Youtube comments of (@SG-js2qn).
-
3800
-
2700
-
2400
-
1700
-
1700
-
1600
-
1300
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
985
-
948
-
942
-
868
-
861
-
768
-
755
-
714
-
688
-
633
-
620
-
610
-
588
-
584
-
581
-
576
-
573
-
529
-
519
-
513
-
510
-
489
-
487
-
456
-
442
-
416
-
410
-
401
-
399
-
399
-
387
-
382
-
381
-
378
-
376
-
375
-
374
-
373
-
367
-
359
-
358
-
357
-
351
-
350
-
346
-
345
-
344
-
323
-
320
-
319
-
316
-
313
-
306
-
The chronic reduction of quality in products - the shittification - is a form of economic plundering of the lower classes, designed to make people pay more for things over time. You pay more to get less. People have been complaining about this for decades, since they started building home appliances out of cheap materials that won't last. It's completely possible to build refrigerators, washers, and dryers that will not only last a lifetime, but ones that can be repaired in a cost effective manner, and which can be recycled. People used to be able to repair their vehicles, change batteries in their phones, upgrade their home computers, etc. It's much cheaper, better design, and FAR better for the environment. But we've moved away from this as labor has been sent overseas. There are people fighting for us to retain the "right of repair," and I think it is absolutely essential to bring back manufacturing to our own shores so we control design and replacement parts.
305
-
304
-
303
-
275
-
273
-
272
-
271
-
271
-
264
-
263
-
260
-
259
-
258
-
256
-
256
-
254
-
253
-
253
-
245
-
238
-
237
-
237
-
236
-
234
-
232
-
232
-
229
-
229
-
225
-
224
-
222
-
221
-
220
-
218
-
213
-
213
-
212
-
208
-
206
-
204
-
202
-
197
-
195
-
193
-
192
-
189
-
188
-
186
-
185
-
184
-
183
-
183
-
182
-
182
-
179
-
175
-
175
-
172
-
170
-
169
-
168
-
167
-
166
-
166
-
165
-
164
-
163
-
163
-
161
-
160
-
159
-
158
-
158
-
158
-
155
-
154
-
149
-
149
-
148
-
148
-
Anyone remember "The Sound of Music," which was about the Von Trapp family escaping Germany? The kids in this Quebec video remind me of Rolfe, the young boyfriend of the eldest Von Trapp girl, who becomes one of the police seeking to prevent the Von Trapps from escaping.
Young people can become such fervent believers of utopian falsehoods. It's like living in a science fiction fantasy world for them, where they are going to make everything perfect by simple logical actions ... like killing everyone who disagrees. "Yes, we all agree that group X (Jews, blacks, Tea Party, unvaxxed, whatever) is dangerous, and must be eliminated for the safety of all."
147
-
147
-
140
-
139
-
138
-
135
-
135
-
135
-
134
-
133
-
133
-
132
-
132
-
130
-
129
-
128
-
128
-
127
-
127
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
123
-
122
-
122
-
121
-
121
-
121
-
120
-
120
-
119
-
119
-
118
-
118
-
117
-
116
-
116
-
116
-
115
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
112
-
112
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
111
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
108
-
107
-
106
-
106
-
106
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
99
-
99
-
99
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
89
-
89
-
88
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
Russia was already in Syria. Russia has long had a naval base in Syria, giving them access to the Mediterranean. So part of what Russia was doing was securing its base. Secondly, the reason for the war in the first place was that Qatar wanted to run a natural gas pipeline across Syria to Turkey, and from there directly supplying Europe. But Russia jealously controls all energy going to the EU market, and Syria is their ally. So Syria opposed the pipeline. Thus, Qatar and the west decided to foment an uprising against Assad. As an ally, Russia increased their forces. They also offered Erdogan a lot of money to forgo the Qatar pipeline and accept a Russian pipeline instead. At first, Erdogan refused, standing with NATO. But as the war in Syria faltered, Turkey accepted Russia's offer, and there is now a natgas pipeline that goes from Russia to Turkey, capable of supplying energy to Europe. Nobody tells you this story, and I have no idea why, as every single piece of it is available in the media, just not as a complete tale. They control the narratives, and they don't want you to know about the pipeline war that Russia won.
BTW, when Hillary Clinton was Sec of State, she was trying to schmooze Assad, but he stayed with his ally, Russia. Which is when they decided he had to go, and they began the insurgency known as ISIS.
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
Indian chai is spiced tea with milk. Same basic thing. There have been spiced holiday winter blends for coffee for quite a while. You don't need to get a special coffee. Just add a few granules of whatever holiday spices you have at home. Any of ginger, cinnamon, nutmeg, allspice, clove, and even cardamom and black pepper can work. If you have vanilla or orange peel, those flavors can be used as well. It's just Indian chai style spiced coffee. It can be a pleasant change of taste. FWIW, in 1980s sword and sorcery fiction by Steven Brust, characters were drinking a spiced latte called klava. Arabic coffee, which has been around for generations, is spiced with cardamom, saffron, cloves, and cinnamon.
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
If you mean the Democrats, they have been the historic party of war in the US. If you're old enough to remember the Sixties, the Kennedy brothers were on the side of the Democratic Party that favored peace. That was the weaker side of the party, not allied with the deep state. Both were executed by the deep state.
Wars started with a Democratic president: Mexican-American War, WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo. Modern proxy wars: Libya, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine.
Wars started with a reluctant Republican president: Civil War, Spanish-American War. In both cases they were pushed into it.
Wars started by deep state Republicans: Iraq 1, Afghanistan, Iraq 2.
Of these wars, only the two earliest may (?) precede the development of a deep state: the Mexican-American War and the Civil War.
The deep state (military industrial complex) and the Democratic Party have had a natural affinity from the beginning. The Whigs / Republicans did not have this affinity, but with the RINOs, they do now.
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
Ryan, I appreciate that you are educating yourself, and doing your own research, which is GREAT. But you are missing out if you think you don't need to research further back than the 60s. We're still going through everything that was present with the Wilson administration, and the French Revolution is still HUGE in the world. The French Revolution is where the terms left and right were were born, and they have been misunderstood ever since ... and that's on purpose. The French Revolution is a period of revolution, the Reign of Terror, and empire. This same pattern is followed repeatedly, in the Russian Revolution, WW2 era Germany, Mao's revolution, and even in Castro's revolution. Modern liberals subscribe to Bentham's philosophy, and he was from the French Revolution era. Marx's philosophies were based on the French Revolution philosophies. All of this led to Progressivism, which was the key philosophy of the Wilson administration. Progressivism is the left and it is the revolution. The "right wing" is simply whoever is not sufficiently on board with the revolution. ("If you're not with us, you're against us.")
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
This is actually great advice for men and women: avoid hedonism. Hedonism is the philosophy of following pleasure and avoiding pain. This is the core of modern "liberal" life, but what most people don't realize is that this is how children naturally operate. It's a simple system, and they clamor for pleasure and avoid pain. They'll take sugar till they get sick, for instance, and then once they've recovered, they'll do it again. By contrast, morality is the operating system of mature adults. It involves a willingness to forgo pleasure and to withstand some pain, all for a greater goal, which may not be for you. These "moral" qualities are natural, and are required to be a good parent. If you are a hedonist, you cannot be a good parent, and you should not get married.
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
Women in the US and western Europe, Canada, Australia, and NZ, in the majority, don't want marriage to men. They want to go their own way, independently. It has been this way for decades, which is why the divorce rate has been so high for decades. Some men are fine with that, as they don't want children or a marriage, but men who want children and marriage need to either find the rare pearl in their home country, or find someone from an overseas culture where women still appreciate the concept of marriage.
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
Skin color is NO indication of race. It's insane. Two unrelated people can have the same skin color, and two closely related people can have different skin color. So how can this be taken as being scientifically sound in any way? The world "race" denotes a lineage ... a line, as in ray, trace, track, and royal. Those words share the same root and meaning as the word race. Thus we can scientifically refer to the "human race," and sanely refer to, say, "the Irish race," as used to be done, because we're talking about a group of related people. But this has very little to do with skin color. So if one parent has light skin and one parent has dark skin, the child is of the race with dark skin ...? This is about as scientific as astrology. It's nonsense.
25
-
25
-
25
-
"Subconscious" to her? It's obvious to me. I've been able to read this in women for 40 years. But I guess most people don't see it? All of the women I dated, I rejected, because they either didn't want to get married, didn't want to have kids, just wanted the kid (and support), or wanted to marry / divorce / take the kid. I realize that after I say that, many may think, "Oh, you didn't give them enough credit," which is what people said to me. But ... if you follow their lives, that's exactly what happened: unmarried, married and divorced, single mom, married / divorced / single mom. It was clearly what they wanted. They exited adolescence convinced that having a man in their lives was bad and they should only lure him in for sex, money and a kid, then reject him.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
In my modest experience with Native Americans, they are like anyone else: they respond well to challenges, and in the absence of challenges, they grow lax and lost. IMO, there is a myth of Native Americans suffering generational damage and depression due to loss of culture. What has really hurt them is the guarantee of subsistence living. It's the same with the African Americans. When challenged to perform, people do perform. When a subsistence lifestyle is being offered - like a universal income - then people veg out and make nothing of themselves. I'm not saying we should eliminate welfare, but we can't just guarantee infinite paychecks and call it a day. For many people that functions like an addiction, and they get hooked on it instead of prospering. You can't guide people to prosperity by giving them free money, free food, and a free place to live. They have to be challenged to make something of their lives, and to be helped to do that.
What I did, decades ago, was I taught young reservation boys how to play chess. Modest as this may seem, it quickly boosted their self-esteem and critical thinking. It opened their horizons a little bit, because at first they didn't think they could do it, that chess was a game for "smart people." But they learned they could do it easily enough. All it took was the challenge and a little help or encouragement. And that's how you get kids learning physics, and math, and biology, engineering, and so on. It's how you get kids to study on their own, because they can see it starts to fill out their character and make a difference. These days, teaching reservation kids vocational skills is probably a great idea, because so many other jobs - like coding - are going to be replaced by automation.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
I remember complaining maybe about a year or so ago - IDK, maybe it was several years ago - that so many of our young people, like Candace, have a poor grasp of America's real history, like on Watergate, Mockingbird, MK-Ultra, and COINTELPRO. I'm so glad to report that she's been self-educating, and proud of her progress. It IS possible to pass on the truth and wisdom to a newer generation. 🕊 As for the CIA, I suspect they have been working with the CCP since GHW Bush. They might be ending that now that the CCP is out of money, though. As for the CIA / Mossad relationship, I don't think they're joined at the hip. I think they're joined through the UK intelligence service, which is NOT subordinated to US intelligence.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
The CIA fought the WH after Truman signed it into law. Nixon's episode with Watergate was just part of it. IMO, the CIA was behind the attempts on Truman and on Ford, and the true subject of Eisenhower's warning. GHW Bush was a former CIA Director, and he was attached to Reagan with the idea of assassinating Reagan, and they shot him just a few months in. Reagan survived, but Bush was still able to operate to do things like Iran Contra due to Reagan's fragile health. After that, every candidate for the WH was selected by the CIA, with the exception of Trump. The CIA put forth the candidates on both sides, and intended to have Jeb Bush instead of Trump, so that no matter who won the elections, it would be a CIA-friendly candidate.
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
Great opening lines by Charlie Kirk. Finally somebody talking about the REAL problem, which we have faced and been subjected to for the last 100 years! The 16th Amendment (income tax) was created by the Democrats to fund the Democrat expansion of un-elected federal bureaucracy. This whole situation we're used to by now, of having a federal income tax and colossal and all-powerful federal govt ... this was not how the founders constructed this country. The Democrats had to amend the Constitution to get it done, and now all the money goes to officials (who are Democrat) who aren't elected, and they're the ones who truly run the country. Elected officials have no power against these bureaucrats. They can't make them do their jobs, investigate them, or even fire them. (The Administrative Procedures Act of 1946, signed by Truman, prevents the elected officials from firing anyone in the bureaucracy, aside from the department heads, which then must be replaced with someone else who is senior in the department. So you can't fire your way out of the corruption.)
Who was the most recent honest FBI director? Wray, McCabe, Comey, Mueller? No, we know they were crooked. Before that, Director Freeh was apparently in the Biden crime family circle. So now we're practically in the 80s, and in the early 70s the FBI director was still J Edgar Hoover, who was notoriously crooked. So you're telling me that the FBI went from being corrupt for about 40 years, to being honest for about 20 years, and then crooked again for another 30 years? Isn't it more rational to assume that the FBI, which was created by a corrupt DOJ, has been corrupt this whole time? The FBI's current behavior is exactly what it was under Hoover.
It's just maddening how people refuse to research the history and just assume that things were pristine at some earlier date. Stop being so damn lazy. You can research this on the internet. You don't even have to get up from your chair. In a few hours you can piece this whole thing together and understand it. You have to know your history to see and understand well enough to make the necessary corrections. Otherwise you're just stuck in an ineffectual time loop, on a treadmill, and making no progress toward fixing the problem.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
Bill Gates: "I don't think the internet will ever amount to anything, and who needs more than 640k memory?" Also Bill Gates: "Ten million in Africa will die of covid." And: "Unfortunately, omicron is acting like a vaccine." Bill Gates saying in advance of the election: "It will be a tie," is just like the Grandmaster in "Thor: Ragnarok" saying to the rebels who have defeated him: "It's a tie." After conservative wins in Sweden and Italy, and before a likely red wave in America, notorious big money, manipulative Democrats like Gates are saying, "It's a tie." He's literally delegitimizing the Democrat loss before it happens! All we need now is Hillary to come out and say, in advance of the election, that the election doesn't matter, she doesn't recognize it as valid.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
The left has always been aiming at creating a dystopia. That's why they are always opposed by regular people, but not always successfully opposed, as in Germany, Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. Will the left be successfully opposed this time? At point, it looks like no. Right now, it looks like they have been allowed to take control of all vital offices in the US, and it's the same in the rest of the west.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
I don't entirely agree with part of this assessment, @1:30. Moral women are FEW by percentage, and they are the ones looking for relationships. Hedonistic women are the largest by percentage, and they are not aware that they are not moral, though their whole pattern is oriented around pleasure-seeking, not "doing the right thing, even if it involves suffering." I dated women who were the most moral I could find, but quickly determined that ALL of them had in mind the idea of being a single mother or not having children. And that is what they are now, years later. Those that married got kids and divorced, and those that wanted to be single mothers without marriage are that. Most women are not focused on real relationships with men. They are looking to take advantage of a man, like a dog that can fix things around the house. Only moral women, fewer in number, which are the ones focused on "doing the right thing, even if it involves suffering," are focused on a real relationship with a man.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@GameJournal0101 I agree. Women operate from a place of crushing insecurity, and most are hedonists until (if) they enter parenthood. A hedonist only thinks of themselves, is faithless to others, is demanding, and refuses to make sacrifices. You cannot be a good parent with that approach, but becoming a parent in many cases changes this outlook on life.
Hedonism is the operating system of the immature person, of a child. The problem we face as a society is that as the circumstances of life become easier, people remain immature longer. In hard times, a person is more likely to mentally mature at a younger age, and thus will more naturally operate as an adult when physical maturity occurs.
By contrast, today's easy times have made physical adults who are mentally still children. While this obviously includes men, it is super common among women, who have been coddled to the extreme by society, treated as little princesses. This princess model has turned them into immature adult monsters who think only of themselves well into advanced adult years.
This is why the passport bros exist. Women from other countries where life is harder develop mental maturity closer to the time of physical maturity.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
IMO, the Grand Highlander fulfills the purpose of the original Highlander. It turns the regular Highlander into more of a "Grand RAV4." As for the Sienna, it's an urban hauler. Once it gets out of the metropolis, shortcomings may start to appear. As for Sequoia, hardly any are made. The 2023 redesign gave it some much needed updating, but they seem to have botched the hybrid battery placement, which might be why the back passenger / storage area is so funky. It might have to do with battery specs they were given at design time, and not having access to Hybrid Max technology. Not sure what they can do about that now, as the Sequoia is a low, low priority for Toyota. The Sequoia 3rd row can scoot back a few inches, though, giving more knee room.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Even when women say they picked the wrong man, somehow it STILL isn't their fault or something they take accountability for. Women pick the wrong man on purpose, because they want a failed relationship. They want to feel wanted by many men, they want control, they want drama, they want a breakup, they want more men. It's very obvious. They will admit they favor the bad boys, that it is toxic behavior, and that they don't even see the good guys, but somehow that equation never resolves into the logical solution: "Maybe instead of picking bad boys and having bad relationships, I should pick a good guy?" Then after they hit the wall, and no good man would ever touch them, then they decide they need to trap a good man, lie to him, and destroy him.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
She doesn't have to make sense. She just has to be camera-friendly, read her script, maintain eye contact, and sound passionate. That's all it takes. If people were afraid of her, it would work even better. Also, this woman sounds a lot like my older sister. So yes, this message is really out there, and people are thinking and saying this. Except for that part that sounded Republican, about 18:00, where she talks about taking over school boards and finding DAs who will enforce the law, and so forth. That was unexpected. BTW, great to hear Jimmy finally talk about the corrupt FBI, CIA, FDA, etc. Because that is problem #1, not our elected officials. It's the UNELECTED officials who are truly running this country, and they have been for decades.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@saraeatononshorts Let me expand on that a bit. Men naturally have faith, in that it is basically what's given to them by testosterone. Women always think it is confidence, but that implies that the man has strength and control and that's what makes him confident. Nope! Men take note of the risks and bravely enter into situations with the faith that things will work out. It's not the same thing at all. Nature gives women estrogen, which causes them to be fearful, anxious, and insecure, which is the explanation for so many feminine behaviors. Men don't feel that way. It's the big difference between the sexes. Women fluff up, put on makeup because they fear inadequacy, and men shower and run their fingers through their hair because they figure things will work out. Women think men are stupid because men don't seem to acknowledge all of the things women fear. But if you ask a man, he says he doesn't care. That's not quite accurate, but what he means is he just feels it will be okay. That's because he naturally feels faith. Women can feel faith too, but it has to be a learned behavior.
9
-
9
-
9
-
I'm glad we're able to talk about China these days, on channels like this. China has been a growing threat for so long, yet nearly everyone was sleeping on it, ignorant. Hopefully we're entering a positive inflection point for the west, as the last few decades have had the CCP in ascendance over the west. People don't remember how bad Mao was, and how influential Maoism was despite that. In the Sixties, in the song "Revolution," the Beatles sang, "If you carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow." Who, in popular culture today, is going to speak out against Xi? BTW, I consider it possible that G. Soros has been allied with the Jiang faction. I think the WEF is also associated with the CCP, but I don't know if it has factional allegiance.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@canm7157 IDK if they're trying to make men feel insecure. They're insecure, and they project on an emotional level, defensively. Like, if they're feeling fat, they'll say something about your weight, one way or the other, even if your weight is fine.
It's very hard to find a young woman who is secure. I don't know if I've ever seen one. Usually it's just different ways of coping / burying / denying deep insecurities.
