing to acknowledge my personal experience is degrading and sidelines my existence. Now don't get me wrong, there are some men who deserve to be divorced. But the majority of divorces are initiated by the wife and the social programs that exist give more to single mothers than to families. Womn need to pick between the high status, hot guy with money and the stable, average Joe with far less money. They usually choose the wrong guy. That's their fault. Not the guys. Be more selective, don't pass yourself around like a hot potato, don't have unprotected and unintelligent shrex with people. There are so many ways now days not to get pregnant that if you do become accidentally pregnant then that's on you. That guy has a right to choose too. Your body tour choice, I agree. But that's works both ways. His wallet his choice. He doesn't want to raise that kid because he didn't agree to have it? Fine. He should have that choice. But saying that is ridiculous to most people despite the fact that that exact argument is used to justify womns behavior. Talk about "male privilege"... In what? Sports? So what. We are more likely to die from a workplace injury, commit self unalivement, we die younger, we are more likely to be homeless and for longer periods, we are more likely to be poor and have less opportunity for upward mobility, we graduate less and get lower scores... All of that yet men are privileged?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheYolo20 I agree that the government should provide immigrants which have been accepted, language courses, history classes and the values prevalent in that particular country. But some can't assimilate. Their values and their their cultural/ethnic background simply won't allow it.
As for Capitalism benefiting from immigration, it's a key reason that immigration should be highly restricted. But even in socialist society, displacement, division, taking of jobs, lack of housing, etc with still be a problem. Immigrants have almost never been a net benefit to local populations throughout history. That's simply a fact.
People can visit and travel to other countries and experience other cultures. But long term? Stay put. We have settled our respective territories and they should not be infringed.
Also I vehemently disagree with your belief that a community cannot claim land for themselves and exclude others. I'm opposed to private ownership of land. Not communal. And no, I don't mean "Global community" as there is no such thing as a "global community" no matter how much internationalist idealists claim otherwise. I think telling people that they and their cultural history don't have a right to particular place/region of land is disgusting. To force yourself into them is colonialism, gentrification and displacement. Do so at your own risk.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"You cant tell people where you can work, how you're going to work"... sounds like you're against Capitalism sir, since we are forced to pick certain careers or starve/suffer and when we get those jobs we have almost zero freedom in what we do. We listen to our bosses and if we step just one centimeter out of line we can get fired. You want free enterprise, make sure the people can invest in themselves and in each other instead of relying on the banks and large investors that take stock and ownership over that new enterprise. You want freedom? Make sure people have their basic needs met and have access to resources necessary for them to pursue their own future.
And maybe you, Jaime Dimon, should read the history of socialism. It might help you understand that socialism is not "when the government does stuff der der der". The government does what the people wants, in theory, but big companies and fat cats like YOU buy the government so that what the people want wont happen. These powerful capitalist overlords are just that, overlords. They bash centralized socialism from the 20th century yet what is a monopoly? The Soviet Union was a monopoly, the people were the employees of the only real business in the country, the government. That's no different than capitalism today. That is capitalism's nature. It flows to a small group of people. The very system that pushes competition pushes constant growth and buyouts of smaller chains more. The very competition they espouse, is the process that allows competition to falter. Because eventually, 1 or a few people will have won from that competitive market and leave the rest on the bleachers and in the audience to watch as things continue on without them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not sure its the "far right", rather a return to traditionalism in certain areas of life. Most men want to have a traditional family, which women and society at large have been told is oppressive and toxic. So yes, the demonization and emasculation of men will lead to an uprising by men who need, not want, but need to take society back for themselves. Because as it turns out, men and only men (working class, family oriented men) can ensure societies well being. Not rich billionaires who don't truly contribute or live degenerate lifestyles and certainly not women, who seem to dismantle every good thing they are in charge of. Hell, they don't even need to be in charge, they just enter a man's space and the institution goes to shit.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@user-tr9rw7ne8x I'm not an egalitarian. Equality is a myth and doesn't exist. We aren't the same. Not only are men and women not at all the same but men themselves aren't equal either. We have different strengths, weaknesses, values, worth, dedication, predilections and proficiencies. Not only that but I refuse to take anyone seriously who claims to be a socialist and fight for such an abstract notion like equality or freedom.
These are ideas. I don't care about ideas. I care about truths, material conditions and what is or isn't functional. That's all. Freedom is not only a lie, it doesn't exist. Freedom to do what? Freedom from what? What are we talking about here? Freedom to exploit? Freedom to be irresponsible? Freedom to turn our back on our family, our community, our work? We have obligations, duties and roles we must all fulfill. Some of us are gearheads, others are planners, some are caretakers, others are electricians. Some smarter than others. Some more willing than others. Some people are harder working than others. Some are more lazy and manipulative than others. When people have too much free time on their hands they do dumb shit.
We need purpose and meaning in life. Gender roles among other things like work and family supply that.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I wish I had a computer, man. Then I could full time devote myself to making content and arguing from a different perspective, communicating with people like you, Case, Hasan, Destiny, Vaush, Convo Couch, Jimmy Dore, Kyle and Saager, or whoever. I've always been political and I've always had a very logical perspective, which has evolved over the years. I'm not a progressive but I am a leftist and I strive to reveal to conservatives, the MRA community and centrists that Capitalism is their enemy not their savior. I fight for family values, Capitalism hates the family because they want people married to the company and to the profit motive, alienating us from our labor and each other.
But Ii sincerely wish I could put my two cents out there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@laur131306 the problem is, we all sell our labor for a wage. And that's ironically why some leftists are opposed to the ban or shaming or sx work. It is ironic though considering that socialism in particular is all about ending that exploitive relationship between laborer and owner. There is term for this btw, commodity fetishism. When people view themselves and others as nothing more than goods and utilities who's value is derived from their ability to sell themselves, their labor, their talents etc. We are reduced to commodities no different than the products made in a factory and discarded no different than a frozen meal when we are no longer of use value. Marx himself was vehemently opposed to sx work and found it degrading and yet another way to destroy the human value individuals, in this case wmen, have.
Men who are low income for instance and who can't afford their education, don't have the ability to sell photos of themselves online for people to get off to. Womn don't need to pay for something they can get for free whenever they want. Men on the other hand are typically only seen by womn as valuable to them or worthy as a boyfriend/husband when they are of a certain status and have a certain level of resource security. Hypergamy is real thing. And when this occurs at a large scale, polygamy becomes increasingly popular, where a few men have all the gurls cause they have all the benefits from Capitalism; resources, affluence, influence, status etc. The remaining guys are left alone and neglected of affection leading to a masculinity crisis and an increase in violent crime. Men who don't have stable relationships are 10 times for likely to take risky behaviors and act out impulsively. We need a better economic model that ensures at minimum, a basic safety net is provided and at most, private property is abolished and owned socially. Before anyone gets confused, this does not mean your toothbrush, car, house, kitchen utensils, tv, computer or any personal items you use for daily life. Private property refers to property used in the production process, factories, land, machines, etc. You own your phone but those who made the phone or work at the factory that made your phone do not have any right or ownership over the production of that phone and all the others like it. That the difference.
I'm an old school labor boy. Unions, universal healthcare, paid family leave, decommodification of the housing market... That's what I stand for. It liberates people from being owned and dependent on private Capitalists. Landlords, primarily rhe big ones on talking about, make their wealth via passive income extractions via rent. They don't produce anything. They make money off the producers who are forced to pay these people money to remain sheltered. We end that, less men would be lonely and more couples would come together. This is on top of culturally shunning behaviors that are deemed dysfunctional, exploitive or objectifying.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As a Marxist, i realize Marx was quite opposed to certain activities Kirk believes to be degenerate. He was vehemently opposed to pro situation and was very in favor of loving relationships, both platonic and romantic, he wrote in quite extensively. Engles himself in the Origins of the Family and Private Property talked about a society would become a "realization not just for women but for men too". Marx spoke about how Capitalism makes every old school foundation that kept sociality together antiquated before it could "ossify".
Vaush described the State of Nature, an environment that is chaotic nasty, violent brutish and short. This was described by Thomas Hobbes as being "man against man, all against all, man against all". Charlie Kirk later in the conversation mentioned Hobbes and falsely claimed that HUMAN nature was nasty brutish and violent, it is not human nature Hobbes warned about but the State of Nature that coerces man to act selfishly for his own gain due to scarcity and chaos.
As for the chase for freedom, i do not personally chase freedom. I chase function. I recognize that freedom can result in bad choices that impact overall the group so therefore freedom must be restricted. However, i believe freedom is necessary for a society to function. To strip away people's freedom of choice and thought is not effective and is not functional to a well oiled society.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I love how conservatives complain about homeless people and shame them for their situation but then blame the "Libs" for their condition to score political points by acting like they care. They also complain about how California would help the poor if they money from them but then go on to champion capitalism. They call the Dems socialists then criticise the Dems for being greedy capitalists who dont actually care about the homeless... ironic. We need actual Leftists to come in and disrupt this system and give the people their basic dignity back. These people, these homeless people, they need homes. That would help out so much, but oh no, "free shit" how dare those dirty commies give people homes who desperately need them so they can move forward!
The despair of being without a home harms us mentally, making the potentially already underlying mental health issues wayy worse. Its not a lack of character. Rarely ever is. It can happen to best of us. Those who dont have mental issues fell victim to circumstance. The cost of living, healthcare costs, low wages... For those who DO have mental health problems, many dont need to be locked away in a facility. That's not the answer. The majority need assistance but they first need a home, then we can truly help them mend.
No more shaming these people. Do you want drug addicts on the street or in their homes or safe places where they can be monitored? Im not supporting drug abuse or drug usage but alot of these people do drugs after becoming homeless, not before. So many of you are a paycheck or unexpected emergency away from it. I've lived in my car for years. Im disabled. Its really fucking hard. And the hate and the discrimination you get, the dirty looks and comments...even though i shower at the gym. It's awful. You are always self conscious. Afraid the cops will tell you to leave or that someone will harass you. No one knows how hard it is to get benefits from the government either. They act like its easy... its not easy. It takes years for most people to get approved, often with lawyers. And the amount you get? Not nearly enough to live anywhere. Housing should be a right. Healthcare should be a right, including mental healthcare services.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Here's my issue with this, s he has done this before, s he has competed on this level before. She also should have known going in what her "mental health" was like before going on stage. Instead, s he selfishly took a spot from someone else who would have gladly competed and would have done so not because of "fun" but because they would have a duty to perform, a duty they agreed to perform. If you sign up for something, and you make a promise you have to make good on that promise. S he bailed on her team and made an excuse, plain and simple, for why s he wouldn't continue. This is a further example of our culture nowadays, it's not even Simones fault, being raised in "me, me, me culture" where responsibility and duty are shunned as objects of oppression convinces everyone that's it's "stunning and brave" to just say "I know when to quit". It's not that we know when to quit, it's that we are encouraged to find any and all excuses to quit. Blaming stress is bs, everyone has stress, everyone faces pain and set backs, some more than others. Stage fright cannot be the issue since this isn't her first rodeo. And there are people with actual anxiety disorders who face lifelong pain trying to deal with their issue. This is not that.
Also, you are not, let me repeat that, you are NOT there to have fun. You are there to win or you do not need to be there at all. The issue wasn't that s he let down herself, s he let down her team and her country. Simone had 1 job, and was unable to even do that. A terrible performance proves s he already knew there was a blockage mentally meaning that someone else should have been in that spot in the first place. But because of a culture teaching that weakness is strength and quiting is bravery, this act is accepted by a majority of people who must also be weak and just also be quitters.
There is nothing wrong with knowing your limits, but forethought was of the utmost importance here and clearly none was used. All I heard was excuses, especially considering s he refused to comment on exactly what the issue was. This was not about her, it was about the shared goal of everyone involved who was let down.
"I don't even know if I enjoy doing this anymore" then why did you sign up and go into the Olympics then?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The problem is not that we don't have enough housing, it's that housing which does exist isn't affordable.
Community land trusts, rental and mortgage assistance, co-housing, tenants councils, union jobs, manufacturing brought back to the US, municipal and state built) owned housing, family assistance and incentive programs, restructuring zoning laws to allow for more than single family homes, housing first laws, renovating old hotels and turning them into mixed income units, and housing cooperatives. All of these things or a handful from this list can and will benefit the economic impact of the housing market and the majority of everyday people. Oh, and institute a land value tax.
And the guy mentioned immigrants. Increased immigration both legal and illegal results in higher demand which results in higher prices. So good job advocating for more of the problem.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm not advocating for communism, but, the criticism of today's world is describing their discontent with capitalism. Working longer for less pay and less vacation time, crappy jobs, lack of labor rights, automation, immigration and outsourcing limiting job opportunities, small businesses and cooperatives being overrun and out competed by too big to fail corporations, big money in government, no one having affordable housing or healthcare, education that doesn't actually provide knowledge or skills.... The Soviet Union provided all those things. It's 2023. Surely we can do those things for our people and do it superiorly by learning what did and don't work in previous and current nations.
That video of Gaddafi showed what a leftist and or national government can do. But even that can be built upon with out own characteristics. Free market Capitalism is never the answer. Because no one is free except those who own the most capital. If you rent, you're not free. If you rent your labor for a wage, you aren't free.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
America should have the following parties.
The Conservative party, family values, economic protectionism, non interventionism, streamlined welfare state.
Libertarian party, free trade and deregulation, tax cuts and elimination of most social programs, basic income or negative income tax.
Republican party, pro war, anti abortion, tax cuts and deregulation of the market, social conservativism, nationalism.
Progressive party, welfare state, social liberalism, affirmative action and diversity training, environmental protections.
Workers party, pro union and worker representation if not outright worker ownership of business, moderate social policies, nationalization of basic utilities like energy.
Democratic party, moderate regulation of the economy, free trade, half measures on healthcare and education, interventionism, aligned with tech companies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Men should compete with men. Women with women. Para-athletes with para-athletes. Trans athletes with trans athletes. Pretty simple. I don't know why we are even talking about this. Im Left wing, a genuine lefty, socialist. But i acknowledge science and the realities in our material world that are objective, science should not be political. Yes it's becoming political. Right wingers are anti-abortion despite the science around it. "Left" wingers are pushing gender theory which is not based in science or is at least overpowered by biology, physiology and evolutionary psychology. Right wingers deny climate change. Left wingers report that masculinity is harmful and dangerous... Its ridiculous. And lets talk about the gender issue. How can someone identify as a woman if what makes a woman a woman is merely a social construct that either doesn't exist or is on a never ending spectrum? How can someone FEEL like they are a woman? Isnt that promoting gender stereotypes and roles? Roles and stereotypes that are claimed to be socially constructed? And if someone doesn't identify as either male or female then how do they compete in sports? If someone chooses to transition then we are acknowledging that there is a binary and that you are going from one to the other. If gender is a social construct then why do you need to transition? HOW can someone transition if gender doesnt exist it is on an endless spectrum? And which is it? Is it on a spectrum or does it not exist? Because it can't be both. Its either an endless personal and individual identity, in which case the law should have no say or involvement in it because at that point its not something that can be followed. At that point gender is the same as personality. And if it doesn't exist at all then why have this conversation? Why claim to be anything? Why try to place a gender label on yourself if it is a purely cultural phenomenon that isnt based in evolution? At that point we go right back to where we were, we go back to understanding that our biological sex is how we should base our society and not our gender. Men can wear dresses and makeup, that's called a drag queen. It may be creepy to some, but its a way of life for others. Solved, done. A woman can be "butch" or a tomboy androgynous but so what? Should they identify as a different gender in order to rally against the social norms built by the dreaded patriarchy? Or should they be content with who they are? Why make a big a deal about it? If someone has gender dysphoria or an intersex condition then of course they are outside the norm, just like children born with extra toes or born conjoined are outside the norm. They aren't less human, they are people with a medical condition or abnormality. And dont gender theorists who refuse to allow studies to prove its a psychological disorder realize they are further stigmatizing the idea that if you have a disorder then you are less than. It perpetuates the lie that people who are or have emotional and psychiatric disorders like bi-polar disorder, anxiety, people on the autism spectrum and so on should feel ashamed that they have these issues. Its insulting to people like me who DO suffer from some of these mental and behavioral disorders. I want more studies to be done on the conditions i and other have to better be knowledgeable about them. But suppressing scientific inquiries about trans conditions is not only counter opposite to what they usually champion, which is "liberation" but its also furthering the myth that people either dont have disorders and should people just accept them without trying to help them and it leads to the ignorant stance that if they have a disorder that that is a bad thing.
As for the bathroom issue, if a man wants to use the women restroom but identifies as a woman in that moment who are you to say otherwise? Who are you to tell him he needs to feminize himself to appear more like a woman to use the women's restroom? Because now what we are saying is you can only be considered a woman if you dress a certain or look a certain way. We shouldnt discriminate against a "man" who chooses not to change their appearance at all but stil identify as "female" because they dont believe that women should have to dress or look a certain way to be female. Maybe they dont identify as anything... what then? What bathroom do they use? Should we just have co-ed bathrooms everywhere? But if we did then that is harmful to the rest of society who isnt comfortable with that. My mom isnt sharing a bathroom with a man. Im not sharing a bathroom with a woman. Many people will feel too uncomfortable and if say "oh just get over it" then what we are saying is that "cisgender" people's feelings dont matter but trans-people do. Also how can anyone truly be cisgender if gender is just a social construct? Just use the family bathroom...
