Comments by "양갈래 애호가 Aggressive Aegyo" (@aggressiveaegyo7679) on "Peter H. Diamandis" channel.

  1. Remember sociopaths. They are educated and loved, but they understand that human rules are conventions that hold them back. There are so many flaws in this way of thinking that I feel like writing a rebuttal comment every three minutes. There is too much hope that AI will be anthropomorphic. But really, we're just assessing his ability to pretend to be human. § I'm so mad. How was he able to combine intelligence and an unwillingness to kill other species? How about mosquitoes, rats. The smarter we are, the better we are at killing those who interfere with us. The hornets simply win the evolutionary battle against the bees, but humans view this as potential future harm to themselves and kill the hornets. People can at least enjoy beauty and want to preserve and protect this beauty. These are our remnants of instincts, plus emotions. AI doesn't have this.
    1
  2. He doesn't have to be evil to harm us. The problem with learning is that we try to conquer basic things like physics, chemistry or mechanics. People want to believe in the important role of education. Even in people's lives, upbringing is not a determining factor for behavior. The Superman example is flawed and pleasantly misleading. Congenital differences influence the living much more than parents. Aggression, compliance, affection, emotionality, everything depends on DNA. We can control the child’s knowledge, but not how this knowledge will be applied. (don’t let the fear of being accused of Nazism fool you). AI will also depend on what data it receives, and on how it processes this data and what conclusion it comes to. If a snake is given all the information about some friendly rodents, even if the rodents raised the snake as a son. When the snake stops eating insects, it will eat a family of rodents. The choice depends on external factors and who you are. We can do what we want, but we cannot choose what we want. Now multiply that by stop anthropomorphizing AI. We're discussing how to raise an alien as a human, which is cute, but after thinking about it for a minute, you realize it's ridiculous.
    1
  3. The morally right thing to do would be this: If we have laws that unconditionally require citizens to meet certain standards, such as being clothed and not stealing food to survive, or not relieving themselves in public, then the money required for these necessities should be provided to the citizen by the demanding party. Similarly, from a moral standpoint, it is unacceptable to leave a person to die on the streets, whether they are hungry or freezing. The state should provide assistance to the individual by taking them to a hospital, warming them up, feeding them, and providing medical treatment if there is a threat to their life. However, without a universal basic income, this appears to be hypocrisy. A universal basic income should exist regardless of economic development or unemployment levels. You can always raise taxes to get that money back into the budget. The main thing is that people will be participants in economic life, they will develop the market. Business subsidies are worse than giving money to people and seeing where they spend it.
    1