For instance, I believe the epidemic of female narcissism arises as a coping mechanism for deep insecurities. They feel worthless, and to protect themselves, they create an epic delusional gaslighting about their value. Same with the epidemic of Karen-ism, which comes from feeling powerless and needing to control everything. "Epidemic" is a good word to use for the behavior, as they copy what they see as successful coping strategies from one another.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
We had better education in the schools a few decades ago. Critical thinking was still encouraged, as was self-education. The media narrative still existed, but a lot of adults didn't believe that narrative. Things have definitely changed for the worse, and near as I can tell, this change began in the 80s. Indications are that it was the result of CCP money entering into the US education system. This influence doesn't seem to be adequately exposed yet. In my life, the Beatles could sing, "If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow," yet in this modern era, so many people have been duped into thinking that Chinese communism is a compatible friend to America and the west. It isn't. They want to end us, and they are trying.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@78David I disagree, though of course there's room for debate. The left (and right) began with the French Revolution. The left were the revolutionaries. The right were defined by the left as "monarchists," but the functional definition was simply anyone who was not sufficiently enthusiastic about the revolution.
The French Revolution, as with all of the others of that type, was really just a coup d'etat with a lot of propaganda aimed at getting popular support, but which immediately turned into a Reign of Terror, and then a dystopian Empire. Same thing echoing elsewhere, like in Russia, China, Cuba, etc.
That's the actual left. The right is only the ones who are either the opposition, or those not embracing the left as quickly as the left thinks they should be. Only the left is really defined, and they are the revolutionaries. And their cause is whatever the slogan of the day is.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
If Canada does join the US, it should join as two states: 1) a state comprised of the border strip extending from Windsor to Halifax, including the metro areas of Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and Quebec, and 2) the rest of Canada. That narrow strip of cities accounts for 40-50% of the population, and it is hyper liberal. Make that a state and call it "Quebec." The rest of the country holds virtually all of the conservatives. Call it "Canada." This way you have two states admitted into the union, one liberal and one conservative, and roughly equal in population, where one is focused on metro issues and needs, and one is focused on rural issues and needs. I think this would do a lot to straighten out the political mess that has mired Canada.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I don't think it's even required to marry for love. I think it's required that you marry with FAITH, and that this is the reason why it is typically a religious vow. I will love any pet I take in and care for. If you put in the time and the care, you get invested. All of these women who reject their man in marriage, they're not invested in him. Why is that? Because they don't have faith in what they're doing with the marriage, and they didn't commit. We must approach marriage in faith that it is going to work, and invest fully in it, or it will not work. Love comes as a consequence of us investing our time and effort into things. The love of a parent for a child, the love of a child for a parent, the love of a farming family for their land, etc. Lots of tears, maybe, but love too.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Inflation seems way more than 8%. My rent went up by more than 10%. Gas is up by more like 50%. Groceries are up by about 30%. Diesel fuel, which the country runs on, has gone up by multiples due to chronic scarcity, causing all other prices to rise. The US uses Canadian oil to make diesel. US shale oil is too light. We need those Canadian pipelines.
As for the Fed, they're in cahoots with the WEF, and their goal is to destroy the middle class. If you look at everything they do, it's in line with that goal.
BTW, what Jimmy refers to as "the establishment" is the Democratic Party. The party affiliation of Washington DC is over 90% Democrat. All of the federal offices are over 90% Democrat. So the Democrats don't especially fear losing elections, because they hold ALL the unelected positions and can't be unseated. Winning elections is better, of course, but they profit from fear, and losing elections periodically helps them project fear into the voting population.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@jefeseason4990 If they're related, yes. Not sure what you mean by Hispanic in relation to race, as Spanish is a language, originating in Europe, that spread to the Americas. Anyway, race is lineage. You can have a father who has light colored skin, a mother who has dark colored skin, and a baby who has light, medium, or dark skin. But the child is always of the same race as both of the parents. It can't be any other way. Skin color, hair color, eye color ... it makes no difference. This notion of skin color dictating race is completely fictional, developed as part of Progressive pseudo-science in the 1800s.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Since the Civil War, the media has hated Republicans. When you consider that Lincoln was the first Republican president, this basically means that Republicans have been hated by the new media from the beginning. For instance, they hated Grant, the most successful Union general. But they really turned up the heat after the Wilson administration, which was practically a Nazi administration. You have to read history yourself in order to understand this, because the media feeds us a false narrative, turning Wilson, FDR, and Truman into saints. The first Republican president after Wilson - Harding - is now routinely considered the worst president ever, and corrupt, and no one even questions this. But if you look into it, he wasn't a bad president; the left wing just insists that he was. It's a smear job, a re-writing of history. Harding was actually a popular president at the time, and not corrupt, but the left wing media destroyed him in the years after his death. The media, which joined operations with the emerging deep state and Democratic Party in the Wilson administration, has worked to destroy EVERY Republican president. Recent presidents, like Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Bush / Bush, and Trump all got the same treatment. Eisenhower was somewhat immune, due to his status as a general in WW2, but they griped about him as well, even though he's the one who warned the public about the military industrial complex, which the left SWEARS they care about, as the "anti-war" party (when in fact they have always been the party FOR war).
The point being ... do your own research. The media exists to lie to you and conceal the truth of the past.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
On the other hand, the child born in December may be challenged to advance more than the January child. Challenge is important, because when things are easy, people tend to slack off. When you're smaller, in athletics you have to try harder in order to compete, which can be beneficial. It depends on how the program is structured. If the program is built to penalize the smaller kids and reward the taller kids, then that's what will happen, and that may be what Spain is creating and seeing. Let's translate this to basketball, for instance. The best players are usually the shorter ones, because they were forced to be better ball handlers and shooters, and then if they had a late growth spurt, they will dominate other big players because of their advanced handling.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
No, we do know why there's such an attack on fossil fuels, agriculture, money, jobs, etc. It's because the elites have joined together across the west to destroy the middle class, to remove all freedom and prosperity. It's pretty obvious. They want to increase control, and they don't care if we are forced to eat bugs. In fact, they'd prefer it if we were. This is the international Progressive thought that led us to the WW2 generation (Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Mao) all over again. People don't seem to remember the suffering and the lessons of that era.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
There's a basic misunderstanding here by PBD and others. Science is about QUESTIONING things. But there are people who don't believe "the science" should be questioned, and those people are the Progressives. It's the Progressives who oppose investigations into archaeology and history, just like they oppose every other thought or action that defies them. They cannot tolerate defiance from anyone. It's as simple as that. If you have an idea that goes against the grain of the current orthodoxy, which is Progressive, they will try to run you down, just like they did to Rogan after he decided to use prescribed ivermectin. American archaeology, in particular, has been run by science bullies since the beginning. They do not tolerate dissent.
That said, I'm unfamiliar with this guest and his claims, and I don't mean to be construed as endorsing them. What he says in this clip is well known, old as the hills, not remotely controversial, and nobody would have complaints about it. But if you know American archaeology, you know what I'm saying is true. They're academic bullies who demand that everything be their way.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
IMO, the western ideal for men has long been a sort of mystic stoic. Pragmatic and practical, independent, but willing to sacrifice if needed, and seeking the truth, including higher truth. This is the sort of ideal the founding fathers of America pursued when the US was born.
The "enlightened" philosophies of the French Revolution, which occurred a generation later, is unfortunately what is taught today. This Orwellian model places emphasis on hedonism, selfishness, materialism, atheism, rejection and disrespect of the past in favor of the recent (modernism), and obedience to the revolution / state. Marx was one of the philosophers contemporary to the French Revolution, and socialism / Marxism is what's being pushed hard now in the west (promoted by the CCP). This Progressive philosophy is contrary to the roots of western civilization, which began with the classical era of ancient Greece and the birth of Christianity. Progressive socialism is threatened by, and wants to wipe out, religious philosophy / morality, independence, citizen's rights, and western heroism. This is why western masculinity is under attack.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@AlexxSerpa Steven Scott gave the answer I would give. Hedonism is the more basic instinct, which children exhibit. The prefrontal cortex is considered the last or one of the last areas of the brain to mature. However, one should be mindful that all parts of the body respond to exercise, including the brain. If childish hedonism is taken as the highest wisdom, then the development of that cortex will be small. Or, if the child is raised with stoic type patterns, this cortex will appear more advanced in development. It's a bit like the test where they offer a child a cookie, then say but if you can wait five minutes before eating it, I'll give you a second cookie. Some children will decline to wait, and others will have no problem waiting in order double the reward. IQ is higher for the child who waits, basically.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The liberal media's hatred of Nixon was intense. And with every Republican president they always say, "Oh, the media really doesn't like this guy. America's more divided than ever!" No, it's the same, every frickin' time. The left puts a halo on every single one of their guys, and they maliciously attack every president who isn't one of theirs. They always try to make it seem like the Republican candidate is especially defective, like they're Hitler, a racist, a warmonger, etc., when the reality is that it's the left that holds those positions. At least up till GHW Bush, who was a CIA man, and he was a warmonger, along with his son, as were McCain and Romney. Prior to that RINO takeover, though, the Republicans were the party of peace. Nixon was a Quaker.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The Democrats ARE organized crime, and this comes from Tammany Hall, which they set up in the 1820s. After the Civil War, they exported this model to every major American city, including DC. So they run the police, the courts, and all levels of politics in the big US cities. So you only go to jail if they want you to go to jail. If they don't want you to go to jail, they fudge the reports, remove the evidence, etc. It's real organized crime, with money and threats and deaths. The FBI and CIA were set up in DC after DC had been corrupted, and these two organizations are among the many thoroughly corrupted groups associated with the Democrats. You want to know who rules America? It's this network of people. Definitely not Democrat voters, who are rubes.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The big problem in Europe, a problem for quite some time now, is their lack of energy independence. They must import over 50% of their energy. Some countries, like Spain, import 70%. The recent wars in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine are all about Russia trying to capture the European energy market. Germany, which tried to follow Greta's guidance, has been paying about 3x what the US pays for energy, per person. They decided to shut down their nuclear power plants, leaving them with no option other than to get a higher percentage of their energy from Russia. Europe is a mess on energy, and their lack of focus and high corruption has cost the world a ton of money and millions of innocent lives. And yet the average European has no idea this is an issue, that this is happening. Instead, THEY BLAME THE US.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@contribution741 Of course, what I say has no weight. But it would probably be up to what Alberta decides on their end of the negotiation. The US won't take any illegals, and they will probably expect some history of residency, though I'm sure the US is not fussed about taking in citizens from anywhere in Canada.
Just speculation, but if a deal was worked out between the US and Alberta, and it looked like it was really going down, I doubt Alberta would be the only province opting for the deal. The whole thing would probably unwind, and Canada would join the US.
Some object, saying that Canada is too left wing and would tilt US politics. I say it doesn't have to be like that. We observe that urban areas are liberal, and rural areas are conservative. So if the whole thing is coming over, do some gerrymandering. Like, take the whole border corridor from Windsor to Halifax, including Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and Quebec metro areas, and make that one state. Call it Quebec. Then take all the rest of the country and call it Canada. Two states, one liberal and one - hopefully - conservative. And much less chance of useful things like pipelines being opposed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's not exactly true that women have become more choosy. What happened is the philosophies of hedonism and progressivism dominate modern culture, especially among women, and this causes them to look for "perfectly satisfying" situations. And when they don't find them, they leave. So women are not building, they're leaving. It's just hedonism. What's required is a more stoic philosophy, if you're going to have relationships that persist despite ups and downs. However, stoicism is seen as an "old, traditional" value system - not modern - and thus valueless, according to progressivism. Progressivism says that all old ways are bad and must be replaced by the new, and hedonism is always talked about as if it is "the new way," but of course it isn't.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Wokeness is rooted in hedonism, as is communism. Hedonism is an immature mentality we find in children. They are impatient, demanding, selfish, pleasure-seeking, and won't share toys.
Morality is what we find in the mind of the mature adult. There is a focus on truth, foresight, patience, development, shared prosperity, and self-sacrifice ... the qualities that make for a good parent.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The left wing is hedonistic and elitist. They have been this way since the "Age of Enlightenment." They are adult in body, but children in the mind, following prejudice but calling it science. I think this comes partly from nature, partly from nurture, just like IQ. The prefrontal cortex is the seat of mature and moral behavior, along with general IQ. Children, in their immaturity, exhibit all of the characteristics we see in the left, like impatience, impulsiveness, inability to accurately forecast the future based on current actions, delusions guided by wish-fulfillment, and so on. When or if the prefrontal cortex kicks in, maturity emerges. Nature uses the prefrontal cortex to provide the behaviors needed by humans to be good parents: patience, sacrifice, prudence, etc.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Modern women are hedonists. That's what feminism is really about ... transforming women from a moral state to a hedonistic state. As hedonists, they operate without morals, and anything goes. This is why narcissism, predatory behavior, and ultimately loneliness is so high among modern women. Hedonism is socially slipper because it is about using people, and everything is a negotiation that can be revised. There are no promises, no duty, no sacrifices, no giving ... all of which are behaviors that relate to morality. If you are a moral man, you must avoid hedonistic women. There is no possibility of lasting marriage to a hedonist, and hedonism permits and promotes lying and cheating, counting anything you can get away with as a "good."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The Democratic Party has always been the party of war. They profit from new arms sales. Republican president Eisenhower warned the US about it, as did Gen. Smedley Butler. JFK and RFK tried to turn the Democratic Party toward peace, and they were killed. Beginning with Wilson, the Democratic Party created the deep state, which includes the Federal Reserve, the CIA, the FBI, etc. This bureaucracy - which is unaccountable to anyone - keeps the Democrats in power even when they fail to get elected. The media is Democrat, and so is education. So Americans are heavily brainwashed, marinated in "the narrative." Biden wants the WEF's Chrystia Freeland to be the next head of NATO, so you can see the Democrats are with the WEF and Great Reset.
3
-
3
-
China wants to steal Russia's resources. That's the #1 threat to Russia, but I doubt Russians see it coming at all.
As for the west, the west mainly wants Russia to stop trying to control and limit their access to energy. Russia keeps trying to corner the European energy market. That's the real reason for Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It came directly after oil and natgas resources were discovered in Ukraine. Russia didn't want that to be available for sale to Europe, so they invaded to take those resources. Russia is active in Libya to try to control those energy resources (to prevent them from going to Europe), and the war in Syria was a pipeline war, where Qatar wanted to run a pipeline through to Turkey, and from there to supply Europe, but Syria, a client of Russia, said no. So Qatar and the west tried to overthrow the Syrian govt. Meanwhile, Russia was trying to get Turkey to approve a new pipeline coming from Russia. Turkey, a NATO member, was told to refuse it in favor of the Qatar pipeline. But when the war in Syria failed, Turkey did approve of the Russian pipeline. Wagner is in Africa for several different reasons, mainly related to resources like gold and oil. Russia is a member of OPEC to influence oil policy. Why is Russia so persistent in wanting to control energy to Europe? It's because for a long time now Russia has wanted to conquer and control Europe. It wants to control all of Eurasia, and it came very close to doing it under Stalin. This was the goal of the Tsars, and it continued to be the goal under the communists, and now, even in relative ruin, it remains the goal of Russia.
But what's most likely to happen is that China will secretly take over Russia and have a puppet like Shoigu run it for them. Just like what they're doing in other countries.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The root issue is hedonism. The immature mind is hedonistic: self-centered, imprudent, impatient. When you grow up, this is supposed to be replaced by mature, moral thought. However, since the French Revolution, there has been an effort by an "intelligentsia" to promote hedonism as the mature form of thought. Hedonists eschew morality, claiming it is arbitrary. But what morality is, is simply the world view and behavior developed by a mature mind. The mature person is patient, oriented to truth and doing what's right, and is willing to suffer or sacrifice in order to do the right thing. This is, for instance, the nature of parenthood. What's happening with the sexual revolution is that it is behavior chosen by people who are mentally children. It is what children would do with adult bodies. It's a plague of immaturity.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It seems clear to me. The Russians controlled the site, and it was destroyed from the inside, not the outside. Strategically, Russia wanted to defend against an assault coming over the dam, which was the last bridge across the river. Russia was also aware that Ukrainian forces were building up on tiny islands in the river, preparing to come across and challenge the Russian lines. So they raised the water retained by the dam, and blew the dam, so that the wreckage of the Ukrainian forces would be maximized. If you've noticed, Russian generals literally do not care about civilians or their own troops, so the losses there did not matter to them. Also, they could not move troops or evacuate residents without the Ukrainians noticing.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
European cowardice? I don't think that's the case. The communists know they are fewer in number and act accordingly. They bribe, intimidate, steal, and subvert, just like the CCP. Most people in China don't want the CCP, but the CCP uses Mafia tactics to keep people in line. Ditto for Europe. Ultimately, if you want to understand communistic liberalism, it is organized crime. They take over the govt, police, and courts, and force the people into immorality over time. Remember, people were willing to die to escape communism. People have also been willing to risk it all to get into a country with capitalism and personal freedom.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The French Revolution is still being fought. It's the spirit behind socialism. In the US, the Democrats and deep state are political and philosophical heirs of the French Revolution. Marx, Hegel, Bentham, Malthus, and other philosophers ... they were contemporary to the French Revolution, and their thought guides the left all over the world. The principles of the French Revolution began to overtake those of the American Revolution in the US during the administration of Wilson (D), and this is the beginning of socialism in the US. It's been around for 100 years and it needs to be reversed, because it has pulled the US into "forever wars," indoctrination of the people, and censorship for "your safety" over free speech.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Basically, the feminist bias casts women and mothers as godlike Mary Sues, and men as Homer Simpsons. We know this. We see it daily. It's not true at all. It's just a delusion that women prefer to believe, because women are by nature super insecure, and they do things like this to protect their egos. They're not insecure because they are threatened. It's because of female hormones. As with boys, the sex behavior starts as children. Due to testosterone, boys are prone to explore, be physical, and engage in risky behavior. That's part of male nature. Girls prefer to stay with the group rather than run off, girls are more concerned with social dynamics like who thinks what about whom, and girls try to match things together. As for civilization, that's tied to morality, which arises from mature human behavior. As children, our minds are rapidly developing, but we begin as hedonists ... following the principles of pleasure and pain. Some of us reach physical adulthood and pass all of our years in this state. But normally what happens is that as our brains mature, and the prefrontal cotrex kicks in, is that we're capable of more advanced thought, which is moral thought. For instance, while the child very natural thinks only about themselves and their wants, the mature adult thinks of others and the community. In particular, the parent thinks of the needs of the child. But you will find influential adults who never matured, and they will argue that self-interest is the only reality, and that this is what drives everything. So be aware of this dichotomy in philosophy. Hedonism, as put forth by Age of Enlightenment minds like Jeremy Bentham, is the core of Progressive, utilitarian, and socialistic thought. It says that morality is just a set of arbitrary rules made up by people who want to control others. But this is just someone stuck in permanent childhood complaining about their parents. Empathy and altruism are essential for civilization. If you don't have these qualities of the mature mind, civilization crumbles into anarchy / tyranny, where the strong have their will done and everyone else suffers.
Two other advanced functions thought to be brought into being by a mature prefrontal cortex. One is the ability to foresee the consequences of actions, and thus be prudent. Immature minds lack this ability, and will chronically do things as if they cannot see where it is leading. The final advanced function is the ability to withhold from taking immediate pleasure, instead deferring it while in pursuit of a greater goal. There is a classic test given to children where they are offered a cookie. And they are told if they can avoid eating the cookie for five minutes, they will be given one or more additional cookies, and can eat them. Generally, the younger children cannot resist, and will eat the cookie. Older kids are more prone to wait and get the greater reward. This is the ability to be patient, and to sacrifice. These qualities are essential for parents. But again, many physical adults lack these qualities or do not believe in their value. They do not believe they should ever sacrifice, for instance. And they have no patience.