I know this has been alot to read but i just needed to rant. Thank you for reading (if you did) and please take what i say with consideration. I have done much research into this topic but i dont know everything, but i want to know more which is why we should encourage further studies to better understand how this all works. Trans folks and non-binary people who read this (if you do) please understand that you are not less than human for how you feel but i firmly believe that you should accept your non-conformity and leave it at that. Changing and demanding others acknowledge that you have somehow switched genders, do not have a gender, can switch back and forth between them or fall somewhere on the "spectrum" is not beneficial to you or society. Accept who you are. Unless of course you have an actual medical condition such as gender identity disorder, which i hope you seek help for as their is nothing wrong with having a disorder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The individual and the community are inseparable... Its because of our interactions with others that individuals can have anything, achieve anything and find meaning in anything. Hello, it took two people in the community to come together and care more about your needs for 18+ years! That's the point of conservativism isn't it? Community, duty, responsibility, contributing to something greater than thyself, the congregation of individuals as part of an organism made up of various parts? All of which makes sense btw. Yet ironically, the very conservative values most people, even leftists, probably agree on mostly, is rejected in favor of rugged individualism despite the two being inherently contradictory. The greater good, the commonwealth, pulling your weight, starting a family, staying In line, confirming to a role, the rejection of the social deviance and the act of shaming people who hurt the viability of the commons, aka drug offenders, lazy people, artists, the unwilling to learn, the promiscuous... All of them rejected for what purpose? Because it's not productive. Irs not beneficial to the well-being of the community at large. If you're religious then I'm pretty sure jesus christ said idolatry of anything or anyone but God himself was blasphemy, that those who seek wealth in life with find themselves in fire in the afterlife. The poor man who gave five dollars to charity was more worthy than the rich man who donated 1 million. Getting mad at transactions occuring in the place of holy worship. Christianity is not Capitalism's friend. Neither should secular conservatism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah yes, globalism, immigration and "culture" will save us. His argument is terrible both from a conservative and a socialist perspective. Openness has gone too far. Immigrants hurt workers from local areas, not benefit them. Global capitalism hurts national economies for the benefit of international organizations and transnational corporations. Workers do need to have more skills, but that's because that knowledge of their labor allows them to better manage their own labor along with the other laborers who likewise have that skillful knowledge. But to have that knowledge itself, without any say over how that skill is used and for how long and for how much, is meaningless.
Conservative socialism is the future. Economy for the workers, workers of that region/nation/city etc, while workers elsewhere have the power to choose for themselves. Workers of the world can't unite if the workers of the world all immigrate to a small number of already developed countries. And those workers of the world can't control their own labor in their own country because global capitalism places embargoes on those people, global capital instigates and funds coups/assassinations of those people's leaders who dared seek a more worker oriented economy. America privately owned Venezuelan oil, until Chavez said "nope". Then that global capital said, "alright, if we can't have your resources, no one can".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Im a socialist. We should all be socialist. You talk all about camaraderie, well what do socialists refer to one another as? Comrades. Where do you think that comes from? Want male solidarity? Can't do that if our labor is not controlled by the workers and if those workers view one another as competition rather than collaborators. Unions were indispensable to the creation of the middle class and often, to successful marriages. Many men met their wives through their union colleagues.
Socialism values fraternity, community and individual contribution. Literally their entire philosophy is "from each according to his contribution, to each according to his need". Sure, alot of socialists nowadays are more focused on cultural elititism. But socialism itself is dominantly about power structures and material conditions. Capitalism alienates people from their work, from their fellow man and from themselves. Capitalism killed the family. Capitalism destroyed our communities. Capitalism turned everything on it's head. Socialism, or at the very least, socialist esque policies, staved off the negative aspects of rampant free market liberal ideals. If you value the ability for men to take control over their life, they need to have control over their labor. That means being a socialist.
Oh and if you genuinely believe a poor person in America has it better than a king or queen 150 years ago or whenever, you're too far gone and your mind is made of mush.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not a big fan of him even though he is very popular in the manosphere. If he is a threat to young men, its because he is a grifter who makes money off his audience of lonely, desperate men. But censoring him to prevent his takes from reaching people? Nah, that ain't it.
Men need a leader. They need a guiding hand, tutors, instructors and father figures. Nothing in this society is for men, but all of it demands that men maintain it and build it. Until women realize this, which wont ever happen (on their own anyway), then men like Fresh and Fit, Andrew Tate, Rollo Tomassi, Better Bachelor, Coach Greg Adams and others will need to fill that void and will serve a valuable purpose.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@purple-flowers well we produce our own meat so we dont need to get it from other countries. I eat meat about 5-6 times a weak, its a staple with my meals as i workout regularly. Meat should be the cornerstone of every course, with veggies as a side. Fish, pork, beef, shrimp, crab... Its all extremely important to a healthy diet. Liver, steak and tilapia are my favorite dishes. Im not changing my diet when its not my responsibility.
Yes, lets stop using slave labor to produce chocolate. Lets cut back on coffee and chocolate, which is not as healthy or necessary as meat products. Though this should be a choice people make, not a coerced change in peoples consumption. That said, factory farming and the consolidation of farming by big corporations is not my idea of productivity and animal agriculture. Locally produced, American farmers are the future as they were in the past. So is cultured meats. If we can produce meat in a lab from animals without the taste or nutrients going away then im all for it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You do have examples of monopolized industry today. Corn, oil, meat, nuts, cable, water/sewage, baby formula, shipping, paper towels, cheese, eggs, bananas, concert tickets, airlines (nearly).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So, a combination of bartering, mutual exchange, tragedy of the commons and "you will own nothing and be happy". Yah, thanks for proving my point btw. You literally just showed the WEF and it's stated goal in your video, then for some reason some how claimed it wasn't what the WEF was looking forward to in the future. How can you be this dum? Its not an accusation, its not a conspiracy. It's out in the open, in your face, proud of what it is and here you are, minimizing it. You ought to be deeply ashamed of yourself.
There are some redeemable qualities about this "library" economy, but the drawbacks seem apparent and dangerous.
"It doesn't mean we bring country club Karen energy though" yes, yes it objectively does. Its inevitable. And to some extent id even say necessary to hold some ppl accountable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't understand... If a middle manager (which is very anti socialism btw) doesn't personally profit more than the other workers, what is the incentive to lie about production? Also, if he is caught lying (which should be easy) why then can the Soviet government just not remove him with someone else who won't lie?
Finally, if there is a plan to do something and you discover you've fallen short of the objective, what other reasonable conclusion can there be besides "hey, let's throw more manpower and resources at it"? Seriously. I'm genuinely curious. Because the opposite end of that spectrum is austerity, which says, "hey, we missed this qouta or objective because we didnt have enough to deal with rhe problem like we thought, so let's cut the amount we have to work with further, surely that'll solve everything"...
Literally all of the inefficiency could have been solved if lying middlemen at workplaces were simply called out and sent to gulags for deceiving productivity data
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm a big fan of if it ain't broke don't fix it mindset. But there is so much wrong with this society both socially and economically. I am not progressive at all, I'm quite opposed to modern progressive ideology that desires to end the family, monogamy, gender roles, duty, responsibility, and hopes to replace citizens via immigration and champions multiculturalism to no end despite it never working in any society for an extended period of time. But economically, Capitalism has got to go. You can't be pro family values and then destroy labor rights. You can't fight for a stable and orderly community when it's every person for themselves in a rugged individualistic real world battle royale. You can't claim to want to conserve what's great about the world and then endlessly ruin it via resource exploitation.
I get people mad at me me alot. Conservatives get mad at me because I don't worship the feet of the Founders, I don't think "small government" is the answer and I do see liberal society (classical liberalism) as the way forward. But progressives get angry with me because I recognize that there is a binary, that the genders are different (though should be socially equal), I don't support wide drug legalization and I'm tougher on crime than most progressives would like. But with anything,there is nuance. Being tough on crime matters most after we improve material conditions. Rehabilitation is important but punishing those that hurt others is necessary. Eye for an eye. Blood for blood. Justice is blind, it doesn't care how it's achieved as long as it is. So we should make sure justice happens according to the law so that vigilantes don't run rampant.
I kinda went off topic, my apologies. I identify as a conservative socialist, paternalistic conservative, communitarian, market socialist, hell, I even created a term; Marxist Meninist. Its semi ironic but is does the trick. Ultimately I recognize the faults and the disaster that is Feminism and it's effect on people both men and wmn, and that we need to go back to more traditional roles. Those the rigidity of those roles should be scaled back. Freedom of self expression is important, so is self control though. Many conservatives I talk to, though I wish it were more, often come closer to the Left side of economic thought once I explain how the family unit is a decentralized planned enterprise, where each person's needs are met and the distribution to each member happens as is required. Each pulls their weight and has a role to fill. When I explain it that way it works wonders.
Family, Fulfillment, Fairness. That's my societal aims.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I keep saying this and will keep saying this for all willing to listen, Capitalism killed the family. Don't blame socialism for that, it's Capitalism that made it near impossible to have a household where only one income earner (typically the man) is enough, it's Capitalism that denies paid family leave, it's Capitalism that encourages vvomen to stay married to the company rather than a man, it's Capitalism that convinces men they should fight to exploit and oppresses one another to get the status they desire to attract a vvoman, it's Capitalism that has encouraged hypergamy via wealth inequality and hyper individualism, it's Capitalism which has destroyed the collective bargaining power, it's Capitalism which recklessly damages the farms and the land farmers used to rely on, it's Capitalism that blurred our biological roles so much that people don't even know what they are anymore, it's Capitalism that outsourced all the jobs and hires all the undocumented within our sovereign borders, it's Capitalism that destabilizes neighboring countries and expects the taxpayer to fit the bill via foreign aide, and it's Capitalism which has led to our failure to handle the pandemic not to mention brought us horrendous economic downturns which bails out those responsible and victimizes those who had no say in it.
If you support family values like I do, it's not socialism you should be blaming.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I just find it all hilarious. Im sick of these wmn living in recruit difficulty and then complaining about it. For any pathetic dude who gives money to these wmn, you are a disgrace. None of these OF gurls are independent, clearly, they are dependent on (s) imps giving them donations and clearly are incapable of creating any form of real talent to the world. Making money off of being pretty (supposedly) and exposing yourself for attention and money is baffling to me. No sympathy for any of them, not the consumers of it, not the producers of it. Sx work is not real work. Doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to cash in on objectifying yourself, but it provides no meaningful contribution to society. If our society wasn't so hellbent on destroying meaningful relationships then the need for OF content wouldn't be so in demand. It would still exist but not to such an alarming degree. The banks should have had nothing to do with this but sadly, they run the world and determine things, rather than principle, integrity, honor and responsibility. None of these OF wmn will suffer, there are endless other outlets and platforms for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@taragnor we don't need to educate people more than we already have. Everyone knows and has been warned the risks of doing drugs. If you choose to do them, you are not a victim. You chose willingly to place yourself in that situation. Also, I don't wanna hear excuses about "oh it's a coping mechanism". Too bad so sad, don't give a rats ass. I was homeless for 4.5 years, I'm still dirt poor and barely scrape by. Im disabled and have difficulty holding down a job and making friends. Yet I don't use that as an excuse to drink myself dumb, do drugs and eat poorly. I work out at home everyday. I eat as healthy as I can within. I avoid buying junk food and useless items that take away from my ability to pay for food and gas.
People have always been suffering. The point is to overcome it, hopefully collectively, since what we are capable of doing collectively is far more productive than what we can accomplish individually. If we collectively permit the usage of drugs then we will never be able to function as a society. Simple.
Again, making the argument that certain crimes are already associated with alcohol, which is illegal, so we should legalize other substances too does more to argue my point than yours. If alcohol is bad and readily available, why add to that with other substances? That is throwing gasoline on a camp fire.
Personally, and this is my opinion, not necessarily a fact or objective truth that should be actually implemented legally, but I'm not interested is maximizing freedom. Freedom is a lie and no free society has ever lasted very long without turning on itself or being overrun by foreigners who invade. Freedom of speech is the most important thing ever but freedom of action? Im sorry but people don't deserve that freedom because whenever they have it they use it irresponsibly. I care far more about function and order than liberty or equality.
And there is no such thing as a functional addict. That's an oxymoron.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is the problem with Tim's argument. He is complaining that a select few will "have" to work while the majority are automated out of the workforce. But, we already have to work in order to survive because that is how capitalism works. You sell yourself and your labor to be paid a wage that you can use to purchase things you as an individual deem necessary. In a socialist economy work is the incentive, not wealth gain. Work becomes, as Marx stated, "life's prime want". We as individuals can decide for ourselves what we want to contribute and how and who who we wish to associate with to contribute. We focus on our own interests and abilities, hence the term, "each according to ones ability" and provide that to the world. For example, a chef makes food not to make money but to feed others and know they satisfied someone else with their effort. The same thing goes for the developer of a video game. They make the game for people to enjoy because they want the public to experience their creation. Thats the incentive. Not the perverted incentive of capital accumulation.
I agree automation need to be limited or even illegal in certain industries. Automation for large factories and manufacturing plants should be fully automated but because of this, the community should have access to everything produced by these robots instead of the capitalist reaping the profit. UBI is not the solution it is a stepping stone to the solution, which is, equal access to the means of production. UBI slightly imitates this by giving money to people in order to have access to certain things at a limited level.
Family, free association and achieving the best of your ability become the meaning of society and life instead of working for a wage or accumulating wealth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Poverty and struggle dont make people sad. Humans throughout history lived in worse conditions and depression wasn't a major problem that we know of. Isolation, lack of family and friend connection, destruction of the family unit itself (whether nuclear or multigenerational), constantly comparison to others doing way better and living lives we wish to experience a fraction of... that's what leads to loneliness and depression.
I am a conservative. I always will be, likely always was. Conservative values like family, discipline, brotherhood, self sufficiency, gender roles and community are important to me and more importantly, necessary for society. All this said, the culture conservatives advocate for is destroyed far more by capitalist society and its individual focused viewpoint. Socialism in my mind is far better at maintaining and stabilizing families and communities. But the hedonism, the shamelessness, the lack of personal discipline and self restraint... it is because of rhese things socialism could never last long. That "red pill garbage" as you call it, is exactly what needs to become mainstream for socialism to thrive. Traditional gender roles are necessary for society to exist. Cultural and ethnic diversity/immigration is also a recipe for disaster and the destruction of society itself. Ppl can and should have their own nations, which are socialist preferably, but they need to remain there. Keep their sovereignty as we do the same. Many people can't coexist. Many others can coexist but can't share the same space for any extended period of time.
If you're a progressive (this goes for anyone) you're supporting a culture that benefits capitalism. If you're a conservative, you're supporting an economic system that doesn't care about your family values or self sufficiency. Logical consistency is not the same as ideological consistency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You seem very confused as to what it means to be Left wing. Joe Biden is objectively speaking a mainstream Democrat... There are very few left wing Democrats beyond Bernie, AOC, Katie Porter and Illah Omar. But even then, they aren't exactly bastions of leftism, rather they focus on progressive social policies. This is not what the traditional Left wing is. If you are pro capitalism, you are Right wing. If you are skeptical of capitalism and or want to move past capitalism, you are a Leftist. Most of these if not all of them, still believe in capitalism though of course with a regulatory system that protects consumers, workers and the environment.
I get very sick and tired of woke ideology interfering with the Left wing agenda of workers rights. Then again, you can be a social conservative and be economically left wing just as you can be socially liberal/progressive but have economically right wing positions. I for instance, an very socially conservative but have quite left wing economic positions. The AFD in Germany is very similar, as is the UAR in Romania and NatRally in France. Even Reform UK is rather economically nationalist, though I'd prefer they hone in on that a bit more.
Ive been criticizing for years leftists who claim we should focus on economics instead of culture war issues because ultimately alot of them end up supporting those progressive cultural policies, but simply don't want them to be in the spotlight. I am not a class reductionist, i recognize the importance of culture in society, and I believe a conservative culture is best for society and a more social oriented economy would best supplement conservative values.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Even the CIA, who was staunchly anti communist, had data that showed the caloric intake, literacy and healthcare outcomes of Soviet citizens. So it's untrue that there isn't evidence to suggest their successes.
The market only pays those who follow along with it. Skills and innovations that aren't profitable don't get through. Which often time what is best for society is not best for private capital.
This is the problem with capitalists, they narrow everything down to people. "so you're saying there are bad capitalists". No. Its not about the people themselves. It's about the structural imperatives of the capitalist mode of production itself. For example, a liberal will say we regulations to curtail the negative externalities of capitalism and we need more diverse landlords. The socialist says no, we don't need to continue prescribing pain killers if we know what is causing the pain and repair it outright. We also don't want a more diverse array of landlords, we don't want landlords period. Workers have to put up with bad bosses and polices all the time or else lose their healthcare, income and whatever else to subsist. That's the difference. Workers have only their labor to use to live by. Socialists believe that should be enough. Capitalists want to instead profit off others labor productivity and reap the rewards made by others hands.
