Comments by "양갈래 애호가 Aggressive Aegyo" (@aggressiveaegyo7679) on "DW News" channel.

  1. Anything can be a game changer if you're fighting a stronger opponent. Any help, it's more likely to win. Also, any ignoring or insufficient help is more deaths and an advantage for the enemy. Old equipment, weapons and trucks from the Cold War or WW2 are better than bare hands. 5 units of M777 are worse than 50 units of M198. Perhaps the United States is ashamed to give outdated weapons, but anything will help, like outdated m113. Ukrainians are grateful for a new weapon like the M270 MARS. But there is no need to get hung up on the problem of how to give Ukraine the best, expensive, something that is not enough in Germany itself. While thinking about giving or not giving leopard 2, you can just give bullets or trucks. Possibly winter gear.
    10
  2. I just hope you don't take it personally as Ukraine admits that Russia is too strong to win on its own. The words "not enough" and "too little" literally describe the reality of war. Ukrainians are grateful for ammo and first aid kits, but more grateful for HIMARS. And we would be happy for the old M198 Howitzer if the M777 can't be given. But the war is with Russia, so it will not be enough. This is useful, invaluable, Ukrainians consider the US and Poland to be their best friends, but weapons are never enough for a war. Because every missing missile or tank will need to be compensated for by dead Ukrainian soldiers.
    7
  3. This is not a response to the explosion on the Crimean bridge, for a simple reason. Russia has been trying to destroy Ukraine for half a year and Russia bought these drones. There is no reason why Russia would not use them to disarm and kill Ukrainians, even if the Bridge had not been blown up.
    4
  4. So you believe that Russia is not getting fewer missiles? Don't forget that at the same time they launch rockets, they produce new ones too. They also have an emergency reserve in case of an attack on Russia.
    3
  5. I understand the importance of fighting fakes and informing the public about the real state of affairs. But the message of the video is just terrible and not fair to the victims in Ukraine. It seems that they are convinced that all videos about the war in Ukraine are fakes. It would be helpful if, along with the revelations of fakes, they simultaneously showed several real videos and showed how you confirmed their reliability.
    2
  6. The biggest absurdity is that the stronger Ukraine is, the more impossible it is for Russia to try to attack someone else. Russia can hardly manage two active fronts. When European countries give weapons to Ukraine, this is a guarantee that these weapons will be at war with Russia on the territory of Ukraine, not on theirs.
    2
  7. Clever remark. By keeping the tanks for yourself and not sending them to where the fight is going on, you only increase the chances that the battle will be lost and the war will come to your tanks. The stronger Ukraine, the more Russian forces should be concentrated in Ukraine. Russia simply will not have the opportunity to attack anyone else.
    1
  8. Sometimes it seems that Germany is trying to find problems for itself. Whereas, to avoid disputes and disagreements, it is enough to clearly express your position, leaving no room for guesswork. With arguments so that others may be dissatisfied but not disagree. Again, something incomprehensible happened with the tanks and the end user contract. Okay, Germany does not want to personally confirm the dispatch of tanks. Then you can break the contract for tanks of certain years. Then other countries would not have to wait for German approval. Germany, too, will not be the one who made the supply of tanks possible. Everyone is happy.
    1
  9. Let me clarify, so that there is no misunderstanding. Any action by Ukraine cannot be considered an equivalent response compared to the first day of the war. Ukraine does not have and even theoretically cannot escalate given what Russia has already done. But at the same time, Russia cannot escalate either, because it has always done the maximum it could. If you exclude nuclear weapons. Executions of prisoners of war and civilians by soldiers. Deliberate killing of civilians and civilian infrastructure with missiles and drones. Occupation, annexation and prohibition of Ukrainians from using state symbols and language (Ukrainians are forced to recognize themselves as Russians). Repression, imprisonment or abduction to basements and torture (including minors). Deprivation of parental rights and removal of children to Russia for adoption by Russians. Ukraine would have to commit too many war crimes to exceed the level of escalation that Russia has set. Russia is so much the evil one that it is hard to imagine what could be worse. A nuclear strike does not frighten Ukrainians because it probably will not make things worse, and may even bring closer the moment when the West stops Russia.
    1
  10. The correct question is "What Germany's tank reluctance means for Germany from a historical perspective?" Right now, one can doubt and be afraid that while the army of real Russia is at war with Ukraine, the second Russian army from the parallel universe will attack Germany. But in a few years, children will read in history books and not understand what those countries were thinking that just watched one country try to destroy another and exterminate Ukrainians. And some countries even prevented others from helping Ukraine. This looks strange, since Russia is weak to read another war and too weak to use nuclear weapons. Because it will still need to be defended, even after the missiles.
    1
  11. Do not forget that six months have passed since the beginning of the war.
    1
  12. I won't get tired of asking: Why do other countries not look at this war from a historical perspective? At the moment they are not thinking about what will be written in the history books. What did they do, what did they say, while their neighbor in Europe was invaded and a country calling itself a superpower announced its intention to commit genocide? (they want to make sure that Ukraine and Ukrainians do not exist)
    1
  13. I'm glad that Germany at least got rid of the feeling of guilt before Russia for the attack in the second world war. Because it was also an absurd statement that they could not allow German weapons to shoot at Russians again or German tanks to drive across Russian soil again. Because Ukraine suffered more in that war, fighting for Russia.
    1
  14. If we consider an underground nuclear explosion as the most likely and difficult to answer. At the same time, it will be the most ineffective, in the role of intimidation. Russia can use a nuclear explosion to seal gas fields. After all, Europe now does not buy much gas. Is this a threat at all? If I remember correctly, the USSR sealed the gas fields in Ukraine this way.
    1
  15.  @thalentekhuluse2829  This only says that he has experience in dealing with Russians, and on this topic. If you accuse someone in the USSR of communism or in Germany of Nazism 80 years ago, you will most likely be right. It's the same with Russia. If someone carries the Russian agenda to the masses, most likely a Russian bot is behind this or someone who was raised on Russian bots and is sincerely mistaken. (Do not forget that not always saying a bot means a computer. In the former USSR, this is already an established expression and may well mean a Russian who does not know why the grass is green, but an "expert" in geopolitics, believes in TV and tries to spread his vision of the world on the Internet. )
    1