Anyway, what I just said is super obvious ... or it should be, but I find basically seems to realize this. And that includes the people in the video. If you understand this concept that I'm sharing, please spread it around. Humanity needs to understand itself better, and they need to understand this horrific, ruinous struggle we've been in for the last 200 years, as the inability to understand this leads to endless repetition of either the American Revolution (which is desired) or the French Revolution (which is a setback). The American Revolution sought to dispose of hedonistic rulers and impose a moral government. This is how civilization advances. The French Revolution, however, is the opposite. They turned a bad situation into a worse one, removing what little morality existed, and imposing a reign of terrorism and endless war under an emperor. The French Revolution is the model for all socialist revolutions, promising utiopia but delivering dystopia.
It all has to do with the natural development of the human mind. Some people develop better and reach mental maturity, while others do not. There's nothing inherently wrong with male or female nature, but there is something wrong when either sex is ruled by an immature intellect. That's what feminism is, and that's why men are no longer appreciated as fathers.
3
-
There is no such thing as far right. The whole dichotomy has been defined by the revolutionary left, like that of the French Revolution, who are basically anarchists, terrorists, and communists. Anybody who opposes them is deemed "right wing," "far right wing," "far right extremist," or "dangerously far right wing extremist." But all it means is you don't support anarchy, terror, or communism. There's no "far right" ideology. The various tropes they point to as belonging to the far right are actually policies that have been supported by the left that they'd like for people to overlook in their history. Eugenics is left wing phony science, for example. Modern concepts of race tied to skin color are equally phony left wing ideas. Science says, "One human race." 🤷♀
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
IMO, a lot of the people commenting on this video are as sick as Greenwald, who has been a socialist all his life and he loves Russia and China.
The Ukrainian War is ugly, like every war. There is nothing good about it. But you don't give in when the enemy is about to capitulate. That's insanity. Should the US have given up in WW2 after the losses at Pearl Harbor, or after the Battle of the Bulge, because the losses were hard to bear? It's just incredibly dumb thinking. Russia lost in Afghanistan. They are going to lose in Ukraine too.
As for the Ukrainian people being unwilling to fight ... maybe you aren't familiar with history or the news, but the US voluntary military is seeing declining numbers. If a war with China starts up, without a doubt there would be an immediate draft, where they would force young men to enter the service. There's just so many soft people in the world today, like Greenwald, who have been living on tea and crumpets and daydreams their whole lives, and they have no sense of reality.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Govt ghouls, but unaware of their consequences. Justin is a puppet, just like Joe, Kamala, and so many are puppets. Justin sold out for money, fame, and power, and he does as he's told. It's like Chris Cuomo. Shallow, fame-seeking, money-seeking, and willing to say and do whatever for it, yet at the same time disconnecting themselves from the consequences, feeling like they're not responsible for their own words, their own acts. Joe's not running it, and Justin's not running it. They're just collecting the illicit cash for doing the job. IMO, the left's agenda is really only backed by at most 1/6th of the population, and they're among the most uninformed. The problems are coming from the heads of agencies in the bureaucracies, and their networks.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
"Everybody needs food, and they're not making more farmland. It's best for everyone if I control all the farms." - Bill Gates
Bill Gates, BTW, is suffering from a surfeit of plant carbs, as are most people eating a modern diet. If you focus on eating animal products, you won't look like that. Your stomach and small intestine will be acidic, and you'll have plenty of iron, B6, B12, and other essential nutrients. When you eat too many plant carbs, you get an alkaline small intestine, and that's when you get overrun by bacteria, fungi, viruses, etc. It's as simple as that. Archaeologists can tell when a population first started to eat cereal because that's when they start to get cavities.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Leftism is hedonism, which is narcissistic, sociopathic, demanding, and impatient. There's not only no possible marriage to such people, there's no being with them. They don't have friends, just acquaintances that they use and stab in the back. This philosophy is socially slippery. Every time the left is on the rise, society suffers and people divide instead of joining together.
The right wing, on the other hand, is socially sticky. It's mature, responsible, patient, generous, and faithful. Both partners need to be this way to have any kind of relationship, esp. marriage.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
To a fair extent, South Africa's descent into failed state status is directly related to their severely under-reported association with the CCP. Likewise, there seems to be an agreement to not talk much about the role of communism in South Africa.
Huh, I wonder why that is? Is South Africa the next Sri Lanka? Here's a quote from a common online resource, which at least mentions the association, whereas most resources hide it.
The ANC has long had close ties with China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), with the CCP having supported ANC's struggle of apartheid since 1961. In 2008, the two parties signed a memorandum of understanding to train ANC members in China.
President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC have not condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and have faced criticism from opposition parties, public commentators, academics, civil society organisations, and former ANC members due to this. The ANC youth wing has meanwhile condemned sanctions against Russia and denounced NATO's eastward expansion as "fascistic". Officials representing the ANC Youth League acted as international observers for Russia's staged referendum to annex Ukrainian territory conquered during the war.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think the Mossad link is a red herring and part of the coverup. IMO, it was most likely the FBI itself, operating as they did under their COINTELPRO program, who Epstein worked for. I think he was collecting blackmail information for the use of the FBI. And I think he was ended by the FBI in a manner similar to what we just saw with Chauvin in late November. While in federal prison, Chauvin was stabbed 22 times by an inmate who was an FBI informant. Epstein was likewise in a federal facility, where one must assume the FBI has better access and control than most. The FBI will not reveal the identity of who was in the other cells in Epstein's cellblock. Why? To conceal the fact that one of them was an FBI informant, most likely, who was released while the cameras were turned off.
FWIW, if you recall, mobster Jack Ruby - the man who ended self-described "patsy" Lee Harvey Oswald while he was in police custody - was also an FBI informant.
And of course there's more, everywhere you look. Like, the FBI is sitting on the evidence they collected from Epstein, not acting on it to arrest those who abused minors. It's not because they're afraid of retaliation by anybody. It's because it's THEIR OWN PROJECT, and they don't want it exposed. They are doing a coverup, and trying to make it look like maybe ... the Israelis, or the Russians, or someone else was doing it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jimmy doesn't actually understand what's going on. He's simply settled on a story that tickles his liberal socialist heart. He says some good things at times, but he's not very well informed. He's getting better, but he's seen way too much CNN in his life and smoked too much pot. I'd definitely pick him for president over any Democrat, though, as I think he's sincere and trying to be a good man. IMO, part of the rationale for why the US is spending money in this particular way is the Democrats are largely influenced by China, and China wants Russia DESPERATELY. Not Taiwan, but RUSSIA. Not through military conquest, but by soft control over all key Russian resources. And they've been getting that. Their influence over Russia and Russian resources has been steadily growing since the start of the war. Tim is also not understanding the situation, though he is right about the Syrian pipeline. Russia's strategic policy for the last century has been to control Europe's energy. Stalin was selling oil to Hitler, and trying to use Hitler to take down the west so that Stalin could walk in after. And while Stalin didn't get everything he wanted, he did walk away from WW2 with all of eastern Europe. Putin's no different. He wants to control as much of the world as possible, and would like to restore Stalin's empire. But Putin's real enemy is the CCP, and of all the nations, China is the one winning in the Ukraine war. The saving grace for Earth may be the timing of the current collapse of China's economy. But we'll have to see how it goes.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The three letters you won't find in casual searches, but they are the hand in the puppet ... those letters are C, C, and P. They run the WEF, to put a western face on their agency.
It is instructive to look at Canada, and their massive drug problem that is hidden from the public, where China is implicated. Look at South Africa, which is (still) in decline, where the ANC is hooked up to the CCP. And you know that in the US, Biden was receiving money from Chinese intelligence. So, do some quick math regarding the UK. Ultimately, it is China, again.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm glad somebody's finally talking about China Gate, because whenever I mention it, it's just crickets. It's like people have to wait for someone in the media to talk about it before they can allow their brains to tolerate the thoughts and memories. IMO, China doesn't get near enough credit for their complete undermining of the west, which goes back to the 80s and Bush and Clinton ... who are on the same team, which is Team CCP. That's the same era in which Soros partners with the CCP and Klaus Schwab rebrands his organization from a "European" focus to a "World" focus. Frankly, is it the Clintons who are offing people, or is it the Chinese? We know (or should) that the CCP got John Ashe, Shinzo Abe, and the president of Haiti. Theyr'e actively doing ops.
And it drives me crazy that even Whitney discounts China's involvement, when she can see it all over the place. It's not a misnomer to call China Gate CHINA GATE.
And to answer the other question, about US presidents serving the US, I believe Trump did, and before him everyone was a sellout till you get to Reagan, who they tried to assassinate within the first few months to put Bush in power. Prior to this point, the controls on US presidents are domestic, coming from the deep state. This is why Carter was a one-termer: he didn't play ball and go to war with Iran. Ford was thought by the deep state to be an ally, but when he found a spine and crossed the FBI, exposing COINTELPRO, they used Squeaky Fromme - a domestic CIA asset - to try to take him out. And when elections came, they threw their weight behind Carter. Before that was Nixon, who resisted the deep state and got the US out of the Vietnam War, which is the same thing that got the Kennedy brothers killed. They took Nixon out with Watergate, which was a CIA domestic op. JFK tried to resist the CIA and got whacked. People wonder if it was the mob or Cubans, not realizing that the mob worked for the FBI and the Cubans worked for the CIA. Eisenhower was well aware of the deep state, but couldn't do much except try to warn America at the VERY END of his second term. Truman helped birth the CIA, but he was not entirely corrupt, which is why Puerto Ricans were imported to try to kill him. And so on. IMO, the deep state really begins with Wilson, but that's just drawing a line based on certain criteria. There were power struggles with insiders before Wilson, of course. Go back to McKinley, who didn't want war and was killed, and even Lincoln, who was assassinated after his second election, which put his Democrat VP into the White House right after the Democrats / Confederates had lost the war. You can keep drawing lines and splitting hairs, going back as far as the Hamilton-Burr duel. There's always been stuff going on. But the deep begins in earnest with Wilson, and the CCP influence begins with Bush 1 (during the Reagan administration).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Well, duh! Hedonism is what the whole pump and dump culture is based on. It has no virtue and it is selfish. It doesn't bring people together, but rather divides them.
And stupid people are expecting this behavior to lead to marriage and happiness? Of course not! It leads to sadness, division, and ruin. Just like it ALWAYS HAS. So go ahead, get loaded on booze, pot, whatever, and have sex with whoever, and pretend that you are laying the foundation for a great life. Remove your idiot self from the gene pool, please.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Whenever the Democrats have the upper hand in America, there is war. People should see this right away, but I guess they get blinded by the lies of the mainstream media. Look at the history. Virtually every single war or significant military action has been under the Democrats, while the Republicans - right up to GHW Bush, who was a CIA RINO - managed to mostly avoid war. Even the war in Ukraine could only happen under Biden and Obama, but not under Trump. Kosovo under Clinton (D), Vietnam under Johnson (D), Korea under Truman (D), WW2 under FDR (D), WW1 under Wilson (D), and the Mexican-American War under Polk (D). The Spanish-American War was opposed by McKinley (R), but called for by a Dem majority. Lincoln (R) opposed the Civil War, but it was forced by the Democrats / Confederates who attacked the supply ships at Ft. Sumter, starting the conflict.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The left began with the French Revolution, during the lifetime of influential thought leaders like Marx, Bentham, Hegel, and Malthus. When Napoleon became emperor following the Reign of Terror, he took France into war after war. This same morally crippled mentality was accepted by the Democratic Party in the late 1800s, and they began pushing for endless war, because this was the way to usher in their globalist utopia. First, the "intelligent" people would lead a revolt of the poor in America and take over. This was accomplished during the Wilson regime. Then they would reshape govt so they would always be in power. This was done by legalizing the income tax, growing the bureaucracy, filling it with Democrats, and then feeding the war machine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, people don't know their history, especially of the late 1800s, after the Civil War, up into WW1. Or, rather, they only know of it as it has been told to them by the left wing.
There was a huge swing in the western world toward socialism, coming from the intellectual classes, which was associated with rational science. But it wasn't rational, it was corrupt, just like the climate change hoax, various dietary hoaxes like the egg yolks are bad for you hoax ("we just assumed this, we didn't test it, and when we tested it we found out we were wrong"), and the recent plague and its "antidote." They "scientifically" concluded things like "Jews are mentally inferior," which led to the rational scientific policies of eugenics and population control. The US intellectuals had swung so far into socialism that they were to some extent leading Europe, and socialism was seen simply as "the future."
As for the political situation, what was going on was that it was the Democrats doing everything they could to regain power after losing the Civil War. Like Scarlett O'Hara, having lost, they were determined to never lose again. They formally allied with organized crime - which had begun in NYC with Tammany Hall - and with radical labor, and with banking. So they had intellectuals and newspapers, goons and thugs, and money. They re-took the White House with Wilson and never looked back. We've been living in their world ever since.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gerald Ford was on the Warren Commission, and later he was added to the Nixon administration as VP to support the deep state once Nixon was gone. However, he found some backbone, which he showed when he attempted to end the FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was being run by J Edgar's right hand man, who was also the informant / guide on Watergate, leading Woodward and Bernstein to the desired conclusions which forced Nixon out. This is why Squeaky Fromme - a former aide to Charles Manson, who was part of the CIA MK-Ultra program - was directed to assassinate Ford. What happened, repeatedly, was the CIA ran the assassinations, and the FBI ran the coverups. This means term limits won't help us.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Of course, the problem with this theory is that the Arctic isn't really melting and global warming is just a CCP-oriented left wing scam.
What Trump is doing is fending off an aggressive CCP, which nobody seems to be talking about. According to the media narrative, all China wants is Taiwan, which is BS. The whole immigration wave is the CCP. Fentanyl, which is killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, is seen by China as their retribution against the west. Did everybody forget the hidden CCP biolab in CA? The list goes on. For instance, the CCP is the patron of Biden, Chris Wray, and Justin Trudeau, along with numerous others. The WEF is the CCP's promotional agency in the west.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Real science doesn't have consensus. Here's my take on the origin of the pork taboo (which I see is finally briefly alluded to at the very end of the video). The pig was domesticated at least twice, once long ago in Mesopotamia, and once in the vicinity of China. They became identified with those cultures, just as others focused on the cow, fish, or poultry.
The Semitic cultures of Judaism and Islam fought to maintain a distinct identity from the dominant Mesopotamian one. So they focused on promoting their own traditions of food, clothing, language, beliefs, family stories, etc. Anyone seen partaking of Mesopotamian culture was perceived as an infidel ... someone who was not being faithful to the ways of the tribe.
FWIW, the Semites were pastoral shepherds, and their main protein sources were sheep and goats.
This same problem also presented itself with resistance to Canaanite culture and Egyptian culture.
IMO, this is very easy to understand. It's part of reinforcing tribal identity. I think the cleanliness issue is another retro-projection.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nobody is shocked at this. The left embraced the philosophy of Malthus on overpopulation 200 years ago. Malthus was a contemporary of Marx, Hegel, Bentham, and the French Revolution, which is when the political left was born. The concern about overpopulation is really a desire to cull the herd so that more resources are available for the remaining few ... and of course the people behind this plan intend to be among the "remaining few." Eugenics was an outgrowth of this philosophy, as was its sibling, class warfare. Now the term the left uses for this idea is "climate change." All it really means is that this is the excuse for ending overpopulation on the Earth. That's why they're reducing fertilizer. It's to reduce the amount of food available, which will negatively impact the poor. That's successful class warfare, and if great numbers are eliminated, it also counts for them as eugenics. Fewer people equals more resources for the remainder, just as Thanos said.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DJ1573 I don't think YOU know what socialism is, or its history. Which is not surprising, since generations have been programmed by the mainstream media. Russia is not that different from the USSR, the CCP, Cuba, NK, or Venezuela, if you hadn't noticed. Hamas, like all of the Middle Eastern terrorist organizations, has roots in the Arabic socialist movement, which was sponsored by the USSR, China, and Cuba, along with many other socialist revolutionary movements. Russia has a base in Syria because of the prior influence. Russia and China have supported Palestine as a socialist revolution since the 60s. What world have you been living in? You sound mind controlled. 😵💫
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@shayalynn No, I'm not aware of any specific impetus for Russia to seize Israel.
My studies lead me to believe that long ago Russia set itself the goal of acquiring all of Eurasia: from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from the Arctic to the Indian Ocean. Israel would fall within that zone. This was Russia's side of the "Great Game" against the British Empire, and the goal was retained by the Soviets. Russia looked closer to acquiring that entire area during Stalin's time than at any other time.
However, Russia is, in my opinion, more likely to break apart than grow. Its history is one of being cobbled together like a Frankenstein and held together by force. It doesn't naturally want to stay together, and the central force never made much of an attempt to bring people together, but instead tended to abuse everyone.
As I'm writing this, the Wagner Group is staging a coup of sorts, taking advantage of the weakness of that central force, which has been revealed in the Ukraine war. IMO, this could lead to more natural separation of oblasts (provinces) within Russia, maybe something between two and six states. IMO, the east and west should divide at the Urals. And the west, where most people live, might divide further, with groups like the Chechens potentially seeking independence.
There's also the potential for collateral damage to all of the dictatorships that Russia has supported, like Belarus, and the "stans."
Or, of course, Wagner could be defeated ... but the weakness is real, and it's unclear what would happen after a Wagner defeat. Possibly China would take advantage of the weakness and become more of a power broker inside Russia.