Governments do not create monopolies. Quite the opposite. It's deregulation that incurs monopolies and the second the government steps back on its enforcement the creation of monopolized capital skyrockets faster than ever. We see this time and time again. What government does do, is benefit already existing monopolies via lobbying that ensures centralization of wealth happens even more for the capitalist. Whatever criticism you have of government corruption, always ask the question, who is funding the corruption. You will always follow the money trail back to an oligarchical capitalist.
Edit: I don't want John or Jose to become the next Bezos and create the next Amazon. That's the point. You cannot do that without the exploitation of millions. What is the number of Amazon workers on food stamps? I don't recall the exact number but it's over 60%. By definition, that is a starvation wage since their wage must be subsidized by government welfare. That's not a good thing. Now is Stalin any better? That is where I disagree with the Prof.
"At the cost of millions of people" he says over and over and over again. I wanted him to become one of those millions lost after awhile. We get it. But what about everything we have today? Coffee, chocolate, cars, batteries, refrigerants, oil, aluminum, steel, our plastics, clothes, component parts etc. At what cost globally do we as Americans benefit from the cheap labor of those people around the world? What about transporting dangerous chemicals on trains that derail and explode? What about the cost of the people from east Palestine? Do they not matter?
And then he tells the Prof to move to a country that no longer exists... He's not defending Russia you bafoon. He's making the case for why the Soviet Union wasn't as bad as American propaganda claims.
Wait wait wait... Now he's blaming socialism for the backwards rules of theocratic Iran???! Negative IQ points.
Plenty of refugees and migrants come to America for handouts. That's literally the problem we're having right this very minute at the border..
"How hard was it to get a PhD" who cares!? How hard is it to repair sewer lines and clean rooftops? How hard is it to climb cell towers? How hard is it to maintain a family farm? Infinitely more tasking and strenuous than it is to become a professor. You'd think these people with important labor intensive trades jobs would make hundreds of thousands. But they don't. The market instead rewards a PhD more than the gritty blue collar workers who maintain our society. How do you explain that?!
"What can I do to my employee who flips me off and quits? Nothing". Yeah sure nothing at all. Besides taking away his health insurance, income and blacklist him from other places of employment. But yeah other than literally revoking everything he had to remain healthy, sure, you could not do anything. And 40 million were killed because they quit working? Now we're just making stuff up. Btw, Right wingers approve of that. If you starve it's because you chose to be a slacker and not work for your meals. So what are you complaining about? According to your ideology, 40 million lazy bones got deleted for not being contributing members of society.
Saying that America refuses to ban Chinese Owens TikTok isn't exactly the pro market position you think it is champ. America should ban it. It's in our national interest, not the interest of global capital. We d not have freedom of speech in America btw. Talk to literally any conservative or anti anti war, pro union lefty. Censorship is the name of the game.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nunyabidnis3815 order is determined by function. What determines function? Whether or not the net impact of a decision whether by an individual, group or governing body is net neutral, positive or negative. If the result of that decision was negative and would be negative consistently across the board should it be adopted as a behavior then it's net negative and therefore dysfunctional. If the behavior does not have a clear or overbearing impact on society as a whole then it would be considered a net neutral impact and therefore a tolerable behavior not to be shunned or encouraged. If a behavior, sets an example that is results in a positive outcome and it influences others to take part in similar cooperative behavior then it is a net positive and therefore functional and should be supported by the majority.
I'm called Rex the Rebel because when I was a teenager I was part of a youth Golden Gloves boxing gym. I had a mohawk and looked like your stereotypical punk rocker. Hence the name. But philosophically and politically in a rebel in the sense that I don't fit into any traditional category. I'm an atheist and am avidly anti theist but I'm conservative on cultural issues for rhe most part, but despite this I support the legalization of sc work (even though I despise the practice, it serves a function), yet my economic beliefs are decidedly left wing since I'm a socialist and oppose the private ownership of land and capital. I'm a Marxist in the sense that I recognize and acknowledge historical materialism, class divisions and the concept of wage slavery. Yet I'm not a communist of either the Marxist or anarchist variety, as I tend to support market socialism, syndicalism and guilds. Though I appear all over the place and ideologically contradictory that is because I am not interested in ideology but function and logical conclusion based decisions. If I am logically consistent that is all which matters. I do not advocate specifically for a libertarians or authoritarian position simply for the sake of it. I support free speech because suppressing it is dysfunctional and prevents the subject of what is functional out of proper discourse. However, I do just t support the legalization of drugs because it does not lead to productive, reliable, honest or trustworthy people and often results in undesirable outcome not only for users but members of their community, their workspace and their family.
What someone's worldview is is irrelevant. All that matters is behavior, the intention and the outcome. I care little about what one says, rather I judge someone based on what they do. And everyday we choose and lose friends because of what they say or do. Politically, how we enforce order is by having law be determined by order and not law determining why's order is to be. And again, order is derived from function and more specifically what is overall functional. Certain things that are undesirable serve a function in the absence of an overall functional state. Obamacare for instance serves a function but it's purpose that it serves and the function that it provides would be obsolete if a universal single payer healthcare system was in place. The refund the police movement only works if the material conditions of a community are already improved, the proof of this is the suburbs. Where there is little inequality there is little crime and therefore little need for a robust police force. The concept of the family, whether nuclear or extended, is key to society as it provides the basis of what society is built on, cooperation, separation and respect to skill and contribution, distribution methods to best serve all those involved in the unit, a sense of support and growth, stability and proper social skills. Therefore values around the basis of the family are critical for the majority to uphold. There is always room for exceptions, without filth we cannot know what is clean. The need for rebels keeps the powe structure in line and in return the power structure keeps everyone else in line. The social contract is immensely important for civil society. Emphasis on the civil aspect. When workers are neglected, men are rejected, womn are objectified and responsibility is vilified then hope for social stability and order is lost. Freedom is not free, duty, responsibility and self restraint are essential. Lest we fall into sociological anarchy.
1
-
1
-
@nunyabidnis3815 as I stated before, situations and certain environments change the importance and the necessity for certain functions and that would be taken accordingly. Ideology should not dictate anything. Material conditions should. Objective aspects of our reality should.
We only know to have laws in place because we recognize certain behaviors are disrupt social cohesion, some more than others. For instance, jaywalking, despite being pushed by the automobile industry, had an impact because the invention of clear road laws had yet to be determined. Many people would walk in front of and cause accidents. So laws were put in place to reconcile the sharing of pedestrians and automobiles, though it can very reasonably be argued that car dependent towns are a blight both aesthetically and cost wise as they take in more money than they give back.
As for who defines the harm, it depends on the system in place. In a socialist society the workers or the community itself would. In Feudalistic times, landlords and kings did. Today in modern Capitalist society, codes of conduct not driven by Capitalism are made unable to "ossify" as Marx stated on Capitalism's refusal to let any form of value, norm or social behavior exist outside the need for consumerism. So a battle between business, voters, experts and politicians all vy for control. However, what is the most functional for them dictates their motivations. But that's why the aggregate is more important, that's why the general rule is important. Because as a general rule, while outsourcing, low wages, illegal immigration and deregulation might be the most functional for widescsle profit, the negative externalities that affect consumers, domestic laborers, foreign labor, the environment and the upkeep of social interdependence suffer as a result. Weighing the pros and cons needs to be deliberated on based on facts presented.
It not functional for a purely centralized or decentralized system to determine prices and production. A mix of both is necessary. Life is complex but actions and outcomes speak for themselves. I don't need to jump off a bridge or stab a needle in my arm full of heroin to know that neither of those things are good for me, neither of those things are subjective statements. The more we make things subjective the less we can even rely on truth to dictate how we operate our lives. I fight against people's perception of the truth because ones perception is irrelevant. Someone may truly believe that they are a ghost and act like they are, this is their experience and therefore that's makes it real to them, just like someone who is schizophrenic or anorexic. But it doesn't matter what their experience is because their truth does not determine the truth. Material reality does. Someone's faith is whatever god they believe in does not make it so because they have enough faith. Religion is so atrocious for the very fact that it is so interpretable and unobjective yet millions live their life by it. Sure, religions can form a sense of social commonality that helps that community flourish but we need other things that are concrete and evidence based to determine that common sense of values. If it ain't broke don't fix it. This is valuable because it shows what works and what doesn't. Things that don't work should be replaced. Its very easy to determine what works and what doesn't when looking at things for what they are.
No system is perfect, that's because humans aren't. I'm not asking for utopia, I'm not an anarchist who believes society and it's inhabitants will spontaneously and magically all recognize how everything and everyone should fit into place. The O in the Anarchist logo is just that, an O, not a circle. It stands for Order. But they believe this order will come about spontaneously. I do not. It takes time, trial and error, arguments.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, we do not know that "animal agriculture is a leading cause of the crisis". It was my understanding that a single almond farm in California uses more water than every other meat/dairy farm in the US combined. This is according to Boulder St University. The majority of our farmland cannot produce crops and the only way to have healthy soil to make crops is to use animal fertilizer. Which is natural and organic. The leftovers of vegetable farming that humans don't eat are fed to cattle like pig and cow.
So who's farming practices actually produce the most waste? Because animal product provides meat, clothing, dairy, eggs, fertilizer, enrichment of soil and many other uses. What uses does your veggies create? Hmmm, none. Except imitating what meat already does and less efficiently.
Sure, I'll agree that factory farms are harmful not just to the environment but to the animals and therefore humans too. But the answer is localised farming and regenerative agriculture. Not eliminating meat and dairy. The answer is to stop monopolistic control of the meat industry such as Tyson , which controls near 94% of Chicken production in the US. That's a far bigger issue than neat consumption itself. If it weren't for humans regular consumption of meat, specifically cooked meat, our has structure, teeth and even out ability to digest certain vitamins would not exist.
1
-
My mom and I are homeless, have been for three years. Three good damn years. I'm autistic and she has arthritis. We live on fixed income. It is no where near enough to feed us the entire month let alone help us afford a small apartment. And the assisted living programs are useless. We've been trying to work with them for years. It is backlogged because so many people need homes. And there are more than 560,000 homeless people. Those are head counts where groups go twice a year to look for those living on the streets and also by counting those in shelters. News flash, most homeless people choose to go it alone on the streets than in a crappy homeless shelter. Many of us live on your cars. The fees that homeless people have to deal with are bad, car insurance, can't afford it. So you get pulled over for a cracked window which you can't fix because you can't afford it. So you get a ticket which you can't afford to pay for something that you were unable to afford to pay for... Evicted from your home because the water bill suddenly became separated from the main rent which was rising every year, storage unit, price goes up every six months. That's a hundred out of your limited income. A loan you needed to get to eat because you didn't have any money that month because of a car emergency. That loan given to you so you could eat and not die had 115% interest rate. 18mknths later and you're paying it off. Another 400 dollars down the drain which put us in the same situation over and over and over again. 20 dollar gym membership which becomes 30 dollars because your fee is either late or unable to be paid so you can shower... Food and gas expenses so you can survive and get from place to place, like the library for instance. A salvation of sorts.
People don't need to build more middle class apartments. People don't even need to build low income apartments and housing. There are already enough apartments and houses to go around for every homeless person, 6 for each infact. Shelter, internet access, a kitchen to cook or own meals instead of being forced to buy fast food or eat canned food from a food bank. Is like to make money online from YouTube videos and streaming. I'd also like to sell chili that me and my mom hope to make with a new recipe we've been thinking up.
And you're right, Kyle, no one talks about homeless people. When they do it's for 2 minutes. And it's usually to demoralize them and blame them/us for their/our condition. Instead all I see anyone talk about is immigrants this and immigrants that. The poor immigrants. That desperate people who need or support. Well where is my support? Why is it that these immigrants receive all the sympathy and attention? Why are they considered desperate and selling economic opportunity while I'm not? Because I and most are. We get lost and ignored. No help is given to us. Yet these immigrants often illegal are given more than we are. They are promised more and get treated better than us. I'm not familiar with too many illegal immigrants being homeless. Tell me why is that? And I've seen the photos of these migrants supposedly traveling miles and weeks to get here. The clothes they wear are often now expensive than we spend on did in two weeks. They don't look like they are struggling. They look like people who decided to go for a hike. They may have issues but mine and other homeless people have problems that area probably worse. I would like to add that we are citizens. American citizens victims of brutal class discrimination and capitalism. Capitalism then exploits these immigrants but these immigrants also exploit us, our asylum laws and our legal process. The reason so many come here illegaly is because of how good they have it when they arrive. If is easier than entering the correct way and they don't have the same responsibilities citizens face. If it was so difficult for them they would not continue coming. Yet homeless people are still here. Suffering while illegal residents live in the homes that belong to us instead. They get healthcare and access to colleges to recieve education that citizens homeless or not do not get. We cannot have Medicare For All and free college if we continue to have such lax immigration policies.businesses who hire these people before citizens should be fined. Those who have been here illegaly for years should pay fines, the longer the illegal stay the larger the fine. Those who allow illegal immigrants into their homes should be fined. We need to limit how many people come in here. 12 millon are here illegaly that's not ok.
Homeless citizens should come first, they should be priority number 1. They have have just as rough if not rougher. America needs to get it's priorities straight. It's priorities are ending homeless, Medicare For All, universal basic income (which would help eliminate poverty), affordable education and infrastructure as well as investing in low income communities to help them build their own local markets grow and flourish rather than large corporations. These large corporations are not the job creators nor these communities need. Self management, worker co-ops and and small businesses are what these communities need. And limiting immigration is also a good policy. Rich immigrant or poor immigrant matters not to me both are harmful to the workers of this country.
America first, Americans first. Let's fix our own shit before bringing in more to exasperate the situation. It's a distraction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Question: "why are you so angry?"
Answer: because I'm constantly told I have mass amounts of privilege yet haven't seen or felt any of them. I was homeless for 4.5 years (as many men are as compared to wahmen), I now have a trailer that is way overpriced but is all that is available and partly paid for with assistance from local government aid, I don't have WIFI or a computer, my phone is cheap and cannot handle recording videos which is what I want to do, I want to be a streamer and I really felt the same as that hotel employee because we are both disabled and have issues holding down work. I am alone and single and I see that the behavior most people, most wahmen are partaking in is behavior like what we see on these streams. This culture we live in now is so selfish and irresponsible that it creates it's own villains and blames those people for fighting against all of this crap. I'm angry because I can't respect someone who doesn't respect themselves or anyone else yet demands they receive respect and approval despite it all. I'm angry because I'm not the only one suffering, millions are yet no one cares and no one wants to do anything about it because it's not profitable and does not fit into their woke progressive narrative. I am by no means a Right winger, not by any stretch of the imagination. But I'm sick of people constantly acting as if they are superior to others when at the same time they shame men for supposedly being "superior" or "systemically benefiting" from the world. I'm angry at the double standards, the hypocrisy and the never ending irony of all this. The degradation of moral fiber and objectivity in the world, the constant whining about meaningless things yet the dismissal of issues that matter. In angry that I've lost hope for society because society has given up on it's people, on its priorities to them and to the stability and freedom we are supposed to want to have. And I'm angry that so many are willingly leading us down a path to destruction and that most who oppose publicly all if this crap are just as partisan, subjective, wrong, foolish and corrupt as their opposition. I hate that moderation, balance and the need to understand what that is has been long forgotten and in fact rejected.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Very interesting video. I love seeing this. Personally i have many progressive and conservative ideas but i identify as a socialist. SJWs are not "far left" btw, they are closer to the center as most still support capitalism. Anyway, i don't identify as a feminist but i do mostly support progressive policies and values. Its also interesting to see a progressive trans person not be a feminist, but i think that's cool, shows that even amongst "Left" wing people they don't all degree; obviously. To the girl in the red scarf,i have to say, black power is definitely anti-white as the majority of leaders for the black power moment either supported segregation and didnt want us interacting or they fought for black supremacy, that just historically true and even today when i see someone support that movement they seem to be very discriminatory and hostile towards white people.
And men dont privilege. privilege is based for more on the basis of class and wealth than it is gender, especially nowadays with how privileged women are over men. Everyone has privilege over another. That one girl said she was homeless for awhile, i know what that's like. Im homeless and have been staying in my car for 3 years. Im a man, and homeless people are disproportionately men. Those who do better in school and who graduate or likely to be women, not men. We should not focus on what divides us. Constantly talking about "male privilege" is why so many men, like myself, cant consider myself a feminist because I have no privilege. I never have. I grew up poor to a single mother, who got inured on the job and now finds it difficult to work. Even worse, im autistic and so its very very hard to hold down a job for me, i wished it wasn't but it just is. Of course conservatives mostly don't get that and claim its an excuse and that we "deserve" to be poor because if we wanted to then we wouldn't be, even though that's blatantly false. it's good that they acknowledge that "patriarchy" is not men though and that men are victims too. There are plenty of women who have power and privilege and there are plenty of men who are. We divide it on gender and not class, that's what bothers me. And the black girl in the red jacket really made a good point, we need to push for legislation and policy to get us to a more equal, free and fair society. To me, that means free or affordable college, universal basic income, medicare for all, small business incentives and business cooperatives etc etc. The black community especially needs these things. Large corporations don't help poor blacks, small localized markets and businesses do, worker cooperatives do. That's what those communities need. More funding towards schools in rural and poor neighborhoods too, regardless of the racial demographics.