But back to Israel ... I can't think of why Russia would have a significant interest there at this time. In the Soviet era, yes, but right now ... no.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I don't think you appreciate the corrosive nature of chronic Mexican disorganization. The US could very easily have annexed all of Mexico after that war, but they didn't, because it was a chaotic mess and not worth the fuss. Now, 150 years later, it is still a chaotic mess, and still a problem, but for a slightly different reason. Because of its proximity, Mexico is a perennial target of the international communist left wing, seeking ingress to the US to capture and subvert the US. Same thing in Canada. It's not a coincidence that communist China has allied with the cartels operating in both Mexico and Canada, and it's not a coincidence that Trump is taking China's influence on as it appears in Mexico, Canada, Greenland, and Panama. What's happening is the same kind of situation that has existed in the Middle East, with Palestinians continually getting exploited, first by the Soviets, and now by the CCP, as those powers seek to destabilize the Middle East and turn it into part of the socialist empire. IMO, for long term peace, it makes sense for the US to annex both Canada and Mexico. You don't like the idea, having been heavily propagandized all your life by left wing malefactors. Mexico has already been targeted and destabilized by the international left for a century. How much longer do you want it to be targeted? At what point do people choose peace, prosperity, and freedom over the promise of a quick payday for living a life as a socialist-backed criminal?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jefeseason4990 Not sure at all where you're going with this. Being Dominican is not a race. In Jamaica, you have European whites, descendants of native people, descendants of people from India, Africa, etc., so there's quite a mixture of bloodlines. All of them belonging to the human race, but also each family lineage can be referred to as a race. If you're related, you belong to the same race, and if you're not, you don't, even if your skin color is identical. A race is a line of descent, and as such, has nothing at all to do with skin color.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Federal Reserve, federal income tax, segregation, camps, propaganda, FBI, globalism, and so on. This era is where we really lost America. People think the disasters they see around them are new, but they are not. By the end of the Wilson administration, DC had already been turned into a clone of Tammany Hall. Big media, big banks, big business, and the military industrial complex had all come together to form the deep state, and it was Democrat.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
People seem to be missing on what the real problem is. It's the 430+ federal agencies, including the Federal Reserve, that were created one after the other in the 20th century. In 1946, these agencies were completely removed from all accountability. This is why voting seems increasingly irrelevant. It's because we have millions of people working with no term limits in hundreds of federal agencies, making rules with the weight of law, who are not accountable to the people or anyone but themselves. The growth of this power, which is against the pattern laid out by the founding fathers, is turning the US into a totalitarian state that serves these corrupted agencies. To regain our freedoms, we MUST abolish ALL of these federal agencies. Their missions, where truly valid, must be moved to the state level so that we have some accountability and checks and balances. When they exist at the federal level, the power is focused and an easy target for corruption. It's like what happened with the news industry when it converted under Clinton from a model with distributed ownership to one where there are only six owners. Look at the social media monopolies. What if, instead of having 1 Twitter, we had multiple Twitters sharing a common platform? The more that control is distributed out, and harder to corrupt, the more likely we are to have freedom and accurate representation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Anyone remember how men used to praise women, in general, for being the mothers and wives who worked hard and sacrificed for the good of the family? Yeah, it's not something you hear so much anymore. Why is that? Because women changed, like a school of fish suddenly swimming in a complete opposite direction. Instead of being someone you could compliment as being the moral backbone of a family, they've decided to become unabashed prostitutes, looking out for no one but themselves, and avoiding all sacrifice. This world of left and right politics parallels intrinsic human behavior. It's hedonism to pursue pleasure and avoid pain. It's morality - and maturity - to put off pleasures and embrace suffering for the good of others. Like being a parent. Like being a spouse. Modern women are trying to have marriage and kids while maintaining hedonistic goals, and that just doesn't work. Being a parent is not all pleasure. Being a spouse is not all pleasure. And this is why kids are no longer maturing. It's because their mothers are not mature, either, and there's the expectation of a childhood that extends into your adult years. That's not something anybody really wants, because an adult who is a child - selfish, petty, demanding, impatient, shirking responsibility, etc. - is a monster.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Keep in mind there were two attempts on Ford back in Sept '75, both at close range (Secret Sieve, where were you?), and Ford was saved by a point blank misfire and a miss. The first attempter was tangentially related to the CIA, reportedly. The second was a "former FBI informant." What was going on at the time? The investigation, exposure, and censure of the FBI for its COINTELPRO program. IMO, the CIA is involved when it's a foreign national or drugged up crazy person (MK-Ultra signature move). The FBI is the culprit when the attempter is racially or politically motivated. You know, as in, "I was chatting with friends online, and I met some new guy in the chat room who suggested I should take my ideas and put them into action."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There are two reasons why left wing cities are always in decay. 1) The left is hedonistic, not moral. Everyone seeks their immediate pleasure and cares not for the future or for others, and this exists from top (politicians) to bottom (criminals). 2) The left, being hedonistic, is in league with crime and corruption. City Hall is corrupt, the courts are corrupt, the police are corrupt, the schools are corrupt, the hospitals are corrupt, and so on.
It is common that once the Democratic Party takes hold in a city, that city will remain Democrat forever. That's because they set up a corrupt Tammany Hall, which is like a shadow govt that continues to run the city no matter who is elected. Washington DC has the same setup.
All good things are built by moral people. Civilization is built by moral people. All hedonists do is destroy. They are parasites.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I actually don't agree with Mr. Sowell on this one. The liberals changed their tune on scientific racism because it wasn't playing well. They flipped the script, taking the criticism of themselves as "old white racists" and blamed their opponents for that, claiming that liberals were the virtuous non-racists while the conservatives were the real racists. This is a time worn tactic of the left, to shift the blame for what they themselves have done onto others. Though they reshaped their message, they kept on working according to their old Progressive ideals. It's just like how beginning in the late 1800s the Democrats described themselves as virtuous populists while they were in fact allied with big money,, but starting with the Tea Party and Trump administration they now describe populists as being the worst evil. "Conservatives are dangerous populists!"
Another recent example is how the liberals had to tear down the Confederate statues, which they said were "conservative." No, it was literally the Democrats who put those statues up, during the Jim Crow era. By removing them they helped to cover their tracks, so it was more difficult for incurious individuals to stumble across the true history of the Democratic Party.
It's like how the Democrats, now branding themselves as the champions of rainbow sexuality, were a few decades ago the ones who were fighting against homosexuality and running vice squads. The comic book code - which was largely put into place to forbid children's exposure to sinister homosexuality (like Batman and Robin) - was championed by the Democrats, with one Democrat presidential candidate running specifically on this platform. The next generation saw this same sort of pattern re-emerge under Al Gore and his attempt to preserve the innocence of youth by attacking the lyrics of popular music. Liberals are Progressives, and Progressives are always trying to shape society according to their communistic ideals using the excuse of phony science. The "scientific" determination by Progressives in the US that Jews were intellectually inferior - mentioned by Sowell - is linked to the Holocaust. The German socialists of that era were Progressives and inspired by the American Progressives. Wilson, the Progressive racist, was very popular in Europe. And of course, in the years since that era, the liberals flipped the script so that now they blame their opponents, the "conservatives," claiming the Germans were conservative and that the Holocaust was the result of conservative ideals. All of these lies and pseudo-science should be transparent to anyone who understands history and science. Unfortunately, the liberals protect their lies with billions of dollars of propaganda pumped through the "news" media and educational system every year.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
While I don't think we should be ignoring everything at home like we are, and while I don't think we should be spending money as frivolously as we are, I do think it's good idea to arm Ukraine. They are spending their lives, which is the harder part of the job. My analysis is that Russia's plan ever since Peter the Great has been to take over Europe, and over the last century they have attempted to do it in various ways, including cornering the market on energy imports to Europe. Despite what has been said to the media, the whole reason for the invasion of Ukraine was to take the energy resources there, to control more of the energy going to Europe. The regions Russia took were where the oil and gas fields lie. As with Syria, none of the media ever talk about the REALITY of the situation. In Syria, Qatar was trying to run a pipeline across Syria to Turkey, to supply natgas to Europe, breaking into Russia's market and control. At the same time, Russia wanted to run a pipeline to Turkey, but since the Qatar deal was underway, Turkey refused. In the end, thousands were killed in Syria and no pipeline was run through. Instead, Turkey accepted the Russian pipeline. This invasion of Ukraine is just the latest battle in the ongoing war of Russia trying to take Europe. People seem to have already forgotten that Russia was attempting to take Europe in WW2, and succeeded in taking the eastern half.
2
-
IMO, the eastern countries would benefit from forming their own alliance. Everybody from Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland in the north, down to Greece in the south. Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Finland could join, or form their own group. It's these small countries that need to band together. Germany can stand on its own. France, Spain, and Italy might benefit from their own group. Something like that. But they all need to kick China out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
All of this is happening because of the swampy state, which is the federal bureaucracy. The Democrats created this bureaucracy as an end-run around the Constitution. The swampy state can rule this country unimpeded, because they are not elected, and since the Administrative Procedures Act was passed in 1946, the WH and Congress cannot really manage these agencies. They can select a person to run each one, but other than that, it's hands off. So it's really this bureaucracy that runs the country regardless of who the people elect, and it has been this way since the mid-40s. Which is, BTW, when the CIA was created. And just a few years after this act, the CIA was running programs like MK-Ultra and the FBI was running COINTELPRO.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Heartless = modern. Modern women, in contrast to traditional women, are fearful, defensive, predatory. They're Karens.
It's Progressivism that causes this. Progressive ideology began with the French Revolution and contemporaries, like Marx, Bentham, and Malthus. They want to control population, eugenics, the economy, politics ... and the leading principle for governing your life is the "pleasure principle" ... hedonism. That's what creates modern women. Traditional men and women are faithful. They are not subject to the anxiety experienced by moderns, and don't feel the need to heavily self-medicate with substances, gambling, or promiscuity. Traditionals value courage, strength of character, altruism, and restraint. This correlates with the development of the prefrontal cortex of the brain. When people do not develop this area, they make decisions based on emotions rather than logic, they tend to be selfish, and they act without regard to consequences. When this part of the brain is more fully developed, a person has restraint, is thoughtful of consequences of actions, and tends to be a more disciplined thinker.
IMO, the cultural practice of the philosophy of hedonism is creating a low IQ, impulsive society that fails to think of the consequences of their actions. This is being driven by selfish pleasure as an ideal. The CCP and other socialist / criminal organizations take advantage of this cynical approach to life, as they find that hedonism makes people easy to control. People of faith, on the other hand, are very hard to control, which is why tyrannical powers target them for elimination.
For any nation to be free and remain free, they must be people of faith. When the number of faithful people falls and the number of hedonists rises, that nation is in deep trouble. Hedonists don't care about what happens to you, and they don't care about the future.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Universities have gone hedonist and socialist. Anybody wanting to elevate their thinking has to learn from someone with a fully functioning brain, which means someone with morality. I'm serious. Hedonism in adults is the result of brain damage. The prefrontal cortex provides the qualities we observe in a mature mind, and it is responsible for traits associated with advanced IQ, like patience, prudence, empathy, and morality. Little kids are hedonists, only thinking of themselves, not thinking sufficiently about consequences, and impatient. Their prefrontal cortex is not developed yet. Nobody should be reaching adulthood with that kind of behavior, but up to about half of adults these days are impaired in that way, acting like children, as though their prefrontal cortex does not work. The last thing you should be doing is getting your education from brain impaired adults.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Russia's ruble is strong because it is backed by Russian oil, timber, and grain ... but America's dollar is weak because ... it is backed by American oil, timber, and grain? lol
The second person interviewed was great. She seemed like practically a member of my family. The final man is right that real prosperity is a shared prosperity across all the people of the country, and not a greedy grab by those in power. Russia, China, and most nations are an example of greedy govt, and the US, unfortunately, is headed deeper into that itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Tulsi still doesn't know enough history. Like, aside from JFK (D), which presidents have been shot? Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), Teddy Roosevelt (R), Reagan (R), and Trump (R).
Now tell me again, Tulsi, how the Democrats were really great, and Republicans were the bad guys. You think all of those Republicans deserved to be shot? Do you think it wasn't Democrats shooting them? Do you really buy that "crazed lone gunmen" were responsible for all but Lincoln? Even when you know MK-Ultra is real? C'mon. Democratic Party leadership is rotten.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It didn't start with Eisenhower. People became alerted to it, but it had previously existed and Eisenhower was only giving credence to the idea. Yes, Eisenhower was speaking probably more specifically about the CIA, which was signed into being by Truman in the previous administration. But before the CIA was created, this still existed. It even existed before the FBI was created, because the DOJ was already corrupt and serving the deep state when they moved J Edgar Hoover over to head up the FBI. If you look at the assassinations of Lincoln (R), Garland (R), McKinley (R), and the attempted assassination of Teddy Roosevelt (R), I think you can see the trail leads right back to the end of the Civil War, which the Democrats LOST.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
War has been a major money-maker for the Democratic Party for over 100 years. They are truly the party of war. But they used their control over the propaganda apparatus to make you think it was the Republican Party that was the party of war. All you have to do is look at the facts realize the truth. No Republican president called for war until former CIA Director GHW Bush, and his son also called for war. That's it. Meanwhile, the Democrats have the Mexican-American War (Polk, D), the Civil War, the Spanish-American War (Hearst, et al), WW 1 (Wilson, D), WW 2 (FDR, D), Korea (Truman, D), Vietnam (Johnson, D), Bosnia (Clinton, D). And which US presidents have been shot? Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), JFK (D), Reagan (R), Trump (R).
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm disappointed in the lack of nuance in this video. While some in the South were seceding to retain the right to own slaves, others believed they were seceding to protect states' rights. And for decades leading up to the conflict, there were political tensions between the N and S based on trade, where when the N rose to power, the S would become impoverished, and when the S would rise to power, the N would suffer. This hatred between N and S started before the issue of slavery blew up. Also, SC tried to secede from the Union earlier, over taxes, and President Jackson threatened to take the army to SC and start hanging everyone who refused to pay. So there was an antecedent for secession and rebellion that had nothing to do with slavery, and it was linked to states' rights and a feeling that the federal govt was not always looking out for the well being of the South.
2
-
2
-
Yes, we need to cut the federal govt back, but term limits aren't the solution. That's not where the real abuse is. The solution is to GET RID OF THE AGENCIES. They are the WHOLE problem. Ask yourself, who investigates the FBI? Turns out, it is the FBI. THAT's the problem. The people have no control over the 430+ federal agencies that were all created in the 20th century. You get rid of the agencies, push their missions back to the states, and all of a sudden you have checks and balances that did not exist before. The federal govt is shrunk, its power is shrunk, there is no longer an excuse for federal taxes (aside from defense), and virtually all lobbying will evaporate ... because aside from defense, it was all related to the activities of the agencies. The number and size of Congressional bills would diminish, because there are no federal programs to run.
THAT's the solution that fixes things.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@blintzkreig1638 No, I'm not French, and if your reading comprehension was better, you'd realize I said to "be prepared," which means to be prepared for war. Chinese troops were on the field in both the Vietnam and Korean wars. But faking physical war and running other operations instead is mainly what China does, and people need to recognize that. China is more likely to tilt Taiwan through spy ops rather than by open warfare. IMO, recently they assassinated Shinzo Abe and the president of Haiti, in addition to their well-known bribery of high officials (like the Bidens). I'm hardly the only one pointing out that the PLA has zero recent experience in warfare, but plenty of spy ops experience, and that Chinese generals have nothing to lose when sabre rattling, but plenty to lose if war breaks out and their forces get exposed as unready in some way, just like what happened with Russia when they invaded Ukraine only to have vehicles stall out due to chronic poor maintenance.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The 5 most devastating influence from the US govt: the intelligence agencies (it's not just the CIA), the law enforcement agencies (DOJ, plus everyone underneath them, like FBI, ATF, DEA, etc.), the military industrial complex, the pharmaceutical industrial complex, and the financial complex.
And since the 1980s, these are joined by an outsider: the CCP, which has been running influence operations throughout the West, plus drugs, espionage, and assassinations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This guy is pretty dumb about food for a chef. EVERYONE KNOWS that modern food culture was developed as a consequence of the spread of regional foods, especially spices, world wide.
Thus, Italy is associated with the tomato, which is of course a Native American food. The Irish are associated with potatoes ... which again, are a Native American food. Pineapple, which is eaten all over the world ... yes, it comes from Native Americans.
Furthermore, the notion of discovery is legit. If this chef ever gets his act together, he should HOPE that people DISCOVER his restaurant. No, it doesn't mean that the he didn't create the restaurant, but when people who don't know about something find it, they DISCOVER it.
So many TED talks are just utterly ... bad.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Actually, I think it's fair to say that ALL of the Republican presidents are massively underappreciated, because they've all taken the brunt of left wing history re-writing and getting lambasted in the crooked press. The left LIES constantly about these men. For instance, consider how much the press has bled ink over the death of JFK - which was horrible, and by the usual suspects - yet they don't talk about how these four presidents were shot within a 35 year period: Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), and T. Roosevelt (R). Huh, I wonder who could have been behind that? Just crazy lone gunmen, I guess! Watergate was a CIA op, and Reagan was shot just 5 months in, in an attempt to promote CIA Bush into the Oval Office. And the left says Harding (R) was the worst ... the "most corrupt" since ... Grant (R). Yet there's nothing there. It's empty mudslinging. The who don't research for themselves don't know, because all that is taught in schools and in the media is LIES! Getting back to Nixon, if you got your information from popular culture, you'd think the Vietnam War was his, and that he championed it, when the opposite was true. It was Johnson's war, and like RFK, Nixon campaigned on ending it, and he did. Which is why he was re-elected in a landslide.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This story is such BS, it lacks integrity, and it's the #1 thing I dislike about this channel. The Manhattan Project was overwhelmingly staffed with Americans, but at the top was a small cluster of international greats. The same with the early space program. The same with Musk's Space X. So stop lying to people about H1B, and stop the jingoistic bigotry. As with the gun control argument, you don't take away ALL rights to use foreign workers because SOME abuse it. Also, there IS a SEVERE rot of work culture in America, and you know it, but you deny it when it suits you. Such hypocrisy! The woke people whose jobs exist because of DEI, this is current American work culture. The left half of America wants a paycheck just for existing, and they're not good workers.
2
-
2
-
If you don't like the military industrial complex, steer your thoughts to dumping the 16th Amendment (income tax). The founding fathers rejected and warned against the idea of a federal income tax, but the Democrats pushed it through in the early 1900s, telling their voters it was for "social justice." This was a LIE. What it was for was the creation of organized crime in federal govt, which included the creation of the military industrial complex. You can't fund endless war without the income tax. If you are interested in this era, it begins with the Spanish-American War, which was promoted by Hearst and the Democrats. Republicans, like President McKinley, rejected it, but when Congress called for the war, McKinley reluctantly signed off on it. He was subsequently assassinated. After the war, the 16th Amendment was signed, and this provided the funding for continuous warfare and continuous expansion of federal govt and federal power over citizens and the states. This is when socialism began in the US, and most people didn't notice because like the frog in the pot, they turned the heat up slowly. We are the frogs, and the water has been boiling for a while now. 🐸🔥
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jeffs6081 Again, thanks for the response, but I don't buy that. And I don't believe a mass migration is required. Look at England. Each minority ruling class in turn apparently used their language as the language of govt, which in some way trickled down to the masses, affecting the common language going forward. So English has very few Celtic words (though more as you head into the hinterlands), more Germanic words, especially for common language, and alternate French words that represent the upper class accent. Thus, residence instead of house.
IMO, it's almost completely certain that some IE group entered southern Italy and became dominant. That doesn't mean they replaced the Mediterranean genes. They were probably a minority, as in every English invasion. But they were dominant to the point their language replaced the local pre-IE languages like Etruscan.
Anyway, I don't mean to bother you about this. I'm just curious about what we know, what we don't know, and how it all might have happened. I find this particular thing to be an unanswered question.
Have a good one! 👍
2
-
@jeffs6081 History is a science where new discoveries take a while to be evaluated and then either rejected or added to the overall story. So there's always a bit of a lag between discoveries and the official story (of the moment).
My impression is that we now know there was a massive migration - I call it a "Celtic expansion," which would probably make some scholars vomit a bit - out of the Baltic in 2500 BC in all directions. This carried the first versions of what we consider true IE language. Before that, there was a long period of what's called "proto" IE. There were many migrations out of this area over the centuries because every time a volcano somewhere in the world goes off, it affects the most northern latitudes the most, simply as a quirk of geography, due to the northern hemisphere having so much inhabited land near the Arctic Circle, especially at the Baltic due to the Gulf Stream. Any significant eruption would bring potentially a deep cold wave lasting a long while, starving people and animals, driving populations to head out - Viking raider style - seeking warmer lands that were lightly populated. Or, alternatively, a warm period could force them out due to population increase, as this is what happened with the Vikings.
As a pattern, I think they would first establish a trading colony in a distant land, and then in time of need, they knew where to go for a settlement colony. (This same pattern was followed by the Vikings, the Greeks, and probably the Phoenicians.) I propose that it is also the pattern of the Sea Peoples.
Thus, I think the Sea Peoples invasion is linked to another volcanic eruption - this time in Iceland - that affected the climate in the Baltic for a long time, forcing people out. (Feel free to do your own research on the subject to evaluate this.)
Many have noticed that the names of the Sea Peoples resemble those of known historic groups. IMO, they migrated from the Baltic via the river routes to the Black Sea, a path that appears to have been exploited since about 6000 BC. They settled along the open shores as they traveled, each new group in the exodus probably having to travel a little farther than the previous, avoiding already populated areas, or aggressively hitting some of them and moving in.
There is a dividing line - centum / satem - in the IE language family with the line drawn approximately at Lithuania. Latin belongs to the centum or western group, while Sanskrit is part of the satem or eastern group.
If you talk to professional scholars about all of this, you will likely get very conservative responses, placing the IE language in the steppe or Caucasus, because everyone has to protect their reputation and not stick out too much. Then there's wing nuts like me who have no reputation to protect and just want to know the truth, not yesterday's agreed upon politically correct orthodox view. IMO, the Baltic makes far and away the most sense for the birthplace of proto-IE and IE. And in terms of spread, the 2500 BC wave of IE speakers almost certainly came out of the Baltic over water, as it hit Ireland, which is hard to do by land. And it traveled to Spain, hitting the western coast. And in both cases they were reavers and killers, with DNA indicating they killed about 90% of the males after landing. So no, I don't believe it was a steppe or Caucasus people that originated and spread IE, but that it began in the Baltic with some spreading west by sea, and some spreading east by the steppe into Persia, India, and China.
So IE migrations in 2500 BC, and Sea Peoples about 1000 years later.
Your mileage may vary, of course. Everybody should use their own brains.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
IMO, there are several influences. The CCP is a global influence, being the root cause of the swing to communism since the 80s, including the WEF, Bilderberg, and Soros, who are behind the immigrant wave destabilizing the west. The CIA is also a key player in the US, dominating elections. Only candidates acceptable to the CIA can be elected, which is why we have an obvious puppet in office now. It's who ran J6, and who is presently defending Hunter Biden. They're also running the mainstream media. Have you felt only a certain kind of candidate has been available for president since Bush 1 (a former CIA Director)? This is the case, and Trump's election in 2016 was for them an unexpected failure of their domestic control system.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What I've found to work for my cat with kidney disease is a little bacon every day with her regular dry food, or ham fat instead of bacon if her protein tolerance has become very low. Once or twice a week, or as needed, I give her two drops of a herbal kidney tincture (for humans) in about 0.8 ml of water, which I squirt into her mouth with a small syringe (no needle). Very rarely, I have given her subcutaneous fluids, as needed. A couple times I gave her a small squirt or two of baby electrolyte when her back legs got wobbly (indicating low potassium). The herbal tincture has a variety of herbs, including buchu leaves and uva ursi, which are good for preventing UTI. It's still possible to get a UTI, since kidney cats are prone to it, but it's far less likely. I think she only got a UTI once, which we resolved with antibiotics.
She was diagnosed in September of 2017, and they gave me hundreds of dollars of medicines she wouldn't take, and she wouldn't eat the special food. They estimated she had about 25% kidney function remaining. She's still alive, as of November 2022, lounging on my bed as I write. She was about 12 when she was diagnosed. They said she probably had a few months to live, and in the best case scenario, about 2 years. She might be getting close to the end of life by now, but we've long surpassed the original projections.
Best wishes to all with your cats! 🐈
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sachs is CCP. He is pro-China and works with them regularly. (Tucker Carlson interviews him all the time, and seems to regard Sachs as a source of great truth. Tucker also regards Putin as being truthful. I tend to like a lot of what Tucker says, but he was left wing right up until 2016, and he admits he didn't see anything wrong with how DC operated till then, and he was a friend of Hunter Biden.) Anyway, take everything Sachs says with a huge grain of salt, knowing his compass points to the CCP. Sachs starts off by saying that it's Iraq, Syria, and Iran that support Hezbollah and Hamas, when China is clearly the big instigator behind the curtain. Trump is aware of China's moves, and everything in his "shopping cart" is related to China's moves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gallectee6032 It's not non sequiturs at all. You have to use your brain. Don't be an empty vessel waiting to be filled by someone else's mind, or a marionette waiting for someone else to grab your strings.
You don't understand what the right and left wings are, at all. You are just repeating propaganda BS without analysis.
Right and left wings come from the French Revolution, which is a story told by the left. The left wanted revolution, and the right was anyone who resisted or was deemed unworthy. That's who the left killed.
And they did what socialism always does. Despite the promises of a new, rational utopia - liberty, brotherhood, and equality - they created a reign of terror and an empire that was always at war, with the goal of total rule.
The left lies about its nature. It describes the others as being "imperialist," when they themselves have the goal of conquering the world. COMINTERN was international. Stalin wanted Spain, Germany, China, Cuba, etc. He didn't have a stopping point except total global domination. It was the same for Germany under Hitler, and the same under the CCP.
The left follows the philosophies of Marx, Bentham, Hegel, and Malthus ... all contemporary to the French Revolution. There's nothing new in what they're doing. They've been doing it for 200 years.
In its most "benign" form, it's a localized tumor instead of a spreading malignancy. North Korea and Vietnam are examples of the localized tumor form. Any modern totalitarian is indistinguishable from an Orwellian socialist govt. Fascism, socialism, communism, authoritarianism ... it amounts to the same thing.
As for the US, its revolutionary war was completely different, coming a generation before the French Revolution. It was not accompanied by a Reign of Terror, and it didn't create an empire. However, after the French Revolution, the philosophies of that revolution came to America as well as the rest of the world. Slowly, America bent under the pressure of socialism, and at approximately the same time as the Russian Revolution, the US became socialist. That's known as the Progressive era in the US. Progressivism and socialism are the same things. And ever since Wilson, the US has become more of a tyrannical, terroristic, corrupt, and totalitarian regime, eliminating the freedoms and the prosperity of the people in favor of an upper class of cadres who are above the law.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China intends to take all of Siberia. It's their top plan, and that's why it is their most secret plan. Second is control of Myanmar. Third is probably the various things that Trump is now countering, like Panama (10-20% of the population is now Chinese), Canada (laundering 90% of the drug trade through Canadian banks, in turn run through real estate, which has caused the price of Canadian homes to go sky high), Mexico, and Greenland. Way, way down the list, trotted out to the public as a red herring, is Taiwan. Sure, it would be great to take Taiwan, but that is there to draw attention away from the most important goals for the CCP. The Ukraine War is part of China's plan, called for by the WEF (the CCP's western office), and intended to weaken and isolate Russia, making them more dependent upon China. This is one of the reasons why China has insisted to be part of any Ukraine peace plan, and why Trump won't let China participate.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
IMO, it's fundamentally the CCP that is opposed to Trump and his threat of increased penalties on China. That's real money, and China doesn't want to lose it. This trickles through the international left, which has been funded by China since the 80s, including the WEF, and through the Democratic Party, which has been the favored party of the CCP since the Clinton administration. The Democrats hardly need encouragement, if you remember your US history. Aside from JFK (D) who likely died as a consequence of his opposition to the CIA, who are the US presidents who have been shot? It's very one-sided: Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), Teddy Roosevelt (R), and Reagan (R).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Democrats have been an anti-American, socialist force working cynically against the people since the Wilson administration: 100 years ago. And before that, they fought to keep slavery, and when they lost that war, they started Jim Crow. People reject this, because they know people who vote Democrat, and they're not necessarly bad people. The analogy is with Bernie Madoff. Bernie Madoff was a con man, cynically ripping people off with a phony investment scheme, living the easy life of a mega wealthy man, and not caring about what was going to happen to people after their money was spent (by him). That doesn't mean the people who were investing with Madoff had the same attitude, right? Likewise, the Democratic voters are low information people easily led by the heartstrings, which the con men constantly pull, with wild schemes they know their voters will never research. Like global warming, EV batteries v gas, the Russia hoax, the Nazis being "conservative," and so on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Maybe it is finally dawning upon Putin that he has delivered Russia into the mouth of the dragon - China - and that his trusted generals, Shoigu and Gerasimov, are in the pay of the dragon. And those that he thought of as his mortal enemies are really his brothers, but they are also in the pay of the dragon. I think Putin is perhaps surprised to find at the end, like Denethor, that he does love his country, and that the dragon does not share power. It just eats and leaves ruin behind it. Just look at the two sides of the Amur River. If Putin is to save his country, he must place the tail of the dragon in its mouth. That way, in its own appetite, it will devour itself. Or perhaps the dragon has grown so fat it cannot recognize its own tail, and will do the deed itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I very much appreciate Tulsi and what she's saying and doing for all of us. But she still has not educated herself in the true history of the Democratic Party and the true history of the Republican Party. She believes there was a time when the Democrats stood for somethig good, and this NEVER happened. The only anti-war Democrats were JFK and RFK, who were shot by the CIA, and probably Carter, who they turned into a one-termer. Speaking of JFK (D), who were the other presidents shot? Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), Teddy Roosevelt (R), and Reagan (R). Do we really need Sherlock Holmes to solve this mystery? It's pretty obvious who was doing the shooting, and why. The Democrats are the military industrial complex.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ah, tribalism! No shortage of people who feel like they must defend Tucker.
I'm with Tucker on a lot of things, like the things America should be concerned about, and the direction it should be taking instead of the current one. But it's ridiculous how tribal people get, feeling they need to defend every little thing said by "one of their guys."
Tucker is wrong like 1 out of 10 times. That's normal for people. Keep in mind he used to do drugs, was a friend of Hunter's, and saw nothing wrong with influence peddling in Washington DC for years because he was in those circles and everybody was doing it. Tucker has said all of that publicly. Like several new spokesmen for the right - Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, Dave Ruben, Bret Weinstein - Tucker has been a left winger most of his life and only recently converted to the right. That's the pattern of maturity, being liberal when young, and then catching on to all of the scams and their coverups by your 50s.
Anyway, sad that so many on the right choose to behave like the left, instead of siding with logic and reason. I'm not going to say anything further to you on this.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Modern men and women are hedonists. They follow the pleasure principle. They perpetually shop around, and out of self-centeredness they lie lie lie to get what they want. Virtues are not important to them. The life of a hedonist is one sugar rush after another, never feeling fulfilled. But if you want something good in life that lasts, that's fulfilling, you have to build it, and that takes time, effort, faith, and commitment. You have to develop your virtues. What makes women go more fully into hedonism than most men is that women are AFRAID and INSECURE. They break easily and then go into sabotage mode: narcissism. Also, most men are raised with the hero role model, with the idea of being moral champions. They want to develop their strength, their stamina, their skills, and their virtues.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@seamusbyrne7820 No, I hold what I said as obviously true. The right doesn't exist, except as a creation of the left, because people don't want the communist revolution of the left once they understand that this is indeed what the left is really doing. In France they promised "liberty, equality, and brotherhood," which sounded like the American Revolution of the previous generation. But the American Revolution aimed at moral behavior, small govt, and letting people be free. The French Revolution was of the same time as Marx, Hegel, Bentham, and Malthus, and it was followed by a reign of terror and an empire, which is the pattern we see in the various communist/socialist revolutions that came after (Russia, Germany, China, Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, etc.). The left wants Orwellian tyranny. The right is just people who don't.
In relation to this, some try to cast Germany as right wing, because Hitler didn't want to be a puppet of Stalin. Hitler was left wing, but he wanted to be his own man and not have Germany under the empire of Russia.
Mussolini, likewise, was left wing and wanted his nation to be independent. But in steering away from Stalin he sought the aid of Hitler, and Hitler was just as dangerous and acquisitive. Nazi Germany rook Italy.
We see this pattern repeat, in that Stalin expected Mao to be his puppet, but Mao wanted to be the head of China and for China to be free of Russia. North Korea also sought independent rule, and plays Russia against China to get it, giving in to neither. Vietnam has tried to do the same, but actually had to fight off China, when China tried to imitate Hitler vs Italy. And so it goes. The left's socialism is just old school authoritarianism like that of the feudal era, but with Orwellian characteristics. It's a surveillance state with social credit and allegiance to a party (think organized crime ring with multiple inner power groups), not an individual or family (though one individual at a time is the high leader to be worshipped).
So yes, look at the behavior and what it is, but do not take the definition they offer, because that is simply propaganda, and it confuses people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Victory Day" ... aka, Stalin's victory over his German puppet, Hitler, as Hitler was forced into fighting in both the east and the west, while running out of oil.
Stalin was the patron of another mass murderer, Mao, who, like Hitler, resented Stalin's attempt to control him and his country, China. Having inherited the hate of Russia, Xi has lured the Russian bear into a trap, and when the bear is weak enough, the CCP will take over Russia.
2
-
The Great Game / Tournament of Shadows ... the spy game for world domination, played between the British Empire and the Russian Empire, which has continued from centuries ago to the present. Also, true, as one man said, that China is NOT an ally. China is friend to no one. As for the western countries, most people in the west don't even think about Russia, except when Russia does something heinous ... like the invasion of Ukraine. Why can't we all work together, live together? As for dividing Russia, it's not necessarily a bad thing. The east and west of Russia are two completely different places. Moscow has no business running Siberia; it's like Mercury running administration for Pluto. But I don't think anyone outside of Russia is attempting to break it up. If Russia breaks up, it will be from the inside. It's the same for the UK.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There's more than one kind of woman, and the happiness depends on what kind. If you are a hedonist, you will be unhappy with marriage, kids, and being with anyone. Because hedonism is selfishness. It's narcissistic, sociopathic, don't give a damn about the others and where's mine? That's the orientation. Like Handler, and the feminists, and the left wing. It's all hedonism.
Women raised with the idea of being virtuous, and that your life is NOT ABOUT YOU, can be happiest in marriage and with kids. They feel better for having made a positive difference.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think all of this comes from the CCP, and the WEF is a tool of the CCP. Trudeau, for instance, is a star pupil of the WEF, and he praises China and works with them to the extent he invieted the PLA to wargames on Canadian soil. China also destabilized Sri Lanka with predatory loans. Sri Lanka was also trying to comply with WEF fertilizer restrictions. Both Soros and Hunter Biden had high ranking CCP intelligence officers as business partners. The policy of Soros seems identical to that of China. Meanwhile, Joe Biden is recommending Trudeau's right hand zealot, Chrystia Freeland, as the next head of NATO, after WEF never-Trumper Jens Stoltenberg retires. To me, it seems very clear that the CCP is pulling strings all over the place: in the US, in the EU, in the UK, Canada, etc. They are trying to destroy the west with an unconventional war that hits on all possible levels, and their goal, as is typical of socialist regimes, is to dominate the world.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
My analysis is that women get squirrelly when they don't have faith. I don't mean religion, but more like faith as in the 12 step program. You have to have faith things are going to be okay. Women are naturally driven, by their hormones, into a fearful state, and for the modern atheist, the only solutions for this are drugs, delusions, and maniacal efforts to control. Men have it easier, in that testosterone is more like liquid faith ... it can boost a person to reckless levels. Most men are granted the feeling of faith, that things will somehow work out, by virtue of biochemistry. Women seem to have more of the opposite, and so for them, faith has to be learned. Only then can they loosen their grip, stop riding highs, and start entertaining truth instead of illusion.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No, that's not right. The LEFT has to be pushed out, because they are delusional, lack foresight, and they are corrupt, because their core philosophy is hedonism, not morality. Men and women both, though more women by proportion are left wing. You can't tell me Disney's problems come from just the women, for instance. Or that Le Pen and Meloni are somehow worse than men.
Capitalism requires moral leaders and decision makers. Morality and critical thinking is what the left calls conservative, traditional, anti-progress, and "dangerously far right wing."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I find that hardly anybody understands what's going on, but it's perfectly obvious if you know history. The socialist movement basically begins with the French Revolution, which was completely different from the American Revolution a generation earlier. While the American Revolution enshrined morality and virtue, the French Revolution embraced the socialist ideals of hedonism and "progress," while rejecting faith, virtue, and morality as being "against the science." The cultural conflict we're experiencing is because the socialists have been pushing hedonism as being "the science" of how to live, and they're suppressing morality as being backward and "against the science." But morality is what makes social glue, causing people to stick together and stand up what's right, while hedonism tells people to keep their head down, cooperate with power, and it is socially slippery ... it doesn't bring people together, but instead it divides them. That's because you do things for yourself, and not for others. "Following the science" is really just an insistence that hedonism is the right path, because it is the way to break down a society and turn it into something consumable, exploitable, and controllable by a tyrannical state.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Malthus was a contemporary of the French Revolution, as were Marx, Hegel, and Bentham. These are leading philosophers of the left to this day, and as in France, the left is trying to overthrow regimes, to install a Reign of Terror, and then a totalitarian empire with forever wars. The contribution by Malthus is a pseudo scientific concern about overpopulation, so the left has a desire to eliminate "excess" population in order to make more resources available for those who remain ... who in this case are the wealthy and connected, the elite cadre of the revolution. Europe is a very depressed place, where the people prefer to bury their heads in hedonism and piles of propaganda. Hopefully stoic, moral people will take power for the first time ever in Europe.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
They hate Trump because he's not WITH them. It's like an immune response. He's a foreign organism, and they're throwing everything they've got at him. Since Reagan, EVERY US president has been a deep state made man. That's Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, Obama, then the plan was a playoff between Hillary and Jeb: both deep state made men. Trump's election was a bone in their throat. So their response was to bury him with open fraud in the next election, and they put in Biden ... another deep state made man. As for Whitney, blessed as she is with information, she still has her biases. She's anti-Trump, and she's not going to change her mind. She's a liberal who did some research, like Taibbi and Greenwald, who are also NEVER going to like Trump.
As for Kissinger, he's for China. I think he was turned by Bush 1, and he in turn roped in Klaus Schwab.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thomgizziz That's not quite it. Corruption is like mold. It attacks the healthy organism and turns it rotten. You fight mold contagion by identifying and getting rid of the things mold is growing on.
Any organized crime group knows that to be successful you have to make deals with police, courts, and politicians. You buy them, and you threaten the ones that won't accept the bribe.
Then the people, who expect the politicians, the courts, and the police to identify and get rid of the mold, don't know what to do when the police, courts, and politicians are moldy. So they ignore it. The media, which is also full of mold, helps the police and politicians cover up the fact that the mold is spreading everywhere, into the schools, into the hospitals, and into every aspect of life.
At some point, the people have to reject the mold, identify the moldy people, and reject them as well. Mold is running the nation for the purposes of mold. It is devouring the people, and it leaves a trail of toxic slime as it goes along.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Don't expect the excess Chinese males to behave like Vikings. China uses bribes, theft, and intimidation to get their way. They do not favor open battle. The young men traveling to the US are probably going to behave like a combination of the German brownshirts and the Mafia. In Chinese terms, these are white shirts, who are often Triad members that the CCP often hires as mercenary secret police. They'll do the dirty work of beating people up, stealing things, human trafficking, drug trafficking, and so forth. As these criminal gangs operate in America, it seems logical to speculate that they will amass a fortune, and they can easily use that within the country to expand the current bribery program, which is already far advanced.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The US is standing still. It's the EU that's leaving NATO. The following countries could remain with the US in the actual, functional alliance: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Hungary, and Greece. All the rest are freeloaders. Generally, the EU is politically against most if not all of these countries. Makes you kind of wonder who the EU really serves, doesn't it?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
When a child fails to mature, when they become an adult they are a monster. Selfish, narcissistic, impatient, delusional, unable to accurately foresee consequences, lacking empathy, and so on. Whatever it is they want at the moment becomes their primary concern, and they will throw a tantrum if they don't get it. They don't respect anyone, anyone's interests, or anyone's property.