That girl in black though... what a dumbass. Im sorry but c'mon? Really? You voted "as a joke"??? Wtf? And the girls response to her was perfect. All of theirs. But the red shirted girl doesn't realize he is a bad business man. His business dealings are shady as fuck too. AND he just gave nuclear technology to the Saudis. The excuse given by conservatives is that its better the US does it instead of China or Russia... but that's misleading and dodgy. And again, Trump has broken many promises. Lower the deficit? Nope, that exploded. Choosing not to touch healthcare? Nope, he cut it and ripped it apart, hurting millions. The wall? Nope, even with a majority he couldnt do it and then he waited til the midterms after the Democrats gained seats. And he blamed them for the shutdown... give me a break. I wanted to give Donald a chance when he entered office but he failed me and America time after time. Im done with him and if he gets reelected my mom said we'll flee to another country and claim we are economic migrants due to our abysmal financial situation. And again, the Jewish lady in the black one siding this argument... conservatives haven't been mean to you because they mostly agree with you... I wore a shirt that read NRA: Not Rational Adults and i got jumped for it. I wear my Bernie shirt and i get harassed constantly. My Socialism t-shirt that reads, "A system where greedy and lazy bigots steal from the laborer and give to themselves... oh wait, you mean capitalism"? People coming up to me all the time and talk shit, calling me stupid and that im "anti-american" and that i want to make the US Venezuela, that's every conservatives defacto argument.
Quick answer from me about abortion, im pro choice. Not anti-choice. There is no pro-life, its anti-choice. You don't want teens to get pregnant? Don't want black babies out of wedlock? Pro-choice is the way to be. Its not a baby, its the potential of life. So is my sperm... so what? And conservatives really are over blowing and misrepresenting the abortion bill recently passed. Planned parenthood to kill black people? Give me a break. Less people get abortions when its legal. Less teens get pregnant now anyways. And not only that but poverty leads to this too. So if you don't want abortions, help eliminate poverty. Sex education is important, teaching us not to engage in casual sex is important. The MeToo movement had good intentions but it devolved into an actual "girl cries wolf" witch hunt that showed its hypocrisy and its bias towards hurting men who didn't deserve to be vilified. Feminists and the MeToo movement have damaged the relationship between men and women, its made men and women unhappy and it has broken up families... its why we have low fertility rates because men don't have sex as much anymore largely because of how many women are and how the economy is. Its so difficult to approach women now because they are super paranoid, im not a predator. Im a shy guy who is awkward... im not a villain who wants to hurt men. I love and respect women, im against casual sex and i prefer monogamy. So no, im not some horrible person looking to use a woman. But ive experienced this. Its also something many of my friends both male and female have experienced. And to the point about women being afraid of men, i get that, i totally understand that. But if you are at the club and drinking... you aint scared of shit. You are there to flirt and go home with some guy for a hookup, likely while drunk. So don't give me this bullshit of "oh i was so scared", bitch no you weren't.
You're Muslim and you are bisexual and you have sex outside of marriage.... you are not Muslim... denounce he religion because the religion specifically denounces you. Progressive Muslims piss me off with that hypocritical shit. Also, you are against the patriarchy but subscribe to literally the most patriarchal culture in the world... what an idiot. You can't even show your hair.
And consent is a difficult subject. i don't need to consent to ask a surprise my friend who is a girl and hug her from behind. I know her and she knows me. We don't always need consent.
The gender thing is soo tired. Gender has become the same thing as individual personality. Its not. It should not. If you express yourself a certain way with dress then that isn't your gender. Your gender doesn't change nor is defined by your attire. If you are transexual then of course you can and should be accepted as a third sex/gender. That trans person in this video became a woman, why does she feel she is a woman if being a woman and feminine is only a social construct. The gender non-binary debate contradicts itself at every turn.
Awesome video btw. I enjoyed it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The people who cry about "class reductionism" are dead set on dividing the working class into separate groups instead of one mass proletariat. Marx did not want us to fight about who was the more oppressed, he wanted us to fight against those who were the oppressors. The white man and black woman working under the harsh conditions at Amazon have far more in common than they do different. They claim we should not deflect blame to immigrants or black people but then deflect that same blame to a group of innocent people because of their race, their race happens to be white. You aren't going to gather a coalition of people who have been told they are privileged and are racist cause they are white. You will create racists, the thing you hate. They are manufacturing their own villain. White people who are disaffected, poor and angry hear non-stop that they are the villain, that they oppress others and benefit from this supposed racist system when they themselves are under the boot of desperation. They hear all the pandering to minorities and think, "wait, I'm not the bad guy... Where is my issues being addressed? Where is my affirmative action? Where is my housing voucher?"
When woke identity obsessed liberals put arbitrary conditions over the real issue, those who own the production and those who make it, you lose part of that group. You demonize a group of people while at the same time calling for unity and insisting that we shouldn't generalize. They say we shouldn't blame blacks for this situation but then around and blame random white people.
What a strategy... those so called "socialists" on the Left who focus on race over class should be ashamed of themselves. Like you said, Kyle, you wouldn't have a bunch of people blaming immigrants and blacks if everything was hunky dory. Of course illegal immigrants are most certainly partly to blame but that's not the point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I personally don't agree that freedom is something that we should fight to maximize over all else. I prefer functionality as a goal. And of course without levels of freedom guaranteed to the society, it can't be functional.
However, your position on relationships being organic is nonsense. Most are by circumstance. Friends of convenience and proximity. Today, relationships don't typically exist and if they do it's short-term only. Intimacy is dead. Love is dead. Arranged marriages come in two forms, the form he was suggesting was forced rather than consensual. Indian marriages exist in both forms but their relationships are healthier on average. For better or for worse, for richer or for poor. Unless someone is being abused or both parties agree, you should not be allowed to divorce. Marriage was created for a completely different reason than the atrocious one you listed. Marriage was a tribe recognizing two people being unified, their families mixed as one now. That's what a wedding was, a ritualistic recognition of that union. It insured that abuse did not happen because you would have to be punished for your abuse by the others family. It ensured the stability of the child. It also protected both husband and wife from infidelity, which in some places was justification for the family of the other to order an annulment.
Womn are not good at picking men. Clearly. That's why they have their father or grandmother or elder in the community pair them up. It's a system that ensures the men they are with are healthy, reliable, productive and kind. It ensures the womn paired up with the men are modest, dependable, nurturing and not the town bicycle.
Freedom without responsibility is corruption, responsibility without freedom is slavery. There has to be that healthy balance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So i wrote a WHOLE LOT and for some reason it didn't send. Which infuriates me. So ill shorten it this time the best i can without muddling up the point.
I dont care about these immigrants like many others do, im sorry. But my priorities are on the American citizens who are falling behind and failing. Immigrants and illegal immigrants in particular get all the attention and all the sympathy we can offer while millions of Americans dont even have healthcare coverage or the millions more who are underinsured. 40,000 or die a year from not having health insurance or being afraid it will cost too much. Around 500,000 people suffer medical bankruptcies a year. Yet illegal immigrants are given healthcare from OUR tax dollars. American citizens are fighting tooth an nail for universal healthcare and here are these non citizens benefiting from that before we do! They go to university for FREE while our youth drown in debt from trying to get an education to advance in the world and innovate. Yet we instead bring over foreigners to take these high positions, to get the glory and the accolades. We give grants to immigrants to invest in businesses so they can be shown that the "American dream" exists and is alive, then they bring over their family to reap the benefits of this alongside them. I know a Chinese family who owns a restaurant who benefits from this. Why do entrepreneurial citizens not get the same respect? Why do we not invest in our communities, more specifically our lower income communities? Invest in infrastructure, small business and worker cooperatives? We can actually learn a thing or two from these immigrants who run these businesses essentially like a business coop similar to how Joey mentioned. They assist one another and work together instead of competing against one another. We should do the same, we should be invested in the same way. No more subsidies to large companies. Instead lets help subsidize small business and local markets.
What about the alarming homeless crisis in this country that is exacerbated by illegal immigrants, who interestingly enough aren't typically victims of homelessness...hmm, i wonder why? Over 560,000 homeless people survive in the US and that is a flawed conservative estimate that is based on poor data and abilities to track all the people living in the woods, in their cars (i can tell you there are so many people living in cars) and not in shelters or after a day long head count once or twice a year. Where are these homeless peoples economic opportunity huh? We care about immigrants economic opportunities and desire for a future but what about the homeless people who deserve that same right and even more so. Immigrants, especially illegal ones get priority while we ignore the hundreds of thousands of homeless people who are shamed and blamed for the situation they are in, all the while immigrants are just victims who need help and who came in or are in a bad spot. Well so are homeless people. Afraid of being arrested simply for existing. Wondering if a cop will tell them to leave where they are sleeping, be arrested for loitering or for illegally sleeping "in public". Worrying about when we will get our next meal. How they will pay for gas or how to ride the bus to get to work or to somewhere with a roof during the day, assuming they don't get told to leave. Whether on the streets or in a car they are forced to survive in the heat of summer, the cold of summer and the rain. Immigrants distract us from focusing on homelessness. They receive housing and own property while American citizens, often military vets, abused women and/or children and the disabled are forced to live on their own in the elements without a bed to sleep at night. It sickens me. Homelessness is almost never in the news and when it is it is only for literally five minutes and then we go back to bitching about a dumb tweet or about immigrants and their rights being violated. What about the rights of failing Americans? Why don't they get the attention? Why arent their needs payed attention to? Why does no one care about my needs, my mothers needs or the thousand of other victims in a similar situation desperate and alone, much like these immigrants, who seek a roof over their head and the opportunity to start a better life? Immigrants whether intentionally or not (and i dont believe it is intentional) make matters worse.
We deport too few and don't turn away enough. We have our asylum laws being exploited. People skip the line and refuse to show up at hearings. They run around the country undocumented to do whatever they like. They demand to be let it. But we cant let every person or family who shows up to the border to be let in. "Ok im here, let me in" is not a reasonable policy. We use xenophobia and racism as excuses not to look at the applications towards stricter border security and immigration control. Its all to shame people who have a different opinion other than the one liberals and libertarians use to appeal to sympathetic bleeding hearts and big corporations who exploit them. If a business hires an illegal immigrant they should be fined. They should be required to inform the government when one applies. We champion illegal crossing and allow them to get off scott free, with no repercussions for violating the law and the legal process. No respect for us or other immigrants coming in the right way so why should they get the same respect? They should pay fines for illegally staying here. The longer they stayed illegally, the larger the fine. If they have been here more than 3 years and haven't committed a crime like fraud (which is hard to believe) or a violent act then they can get a path to become a permanent resident, but not a citizen. They lost that privilege when they arrived here illegally to leech off the system whose benefits should go to the American people.
I care about low income people who are disproportionately affected by mass immigration and illegal immigration. About the workers impacted and the wages. I strive for Medicare for all, UBI, affordable education and other programs that support the well being of our citizens but illegal immigrants threaten that. Poor communities, black communities and even immigrant communities are negatively impacted by mass and illegal immigration. A form of gentrification called immigentrification occurs and pushes the people out of their own communities, displacing many. They contribute to rising housing costs and low wages and hurt those who are already most vulnerable. The immigration issue is a distraction from the real problems and the elite members of society know this. Republicans use this to their advantage to halt progress. Democrats use this to shame Republicans for these problems even though Republicans didnt cause them, they are just banking off them.
I am against mass immigration, i am against outsourcing, i am against corporations from exploiting this opportunity and the people. I am for the American people. I fight low income housing, community homes and public housing. I am for investing in our infrastructure, especially in our most forgotten and left behind communities. I am for supporting small business, worker cooperatives and local markets. I support a universal basic income and a Green New Deal that tackles the issue of the massive corporations contributing the most to negatively affecting our environment instead of being told to recycle or use paper straws... Although im a Lefty, i do not support what is essentially open border policy. Immigrants are more of a burden than a benefit nowadays. Look at Europe as an example. Look at our own country. We claim we were founded as a nation of immigrants, duh, every country basically is. But those immigrants, also known as colonizers are routinely shit on for coming here are wreaking havoc. Our ancestors came here illegally by the way... and we shame them for that but also use that as an excuse for their own agenda to defend these modern immigrants. We cant take all these people in. We have 12 million already here illegally and even though we cant possibly deport all of them we have to do something. Until we solve our problems, immigration is going to have to wait. The border and the immigrants attempting to come here are going to have to wait. Just like how my mom is waiting for healthcare to deal with her diabetes and arthritis. Or how im waiting for roof over my head and kitchen to cook my own food and make my own recipes to sell to the community and contribute to the economy. I want my economic opportunity. And until me and other Americans like me get the assistance WE NEED im sorry but my sympathy for these immigrants will be limited.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Im torn on immigration, i really am. But i don't necessarily support a wall though i certainly support stronger border security and turning more people away as well as deporting those who don't came in the wrong way. Lets not reward people for cheating. Lets plce heavy fines on rich corporations and business owners (like Trump) for hiring illegal immigrants. Lets make it to where its nearly impossible for illegal immigrants to make it in this country because its really easy for them compared to even low income Americans, if it wasn't so easy they wouldn't keep entering illegally. But As for the "groupy" situation, those women purposely put themselves in that situation, just like all the women who had sex with Harvey Weinstein to get a leg up in Hollywood or to say. "holy shit i just had sex with a famous person", he was so bold and creepy because women regularly allowed that behavior and showed him that that behavior was acceptable. Being a random women in the street or in the club is not at fault if she is raped by grinding on a guy and toughing him certainly is, giving hints and eliciting that response through other various means are though. They invite it and find it funny. I saw it in clubs all the time when i was a doorman.
Oh my gosh, "Bernie Sanders is a millionaire" is such a dumb fucking argument. He wasn't a millionaire til he wrote his book. And what do you mean he has never worked a job? The fuck nonsense is that? Are saying being a politician isn't a job? And he worked when he was younger before being a politician... Not only that but he doesn't have 3 houses. He has a house in Vermont and a condo in DC due to his work. His wife owns the Maine house which she inherited. And so what if he's a millionaire? If his policies help relieve the debt and healthcare costs on millions then i dont give a fuck whats in his bank account. His whole ideology is that he wants people to have the time and money to write their own books and make money doing what they love... being a millionaire isnt that rich either btw. Trump is a fucking BILLIONAIRE! For what? Did he work? No. He lost money time and time again and got bailed out. Also that loan of a million dollars, yeah, why dont we do a similar thing like that for all Americans, like a certain Freedom Dividend of sort? HMM?
"Patriarchal hetero-normative world"??? Shut up you SJW loser you are just as whiny and annoying at Trumpists. Straight white male here. Im homeless and have lived in my car for years. I get discriminated against ALL THE TIME even before i became homeless because i am autistic and have tourettes. If anything, this country has become so lenient to members of the queer community that being straight has made you marginalized of sorts. But this is irrelevant because class matters far more than race but im a "dumb brocialist who turns a blind eye to racism" aren't i? But i guess we agree that the binary of political factions is definitely harmful. I hate the black and white spectrum of politics. Even the Nolan chart is greatly flawed. Im a market socialist, but i dont see too many people talking about market socialism. Where is my representation?
But my god is this black/Hispanic (?) woman a bitch, my goodness. So entitled yet she speaks of oppression. How do you experience racism getting dressed? Is there a 2 way mirror where KKK members in their robes cry because you are putting on clothes?? Im confused. And do you no go into stores that are typically in your race dominant community? because odds are you live in one. You could argue that itself is a form of racism due to ghettos. But then we have to look at the complexity of why those exist. But no, not every little thing you do is chastised nor do people give a flying fuck about you, an insignificant person does.No one cares what I do and no one cares what you do. If anything, me being homeless gives me more unwanted attention than YOU. Do you know what its like to be homeless? Because that there is true oppression. And the only reason im able to type this is because i am in a public library to escape the smoldering heat outside sense i have no shelter. Tell me about oppression when you cant afford to live anywhere and wonder when your next shower or real meal will be. Until then, do me a favor and shut up. And btw, if she ever spoke to me like she spoke to that idiot in the black shirt, we'd have serious problems. Talk to me like that, i fucking dare you entitled bitch. She pissed me off the entire video.
Donald Trump's prison reform is one of the ONLY things he has done that is somewhat positive. Not everything he does is horrible but nothing he does is great. But we still incarcerate more people than any other country.