This is what the left actually is. They're adults with arrested development.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I do think the French Revolution is still impactful in the world, and people don't recognize it or misunderstand it. I think it is affecting us in the present, and I think it has been affecting us since it first happened. It's like a mind virus. I think it has a lot to do with "rational" philosophers of the era whose thoughts are still extremely popular, even if most people don't know who they are. To me, the "four horsemen" of the social apocalypse are Marx, Hegel, Bentham, and Malthus. The idea and mechanism of revolution comes from Marx. Hegel is the father of Progress, where people think new things are better, forgetting there is such a thing as regression. Bentham promoted Orwellian hedonism over morality. Malthus was Patient Zero of the desire for depopulation.
In a nutshell: the French Revolution told people that hedonism was enlightenment, and that it would lead to utopia, liberty, and equality. What it lead to was oppression, loss of freedom and privacy, and endless warfare. People should not have been surprised by this, because hedonism is socially slippery. People who are hedonistic don't stick together. Morality is socially sticky. Morals are what binds friends, families, and communities together. Morality is what resulted in the birth of civilization. Without morality, there is anarchy until the strongest person establishes tyranny.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
All the left wing is, is childish behavior coming from adults. All the so-called "right wing" is, is people behaving like mature adults. That's it.
There's no political spectrum of legitimate views. The left is childish anarchy, bullying, taking the other kids' toys, calling them names, etc., except on a broad social scale, and in an adult way, where stealing cookies turns into drugs and sex trafficking, calling people names turns into debanking them, and taking toys away from other kids is the seizure of money through taxation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
These guests are not that knowledgeable on the stated topic. Let's start with this. Before the CIA was even created, the following presidents were shot: Lincoln (R, conspiracy), Garfield (R, crazy lone gunman), McKinley (R, crazy lone gunman), Teddy Roosevelt (R, crazy lone gunman). So there was an ability to create crazy lone gunmen long before the CIA. Then, after the CIA is created and the CIA is seeking power, JFK (D, crazy lone gunman), RFK (candidate D, crazy lone gunman), Reagan (R, crazy lone gunman), Trump (R, two crazy lone gunmen). If we're counting attempts with CIA fingerprints, they went after Truman (D) and Ford (R, two point blank attempts). With Nixon, Watergate was a CIA smear operation (all members of the break in were CIA).
2
-
2
-
@mishaanton5436 If you are young, you have been fed the wrong idea your whole life, probably. If you are a boomer, then you should remember how it all started. Which is not to say that the media wasn't controlled back in boomer days, because it surely was (as it was in Orwell's generation, which was in the previous era), it's just that the messaging changed.
Go back to what the left likes to call "the imperial colonizer days" of the 1800s. In that time, there was a struggle between the Russian and British Empires for lands which included the Middle East. This continued after the Russian Revolution ended the line of the czars and Russia turned into the Soviet Union. There was no real social or political change associated with the revolution, just eventually Stalin as the new czar, very much like how Putin is the new czar. (Same deal in China, where despite the fall of the Emperor, the country is still run by a mandarin class we now call the CCP, and Xi the "emperor" elected from the mandarin class.)
The struggle between Britain and Russia was called "the Great Game" by the Brits, or "the Tournament of Shadows" by the Russians. It was likened to a global chess game. Russia's goal was to control the Eurasian continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from the Arctic to the Indian Ocean, and from there to colonize the world. It was the same under the communists.
With all of that out of the way, the point being that particularly in the 1950s-60s, along with the conversion of Cuba to communism and de-colonization of India, there was a global effort to topple existing regimes and turn them communist (i.e., into colonies of Russia, as Cuba was). Thus the rise of Arab socialism, powered by Russian weapons and money (the AK-47 is still the weapon associated with terrorism).
Socialism / communism seeks to overturn existing authorities by finding a group they can claim are oppressed, and then target them as the "oppressors." (The Brits did the same thing, except they funded "righteous rebels," which in the case of America kind of defied the plan, as the righteous rebels rebelled against the Crown.) In the Middle East, the Russians targeted groups like the Palestinians to act as their "oppressed,' and formed terrorist groups like the PLO to act as the brownshirts or brutal agitators who would do the actual overthrowing.
The CCP, which cooperated with the USSR on the spread of communism, supported the PLO as well. Neighboring Egypt had once been a British colony, but it had already been "freed" by the socialists, and was run by Nasser. Nasser was being funded by the socialists to attack Israel and turn it communist under the PLO. Working with German scientists (former German sociialists), they sought to hit Israel with hundreds of dirty bombs in missiles, but it never came together, at least partly because of a series of assassinations performed by Israeli intelligence. (The basis of the fictional "ODESSA File" novel and movie, currently free to view on YT.)
The PLO eventually was swayed away from socialist overthrow into a peace with Israel, so the usual suspects formed Hamas and Hezbollah to continue the brownshirt agitation. In Syria, the socialists won, and the USSR got a naval base, which Russia retains to this day. With the deposing of the Shah in Iran, Russia tilted Iran back away from Britain, and took back the oil fields previously run by the Brits and allies. Iraq, which was part of the Arab socialist movement, ended up siding somewhat with the British allies due to better bribes, and fought a war against Iran. Later, Iraq turned against the west and invaded Kuwait, which was answered with Persian Gulf War I.
If you are interested, you should research this subject. I've tried to give you a sketch.
As for the "religious theocracy" notion, this is just how socialist totalitarianism manifests in a Muslim country. It's like how Russia is still run by a czarist / aristocratic system, and China is still run by the mandarins and generals. My understanding is that very, very early on in the development of socialism in Europe, it was thought that it would be a Christian totalitarianism. This changed at the time of the French Revolution, and thereafter it has been the idea of an "Age of Enlightenment" where the policies are based on "the Science," except the science is literally just whatever they decide it should be. Eugenics, for example, was promoted as a science-based idea, as was the abortion of the children of the poor, and the concept of overpopulation. (Eugenics was actually racism, abortion of the poor was classism, and overpopulation was to give an excuse to kill off masses of people, like through starvation, as was done to Ukraine by Russia.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Joe Biden just spoke to friends in AZ, hosted by the McCain family. Cindy McCain said Joe was one of John McCain's best friends in Congress. (IDK if anyone remembers McCain getting caught in scandals before, but it's no surprise he and Joe were good friends.) The McCains, the Romneys, the Bushes ... these are the same people as the Clintons, Obamas, and Bidens. If you don't already know that, wake the heck up and have your coffee. Republicans elect RINOs like these Lincoln Project people every single election. That's why there's only about 1-2 dozen representatives of the people in all of Congress. Please, save America, stop voting for these lying, corrupt, scamming RINOs. 🗽🚫🦏
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Actually, I'd rather have the US making a stronger economic alliance with Russia than Ukraine, for various reasons. Ukraine is a heavily indebted country; they were before the war. Total corruption. Like an African country in that the people and land were exploited beyond belief by anyone and everyone, including Russia and China, plus the west. Europe expects to see their loans repaid, even though Russia purposefully seized the land with the greatest resource value. So, way too many pigs at that trough. Meanwhile, Russia has been getting exploited by "friend for life" China, and is probably starting to figure out that this is a bad thing, and if they want to get their war torn refineries, airplanes, and factories fixed, they need to align with the US.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Waverlyduli Actually, I identify the CCP as the source of the whole socialist / woke wave in the west beginning in the 1980s, which was (not) coincidentally when China opened up to the west. They began aggressively bribing gatekeepers in all western countries in the late 80s, and three of the early converts were Kissinger (Bilderbergs), his disciple Klaus Schwab (WEF), and Soros (Open Society). All of these individuals act to promote China's policies for the west, included unchecked immigration, drugs, and internet censorshp. YT reports on its censorship to the WEF, for instance. Soros works with the China-dominated UN to move migrants. And so on.
If you've never heard of that before, load Google and start looking it up. Within a few minutes you should be able to find notes about Kissinger and Soros working with Chinese intelligence officers in the late 80s, and of course the WEF never misses an opportunity to praise China.
As for the occasional comment against China from Soros, remember there are factions in the CCP. Soros and the rest are more loyal to the faction of deceased leader Jiang Zemin than they are to Xi, but they are still loyal to the CCP.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Look at the history. For instance, the KKK was formed by Democrats on three separate occasions to prevent blacks from joining with Republicans, using intimidation and violence. The city riots are always Democrats. And even looking at the presidents ... aside from JFK (D), which presidents have been shot? Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), T. Roosevelt (R), and Reagan (R). And it seems highly likely the Kennedy brothers were taking heat from their own side, not the Republicans. MLK (R) was shot. So tell me again, ever since the Civil War, where has the violence been coming from? It's not the Republicans. It's coming from the Democrats, who are notably allied with communists, socialists, and anarchists.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
All it means is that he's been eating the CIA's crazy pills (MK-Ultra). Surely I'm not the only one who has heard the phrase "crazed lone gunman" ...? It's the CIA's MO. Routh, the golf course shooter, was hardly bat-free in his belfry, but he looked a lot like a CIA construct, including trips to Ft. Bragg. Other well-known crazies include those who successfully shot: Garfield (R), McKinley (R), Teddy Roosevelt (R), JFK (D), RFK (D), Reagan (R), and Trump (R). It's the crazy pills that get them to do stuff, and then if they get caught, they just blabber like a crazy person and get locked up for life.
2
-
IMO, the destruction of a free and prosperous America began around the time of the Russian Revolution, with Woodrow Wilson in the WH. That's when the deep state - the federal bureaucracy - began to be weaponized against the people. The federal agencies are unelected, not accountable to the people, and barely accountable at all to the WH and Congress. The bureaucracy was created as an exploit, a way around the Constitution by people who have always HATED the Constitution: the Democrats. And the deep state IS DEMOCRAT. They want a socialist revolution, and they are getting it through the federal bureaucracy. You get rid of the federal bureaucracy, and freedom and prosperity returns, because now the bureaus are only at the state level, meaning people can leave the state if they don't like the policies, and the 50 states have to compete, so you restore checks and balances. But as Levin basically notes, the Democrats are the distilled evil of this nation, and they always have been.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The narcissism is just kids failing to mature. Humans naturally have two operating systems: one used while young, and one that must develop before or during parenthood. The OS of youth is hedonism. It is impatient, demanding, selfish, and narcissistic. It is full of childish delusion, it is insecure, and it is unable to accurately forecast the consequences of its actions. As time passes, the child should mature, but it may not. Elements within the environment may push for the child to remain immature. But upon maturity, the child becomes patient. It is willing to sacrifice for the good of others, or for an ideal. It sees and appreciates TRUTH. It can accurately forecast consequences. All of this is required by nature for the individual to be a good parent.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What he's spotting is hedonists, not psychopaths. He's spotting those with immature (problem) psychology. Kids, on their way to maturity, swear they didn't eat the cookie ... when you can see the crumbs all over their face. Kids have delusions and daydreams about things that aren't real. Like, when you try to teach little kids to stay on the lookout for moving cars, they may respond, "But I'm faster than a car and I can run away!" Kids also cannot adequately project the future results of the actions they are taking today. They have poor impulse control and are impatient and demanding. They are self-focused. We teach them to grow up, to become productive adults who can properly raise children. But a large percentage of modern kids fail to grow up: the left wing.
All of these problems we associate with typical abnormal psychology - inadequate empathy, narcissism, the blame game, foolishness - are a lack of maturity. Also, morality comes with maturity. It can be taught to a child as a traditional way, but it's really just how mature adults think. Adults value the truth, for instance, because that's practical, and they don't want to play games and waste time and resources on lies. They value honesty, faithfulness in relations, kindness, patience, and their own self-improvement. This makes them a good parent and a responsible member of the community.
In the brain, maturity comes from the prefrontal cortex. It's the fabled "last part of the brain to develop," which is reponsible for advanced and abstract mental abilities. We observe that IQ varies among individuals, and to some degree this may be rooted in the genetics behind this part of the brain, but mostly it's the nurturing - the training - this part of the brain receives as the child grows up. Gradually, over the last 200 years, western society has de-emphasized traditional education of children (seen as "conservative") and has emphasized remaining in a childish state well into adulthood, with this seen as "freedom." But it's really just hedonism over stoicism. Mankind has had this issue right along, of some adults insisting that being a child as an adult is the most desired and wisest course (hedonism), and others insist that being a mature adult is the only rational way forward (stoicism). Our terms for this come from the battles of classic Greek philosophers, but the conflict of maturing is as old as humanity. Look around you. You know which adults follow their pleasures, and which ones follow their responsibilities.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I appreciate Vivek speaking the truth on what's going on with China. He's not getting into the details, like how Soros and Kissinger (WEF) were among those who took Chinese intelligence officers as partners in the late 80s. But he is drawing the bigger picture to show that China has leveraged our own financial industry against us, robbing the people, dividing the people, and weakening the US economy. But specifically, the US education system has been influenced by CCP money, US officials at all levels have been bribed (state and federal), their espionage has been not just military or political, but aimed at stealing industry trade secrets and the personal data of tens of millions, the CCP influences what gets said or not said in US news media, they are buying huge tracts of land near US military bases, and so on. And he also didn't mention how China is influencing elections all around the world, and even doing assassinations (hard to prove, but there's circumstantial evidence).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Most people who consider themselves Democrats and who vote Democrat are very, very deeply gaslighted about the real nature of the Democratic Party. The Democratic Pary has ALWAYS been the party of war, for example, and even Tulsi doesn't realize this. She thinks the party changed, but it didn't. They're doing the same things they've always done. William Randolph Hearst, the notorious yellow journalist / propagandist who actively worked to create the Spanish-American War, served two terms as a Democrat in the House. That's over a hundred years ago, and the behavior of the news media - which is Democrat - is still the same ... calling for war. And the Democrat representatives are still the same, calling for war. The Democratic Party has not changed in 100 years.
A funny thing is that when the Democratic Party under Wilson was showing favor toward the far left, Hearst switched to the Republican Party. He couldn't go so far as to align with the socialists. In theory, Wilson was against "the reds" as well, but he was in fact an inspiration to the next generation of socialists in Europe.
Bottom line: if you're for peace, for the people, and for prosperity, you should not be aligned with the Democrats. They're big money, forever war, and all about crushing small business and the middle class.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's good for Hungary to stand up to the EU, but they're not saints. The CCP is trying to influence Hungary. "China's investment in Hungary is growing steadily, making it China's largest investment destination in Central and Eastern Europe, covering various industries such as chemicals, finance, telecommunications, new energy, automotive, and logistics. China's imports from Hungary were $4.34 billion, an increase of 6.5% year-on-year, while China's exports to Hungary were $6.54 billion, a yearly increase of 8.1%-on-year. Hungary is China's third-largest trading partner in Central and Eastern Europe, and China is Hungary's largest trading partner outside of the European Union." China wants Hungary to accept immigration, but so far Hungary has resisted.
2
-
2
-
2
-
The PEOPLE of a nation may think China is not a good country, but a lot of people in business and politics are willing to take "special deals" from China. THAT's the problem. Look at Biden, Trudeau, Rutte, Ardern, and so many more ... all scrambling to grab Chinese money. And the people that China can't bribe, well, that's like the US's Trump, Japan's Abe, and the former president of Haiti. Trump was forced out, and the other two are dead by assassination.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not just the FBI. All news media, including social media, has been keeping an open back door for the feds. So ANY federal agency can exercise control of what appears in the media, and they do. FBI, DHS, DNI, CIA, CDC, FDA, and the list goes on. Every federal agency is corrupt, because they were created to be corrupt. Each one is an end-run around the Constitution, because they didn't want to be limited by the Constitution. Each federal agency - and there are by now more than 400 - makes rules with the power of law, and then is granted the right to enforce those laws with lethal weapons against citizens. This is unelected power in America that the people have no voice over, no representation. It was planned to be a tyranny, and that's what it IS.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Diane Feinstein is a classic example of an American official bribed by the CCP for decades, just like Joe, Obama, the Bushes, and the Clintons. And you'll find similar officials around the world, especially in western countries like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and every nation in Europe. Also, the now-buried scandal of bribery from Qatar in the EU Parliament ... that's actually Chinese money going to their socialist agents in Europe. As is normally the case with such operations, blame was scraped off onto someone else.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The corruption is not exactly bipartisan. I know why people think that, but it's misleading to say it that way. The corruption is overwhelmingly Democrat, but part of what's happened is that the Democrats are running their own people as Republicans. That's the RINOs. This isn't accidental. This is on purpose, to subvert the Republican Party, to take it over, and make America function as through it was run by a uniparty, but have it look to voters like there's two parties. Go back through history, guys. The Democrats started organized crime in America back in the 1820s. After the Civil War, this became the most lucrative and powerful Democrat activity, so they carried it to every major American city, including DC. DC is Tammany Hall. That's what we fight.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No, the Haitian president was assassinated by the CCP / PLA, just like Abe in Japan. The CCP had offered him billions more in loans and presumably personal incentives than other countries, like DR, to give up support and recognition of Taiwan, but he refused. So the PLA put together a team of mercenaries who thought they were working for the CIA, as the goal was to blame the US for this killing. The president was killed with no problem, but there was no escape plan for the men who did the deed, because the idea was for them to be caught so they could confess their belief they were working for the CIA. They were led by their PLA handler to the Taiwan Embassy, which the PLA officer raided, and that's where they were abandoned, to be picked up by security forces.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bluesky6985 They absolutely did. It's upsetting to see so many people thinking this govt overreach began with Obama. That's horrible ignorance. If you strip out the CCP influence, which still began long before Obama, the US federal govt has been misbehaving in tyrannical ways, functioning like organized crime, for over 100 years. I'm not quite sure when it started. To some degree it seems to have fallen into place with the Civil War. But the forces of evil definitely captured DC in the early 1900s, and that was the end of real freedom in the US. Since then, we've been like people in "The Matrix" acting as batteries (via income tax) for an alien and malevolent upper class.
Consider what every school kid knows, but doesn't think critically about: "Aside from JFK (D), which US presidents have been shot?" Answer: Lincoln (R), Garfield (R), McKinley (R), T. Roosevelt (R), and Reagan (R).
2
-
@Lancer_0010 I disagree. I mean yes, our primaries often fail us, due to a tendency to promote the person with the most corporate sponsorship as opposed to someone who is most like us. That's a huge and significant failing. Like, we should have supported Kathy Barnette instead of Mehmet Oz. Oz had better donors and name recognition, but Barnette was one of us.
But my analysis indicates the real problem is that corruption happened long before Joe first ran for the Senate. And it's a Mafia that makes deals and promotes "made men." It's very hard to get regular citizens into Congress because of that.
As for the "made men" type candidates, they are soulless creatures willing to be a puppet for money, spending every day selling out America. So not just prostitutes, but like spies selling out their own people. That's why they all look like AOC, Pelosi, Nadler, Joe, Kamala, etc. Soulless hustlers who would sell their mother or daughter into slavery for a buck.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You STILL go out of your way to make the Soviets sound way better than they really were. Stalin was involved in foreign wars, with the Spanish Civil War being partially a proxy war between Hitler on one side and Stalin on the other, with the goal of taking Spain. Hitler would have been unable to start WW2 without two key bits of assistance from Stalin: 1) Stalin allowed German troops to secretly form, train, and equip themselves on Russian land, because Germany was forbidden by treaty to do so. 2) Stalin sold Hitler the oil he needed for industrialization and the war effort. Stalin was planning to have Hitler fight the west, and then when everyone was exhausted, he'd roll through and take everything, including Germany. What spoiled the plan was that when the US entered the war, instead of joining the fight directly in Germany, Churchill persuaded US generals to fight in North Africa first, cutting off Hitler's secondary souces of oil. When this was accomplished, Hitler knew he was entirely at the mercy of the hated Russians, and THAT'S WHY he went the attack into the Soviet Union, specifically targeting the oil resources. He could not fight without the oil. This is why he threw everything he had at Russia, trying to secure the oil, and his failure was the cause for the end of the war.