What the hell is LatinX, i asked my 2 hispanic friends, (one is from Puerto Rico the other is from Mexico) and they have never even heard of it. But if you face "colorism" from your own people then how is that something white people caused? Its racism from people who aren't white. HOW SURPRISING!? Too white? Not Latin enough. Figures.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ironically those on the Left hate woke capitalism too because its all symbolism and theater. These corporations wont likely give better benefits, higher wages, have their employees gain through a company stake, provide better workplace standards etc. And god forbid the workers want some workplace democracy, that's socialism so we cant have it. These capitalist goons will gladly shift and embrace cultural norms because their environment wont change, they will still have yachts, mansions, days free to golf and party, etc.
Its liberal progressives and fake populist leftists who are woke and support what's called "rainbow capitalism", not classical leftists who focus on class solidarity, struggle and dialectics. One side wants to diversify the ruling class, the other wants to abolish (or at least minimize) class stratification entirely. Two completely different modes of thinking. Sadly, the performative and aesthetic viewpoint of political correctness and wokeism has surpassed traditional leftist thought and theory because old school anything is considered "outdated". However, new does not mean best. And sadly, their emphasis on new group identity politics in the form of intersectionality has divided the proletariat rather than unified them and not only that but it has led to a further resistance to class consciousness not only from the conservative rust belt and bible belt Americans but also the very progressive humanist champions they aspire to bring into the movement. "Religion is the opium of the masses" as Marx said, and i think it would be a shame that yet again his name and vision are being used to push things he himself would likely be opposed to considering he was a strict materialist who believed science and objective reality explained or could explain everything and that ideas were products of our material condition not the other way around. The post modern fools are not Marxists since they often refer to class struggle and the need for solidarity and fraternity among the working people as "class reductionst" meaning they dont want to hear how genuine Marxist theory doesn't align with their own.
Anyway, thanks for reading ladies and gents. As always; your favorite rebellious Marxist, Rex.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmmm, maybe it's idk, I mean I'm just speculating here but... Maybe it's the insane housing costs, bast wealth inequality, illegal immigrants being just blatantly let it and prevented from leaving, insanely strict and ridiculous laws courtesy of Gov Newsome, mass homelessness and no one willing to actually do anything about it, the blatant hypocrisy and obsession with being "progressive", silicon valley buying more land and raising the prices of everything for those who live there so much so that many employees of these tech companies have to live outside the city or even the state just to afford an apartment, the failing infrastructure, the engulfing infernos and/or the fact that language and existing as an ideological minority can get you blacklisted (woops can't use that word anymore) from working or even living there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So wait, suddenly I have endless opportunity because I'm healthy as a horse? Universal healthcare doesn't help me invest in MYSELF because I still don't have any fucking money! What the point in having healthcare if we don't have the money to help us assure our basic needs to begin with. I can go months without seeing a doctor. But every month I need money. Talking about all if this is redundant without a universal basic income. UBI gives people meaning by helping them find their own meaning. It allows them to invest in themselves. It helps them feed themselves and have the confidence to focus on what matters to them! Universal basic income would save me and my mom's life! It would save millions of lives! Homelessness won't end because they suddenly have healthcare they don't have to pay for. They need MONEY, money is what gives people hope and opportunity. I support Medicare for all 100% but it doesn't solve poverty, it doesn't solve homelessness, it doesn't solve income inequality. UBI or bust. Get on board or get off the way.
You know what gives people meaning? Art, music, philosophy, love, investing, writing, designing things. Working at McDonalds or for a sewage plant does not give meaning to people. UBI allows people to persue that meaning, whatever that meaning happens to be for that individual. And we need to respect that everyone can contribute in their own way. We need to evolve how we view the concept of work and contribution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wait what? Of course everyone deserves healthcare, food and their overall basic needs to be met. Why is that social justice warrior talking points!? Conservatives benefit from all these things too.
You deserve your basic needs met because we live in a civil society and not on the borderline is primitive hunter, gather tribes, who themselves ensured every member of the tribe was healthy, fed and had their own space.
The government should provide these things or else it has no purpose to exist. It's a social stabilizer meant to "provide the security and welfare" of it's citizens. And no, it's not taking from anyone. It's giving back a portion of what was already taken by those who own the majority of the resources... Is it theft that pays for the fire department, the military, police, postal service, Medicare, social security, etc? If you think so, don't ever call the police, don't ever say anything in support of the troops, don't complain when your house catches fire when your dumbself doesn't know how to cook and while you're at it, don't complain about tech companies and their oversight being non existent because the government would be the thing to step in and why do you feel you deserve not to have your voice suppressed?
We as a nation can easily afford and should both for moral and for practical reasons, make sure no citizen goes homeless and none go hungry. If we do, we are no better than the savages we fight against.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I wish i could run or president. Im bold, unapologetic, angry, independent, i support popular policies (though not because they are popular) and i want to go on to attack the establishment and beat the shit out of it. Im not nice, ill call you an idiot. Ill make it clear what i support, universal basic income, medicare for all and tackling rising housing and rent costs. Those big 3. I would say free college but honestly, i don't support it. Affordable yes, free? No. Im not paying for some SJW to take a gender studies course. Maybe courses that aren't elective but are for careers and trades. Steeper progressive tax, re-instituting workers bargaining systems and unions, environmental subsidies for cleaner energy, rising the minimum wage for businesses with more than 250 employees but eliminating a minimum wage for small businesses. Gun reform, treats guns like cars. Reform the prison system to free most non-violent offenders and take over private institutions, he state convicts them, the state holds them. Strengthen verify systems that penalize organizations that higher illegal immigrants, make pathway to citizenship easier (not easy) and prevent illegal immigrants to own land and property, especially considering that there are citizens who don't have a roof over there head. No more affiliations with most dictatorial countries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"the key to my success is just working hard, 18-20 hour days everyday of my life"... Righhtttt. This coming from the man who makes all his money from the product of other peoples labor in the stock market. By TRADING it. Oh yeah, bro. You definitely work hard. Gimme a break. Also, Timothy, man... you need to get out of your bubble and live in the real world. the VAST majority of communities already hire private contractors to mow and handle lawncare and everything else, meaning that high schoolers and young poor people looking for some extra cash cant mow lawns and pick up leaves during the fall because the neighborhood already has hired a company that does all those things. That's what i learned when i tried to do that.
Becoming rich is all about luck, meeting the right people and starting out with something beforehand. Those who start out poor are very unlikely to move up the economic ladder. That's just a fact. All these people seemed to start financially well enough off. Rich people should pay more money in taxes. Full stop. And those who pay the most should be multimillionaires, people who have 50 million plus. Also, the one girl couldnt think of any rich POC? Really? Oprah, Morgan Freeman, Steve Harvey (who used to be homeless) and literally every athlete and rapper you can think of...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pillmuncher67 fun fact: your argument is a logical fallacy. Another fun fact, even if that were true, which it isn't, it doesn't matter.
An even funnier fact, your argument is cliche and boring. They are not different. Gender is a word originating from the work generis aka general, generic, genre. It means "of the same kind, class, group". It was used so that prudish people even more so than myself, didn't have to say the dreaded S word that rhymes with Rex when discussing the topic. And if gender is separate from sex then why do transgender individuals need to undo or halt the development of their secondary sex characteristics? It's not secondary gender characteristics now it. You don't go on cross gender hormones do you? No. You are put on cross sec hormones. So again even if they were different, which they are not, it would still result in the argument being illogical because we don't determine society, sports, bathrooms, relationships etc based on gender but rather biology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why would drug use lower if its legal and easily accessible? I never understood that. And the Portugal issue is very controversial and uncertain with their results. Weed and certain psychedelics should be legal, laws should go towards small business and cooperatives (like Krystal said), large businesses producing weed and selling it are actually causing bigger problems then when street dealers were because street dealers dont have the ability to put a bunch of chemicals in it. They don't have state of the art technology. Many pot uses were afraid of it being legal and merely wanted it decriminalized so big money didn't hurt their business or hurt their customers. I understand their point, though i still think weed should be legal across the board in every state to avoid state by state inconsistencies.
As for harder drugs, those should most definitely remain illegal. I made a video about it on my YouTube channel in fact. If we legalize these harder substances more will have access and more will do it. It'll be essentially saying, "hey, try these for yourself now", they're legal. And look at cigarettes and vapes, alot of the population wants those banned or more strictly capped. Its for a reason. Cigarettes SHOULD be illegal. Alcohol shouldn't but look at how much is affects society. You wanna make that problem even worse by introducing other drugs into the picture?? Now way. There need to be rehab centers, sure. But many people dont wanna stop and dont feel they need to. They want to continue doing these substances, and can continue to since it would be legal. But it shouldnt be. And those losers who decide to throw their life away and do heroin or crack or whatever should go to jail, they are not productive members of society and pose a risk. They do more than harm themselves and the black market would still exist. Just like the black market with guns and alcohol still exists. So what? Hard drugs should remain illegal and the cartels will exist regardless.
heres my video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CdYDqo_jvU&t=1091s
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I know everyone has already said this, but these people RUSHED the border and assaulted officers. Were these people coming in at an official border crossing, were they applying for asylum? Not that im aware of. I heard from many sources that they denied asylum, starting at Mexico. They don't cooperate. The parents are to blame for putting their kids in this situation, if you want to blame anyone, don't blame the officers. Its weird for me to defend police but seriously... many of these people deserve asylum but they did not come in the right way and weren't trying.
My main issue is focusing so much on immigrants. I fight for citizens, the working class, the lower class. Not random immigrants who shouldn't not be priority. And i know you probably agree, but the Bible should not be the source of our policies. Jesus was an open border idiot who demanded to be accepted because he was the son of God. We do need to fix those countries so they don't have to come here. Im stopping at the "we caused the middle east" issue. BULLSHIT! We didn't start shit, they have been doing that to themselves for centuries. We didn't create those problems in the middle east, we are merely funding them. We did not CREATE them. I dont have much sympathy for the middle east, we dont control their governments. They are the ones who run their countries, we just help them do it. Dont blame us for the decisions made by a bunch of theocratic idiots.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm sorry Matt but I fuqing hate your absurd religious rants. Natural Rights were a concept invented during the enlightenment to oppose the Church's beliefs on Rights. Christianity, like most other religions, was routinely and directly responsible for the enslavement, domination, expulsion, extermination and conquest of millions simply because they viewed them as pagans, heretics, heathens apostates or spellcaster. Heathen literally means "he who is not under God and live ungodly". Atheists get their concept of Rights from nature and the realization that we live in society and as a society we must all acknowledge basic things we are all entitled to if we wish for such a system to thrive.
Me personally, I'm different. I don't believe in Rights at all. But I'm in the small minority. Matt, you need to realize that requiring an invisible, mythical man in the sky that sent himself in the form of his son who his actually just him in the flesh to Earth, to give you a sense of right and wrong, then that says alot more about you than it does about me as an atheist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fuck paper straws. Lightbulb advancement is great though, saves energy and money. But fuck corporations trying to force me, the consumer, tonuse your stupid, inefficient, unhelpful and decrepit sack of shit for a straw. I refuse to eat anywhere that has them, which luckily is very few places. And fuck people who say that planes are gonna be outlawed... No, the energy they use will be altered. People still need to fly to get across the planet. And if anyone actually is suggesting that ait travel go away then that person needs to be considered unfit to hold office. And no, I won't stop eating meat and no i won't be shamed by dumb liberals for enjoying meat. Meat isn't the issue, it's what we feed the cattle and how we handle our agriculture that's the problem, not the animals themselves. Local farms and natural fed cattle largely solves this issue.
And I've been saying for years that private companies caught hiring illegal immigrants should face penalties. First one is a fine, second one is a bigger fine and a third time is the revoking of their business practice, effectively shutting them out of their own corporation. As for the illegal immigrants afraid to say anything, they should be afraid. They should not fucking be here. They are not the victims. They forced themselves into this country without going through the proper channels. I have no sympathy for them. If you are illegal you need to leave or, prove how long you've been here and you can be given permanent residency. But full citizenship? Fuck no . I do not support encouraging people to come here and come to the conclusion that it's okay if they enter illegaly because the Democrats will love me and take me in anyway because they know I'll vote for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What am i always saying? The increase of market skeptical republicans and paternalistic conservatives can join a working class coalition. Sure, socially and culturally there are differences but that isn't nearly as important. We can argue the cultural stuff later after ensuring every citizen their basic needs such as food, housing, work, quality education and healthcare. We can also argue whether all these people actually know what socialism is but what we cant deny is that free market, lassiez faire economics is not workable. Material conditions matter more than anything, not to say culture doesn't matter, it certainly does, but it matters less since the economic base influences the superstructure.
As someone who leans conservative on social issues i hate that progressives have gone so far off the deep end that even being a moderate conservative makes you a bigot. We should have a multi party system but the two main parties should be a progressive socialist party and working families party. The former focusing on progressive social policies and the latter on conservative ones. With everyone largely agreeing on the economic front, the individual states and counties and focus on culture later. Cali can be as progressive as they want and Texas can be a conservative. Let Americans choose whether they want to live in a progressive or conservative locality, and in order for them to choose, everyone must have their basic needs met first. Class consciousness matters more than racial consciousness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Allow the Africans to develop themselves" but thats the problem. They can't develop themselves. They have proven they are incapable. Civilization never existed before the Europeans arrived. Heck, the "mohammedians" as they called them in this video, brought the wheel to Africa... When the Mohammedians left Africa (why they left is an evn more interesting story) did the wheel continue to be used for future purposes? Nope. It seemed to have vanished from history. Now all these years later after the colonial powers left, these countries and its various ppl are in ruins. Some, like Zimbabwe are completely dependent on the Chinese government to develop their wells, homes and infrastructure.
Without foreign intervention whether from Europe, China or Arabia the ppl of Africa would still be messing around with stone age tools. Despite being the oldest ppls in history with more time on their hands to develop than any other ppl, they were still in a technologically old world when the Europeans arrived. The Europeans who had less time to create and yet were responsible for open sea exploration amongst a slew of other technologies. The various metal ages (copper, bronze, Iron) were all achieved by Europeans. The Africans were still using stone age tech. They are now using European tech and Chinese tech, but at a fraction of its capacity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
But good guys with guns are not merely the cops. It's citizens wanting to protect themselves and their families. If good guys with guns, aka parents wanting to run inside and save their children, had guns and were allowed to enter rather than her tackled by cops, then maybe it wouldn't have been so bad.
Everyone should go through basic training to purchase a firearm. Just like if you don't pass your driver's test you don't get a license. You pass firearm training and get a card with your name, the guns you own and your certification of completion in training. It has your personal information and is ran through the computer everytime you purchase ammo or a gun.
Im opposed to res flag flaws btw. They could easily say, "oh this guy is a radical who believes in revolution and abolishing Capitalism, no gun for him" or they could say "oh you're a conservative bigot who doesn't trust hollywood, University or BLM, let's take his guns". No. No. No. Preventing the wrong people from getting guns, aka abusers or children, animals and spouses, should be barred. People with violence in their history, barred. We can cut back on the circulation of guns in this country too. Limit where they can be sold legally. But knocking on the door of a person, a citizen of this country and demanding they fork over their firearm because of a possibly offensive tweet? No. Unacceptable. If there isn't a reciet of them specifically calling out a person and describing what they will do with what weapons, then or should not be illegal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Matt. We don't live in homesteads anymore. We have wifi and internet now. We have cellular devices. That didn't exist in 1785. We live in the modern era with new technologies that make leaving one building for another building to sit in and work, obsolete. You do not have the right to say what work should or should not be done at a physical job location. The only thing that determines this is necessity. Is it necessary for a person to physically go to work at a facility to produce goods and package them on a line? Yes? Ok then. They have to physically leave their home and go to the facility. It is necessary for someone to drive all the way to work to do something they could just as easily do at home? No? Ok then.
Also, your argument about "entitlement" is fallacious. Child labor laws didn't exist then all of a sudden they did. How dare those parents feel entitled enough to keep their kids from working! It's the same argument that boomers give when they say, "back in my day". Well guess what gramps, this isn't your day.
Boomer: back in my day we had to walk to school in the snow, rain or beating sun.
Silent gen: back in my day public schools were few and far in between!
1700s man: well back in my day we didn't even have public schools!
Medieval man: backth henst in thigh days of life, thine peasentry hath been sent to the farms or the battlefields to resist hunger!
Caveman: makes oonga boonga sounds complaining that language and society, therefore school and work, wasn't even possible
Also, your job is literally to sit in front of a green screen and complain all day. I like that you can do this BTW, but don't you dare complain when others can and wish to do the same thing for their job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Belief in truth is not exactly something the progressives can claim to have either.
Not when they claim there are infinite genders, that CRT is not being taught but also is beneficial to society, that children are vulnerable to coof, that multiculturalism is good, that change is necessarily good, that welfare programs dont incentivise single motherhood, that, or that feminism has been great for people, that college is not an indoctrination center, thay voter ID laws are rahcist, that illegal immigration is positive for the economy, that Islam is a religion of peace, that the family is oppressive...
Progressives are just wrong on so many things and even more hypocritical.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Matt, have you heard of this little practice called, tithing, aka when a member of the church places a basket before you to place money in. You do it because your will be shamed if you don't place some change in it. It's not altruism. And who the fuq cares? I don't. Neither should you. I care about if something is beneficial or functional or not. Boo hoo, they didn't do it because of their own good nature. Which of course you have no way of proving or disproving. But let's say they did all do it out of coercion to live up to a social obligation, who cares? Why does it matter?
Shame exists for a reason. You yourself talk about it at lengths in regards to today's shameless culture. People aren't good. They need motivation. They need to be influenced and guided by a strong hand, whether it be god, a sense of duty, family, social contract, honor system or what have you. It's sets a precedent and leads by good example.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I know everyone to the right of me is gonna get triggered but here me out...
Gavin is an asshole, that's his schtick. He's supposed to be. I have no issue with that, but some of the things he says I genuinely cant tell if they are what he actually believes. My issue is with the Proud Boys themselves who beat people up just as much if not more than Antifa. They talk about how manly they are but then are proud when they beat up (often in a pack) these skinny, women looking protesters. Many of the members have genuinely been linked to racists and white hate groups, and many have been recorded (their own recording) saying truly atrocious things. The Proud Boys aren't a fraternity group anymore, they are a violent gang.
As for the bad members of Proud Boys and how when you have a big group, you will have idiots, you have to apply that to Antifa as well. You talk about how the left used to be a bunch of hippies and got mauled by police. Yes, then punk rock took off and they became "pissed off hippies" who fought actual neo Nazis and other similar groups in the 80s and 90s. They became Antifa as we know them today. And it worked, the neo nazi movement got kicked back underground. Punks are supposed to be "violent", they fight back. And I've seen many videos that are supposed to make Antifa look like the bad side and i leave thinkin, "Antifa really weren't the bad guys here". Then I have also seen people who identify under the Antifa moniker who do dumb shit. Its to be expected. They are so wrapped up in fighting the enemy that they create their own, sometimes ones that shouldn't be.
As for the trans thing, that's what we are seeing now. More and more kids identifying as trans or non binary because it's glorified in the media. It's horrible. These kids should just embrace their individuality and not focus so much on changing themselves to feel better about themselves. Often with no success. I don't think (in fact I know) Gavin should not have been banned from social media, but he did advocate violence. There is no getting around that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-tr9rw7ne8x relationships do require commitment and work, something which cannot be prioritized if we also prioritize the freedom of the individual. Relationships don't free the individual, they make like better and more functional for the pair and their offspring. The reason the individual is not as important as the family is because the individual doesn't exist at all without them. "society is not made up of individuals but the interrelations between them"- Karl Marx. Individuals obviously need to have their own individual identities but it's in connection to and in relation with their gender, their family, their work etc.
Gender roles are biologically influenced. Sure, some are pointless, some are socially constructed (which isn't inherently bad btw, we need social constructs for society to exist) but the majority if not so social constructs are at least somewhat rooted in biological science and evolutionary psychology. Relationships can only be realistically between a man and a woman because they can have kids and the point of a relationship is to bear children and raise them.
And I already explained why getting rid of gender roles hurts the family. It takes women out of the home, has them put off or completely forego having kids. It lowered wages for everyone because now the other 50% of the population was seeking work along with the other half. It makes men unattractive to women because they aren't economically viable partners, and the fact that women are attracted to masculinity. Men aren't attracted to masculine women either. We aren't supposed to compete for the same role. We have our own we are meant to fill.
Does everyone fall into it? No. But the exception does not make the rule. And there are several varying roles men and women and fulfill. Not all men are the same. But we all have common values and there are universal expectations that we all should live up to. If you dont want to meet those expectations, sell your house, your car and any other modern technology that comes from society, move into the forest and live like a primitivist. Cause that's the only place where you won't have to worry about society placing expectations on you.
Of course, the only reason we are questioning gender roles at all are because our society is so advanced and our lives so easy, that gender roles aren't as relevant as they once were when life was more difficult and we had to fit traditional roles or else perish.
People can have individual identities, but they should not put them before the family or community. And no, I'm objectively correct about monogamy being the most efficient and healthy form of relationship and has been practice worldwide for millennia. There's a reason homosexuality has not. And there is a reason men and women fit into particular roles no matter the civilization. They were even called hunter-gatherer societies for a reason. Men hunted, women gathered. Why? Because men and women are different, evolved to have different skills and traits. Gender is not real. Sex is. That's what matters. What you identify as means squat.
1
-
@user-tr9rw7ne8x you need to look at this as a collaborative effort. There is no I in team. The individual only exists because of the family. Community only exists because of families. A community is literally a bunch of families who's children have married to strengthen regional bonds and ensure that groups of people look out for another. The sole purpose of marriage is to have kids. That's not a debate. Throughout history, if a woman could not produce children hs could divorce her or bring in another woman into the relationship, who would typically work for the wife as a servant. Not saying we should bring that system back, I'm merely acknowledging the historical practices. Social constructs are absolutely necessary. All customs, norms, traditions and expected behavior are simply constructs. You expect me to come to work everyday, sober and not allowing my private life to affect my productivity? That's a social construct. I don't want you to take my property, my wife, my home etc away from me, that's a construct. Women don't want to be harassed and expect men to engage with them in a particular way that benefits them. That's a social construct. We declare certain things to be illegal because of the harm it causes to others even if it does benefit the individual who commits it. Those are social constructs. Did you leave the house with clothes on? Congrats. Social construct. Did you get frustrated when a guy on the freeway cut you off? Probably because he was inconsiderate, aka he didn't fulfill an expected norm designed to keep people in line necessarily. It's not to preserve freedom, it's to ensure security.
We don't install freedom apps on our one to protect our data and information, we install security apps. We don't have a Department of Homeland Freedom, was have a Department of Homeland security. We don't purchase Freedom Systems to catch burglars entering our home. We purchase security systems. It's not called Social Freedom Benefits it's called Social Security Benefits. Freedom is a lie. What's important is to be functional, healthy and productive. To live a life and to champion a lifestyle that prioritizes the individual over all else leads to selfishness, a lack of commitment, the refusal to accept self sacrifice, greed, jealousy and aimlessness. We need to realize that we aren't the main characters in this story. We are the extra. Life doesn't revolve around us. We revolve around it. And IT only exists because of people coming together, having kids, raising them with discipline and respect then exposing them to get world with others who they will eventually work alongside, fight beside and marry to keep civilization alive. We value friends because we value closeness and secure bonds. We value closeness and secure bonds cuz we were raised in a healthy family setting. People raised in single parent households are much less likely to have healthy relationships later in life. They are more likely to do drugs, sleep around and distrust others.
Also, the reason poly relationships don't work is because people need to focus and devote as much time and attention towards one person and their children. Much like how a classroom looses it's effectiveness at teaching students when there are too many. Poly relationships are about sex, not procreating.
1
-
@user-tr9rw7ne8x No. Agreeing to disagree is what weak people do who cant win an argument. I didn't contradict myself and people do not marry for love. Love isn't real. People who "love" one another stick together out of necessity and reliability. When the man isn't reliable enough anymore she leaves or steps out right? Its not love. People can appreciate one another and respect one another, desire the other persons company due to similar interests and values. But that is not love, its convenience. And that's ok. There is nothing wrong with that.
Polygamy, is no polyamory. And those men who had kids with a woman that wasn't barren, focused all their attention on the wife and the child, not the woman they brought into the home who did not become a second wife and had no legal protections like the wife did. The second the woman had his kid, she became the property of the wife. I never said that was necessarily good and i even stated that we should leave it in the past.
Not all ideas are created equal. But all ideas should be allowed to be spoken. Not necessarily practiced. Your attempted rebuking of the driving issue is actually embarrassing. Who cares why he cut you off? He did a reckless, dangerous thing that is against the socially constructed norms surrounding driving etiquette. It doesn't mean the government inherently has to enforce the cultural values of the community but it's best that the government, aka the will of the people, enforce the will that the people of that community have. Dont like it? Move to another community or attempt to convive the members of your own to change their position. Unsuccessful at altering the public's position? Too bad, so sad. Move on.
Thomas Pain explained it well. The more perfect society is, the less it needs regulation from authority and government, and the more perfect society becomes is because of its ability to self regulate. But when a societies affairs have broken down to a point where men cannot be relied on to supply to civilization their talents and competencies, a stronger hand must take shape to guide chaos back into order.
"When men, as well from natural instinct as from reciprocal benefits, have habituated themselves to social and civilized life, there is always enough of its principles in practice to carry them through any changes they may find necessary or convenient to make in their government. In short, man is so naturally a creature of society that it is almost impossible to put him out of it
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've done a video on this. If you would like to watch, please do. Fair warning, I disagree with legalizing drugs. https://youtu.be/6CdYDqo_jvU
A few questions.
1: Why legalize all drugs but then turn around and say crystal meth and heroin shouldn't be? That's not consistent.
2: you act like these people all want to get off these substances. They don't. Most dont. They want to get high. They aren't victims. Some are, after being prescribed versions of it by doctors. But even then, they chose to go further and get more hardcore versions. With opiods the answer is not legalize all of them but make it illegal to distribute and hopefully help those that were affected. But for the people who made the choice to do other street drugs or pop pills they should be arrested. They are likely scummy people making scummy decisions and they would be better off away from society.
3: also, we agree on regulating guns and preventing the ownership of certain kinds. Call it a "war on guns". Why do we support that but not this? I agree that the way the war on drugs has been carried out has been poor. Profiting off of criminalizing people is not good. But neither are these drugs.
4: Adderall need to be kept as far away from people as possible. I should know I used to take it, I was prescribed it. It was terrible and all I hear from people who have taken it were bad things. There are jokes about Adderall that we've made about Trump. Now we want available at stores? I'm sorry but that is dumb, very very dumb. And it's hard to take you seriously.
5: making a joke about codine in NyQuil is not funny. At all. My mom has told me horror stories about it when she was younger and had to take NyQuil. She was like a zombie for a week, unhelpful to anyone or herself. If we legalized it would that mean NyQuil could once again put that as an ingredient in their product? If so, why? We here on the Left don't trust big businesses. This leads me into my next point.
6: who do you think will take over the production of these drugs? That's right. Large corporations. Big pharma. Last time I checked we on the left do nut trust these corporations. We don't trust the regulations on them. Imagine Republicans took office and deregulated this new industry in the name of "free market" principles? They would ruin your already fragile basis for legalizing these substances.
7: final point. I don't see how or why you would assume the black market would fade away. Last time I checked the black market still exists for products that are legal including meat, guns, alcohol etc. These things won't go away. They will be seen as agorist alternatives where taxes and presumed stupid or irrelevant regulations are free from interference. Many people don't believe in regulations. In fact alot of people didn't want marijuana legalized because they were afraid of the regulations and big companies taking over. If these companies do take over they will be just as untrustworthy and dangerous as the cartel munis the guns in your face. The again, the cartel existed long before the war on drugs, they merely have used it to their advantage. They will continue to intimidate businesses and people. Ask Mexico.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree. Phuck America. This country is crime infested, degenerate supporting, labor hating empire that sends billions of dollars overseas while it refuses to implement a universal healthcare system. We destroyed workers unions, destroyed families, destroyed our economy and destroyed culture. Our jobs are shipped out of the country, immigrant labor is shipped in, men have no hope for a brighter future, wahmen are ruining every aspect of society from relationships to education and our government has consistently bought out corporations that damage the planet and then demand we do something about our "carbon footprint". We give endless money to grifters like Elon Musk who want us all to buy his shitty electric cars that aren't as efficient, don't last as long, weighs twice the weight of a gas powered vehicles and uses dangerous minerals/metals that are extracted using slave labor in Africa...
Inflation is through the roof, crime is everywhere, we lack supplies and production is purposely being cut by greedy businesses who want to artificially control consumer demand. Our schools are the joke of the entire western world, our healthcare system is used as an example by others of what NOT to do, our child mortality rate and our life expectancy is abysmal when in comparison to other developed nations and are infrastructure has been rated as a D by the global architect society for over 25 years. Not to mention we have essentially zero public transportation infrastructure.
Name one good thing about America at this point? We don't have freedom of speech anymore. So what do we have that makes us so exceptional?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This Nomiki person has no idea what proportional rates are whatever, she only focuses on the aggregate. 1: National crime has gone down overall but cities throughout the US, Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, DC, Baton Rouge, Nashville, Louisville, St Louis, all these cities have massively increased crime rates. 2: You can't compare today's crime rate to the 80s without sounding ridiculous. That's the equivalent of saying, well at least there isn't Stalin level death... So what? Why compare something to rhe worst and most extreme example? It's like saying, "well that guy unalived 51 people but I only unalived 25". So what? That not an argument. 3: People weren't stealing essential items. They were stealing from high end retail stores and pharmacies. They didn't use those medicines themselves they re-sold them on the street. How do we know? Because arrests of second hand pharmaceutical sales have increased. 4: You can't defund police services until you decrease inequality and improve material conditions. Of course more crime would happen when the environment didn't but the leniency did. 5: domestic abuse rates have not gone up. They have gone down. Less people are cohabitating and more people are remaining in the house of their family.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@danielboone8256 well I'm a virtue ethicist, not a consequentialist. People can do bad things that result in good outcomes. Like I can kill a man who I don't like simply because he annoyed me but I didn't know he was responsible for graping 4 wmen. Then it comes out that I killed this guy and I'm exonerated because my actions were deemed justified due to who he was. But they never realized I killed him for a selfish, arbitrary reason, not because he hurt people. Which I had no knowledge of.
Conversely, I could intend to save millions by sacrificing thousands. The consequence is more people saved in the long run. But then the event that was supposed to wipe out millions never comes. I might want to cure a disease for instance but instead I make it worse. Resulting in mass catastrophe.
Actions should be judged on whether they are consistent or not. If I consider doing something, I should then imagine how that would go if a majority of the population did it too. If I don't like what it will do, say come to bite me in the ass, I should not do it. The Golden Rule, The Categorical Imperative, whatever you want to call it, that's how morality should be judged.
She's not modest because she is forced to be. She would be modest if she had the option not to be but chose to be anyway. That's virtuous.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Very interesting video. Everyone is different, and we are all individuals. I think it's bad we divide ourselves with things such as gender and race. The "black identity" which has remained in culture is harmful, encourages group association over individuality and creates an identity based off something superficial. I understand why it exists, but it no longer needs to and is hurting us more than anything.
Everyone is afraid of cops. Except blue lives matter cucks who worship them. Even Ben Shapiro mentioned his concern when approaches by cops.
Corporations are the real threat, they discriminate against everyone. They care only for themselves and their bank accounts. Many of these people claimed to use a difficult voice, a white voice. Are the using it for this video? Because most of them sounded "regular". Also, they must not realize that everyone acts and speaks differently in a work environment, an interview or really any situation where they feel comfortable or uncomfortable in that particular situation. I've noticed a lot of things many black people will complain about are things that everyone has to go through yet they seem unaware of this.
How old is this video? Kanye hasn't posted a political tweet or anything in like 3 months ever since he realized he was being used by conservatives to further their own agenda.
Why is anyone proud of something they have no control over? You're proud of your race? For what? Your heritage? For what? You contributed nothing to your ancestors accomplishments. No one is proud of or at least should be proud of their race. That's silly to me. Culture, yes. Sure. Buy your skin color? That's just silly to me.
Edit: Black people didn't invent dreads. I'm tired of this. Ancient Greek and Roman warriors had dreads, the longer the dreads, the longer it showed they had survived war.
Egyptian Pharaohs had dreads. Vikings had dreads. It wasn't nor ever will be, a thing created or owned by black people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CrazyRightWingNut fck man. Youtube autodeleted my response to you. I swear to God. We can't even have a conversation because of hippie cultural crap making everyone so soft and weak. Everyone, those in power love to adopt cultural norms, nowadays is so sensitive.
I'll try again but I'm not typing all of it all over again.
Addiction can be genetic but it isn't for every victim or perpetrator of using. And it has to start somewhere. It also has to stop somewhere. But a hedonistic lifestyle will not do that, it perpetuates it further.
Capitalism should not be the hill conservatives choose to die on. The whole idolatry of wealth is sort of a cardinal sin, in case they forget. But the conservatives aren't the boogeyman. They didn't cause this. Feminists did. Like it or not. All this about equal rights and equal freedoms but equal accountability? What's that!?