You also completely omitted the centuries long fight between the British Empire and Russian Empire, characterizing the Russian efforts as continual losses. Well, in recent times, who do you think freed India? That was India turning to communism and Russia, and away from Britain, with all the anti-colonial furor. And Stalin funded the rise of Mao in China, with the idea that Mao would fight the battles to gain China, and then be subservient to the Soviet Union. So, instead of losing, the Soviets won in India, won in China, and won in North Korea. The Soviets were also influential in Vietnam and Cuba, and are today influential in Venezuela, Syria, and Iran. And this is just skimming the top of it all.
Now I don't hate Russian people or anything like that, but the Russian leaders have been solidly black-hearted individuals. I hope one day the Russian people are a free, prosperous, and happy people. Right now, most don't even smile, there have been so many generations of abuse.
As for breaking up, yes, I agree that Russia is on track for a potential split due to inner power struggles. This could be the best case scenario for the Russian people. At the very least, east and west should break at the Urals, and probably a few smaller western chunks might come off as well. The big danger in this, to my eyes, is China. With Russia isolated, who would defend Russia from various control schemes coming out of China? In theory, they could even mobilize military to take the Siberian provinces, including the oil fields near Japan.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Parents want a better state, nation, and world for their children. Let's make it better! Not with a "reset" or "belt and road 2.0" or "build back better" program, because all of those top down solutions are filled with corruption, and they seek to destroy the middle class. Let's govern from grassroots up. Let's address the needs of regular people, and let's get the economy back on track. Let's be faithful and moral. And as for the deep state, this is what is tearing us apart. It's the 400+ federal agencies created over the last 100 years by the Democrats as an end run around the Constitution, so they can always be in power. That's the corrupt military industrial complex, the DOJ, FBI, CIA, CDC, NIH, SEC, IRS, etc. We need to reduce federal power and restore power at the state level.
2
-
2
-
2
-
This current phase of idiocy began about 200 years ago with the philosophers at the time of the French Revolution: Marx, Hegel, Bentham, and Malthus. It's the latest battle in the war between the hedonists (Bentham) and the stoics. Stoics believe in virtue for virtue's sake: doing the right thing. This is essential for democracy to function. Hedonists believe in self-interest: the pleasure principle. Hedonism is natural state of children, who at the beginning only think of themselves. As a person matures, and starts thinking about the outcomes of situations, they usually become more stoic, wanting to do the right thing for others as well as for themselves. However, this maturity doesn't always happen. Some adults remain hedonistic.They are narcissists and sociopaths. They do not believe in virtue, only in their self-interest. The left is made up of hedonists, and they struggle against those of us who believe in virtue.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If you remember your grade school history, big media, big money, and the military industrial complex came together in 1900 to take over Washington DC. McKinley (R) who didn't want the Spanish-American War, was assassinated in 1901. Within about a dozen years after the death of McKinley, the plan to make a federal income tax legal (it was previously illegal) was nearing completion. The creation of the Federal Reserve was underway as well. But it's important to understand that the income tax was to provide permanent, deep funding for the war machine and other federal scams. The Democrats were the ones who pushed this, and they are the ones today who run Washington DC. It's not a coincidence that DC is over 90% Democrat. They were assisted along the way by RINOs, the Progressives within the Republican Party. Near as I can tell, this 1900s era is the beginning of what became RINO rule for the Republican Party. The RINOs gained power within the party not because of public sentiment, but because big money was behind them and they could catch swing votes from independents who were inclined to vote Democrat. As for Cuomo's comments about earlier generations of Democrats, the Dems who resist federal govt are gone. There's Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr, and they have been exiled, banished from the donkey kingdom. It's only the Republican voters - previously known as Tea Party, but now known as MAGA - who keep fighting corrupt federal power. You can tell this is the case by looking at who the federal agencies are targeting, and it is "far right extremists." There are no Democrats that the feds are going after. Allies like Antifa, BLM, and cartels / illegals are largely allowed free rein. And if you resist the federal power as a Democrat (as very few do), then they come after you and call you a "far right extremist," as you've seen with left wing people speaking out like Joe Rogan, Russell Brand, and others.
2
-
The subtext: "We want investors to blame the audience, not the executives who are defrauding investors, because if investment dries up, our work will dry up. So ... audiences, you suck!!!"
As I've been warning for many years now, since the days of Black Panther and the CW, Hollywood is increasingly acting in a predatory fashion upon investors, just like in the Mel Brooks show, "The Producers." It's a SCAM, and this scam doesn't care a whit about audiences or producing quality entertainment. If you don't get it, look up "The Producers."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's BS. You're just looking to create friction, conveniently overlooking how many people in the US speak other languages. Nobody's pushing the Mennonites or Amish to stop speaking German. Nobody's pushing the millions of Spanish language speakers to stop speaking Spanish. There would be absolutely no problem with speaking French. The problem with losing a language is when the young seek business opportunities elsewhere, and they learn a different language in order to do that, or they marry someone who speaks a different language. So while I certainly could not say that French language would persist forever despite declining populations, poor local economies, and other such adversities, I can definitely say that the modern US doesn't care what language you speak. It's a nation of immigrants, remember? English is the official language, and the language of law, but nobody is compelled to use it outside of such official capacities. Plus, these days we have AI to handle translation. It is completely NOT an issue.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China still has some cash in their account, as you can see. Their whole strategy is to buy their way into every country, and once they're in, they're extremely hard to remove. That's because the officials who accepted the bribes can be exposed, and those officials don't want to be exposed and are then subject to blackmail by China, so they continue to support China. And of course China can dangle the promise of freedom if they do "just one more favor." And then they don't let them go, of course, but keep them on the hook with added blackmail material. They're a crime mob, that's how they work. By following this practice, China gets in the door everywhere CHEAP. They're everywhere but Russia, so far as I can tell, and Russia is on their list of things to do.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AlexxSerpa Well, to me, China is influencing the west, trying to tip the scales toward socialism / totalitarianism. It's part of their unrestricted warfare. But this socialist impulse keeps arising, and its origin in the "modern" world is with the French Revolution, which was quite different from the American Revolution a generation earlier. While the American Revolution put God first, then the people, and then charged the govt to serve the people, with the French Revolution you get a promise of a utopia - liberty, equality, and brotherhood - while what's delivered is a coup, a Reign of Terror, a totalitarian empire, and forever wars. This event set the tone for the next 200 years, with philosophers contemporary to the revolution becoming dominant. This would be Hegel, Marx, Malthus, and Bentham, to name a few. These gave us the philosophy of Progressivism, which is the source of all the unrest. It is a belief in hedonism (Bentham), with pseudo-scientific justification for whatever it wants to do (Hegel). Since the Progressives are elitists, they advocate for eugenics, identifying the poor or otherwise undesirable as "unfit." They want population decrease (Malthus) in order to maximize resources for the remaining few. As for Marx, the system for gaining power begins with a community organizer identifying an "oppressed" community and organizing them against their "oppressor." So, black v white, female v male, etc. This is when political racism and feminism started (1800s). The goal is revolution, in imitation of the French Revolution. We see this pattern in Russia, Germany, Italy, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.
Maybe I've missed a detail, and maybe I need a nap - lol - but that's what comes to mind when you ask about what's going on, what the dynamic is. And I do believe people are getting dumber the more we head down this path. The better path is a combination of capitalism, stoicism, and enlightened Christianity (as opposed to, say, medieval Christianity). I don't mean to dun other traditional beliefs, but to use the social virtues of Christianity - patience, kindness, fair play, etc. - as a shorthand. People need to be moral, not selfish, for a free republic to work. If they turn selfish, then they set us all on the path to tyranny.
To be even more specific about methods, the revolutionaries long ago began to take control of the news media and education, in order to shape minds. They work with politics, organized crime, and created in each national govt a bureaucracy that is not accountable to the people and which is corrupt and which acts to increase its own power and control.
Also, specifically, I think Soros and the WEF act as agents of the CCP, having come to power as the CCP opened up to the west.
2
-
@AlexxSerpa Evil Tube is very protective of China, and plays a lot of games with comments and content. I still see it, but probably nobody else can.
"Well, to me, China is influencing the west, trying to tip the scales toward socialism / totalitarianism. It's part of their unrestricted warfare. But this socialist impulse keeps arising, and its origin in the "modern" world is with the French Revolution, which was quite different from the American Revolution a generation earlier. While the American Revolution put God first, then the people, and then charged the govt to serve the people, with the French Revolution you get a promise of a utopia - liberty, equality, and brotherhood - while what's delivered is a coup, a Reign of Terror, a totalitarian empire, and forever wars. This event set the tone for the next 200 years, with philosophers contemporary to the revolution becoming dominant. This would be Hegel, Marx, Malthus, and Bentham, to name a few. These gave us the philosophy of Progressivism, which is the source of all the unrest. It is a belief in hedonism (Bentham), with pseudo-scientific justification for whatever it wants to do (Hegel). Since the Progressives are elitists, they advocate for eugenics, identifying the poor or otherwise undesirable as "unfit." They want population decrease (Malthus) in order to maximize resources for the remaining few. As for Marx, the system for gaining power begins with a community organizer identifying an "oppressed" community and organizing them against their "oppressor." So, black v white, female v male, etc. This is when political racism and feminism started (1800s). The goal is revolution, in imitation of the French Revolution. We see this pattern in Russia, Germany, Italy, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.
Maybe I've missed a detail, and maybe I need a nap - lol - but that's what comes to mind when you ask about what's going on, what the dynamic is. And I do believe people are getting dumber the more we head down this path. The better path is a combination of capitalism, stoicism, and enlightened Christianity (as opposed to, say, medieval Christianity). I don't mean to dun other traditional beliefs, but to use the social virtues of Christianity - patience, kindness, fair play, etc. - as a shorthand. People need to be moral, not selfish, for a free republic to work. If they turn selfish, then they set us all on the path to tyranny.
To be even more specific about methods, the revolutionaries long ago began to take control of the news media and education, in order to shape minds. They work with politics, organized crime, and created in each national govt a bureaucracy that is not accountable to the people and which is corrupt and which acts to increase its own power and control.
Also, specifically, I think Soros and the WEF act as agents of the CCP, having come to power as the CCP opened up to the west."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Democrats are the literal "party of war" for the US (Mexican-American War, Civil War, Spanish-American War, WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, and Obama's drone wars in Libya and Syria). They're in bed with the military industrial complex, and have been for over a century. But don't misunderstand ... they don't want to WIN wars. They just want to get them started. Endless warfare, and thus endless defense scams. The Dems created the deep state 100 years ago in order to remain the de facto govt regardless of how elections go. All elections mean for Democrats is who is going to be able to be corrupt in office and rake in millions. Just look at the fortunes of the Pelosis, Clintons, Obamas, and Bidens, all gained while holding office.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
IMO, it makes perfect sense for Putin to poison Lukashenko. Putin desperately needs a victory, and he knows he's not going to get it in Ukraine. So he's attempting to formally annex Belarus. Lukashenko probably received chelation IV treatment for his poisoning, with extensive bruising occurring due to his age, which is why he is wearing the bandage. Lukashenko is also partly looking sick because while he thought he was playing it safe by making friends with Putin, he sees the Russian armed forces in his country and feels the poison in this veins, and he knows Putin has him in the end game. Even if he tried to appeal to western powers for salvation, he's screwed, because of the Russian forces in his country. Even so, there's probably some back channel talk with the EU. Will we see Belarus become the next theater in this war? Possibly. I don't see Putin voluntarily pulling out, and without western aid, Lukashenko is dead.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Fed taking over the Treasury, as it has, shows that our Constitutional govt is on the verge of imploding. Make no mistake, the federal bureaucracy is what runs the nation now, and they are not elected, they have no terms, they have no term limits, and they have no oversight. Who investigates the FBI? Why, it is the FBI! And who investigates the US intelligence agencies, like the CIA? Nobody! All of our money and power has gone into this, and there is barely a fig leaf of Constitutional govt ... well, the leaf is not very big, and I think most of us can see the naughty bits all the time now. 4 million employees in the federal govt, and they're taking pretty much all of our tax dollars to elevate themselves and destroy us.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I don't condone drunk driving, especially if you are wealthy and should have a professional driver. There's zero excuses. But mainly they're against JT not for any moral outrage, but because he's a white male. As for Bari Weiss and her wife, they clearly want to insert bad words into peoples' mouths instead of reporting reality. Many people have questioned the US's role in WW2, including the left. As for the Aztecs sacrificing kids, there's a different way to look at it. Women all over used to routinely kill their own kids after delivery. They'd throw them in the ocean, off a cliff, toss them in the river, or whatever. The Aztecs institutionalized it, turning it into a social event, but they may have been accepting babies for sacrifice from mothers who wanted to give them up.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's not just the Islamic ideal to conquer. The Russian Empire, the Chinese Empire, and various others, like the Turkish Empire ... they all see it the same way. The Russian Empire, in the Great Game, sought to push out the British Empire, and that's the source of these problems in the Middle East, with the various Islamic nations getting juiced up by the Soviets for this purpose. To a large extent, this translated into the Cold War, and after the Soviet collapse, China has been stealthily moving in to run all of the old Soviet operations. So China is pro-Hamas. This is the real problem, because Chinese influence grew enormously along with their economy. Now, with the Chinese economy in collapse, is the time to push back and correct everything.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@pearz420 I suspect whatever it is you're thinking of is the result of the nature of storytelling. In recounting events we give characterizations as a sort of shorthand, like "Rome fell," when there was actually no particular time for the people living then to look around and see that Rome fell. The city was sacked several times in the span of centuries, and to the people living in that general era, things slowly morphed from one thing into another over generations. Furthermore, Rome continued in the east for about 1000 years after historians drew the line for its demise in the west.
Along similar lines, what happened in Germany was mostly just tweaks on things already in existence. If you're thinking of the idea of putting certain people in camps, the US did that in both WW1 and WW2. The creation of the extermination camp was a new thing. But analogs have existed for eons. In the ancient world a conquering tribe might kill all of the adult males of the other people after the war. We see evidence of this taken to the extreme in the DNA of the people of the British Isles and Spain, where the invaders of 2500 BC killed off nearly every single indigenous man.
As for ideology, Europe was facinated by the Progressive ideology and policies of the Wilson administration in America. Germany was doing the same sort of thing that Progressives were talking about and doing in other countries. In the US, for instance, it was a Progressive policy to sterilize adults deemed unfit to procreate.
So, I don't know what you're thinking of that was particular to Germany, but I'll bet whatever it is, it was not that different from what others in the world have thought or done.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MrAkaacer Modern people are taught that hedonism is the natural way, and that only stupid people blindly following ancient traditions think virue has value. That's part of Maoism, for instance.
The way I see it, hedonism is self-interest, and this is the natural behavior of children. But as we grow older, and as our prefrontal cortex develops more, we began to see the outcomes of our actions and appreciate how helping others is rewarding. This type of behavior is seen as mature adult behavior, and is linked to development of higher IQ.
But not everybody grows out of their childish self-interest. In adults, this becomes sociopathy and narcissism.
A democracy like what the US once had cannot exist without virtuous leadership and virtuous people. What we have now is the consequence of living for 200 years with the intellectual and social "fruits" of the French Revolution, which was the opposite of the American Revolution. The French Revolution is the inspiration for communism / socialism, and they have been trying to bend the entire world that direction ever since.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What is next is forcing everyone to wear a hammer and sickle emblem, a red star, gold star, etc., and if you don't, you lose all social "privileges" (no longer any rights), like banking, having a job, having a place to live, having food to eat, and so on. If you aren't WITH the revolution, you're against it. We are heading directly into this.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Race used to mean lineage, linked to words like trace, ray, and royal. It referred to people related to one another. However, at the time of the French Revolution and the "Age of Enlightenment," which was really the age of pseudo-science, they developed the false idea of races based on color: Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negroid. But the truth is we're all one race, the human race.
As for the term Caucasian, it was based on an archaeological discovery, and in science ancient artifacts / cultures (and viruses) are named after the places they are discovered.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If we can't talk about Hitler, we can't tell the real story of Hitler, and we can't honestly compare him to other malefic leaders of his era and stripe, like Mao, Stalin, Kim, Pol Pot, Mussolini, and Castro. Hitler was left wing, and they are ultra-demonizing him in order to SAVE Mao and Stalin, so they can continue to promote communism. Hitler and Stalin began WW2 as partners, with Stalin enabling the war in the first place by letting Hitler build his forces (illegally) in Russia. Then Stalin agreed to provide Hitler's war machine with oil, which was critical. And then Hitler and Stalin jointly invaded and destroyed Poland, with Stalin taking east Poland. But the left wants to protect the Soviets, so they distinguish between Hitler and Stalin, claiming Hitler was "right wing." And then, of course, the lie about the Japanese internment camps in the US being a "right wing" thing would also be questioned, because the fact is that it was called for by the Democratic Party, which was solidly left wing. In fact, most of the nations participating in WW2 were left wing, with probably the key exception being Japan. They were not right wing, but basically functioning as a medieval society with modern weapons. If you can begin to talk rationally and openly about Hitler, that's one of many subjects that begins to expose the lies of the left, and the horrors they want to impose.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Democrats like Dick these days, when not so long ago, they hated Dick. What has changed? Only the kayfabe. Now, to protect the deep state, they are dropping the act, and openly showing that the Cheneys, for example, are really on the same side as the Democrats. Who do they really hate? THE PEOPLE. US. They say they hate Trump, but it's really THE PEOPLE that they hate. And that's why they're doing all the things they're doing, like reducing the supply of food, of fuel, driving up inflation, suppressing free speech, etc. Their main war is against the people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Washington DC isn't stupid. But they are 90%+ Democrat, as is the deep state. They have always been slavers, totalitarians, self-anointed elites. When they formed the Confederacy, how many political parties did it have? Just ONE. Coming out of the Civil War, the Democrats embraced Progressive philosophies of utilitarianism, eugenics, propaganda, fascism, and communism. That's been the evil side of America for over 100 years now. Wilson, the first Progressive Democrat, was hugely popular in Europe, swaying many to the philosophies of the future ... with the future being WW2.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Full-on electric cars, made to the scale of the performance of gas engines, is a bad idea at present. It sounds clean, but the "dirt" is just offshored, and the power generation is tucked out of sight. A form of hybrid is the best we can do at the present, where electrical systems are used to make the gas engine more efficient through regenerative braking and similar methods. Safer and less toxic battery and supercapacitor technologies are needed to make the electrical systems of cars better.
Full-on electric vehicles are also a total disaster for our electrical infrastructure, at least until we develop and deploy future technologies, like superconducting power lines and electricity from fusion power. It would be like trying to run a modern city on a Victorian era electrical grid. You just can't do it successfully.