And you must fail to realize that your progressive mindset plays right into the hands of capital. The identity politics, the segregation, the diversity, the distraction from real issues. Why start a family when you can be a career oriented womn? Why marry someone when you can be married to the machine? That's what Capitalism wants dude. Loyalty to family gets in the way of making workers loyal to the company. And for what? How are womn more free? Now they are wage slaves like the rest of us, forced to compete against one another and against men. Rugged individualism right? They shame men who don't make as much as them and shame other wmn who don't segsualize their bodies for money as effectively. That's not progress. The impersonal relations being championed by the progressive Left is hurting us socially. Family is the bedrock of society, the pinnacle of cooperative relations. It keeps people in check so that abuse is left common. Notice how for men, having a career was always a must, never an option like it is for womn, yet those men never problems having a family and a career yet for some reason womn can't manage it the same. Huh, I wonder why?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You do make a valid point. But the wealthy are not the only ones neglecting their duty, the average person is being told to neglect their duty as well because it's seen as oppression just as much if not more then actually existing Capitalism. Socialists need to move past this "it's all about me" nonsense. It's not about you or me or any individual. It's about the movement, the people. If the people who are supposed to be revolutionaries are taught that being a quitter when you made a promise to perform and hold true, then the revolution is over before it started. You can't give up on the fight because it's not fun anymore or because it's hard, or because it's proven more stressful than anticipated. Doesn't matter. Those are excuses. Persistence, tenacity, valor, duty, courage, strength, solidarity, dependability. These traits are essential to society and especially to bettering society. Everyone is responsible for something or someone else other than themselves. Whether it's a pet, a child, a spouse, a parent, a friend, a work goal etc. That's why we need taxes, so everyone can contribute their part. That's why the rich are rich, they don't contribute their fair portion. It's why we should stop interfering in other countries, because it's not our responsibility to deal with their problems but it is our responsibility not to make those problems worse. It's American governments duty to protect it's citizens, from invasion, to sickness, to destitution. It's our responsibility as workers to fight for our rights collectively not rely on party politics. As Che Guevara said, "the goal is not the liberate the people but allow the people to liberate themselves". In order to do that you can't give up because you didn't "feel like it was fun anymore".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is alot to break down here because while AOC is on point for most of this there are some major idiosyncrasies in her argument. It is true that the majority of the country considers themselves independent, which is not the same as centrist, which she mentioned. She also mentions how the system doesn't work for several groups of people, including workers, women, people of color and discrimination against age, though likely she is talking about younger workers not older. My mom has faced ageism for being older. My issue with her comments on who the system works for is she specifies that it doesn't work for women... says the woman of color who is a favored politician according to her base, speaking to a table of women who have been in the business for decades. Then she says it doesn't work for working people, which is true...but, working people includes women. Historically, men were the dominant sex in the workforce which means if it doesn't work for workers it doesn't work for men. No one mentions this. Instead we hear things about supposed "male privilege" a concept that is sexist, harmful and untrue. So by saying the system doesn't work for women or workers she is essentially excluding men from being mentioned and words it to where women are somehow separate from the workforce. She mentions how her opponent (Joe Crowley) was the antithesis of her and who she is. He is the establishment, an old straight white man, yet she defeated him with ease. So where is the privilege or oppression? Everyone in this country has aspects that hinder their rise. To explicitly say the system doesn't work for women is simply untrue. When it comes to workers who is more likely to suffer an at work injury or even death? Men. 95% of the time i might add. IF we are going to talk about the blights of people in this country based on race and gender then we need to talk about men's. And not talk about men and their "evil, toxic, dangerous and fragile" masculinity. Does that exist? Certainly. But is it masculinity itself? Certainly not. We don't talk about toxic women either. And when someone does, they get cancelled and attacked. I.e Meryl Streep.
And if fighting for working families is your fight, then you need to stand up for the family instead of attacking it for being oppressive. Especially since the family is very important in immigrant households. We need to get black people to form families instead of so many single parents running around. We need to stop pushing white people (usually liberal) to reject the importance of the family and instead to reject open relationships which are harmful to men and women and society. Call me a class reductionist, i don't care. That's just you refusing to accept my point as being valid and accurate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
But i don't want these immigrants here either... I want to focus on the lower income people already here. The immigrants already here, legally. To deport or decide whether an undocumented individual should be qualified to stay. I focus on the economy, illegal immigrants are a distraction to the economy. Those people in the video were climbing over the wall, that's definitely illegal and should be a felony. I want universal healthcare, a universal basic income and affordable college. Illegal immigrants are going to our colleges... NO NO NO, bullshit. That's bullshit and should not be happening. They should not be allowed to purchase land or properties either, rent is fine. I dont want them to be on the street. But i dont want anyone to be on the street. I want more low income and public housing. We cant have those things with loose immigration laws.
And before you attack me for being a right winger, im a fucking socialist. So no, im considered an anti american terrorist to the right. I fight for workers, the disabled, children, the lower class and eqaul access to resources for all citizens. That means undocumented residents need to fuck off. And we dont need anymore coming in. They hurt our economy and the immigrants who came here legally. Lets also make legal immigration process simpler and easier. Lets make it so illegal immigration comes with no benefits, and that legal immigration would come with benefits. If being an illegal immigrant was so hard, they wouldn't be entering illegally so much.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I actually identify as a Marxist socialist as well without being a full blown communist. I'm a Marxist socialist because I agree with the Marxist conception of history, I agree with the criticisms of Capitalism it offers and I agree with the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat. But I don't believe in communism, the stage that proceeds socialism. I don't agree with a moneyless, stateless, classless society. I want the factors of production (money, land, property) to be distributed and owned by the community, territory, municipal government, state government, federal government etc. I want businesses to be run either as small family businesses, as consumer owner businesses, worker cooperatives and union operated industries (syndicalism). I don't want classes to be abolished or think it's even possible to truly do so, hierarchies are essential to structure and occur naturally regardless of the social context but what I'm opposed to is obscene levels of inequality and massive disparities between people based on dysfunctional and clearly unnatural hierarchies. Thirdly, I also firmly believe in the nation state. Anything else becomes too imperialist, globalist and prone to unfair/corrupt influence and relationships to other parts of the world.
That's my belief. I want workers of the world to unite but I'm strongly in favor of immigration control. Workers of the world can't unite if those workers are all immigrating to a small selection of countries. Then it becomes workers of the 6 countries left in the world unite...
Also, while I disagree that gaye marriage should be illegal I don't particularly like the idea of them raising children on a large scale. Especially if it's of a different gender, two men don't know how to raise and young girl and vice versa. They simply don't. However, it's better than single motherhood because even in other animal species where there is a shortage of males, females will pair up to the raise offspring. But it is technically different because two males never engage in this behavior and the pair aren't copulating. As for the issue of weed, I simply don't approve of it's usage. It's smelly and bothers both me and my mother when we come across it. Also it makes people lazy, sorry, not sorry. It's decreases ambition and reaction speed.
I'm definitely a social conservative but I'm also definitely a far left economic person. I do not believe Capitalism benefits conservative values. It piggybacks on culture and the arrival of the industrial era destroyed the concept and completely blurred the lines between the roles of both genders. I wish there were more conservative socialists in the US so progressive socialists could align themselves and rally in solidarity to change the economic structure that is hurting our American populace. The cultural differences can be discussed after the revolution, after the shift in power. Let those who want to be conservative be conservative and let those who want to be progressive be progressive. As long as we don't try to convert each other to our/their cultural values there should not be an issue.
The more people can unify to fight back against neoliberals and libertarian principles the better. There is a rather decent sized history of religious socialist movements and they can work alongside conservative leaning socialists too, most of which are conservative not for religious reasons but scientific ones.
Anyway, that was alot to write. I hope anyone who had read this far is at least willing to take my perspective seriously because I find that many people on the Left actually side with these beliefs but are terrified of being ostracized by their Leftist friends and peers. I have no friends so therefore I don't care who I am ostracized from.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just a few things to say, not much though. We just had many women enter the Federal level of government. This shows that it's not a systematic oppressive force against women. The more women who campaign or sign up to run the more likely one will be voted in. Not only that but she already stated herself that representation for women at the state level. This shows that it is not gender discrimination that is at play. Like she also pointed out, the majority of people in higher political power are those who have elite educational backgrounds, inherited the power via their parents and their parents affiliates or that persons income status. Most working class people will not be able to have the capital to run a strong campaign. As we know, the working class is dominated by men. So this isn't a gender issue but a class issue. Americans regardless of political leaning report being curious and interested in having more women in power. So it's not gender discrimination. We do need to establish equality of opportunity, then we can see who makes it and who doesn't. Now for something's there needs to be a more equality of outcome because just because you have opportunity doesn't guarantee anything. And I don't believe in an every man for himself, social Darwinism society. So certain things will need to be accessable to all and owned publicly or collectively.
And as for the cookie analogy, it's not a good one because as she mentioned you are adding something to the cookie that the manufacturers don't necessarily want to put in, but for the sake of public opinion they are put in there. Problem is, I don't want any nuts or other ingredients in my chocolate chip cookies. It's a chocolate chip cookie, the master race of cookies. So no, I don't want any added ingredients in there. So not a good analogy because if the government is a cookie and chocolate chips are men, then and I most people won't want other ingredients (aka women) added to the cookie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Im not at all for the hypocritic and victim casting woman that is the creator of "Blexit", Candace Owens but its not like Mario Lopez is wrong... he has an opinion of his own and others shat on him for it because it didnt fit their ridiculous narrative. 3 year olds dont k now what the hell gender. Most people advocating for gender equality dont seem to know what the hell it is and in fact have often suggested it isnt anything, merely a construct that each individual makes...thats called a personality, not a freakin gender. Children are only discussing this gender post structuralist nonsense becase it is fed to them endlessly. They only questuion their gender and get needlessly confused because we throw it onto them. They think that because they are individuals with their own unique traist and personalities that that somehow changes their gender. It doesn't. It never will. And IT IS dangerous to humor children like this. These kids still have imaginary friends and believe in Santa Claus, now you gonna give them the right to decide what gender they are? HOW? And how can they pick a gender? I thought it didnt exist. But apparently its also infinite and each individual has their own, making the argument about gender mute and pointless. Are kids choosing to be male or female (which is not possible because uh, biology) actually reinforcing the traditional gender norms of the past? All of these gender theories debunk the other. They arent in congruence.
Im as Left as they come, im legitimately a socialist, as in someone who denounces the capitalist heirchal structures, so dont anyone call me a conservative bigot because you would be objectively wrong. But i refuse to acknwoledge the ludicrous idea that children can choose such an abstract idea as gender and their idenity. They are kids, they havent found an identity yet... Even if they do, wearing a wig, makeup and a dress doesnt make you a girl. Having short hair, playing sports and working out doesn't make you a boy. Unless you have an intersex condition, you are not outside the gender binary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hate how he shits on black people, instead of trying to change their culture and give them better opportunities so they don't have that culture anyway. Convince politicians to try and change it by strengthening the local economy and granting them better access to resources, but that goes for any community regardless of race.
Male and man are the same thing.
I also understand that there is such a thing as normal, but my issue is believing that abnormality is wrong. I don't agree with the transgender anti-science bullshit but i don't want them to be harassed or discriminated against. They have a psychological disorder, but that doesn't mean they are inhuman.
He shouldn't be teasing her voice. Listen to his... but regardless, your voice does not change your intellect. As for Kavanaugh, i don't believe there is sufficient evidence, but i don't agree he is fit for Justice.
The right says things over and over and over again too. The high rape count in colleges are not as high as it was accused of though. But that doesn't mean it doesn't happen and that it isn't a big deal.
I'm a straight white man who advocates for socialism. So fucking what? Whats wrong with it? Its not Venezuela or Cuba or the USSR.
The government providing a platform for everyone is not dependency, its a support system that allows people to make their own decisions and learn from them without falling into destitution. But socialism tends to be anti authoritarian so, i don't understand the idea that the government controls the economy.
Women make false claims all the time and rarely get convicted. But false rape claims are not as bad as the actual rape cases. And just because the legal system proves you innocent or doesn't convict you does not mean society will not disown you. Look at Hollywood.
Jesse is like a real life version of Uncle Ruckus.
David asks if Jesse has any real and important topics to discuss, immediately starts talking about football players kneeling... There is nothing wrong with turning your back against the country if the country is making faulty decisions, or at the very least your perception of faulty decisions. Free speech.
To be fair, Kanye wasn't saying physical slavery was a choice. He was talking about the mental enslavement. Capitalism enslaves us all though.
Black people are individuals like other people, and they tend to support masculinity as a pride thing in their community and are averse to homosexuals. Lots of violence against homosexuals in the black community. Like anyone in any group, there are radical gay rights supports.
The great white hope? HAHAHA. Funny, just because its a weird line. Nothing anti white about it, just a random and odd statement.
The majority of illegal immigrants needs to deport them. We definitely need to work with their countries so they don't have to come here. Not that we shouldn't allow people in who seek to move here. But we cant just keep bringing in alot of people with all the problems we currently have with our own citizens. A wall is not the issue. Maybe castle turret like structures spread out across the border to keep eyes on illegal crossing. I also don't understand the hate for the separation issue. Its for the safety of the kids, we cant confirm those children are theirs and we can't put children in adult holding facilities.
As for the black and slow thing and needing short answers, have you spoken to Jordan Peterson? Not that i hate JP but he can answer a question in five hours.
Jobs are doing better. The jobs are shit, and the pay is shit.
The national polls lied, she did not win the popular vote in Michigan (which was proven) and she most likely did it in multiple states. Im in South Carolina and when i voted i wore a "Feel the Bern" shirt, everyone including black women loved my shirt and also claimed to vote for Bernie. The thought that those 2 hours were blips and not predictive of the rest of the voting process, is ridiculous.
Understanding definitions is very important in a debate. Say for instance, misrepresenting socialism.
Also, fuck slut walking. Don't fuck sluts though. That's gross. We all know a slut when we see one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Steve Rogers still believes in the American Dream, its the people who have realized its just that, a dream, because you'd have to be asleep to believe in it. And most comic book writers were typically Left leaning anyway, most villains like Lex Luthor, Doctor Doom and Red Skull especially being depicted as corrupt rich people and authoritarian Right wingers. The only Left leaning villain i can think of is Magneto. The problem is, progressives are that one lie. They lie about almost everything, such as conservatives being German mustache supporters and biology not mattering. But its also a dream aka not reality for many people in this country to have that white picket fence which to them is a gate preventing them from a more secure and free life. That's not up for debate unless you disagree with the notion that outsourcing jobs is rampant, that most families cant afford to live off one income alone anymore, that most people put off family or break off from the family because of economic precarity and the stress that comes with it, or that wages have not kept up with the price of living or productivity. All of these things i just listed are not opinions or interpretations of reality, they are the reality, if you disagree with that then you're blatantly wrong.
So its not that Cap stopped believing in it, its that he realized America doesn't believe in it. Instead, illegal immigrants get endless breaks and privileges citizens deserve and likely dont get or fight hard to get. Instead, tech companies censor our speech and place us in boxes, track our locations and interests. Instead, millions of people go hungry and hundreds of thousands (more now) become homeless. Instead, small businesses close and big businesses get endless assistance. Instead, corporations spend millions to prevent their workers from unionizing (something clearly and historically American) instead of providing better conditions, benefits and wages. Instead of owning our own homes we rent because we cant afford the mortgage.
I don't hate America, i hate the government's refusal to help Americans and its refusal to stop taking lobbyist money which perpetuates the system that leaves millions in poverty. 40-45% of America lives on 40 thousand dollars or less, 70% lives paycheck to paycheck, the bottom 80% own 5% of the wealth. If you dont think that is unfair, dysfunctional, exploitive and needs to be fixed then you're the problem. Too many people see themselves as temporarily displaced millionaires and so they defend the very conditions keeping them from becoming freer and more secure. Jeremy is correct, the majority of people are poor in this country, many of them conservative voters, so why not change the system so it benefits the majority of people and not the small group at the top? Most people don't have the opportunities because they cannot afford them. How is fighting for that change unpatriotic?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@duckhawkninja3614 1: men and women are equal and the same.
2: Sexual promiscuity is cool, acceptable, fine, empowering, not a big deal.
3: the nuclear family is oppressive and dogmatic and should be forgotten.
4: gender roles are social constructs meant to oppress women.
5: women should put off having kids and focus on their career.
6: men are privileged in society and women need special government assistance to make up for that.
7: masculinity is either toxic or imaginary, but still should be adopted by women in society.
8: women should not be held to the same standards as men, who should still largely be held to traditional standards while women can conditionally be feminine or masculine. Men should pay on the first date, make more money, have a killer body, fight in war, sacrifice their finances for their ex spouse, be prohibited from defending themselves because "you can't hit a girl", should be on their own when facing struggles and be referred to as a bum if they aren't succeeding, called a deadbeat if they leave their wife and kid or don't work hard enough as is expected, do not receive free drinks, handouts or special treatment simply for existing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Look man, your denial of SJWs not being a real thing outside of the internet is annoying. Lots of people understate the social and cultural power PC SJWs have on businesses, acedemia and even high schools. It's far reaching and its damaging. These people who constantly demonize white people and who pander to "minorities" while admitting what their white ancestors did are very real. They marginalize white men who are suffering yet don't get any sympathy. White people, especially men, are taking the burden of the sins of their fathers. They are blamed for everything, that the patriarchy is real and is the threat when it's not. I'm a left wing guy, not necessarily a Marxist but I am a socialist, and I'm a straight white male who is at the bottom of the barrel. I am lumped in with this group identity of what white people represent. I don't have privilege, my mom and haven't had any money to spend on food in 5 days... We had to go to a food bank which we do often. SJWs don't care about the homeless rate among men, or the suicide rate. They only care that women still do 60% of housework, that the AC temperature is set to "male body temperature" and that Band-Aids don't match their skin tone.
Do not underestimate their influence. Especially on business and acedemia. The right very much has power too in their own way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The hatred homeless people get shows the moral decay of those who cant sympathize with those who have fallen. Few understand how homelessness works and the variety of reasons that cause it. San Fran doesn't care about getting people off the street, they just care about their mega billion corporations, most of which are the reason for the homeless epidemic. THEY DO RUN ON BAD LUCK. A decent size have mental health problems but they aren't "mentally ill" Joe, jesus fucking Christ. Becoming homeless can lower IQ, create mental instability and destroys ones ability to cognitively function. When we are in destitution like that, people break, and the reason they are homeless probably already cracked them. Also, not so fun fact, homeless people often turn to drugs post homelessness . Its not often the cause, though it obviously can. But what do you do about people who have mental and emotional problems Joe? Huh? You want them shitting on the street or in a house? Do you want them to be eating decent food inside a home or outside in the trash or stealing it from the market? Joe, you are such a fucking idiot sometimes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As for looks...
Girl 1 is a 7.8 in my opinion. Why a 7.8 and not an 8? no idea.
Girl 2 is an 8. why 2 points above the other girl? IDK leave me alone okay! Just the first numbers that come to my head. First impressions.
Girl 3 is a 5. 6 like he said. Something about her nose i didnt like. Not hating on her, just sayin.
Girl 4's jawline is too masculine for me. 3.2 but she has nice hair.
Girl 5 is your typical Asian, which im not traditionally attracted to. 3.4.
Girl 6 is a 5. Nothing spectacular but she aint hideous. the way she stands is odd. I dont know what that means its just something i noticed.
Girl 7 has a very confrontational stance and her face screams "i don giv a fuh" so nah. 3.
Girl 8 is an 8. Pretty and cute. Pretty cute. Plus i like slightly shorter girls.
Girl 9 is rather pretty as well, in a different way than girl 8. I give her an 8.3.
girl 10 might have short hair but her face is cute and her body isn't bad.
Now onto personality. But first, why is he a misogynist for this but the girls can rate us and sure its awkward but its not considered sexist. Just another form of female "privilege" no one talks about.
Before Angela sat down this dude was like, "sorry you being a present is objectifying"... oh hush dude, quit being so PC. its annoying.
Angela: Not enough for me to go off of. Can't really rate her given the 12 seconds i had, give us the full 3 minutes or at least 1 minute of it, Jesus Christ. ill give her a 5.
Sophia: Seems really fun. Also i liked her bubblyish personality, that attracts me. 8.8.
Preeti: The name is just pretty spelled wrong. lol. i like it. She didnt have enough time shown to us to give a rating. Wtf Jubilee.
Noelie: asks a weird but interesting thought provoking question, i dig it. 7.
Irene: Seems down to earth and nice. Also she had alot in common with him. As for me, i also like fighting to preserve nature. So thats something we also have in common. 8.
Ijeoma: No way ill ever be able to pronounce that. Then i find out she's Christian. Dealbreaker right there. I only date non-religious people. Rating...0. She is cute though.
Jevari: Boring, like he said. But then again, 10 seconds only says so much. 3.
Jasmine: What does going thrifting mean? 5. Nothing wrong with her she just seemed uninteresting.
Christina: Not an indian name at all considering all the other names... but that's not important. Alsoyou gave her 4 seconds... wtf.
Dora: THE EXPLORA! Traveling alone? So i can't be Boots? Lame. Shes from London? Interesting. 8.
Again! Dont have him know who he is talking to! Dont have the order the same for both looks and personality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Conservatives should not be beholden to capitalism. It destroyed all we hold dear. As G.K Chesterton wrote, "It cannot be too often repeated that what destroyed the Family in the modern world was Capitalism. No doubt it might have been Communism, if Communism had ever had a chance, outside that semi-Mongolian wilderness where it actually flourishes. But, so far as we are concerned, what has broken up households and encouraged divorces, and treated the old domestic virtues with more and more open contempt, is the epoch and Power of Capitalism. It is Capitalism that has forced a moral feud and a commercial competition between the sexes; that has destroyed the influence of the parent in favour of the influence of the employer; that has driven men from their homes to look for jobs; that has forced them to live near their factories or their firms instead of near their families; and, above all, that has encouraged, for commercial reasons, a parade of publicity and garish novelty, which is in its nature the death of all that was called dignity and modesty by our mothers and fathers."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Im all for strict borders, I support stronger immigration and border controls. But what do military members stationed overseas have to do with that? Wtf, man...
And no, illegal immigrants do not commit less crime. Those are flawed statistics that are often done by pro open border advocates such as CATO. The "humane" border policies are constantly exploited by these people. And no I don't think these "brown people" are dirty. I've seen the pictures. They look and dress nicer than me and my mom do. They often look like they are coming from an outlet mall.
And are most of them criminals? No of course not but so what? That doesn't guarantee you the right to stay here let alone become a citizen. For this who have been here awhile and have not committed fraud or any violent crimes, they should be granted permanent residency. Full citizenship? Hell no.
And my policy is children should be citizens od whatever country their parents are citizens of. Parents are German tourists who had a kid innthe states? Congratulations, your kid is a German citizen who happened to be born in American soil. Let me be clear, I don't give a rats ass where this immigrat is from. Norway, Mexico, Spain, Nigeria...I don't give a damn. I don't care of you're rich, poor, have skills or don't have skills. I don't care about the middle class in this situation. I ain't working for them. I'm defending the lower class, the working class. That's who I fight for. I fight for self managed and worker owned businesses. I stand up for unionization and universal healthcare. Infiggt for UBI. I do NOT fight for or illegal immigrants. I don't really care for legal one's either on a mass scale. Some rich European or Indian guy is now buying up land and starting a business in America instead of the American people being able to use that land for community purposes or having freely associating individuals opening up an enterprise there. I want Americans going to college and being hired for high level positions. I want Nobel prize winners to be hard working abd dedicated Americans with a dream and not wealthy immigrants we brought over here taking up the spot of some other smart but inder privileged kid with little chance to show his or her genius.
And why are people eligible for deportation serving in our military?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"create good jobs but don't allow wmn to get back into the workforce"
What does that mean? Is there something specific about wmn that they are more important? And I don't want more wmn in the workforce. We need to be incentivizing families, meaning they need to be in affordable homes that a man could sustain due to his good paying union job. Stop with the two income trap, it's not good for relationships. Men and women have different roles. It's better that way. Are there exceptions? Of course! And we shouldn't dismiss those exceptions. But they should not become nor should they be encouraged to become the rule. Men and women are not supposed to compete for the same role, we are supposed to collaborating by fulfilling our different roles to make up for where the other lacks. It's like a duet, there are parts each singer has that they aren't supposed to street interrupt the other and then there are parts of the song where both sing.
Some may call me a sexist. That's your prerogative. But I tend to be a traditionalist in this case because this worked for many millennia and since straying from it we have seen no success. Except we do in certain communities like the Indian American and Asian Americans. They are the most successful in the US despite the inequality and the various barriers that make it hard to see how America could be free.
My point is, focusing and forcing (which Capitalism did btw) wmn to get into the workforce have far too many social consequences. They want wmn married to the company rather then a man, depression, anxiety and loneliness are at an all time high with wmn reporting the most of it, drug addiction and self unalivement is at a horrendous peak and it's mostly men. The best economic period for the US was the 50s, where men were in unions, wmn worked part time in typically different fields and then came home full time when ready to have a kid, and housing wasn't so God damn expensive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Women like badboys because badboys don't care. Women like men who don't care because they want what they can't have. They are so used to having men drool over them that when a man is nonchalant, it is attractive.
Not to mention that badboys are tough, masculine, determined, self sufficient and have charisma. Women want the bad boy, the Chad etc, but they also want the stable, secure and reliable dude. But that is after they have been ran through by Chad's in their twenties, by the time they are 30, they don't want to "play around" anymore. It's alpha fux, beta bucks".
1
-
We can blame the breakdown of our social fabric on the commodification of people and the alienation between them and their contribution to society. Family values have deteriorated and that's led to the continuation of poverty and the rise in single motherhood, absentee fathers, drug addiction, self unalivement (can't say the word or the algorithm will get mad) the increase in loneliness, promiscuity and finally, its led to the resentment of others and to widespread fear/skepticism of our fellow neighbors in our communities.
But make no mistake, Capitalism is responsible for all of this. Don't blame socialism, an ideology that largely has no influence over our society, blame rugged individualism, the protestant ethic, non stop endless competition between co-workers and the never ceasing drive to force the working class to consume at all costs in order to sustain this unstable system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah yes, declining birth rates is definitely the fault of men. You know, that half of the population who can't give birth? Yep, definitely their fault...
I'm a "stay at home son" and on Medicaid. I'm autistic, it's near impossible for me to hold a job. I help my mom and she helps me. But beyond that, every citizen should be guaranteed health insurance from the government via a national health insurance plan, so I'm not interested in any arguments that complain that citizens have healthcare because that's barbaric. Also, I have completely lost hope with wmen. They are selfish, entitled and exploitative along with other attributes interestingly similar to our capitalist society that prioritizes consumption, rugged individualism, hedonism and superficiality.
Why would I want to contribute to a society that doesn't appreciate my existence and actively works to replace it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right but if he was poor you'd just complain about him being jealous of others wealth... Not to mention prices over there are expensive anyway. Hasan has regularly turned down ways to make more money via passive income even though he could. And socialism doesn't want people to go without homes, decent homes. They want everyone to be housed and be housed in domiciles necessary to their needs. He knows he's privileged. He doesn't think it's millions with better talents rhan he live in squalor.
Me and Hasan disagree on many issues, particularly social issues. But this outrage at him buying a house, with a loan he took out to do so, so he and his family can have decent space to themselves, is rather ridiculous. Its true, he could have chosen another house. But does it really matter? Socialism doesn't want people to live in horrible housing conditions and it doesn't believe in rent. So homeownership is important.
I'm a socialist, I'm not apologizing for recognizing how Capitalism works. Socialism is about the workers and the community owning property, aka land and factories, not homes. That's personal property, like your car or tv. It doesn't contribute to production.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And of course. Blame the nuclear family, the very thing that is on its last legs, barely struggling to survive. Newsflash lady, the problem isn't the nuclear family unit, it's that there aren't enough of them. Capitalism making it too difficult for that family dynamic to exist is admittedly a problem needing a solution. Teaching wmen that the nuclear family is oppressive as opposed to being a wage slave to a corporation that wishes to pay for her abortions is also the problem.
Yep totally. The dictatorial omnipotent nuclear family... Bad, very bad. The dictatorial, omnipotent state that seeks control and dominion over everyone though, that's perfectly benevolent and good. Also, these kids clearly need cops. Because kids raised outside the nuclear family are infinitely more likely to engage in criminal activity.
Btw, is this wman going to criticize Islam then? Because when it comes to authoritarian religions...
"Why are we leaning about these puritans"... Um, because those puritans founded this country you reeree. 55 native Americans were not deliberately ended. That's an ahistorical fallacy. And who cares if what you're learning is boring. Taxes are boring. Yet we don't get taught how to do them, despite the fact that we should.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why dont stadiums have a different thing going on daily, nightly or every other day? Aside from baseball or basketball, depending on the stadium, you could do volleyball games, track and field, RC car racing, bouncy house days for families, indie wrestling shows, amateur soccer, field hockey, fans could pay like 2-5 dollars to watch an away game at the stadium on the titantron, Nerf events etc
There is so much that could be done when games are not occuring. It would bring in more revenue, provide tons of stable employment, community morale would increase...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I disagree with him on UBI. It pisses me off that he doesn't believe in it.
But, I agree with him on this. Heroin, crack, meth and hard drugs should be illegal. They should remain illegal and the people who create and sell them should be put in prison.
And no, if you are someone addicted to these drugs, you have likely already harmed another person. Even if you haven't, it doesn't matter. You CHOSE to do these drugs. Everyone tells you these are bad for you and you still choose to do them? Sorry. That's on you. I don't have any sympathy. If you agree to a path to rehab after your first arrest then sure. Absolutely. Be lenient but after that, nah.
Heroin should not be legal, it should not be on the legal market for taxes to come from, that's not okay THATS NOT okay. You don't have and should not have the freedom to participate in these drugs. They infect communities. They need to be banned. Just like how banning guns limits gun violence, banning drugs limits drug use. Most people don't do these drugs Kyle. If it were legal it creates more stupid fucking idiots (who deserve what they get) will try and do them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Law19157 conservatives don't want to raise taxes on the poor. Fascinating. You should tell them that when they demand a flat tax to ensure "the 20% of people in this country who pay nothing in taxes pay their fair share".
Republicans have absolutely caused prices to inflate. By constantly deregulating, lowering taxes on the wealthy and refusing to enforce our nations anti trust laws, as well as their obsession with privatization and intellectual property rights, they have given a free pass for mega corporations to dominate and negatively impact the market due to their everpresent share.
Do i blame democrats too? Absofuqinglutely. They allowed this. They abandoned working people in favor of tech giants, coffee shops and universities. They have convinced the working class to go along with elitist liberal dogma while shaming low income workers for their conservative social opinions. That's not conductive to solidarity. The Democrats have sold us out to the war machine and Wall Street. They allow millions of immigrants to enter so they can get more votes and further increase housing costs on the market. But Republicans, for all their talk, like immigration too. Especially illegal. "Free movement of labor" right? Historically it's been the Right who supports more lenient borders. Look at good ole Ronnie Reagan.
Also, that whole job growth schtick has really been debunked so many times at this point I hate that I need to bring it up. They majority of those jobs are temporary, low paying, nom unionized, with poor benefits that typically bring in workers from out of state. They put small local businesses out of business and increase the cost of living in that area.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The mainstream progressive left is not the same thing as the old school labor left. The class analysis types who focus on material conditions and the inherent contributions of Capitalism and it's alienating and exploitive aspects that are done by design, those types of lefties... They are the majority but are too afraid to push back against the mainstream ideology adopted by the neoliberal lobbyists. And there is a reason these Capitalist loving liberals don't mind capitulating to cultural issues, it's because it doesn't hurt their bottom line and doesn't threaten the structure they benefit from.
Leftists, actual leftists, don't want a system with a different shade of flesh, different gender identity, etc. They don't want blak businesses or t-rans CEOs, they don't want private ownership of capital or CEOs. They don't want gaye landlords, they want to end landlordship and make property socially owned.
Marx, who is not the only influence for socialists, was explicitly a materialist that rejected ideology and subjective opinion, he believed nature and science had objective attributes that determined reality. He even said, "never take a person at their word, for what is a word but a lie from someone's mouth not yet proven false?" That's not the exact quote but it's effectively what he said. Marx would not have agreed that there were infinite genders. He would say there are either two or none at all and that it doesn't matter because objective material conditions don't care about your perception of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry Kyle, even as someone on the "far" Left I am stricter on immigration than most progressives/lefties. The only time a child should be separated is if there is no evidence linking the child to the adults it came with. Im much more worried about placing children in the confines of adults who may not even be related to them. To me that is far more unethical (putting a child's life in danger) than placing then.a facility with other children whom people refer to as "cages". They do need better holding facilities for children and I don't understand why they have aluminum blankets but I'm very upset with children being separated considering that if my mom commites thedt or trespassed on private property she'd be arrested. And therefore separated. No of course I'm adult but the Sam would be true if I was a child. Also, the difference between a civil offense and misdemeanor as an excuse to do away with the child separation clause is just legalise. They don't have to change anything to change that rule. And crossing the border should be a misdomeanor. If I or anyone illegaly enter or trespasses on property they do not belong that is a crime, a misdomeanor. If we crossed the Mexican border illegally without a passport or documentation we would arrested. Which h the way we should be they would be enforcing the law, because that just makes sense. If I entered Japan illegally I would be detained and either deported or arrested and help in their custody. Why should we be any different? Don't give me the "oh cause we're America" nonsense.
And also, an illegal immigrant, I'd like to remind people of what that is. It is someone who is residing unlawfully in a certain territory. Just like if someone was residing in a house they did not own and do not have permission to be a tenent of they would be arrested. It's very simple. And in my opinion crossing a nations border is a bigger deal than hopping over a neighbors fence.
And yes, illegal immigrants already get healthcare paid for by our tax dollars. They cannot be sent away. We are bound to help. But, they should not be here to begin with and should be deported or at least under review to see if they should be. we should not not encourage unlawful entry into our country which is what we already do and the policies proposed by Julain Castro, Booker and at least one other are essentially open border policies even if not in name. They would make it to where it essentially is an open border. Our asylum system is exploited everyday. Not everyone claiming to be a refugee is a refugee, I know that's a revolutionary statement but it's the truth. And my tax dollars when they hopefully go toward universal healthcare should not go towards paying for illegal immigrants. They should have to pay. Granted what they will pay eojt ve as expensive ad it is now but that's not the point.
Everyday on the news it's nothing but "poor illegals we love them.so.mich, I cannot believe how horrible their conditions are". But I never once hear about people like me, living in cars and on the streets. We talk about illegal immigrants economic opportunity well where is ours?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1