As for solar cells on your house ... it can be helpful if you're off the grid, but it can add to difficulties with a power grid in some situations, even if you have a wall of batteries. The best available solar technology right now is solar water heating, which is cheap and about as clean as an industry as can be. IMO, solar water heaters should be a part of building codes.
2
-
2
-
The feds are the Mafia, since 1900. You could call them "the DC family." They only go after someone using the law if they're not a made man, or if they ARE a made man but they've fallen out of favor, and using the law against them is the most politic way of going about removing them. For instance, Capone was causing too much trouble, so they sent the feds after him, leaving Capone's rivals with clean hands. What happened with JFK is that the deep state wanted him gone because he was interfering with the war machine. LBJ was willing to go to war, which is why he was VP. Same general idea with switching Ford (Warren Commission) in for Agnew, and then removing Nixon, and with Bush (CIA) as VP for Reagan, then shooting Reagan.
2
-
2
-
This discussion is super STUPID. Sure, some people misuse things, like drugs. But not everyone does. Improve the H1B system, but don't be a fool. Education in the US has plummeted, and half of the workforce, even in STEM, is woke. Musk is not aiming to do a "great replacement." Look at his hiring: at probably his most technical business, Space X, less than 1% are H1B visas.
This channel just gave a TERRIBLE analysis of the issue, basically looking at the way Democrats abuse the country and accusing EVERYONE of doing the same. This channel also said that DEI hires are just the same as skilled, intelligent, moral workers, and they MUST be hired, because they are American! No, they are NOT GOOD HIRES. Far too many STUPID people wiggling their lips on this subject. Yes, get Americans back to work, improve the economy, improve US prosperity, and improve US education! 🗽
Over 200 comments by idiots on this video, BTW.
2
-
2
-
I hope he doesn't stop there. Every single department needs to go. They are not the right answer for a REPUBLIC, they are not constitutional, and they must be removed. Also, the Fed needs to go, and the federal income tax needs to go. In general, conceptually we need to roll back to about 1900 in law, in order to get back to the Constitution. The Founders warned against the income tax, and it was literally illegal according to the Supreme Court. We need to get rid of these federal agencies stuffed full of people we never elected and are unable to hold accountable, yet they can pass rules with the force of law, and then enforce those rules with not just guns, but pre-dawn raids. IMO, those are death squads. This is what America has come to. Wake up! ☕🗽
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The news has had bias and propaganda since the French Revolution / Reign of Terror. In the US, the media grew powerful in the late 1800s, with the examples of Hearst and Pulitzer. In the early 1900s, the federal gov't embraced propaganda and censorship, and first began to limit the right to free speech. Radio and TV, added to newspaper, allowed for more owners and more voices, thus a bit more democracy. This was lost during the Clinton administration, when the decision was made to allow news corporations to consolidate down to just six owners. This policy was advantageous for the Chinese Communist Party, which began to influence the media, in addition to businesses and gov't officials at all levels. China's goal to make the west destroy itself. This goal goes back to the Fifties and Sixties. Originally the USSR was the stronger power, but the CCP rose as the USSR fell. Now China is quietly doing what the USSR couldn't do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It sounds like the baby formula shortage is actually not a federal gov't issue, but it might be purely a state and retail store issue. States like AZ, TN, and TX signed contracts with Abbott for baby formula, and have not cancelled the contract due to non-delivery by Abbott. Furthermore, stores in the affected states have not purchased additional baby formula to sell at regular prices, apparently because they believe WIC recipients won't buy formula unless it is discounted. If this is true, it's not a federal problem, and it's not a supply problem. It's a problem with certain states not being sufficiently proactive, and stores failing to stock formula because they think it won't sell. In theory, Abbott may resume making formula in about two weeks, providing the FDA approves. Not sure why it has taken them 3 months to clean up their manufacturing plant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ye says he likes some of the things Nazis did. Well, so did the Democratic Party, which authorized Operation Paperclip. Wernher von Braun was one of the Nazis brought over in Operation Paperclip, and not only was he a principal scientist behind the US space program, but he also worked with Disney on a few films. He was the chief architect of the Saturn V rocket that took US astronauts to the Moon. In 1975, he received the National Medal of Science. When the war with Germany ended, the US and allies didn't kill every German who served as a Nazi. That was not a crime punishable by death. And in philosophy, they were socialists, very much like the Democrats of today, and the Democrats of their day, and the Democrats at the time of Woodrow Wilson.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I can't imagine what info of this nature the CIA would need to hide. There's a ton of this out in the public, and more published daily on YouTube. IMO, a lot of the wilder points here are wrong, but I think it's certainly true that there have been many earlier civilizations. That's what archaeology is all about. And their position is always that "prior to this date, nobody had any significant language or math or other skills," and then they find something that's older and have to push the date back. The fact is that humans have been capable of coming together intelligently for a couple million years. None of the ancient technologies, like language, fire, sailing, etc. should have been beyond them. So at some point, long before the present, things started.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Imported coal is the answer for the time being, and the nuclear plants need to be revived. Europe has not developed enough domestic energy resources for their own needs. Spain, for example, imports 70% of its energy, and yes, that's fossil fuels. On average, Europe imports 50% of its energy. This is because of politics and ignorant voters. Politicians have permitted themselves to be bribed primarily by Russia to rely on Russian energy rather than develop energy independence. Europeans seem to be completely unaware they are responsible for all of the oil wars. (BTW, if you are thinking of solar cells, nearly all of the world's solar is made by China, the genocidal communist country. Wind, too. Best for each country to make their own energy products.)
"Green" politics is also being used to get rid of fertilizers, livestock, and reduce food supplies. This is happening in Europe. Wake up!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
More to the point: what set Latin America back was the European feudal system. The cultural pattern of Mexico and all lands south were set during the late Middle Ages, while the US and Canadian societies were set in the Age of Enlightenment. So in the north there was an emphasis on individual freedom, ownership, small industry, and developing a middle class. The southern US, with its plantation culture, was very similar to the Mexican hacienda culture, with a small number of wealthy owners and a large number of poor laborers, and it resisted industrialization for some time after the US Civil War, despite efforts by the north to bring industrialization south. Europe was dragged into modernism by endless wars, with the French Revolution decapitating the aristocracy, leading to Napoleon and the Age of Empires. By comparison, Latin America has had peace and stability. Sure, Mexico has had some internal turmoil, but the imposition of Emperor Maximilian, and even the invasion by the US, were relatively quick and minor affairs that didn't alter society much. Latin America is coming along, developing a middle class, but still struggling against a huge wealth divide, which is the defining characteristic of Europe in the Middle Ages.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A non-interventionist policy was normal for the US a century ago. Who was against it? The Democrats, and their allies: the media (Hearst), the military industrial complex, and the banks (the Democrat NYC power base). The Democrats, military, and media forced the country into the Spanish-American War. McKinley (R) was conveniently assassinated by a "lone gunman." The Democrats then passed the 16th Amendment to begin the income tax, which would fund the expansion of the federal bureaucracy and military, and endless war began. This is what Gen. Smedley Butler complained about with "War Is A Racket," because the US was going to war to serve the desires of the connected corporate powers, military industrial complex, and banks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think JP and Tucker are among the many on the right who have this wrong. It's not the first time that JP and Tucker have been wrong, either. Tucker has said some good things recently, but he's such a legit dimwit that he was solid blue pill for the first several decades of his life, earnestly believing in the goodness of Washington DC. He was friendly with Hunter Biden and didn't see anything wrong there. He didn't get a tiny taste of red pill until after Trump was elected. I think you can't turn Ukraine into a black and white issue, where the WEF, Democrats, Ukraine, and NATO are the bad guys ... and by extension Putin, Russia, China, and Iran are the good guys. It doesn't work like that. WEF is bad and Russia is bad. Ukraine should be in NATO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It seems you're sufficiently self-aware, which is a good thing. But there's a thing called "paralysis by analysis," where a person may spend too much time questioning self, and get lost in it. Sometimes you just have to go do things, get stuff done. There is a season for each thing, and it sounds like now is a time of preparation, of tying up loose ends. It's like you're a bird, making small flights, building strength and navigational skills, and preparing yourself for a much longer flight, after which your main concern will be ... building a new nest. I wish you good fortune! Things usually work out, just not hardly ever in the way you expect. lol
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
IMO, they're fundamentally wrong about aging. Fungus is what breaks down all plant and animal matter, and the world is full of fungus biologically engineered by nature to do this. Even the oceans are full of body dissolving fungus which affect the fish. These fungi are in our bodies as we live, and they are breaking us down. When their ability to break us down advances ahead of our ability to regenerate ourselves, that's when we physically age. Regeneration is managed by production of stem cells. So there are two principles: 1) an immune system or micro biome issue related to fungi, and 2) the need for unimpeded regeneration, which relies on underappreciated substances like B12, biotin, iodine, vitamin D, vitamin K2, and melatonin, where two of those substances are related to the amount of sunlight we get (vitamin D from UV, and melatonin from IR). No doubt there are other substances in the chain of regeneration we are completely unaware of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Looks like Orwell has converted another court. "War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, and ... censorship is free speech."
The 11th Circuit has 6 Trump appointees, 3 Obama, 1 Clinton, and 1 Bush.
The 5th Circuit has 6 Trump, 3 Obama, 2 Clinton, 4 Bush, and 2 Reagan appointees.
Looking at who picked the judges, you'd think the results would be the opposite.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump wasn't deep state. All we've had since Reagan are deep state presidents. Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, Obama, plus candidates Hillary, McCain, and Romney. All deep state.
Before that, the president was popularly elected, and when they ran into trouble with the deep state, the deep state took vengeance. After JKF, they killed RFK. They created Watergate for revenge on the end of the Vietnam war, and they sent assassins after Ford and Reagan. Sadly, people are refusing to awaken, keeping blankets over their heads, unwilling to acknowledge what's going on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My assumption has been since the Biden "election" that the US military would end up substantially invested in war in another poor country, because that's the pattern of the military industrial complex. I figured Biden was attempting to set the stage in Ethiopia or someplace like it. Ukraine has been a bonus, but it's not likely to be the multi-decade war that the MIC wants. The fighting is too high of an intensity, and what they want is a low intensity ongoing military operation, like in Afghanistan. At the end, they'll abandon the weapons like Biden did, because the whole goal is to have reasons to make more weapons. The Democrat Party has always been the war hawk party, even if the party elite like to paint themselves as doves, like JFK and RFK (who were killed by the war hawks). The Democrats paint the Republicans as the party of war, but if you look at history, the Republicans have been reluctant to go to war (following the Teddy Roosevelt doctrine), until the RINO takeover with Bush 1. American wars called for by the Democratic Party: Mexican American War, US Civil War, Spanish American War, WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Libya, Syria. RINO wars: Persian Gulf 1 & 2, Afghanistan.
One thing to correct in this particular interview is that this is an extension of the Great Game. It's not just the US scheming about this region. Russia and China are the other shadow forces in Ethiopia. Ethiopia, for instance, is a major hub for China's economic colonization of Africa. It's very much fake news to try to bash America for being involved as if it is the only international force influencing policy in countries around the world. Anyone studying history knows that Russia has been big on the world stage for hundreds of years, NOT just within their own borders. The original players in the Great Game were Britain and Russia, starting around 1600, and there have been many others in the game.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dave keeps interviewing WEF / RINO types. Can he not tell the difference? While I think it's fine to hear from many sources, it looks like an endorsement.
Having said that, some people are lighter or heavier RINOs. I didn't have a huge problem with what this particular speaker was saying. In fact, I agreed with nearly everything she said, except that Americans are too smart to fall for the Democrat / deep state lies. They aren't. And a substantial number of Canadians, apparently, would re-elect Trudeau. She's not perfect, but Nikki is 100% better than about any Democrat.
Nikki is correct that you take only the facts from the news, not the opinions, and you make up your own mind. So many articles put out in the last decade have NO FACTS, just opinions they are pushing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If Gen Z is hitting the late teen / early 20s years, it's very normal to feel alone at that time of life, and to question the meaning of life. It's probably mainly hormonal ... just the way our bodies are at that time, and probably part of nature's way to get us to start families. Women, in particular, would be feeling nesting urges, and heightened insecurity, while men probably feel hormonally like they need to prove themselves. There are other social factors affecting us as well, as there always are, because the world keeps on spinning. But let's not overlook the obvious, which is the stage of life: the challenges of young adulthood.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What DORE is hiding about Ukraine / Russia: Years ago, it was revealed that Ukraine had VAST natural gas resources. Enough that if Ukraine was friendly to the EU, this gas could do a lot to make the EU energy independent. The problem was that Ukraine was a corruptocracy run by Russia and influenced by China.
So the west engineered a coup, replacing the corrupt head of Ukraine with a more democratically elected and western-friendly regime. In doing so, they sided with some unsavory people who were in significant opposition to the Russians. This is when Hunter Biden appeared on the board of the gas company.
But Russia wasn't going to give up, now that they knew Ukraine had huge natural gas reserves. Russia didn't just want the gas, they wanted to control Europe by controlling energy. It's a basic strategy of theirs. They could not let the EU become energy independent. Russia and China also paid Hunter.
So in 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine and took Crimea and regions in the SE of Ukraine ... coincidentally all the places that had the natural gas. The west looked to Obama to do something, and he just looked away.
The west responded modestly by funding the radical opposition to the Russians, the Azov people, just like the US funded the Mujahadin in Afghanistan decades ago. The mission from the west was to disrupt Russian efforts to extract and sell the Ukrainian gas. Whatever else the Azov people did was their own business.
Russia was unhappy with this, and wanted to rub out the Azov people and re-install a puppet gov't in Kyiv. So they bribed western officials to make their countries take Russian oil, gas, and coal. The western officials, always on the lookout for bribes, accepted. So in the west, they shut down nuclear power plants and pipelines in order to justify bringing in the Russian oil. This put Russia in the catbird seat, at least for the winter. So during winter, when the west was dependent on Russian oil, Russia invaded Ukraine.
Now you're up to date with what's really going on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This isn't true. Modern liberals are following the philosophies from the time of the French Revolution pretty much to the letter. This sort of philosophy is like a mind virus, and it has been killing people in droves ever since the French Revolution. Unfortunately, people don't pay any attention to history. If they did, they'd recognize this immediately, because the origins are not obscure at all. They are in BOLD TYPE and CAPITAL LETTERS with arrows pointing to them. This mind virus is what caused not only the French Revolution and the subsequent Reign of Terror and empire of Napoleon - with all its wars - but it formed the basis of Marx's philosophy, and was responsible for the Russian Revolution, Spanish Civil War, WW2 bad guys, the rise of Mao and the CCP, Castro in Cuba, etc. The worst administration in American history, the Wilson administration, borrowed heavily from this philosophy, which inspired the literature and ideologies coming from Orwell and Huxley. The problem is that this mind virus conceals itself, so those who have the virus can't perceive it. We call these people Progressives.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The deep state was created 100 years ago to facilitate the cooperation of big business and govt, while at the same time they were telling us that they were trying to "save the little guy" ... us. The primary tool for this operation? The federal personal income tax, which previously wasn't legal, but they made it legal in the early 1900s, and then they began using it for "social justice" ... so the wealthy would pay a larger share. But in reality, this funded the tremendous expansion of the federal bureaucracy, and created corporate-federal linkages we'd never seen before. We've gone from practically zero federal employees to 4 million, and hundreds of departments. They even put the nation deep in debt, once they figured out they could take more taxpayer dollars that way. It's a con game, and a tyrannical control game. And most Americans still don't realize it, 100 years in.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FWIW, if men were being raised the same way women are raised, they would be villains as well. You'll notice this is factual, in that the children of single mothers are significantly more likely to be involved in criminal activities. It's predominantly men that make the kids aim to be good people. (There can be good mothers and grandmothers, definitely, they're just more rare.)
Men are made good in western civilization by the hero culture. These stories lay it out, in a pattern very similar to that laid out by Joseph Campbell in his journey of the hero. The young man normally finds a good and wise older man as a mentor, and that's key. The mentor helps the young man shape himself into a person of strength and nobility, emphasizing not just physical training, and vocational training, but the development of high moral character and a high-minded philosophy.
Women in the west completely lack this. Nobody is training western women to be of noble character, and women aren't seeking out wise mentors. (Supposedly Hillary Clinton took Margaret Sanger and Saul Alinsky as mentors, but that's like taking Stalin as your role model. Not heroic, not noble!)
1
-
@chriswyma145 While there can be various fears for men, like public speaking, asking a girl out, jumping out of a plane for the first time, etc., men are normally not living from moment to moment in fear. They are fairly carefree. Women, on the other hand, do consider everything in light of their insecurities. Fears of rejection, fears of criticism, "is my nose too big? or the classic "does this dress make my butt look too big?" etc. Again, not all women are like that, but it's so common that when you come across an outlier, chances are decent they are deranged. Like, why is this lady dressed like that, with her hair in disarray, and farting in public? When for a guy, that's just Monday. 😆
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Democrats are long time racists, back to the early 1800s. They define race by class and intelligence, even more than by skin color. Thus, in their racist view, whites and Asians are upper class and smart, and not people of color. This is why if you are black and vote Republican, you ain't black. Blacks and other people of color are lower class to Democrats, they are less intelligent and work menial jobs, like grocery, while Republicans are white upper class. Labor belongs to the Democratic Party. Just look at all the racist comments Joe Biden has made expressing this. This is his viewpoint, and it is widely shared among Democrats. (Except, of course, Asians are not really treated like whites, but according to racist stereotypes.)
1
-
IMO, Taiwan is just a distraction. China threatens Taiwan, which has little strategic value, and while everyone looks at that, they continue locking in on Myanmar, which gives China ports in the Bay of Bengal, getting them past the the sea blockades in the eastern seas. It's clear China's strategic sea plan involves Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and South Africa. China will continue to try to soften up their rivals in the east, but don't ignore what they are doing in the west, which is not being opposed. Also before Taiwan is China's goal of taking Russia. This has been underway for some time. Russia borders China to the north and has all of the resources China lacks. China urged Russia into war with Ukraine to weaken Russia. Neither Russia nor Myanmar have allies, except India.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You can draw different lines, usually, as to when a thing "starts." My impression is it began in the 80s, with the normalization of China and the rise of Chinese influence peddling. What they did was the CCP bought the loyalty of various well-known people, like Kissinger and Schwab, to act as agents, advising people to do business with China. But, China is basically organized crime, so when you do business in China, they bring you - willing or unwilling - into their crime network. Because they can ruin your China business in an eyeblink, and they hold that - and perhaps other things - over you. The money the CCP was making on their end of the deals enabled them to keep expanding the outreach of their bribes, loans, and influence. That's how the west became communist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The cooperation of the media and the US war machine has existed since Hearst and the Spanish-American War. The deep state was formed shortly thereafter (Wilson administration). That's when Americans lost their freedom. Over the last three decades, China has been buying influence within the US deep state, so we're seeing a shift toward CCP style governance.
The deep state can make (or, presumably, break) a journalist's career. The legendary Woodward and Bernstein only became legends because they were guided by J Edgar Hoover's right hand man, who was also in charge of manipulating public opinion for the purposes of the deep state. They wanted Nixon out because he ended the Vietnam War. He was replaced by Ford, who also didn't start a war (and who got an assassination attempt by someone linked to the CIA), so hopes were pinned on Carter for war, but he was reluctant as well. So Carter couldn't get a second term, and they hoped Reagan would approve of war, but he didn't (and he had an assassination attempt). So after that, the deep state has had its thumb on the election scales. Bush was their man, the first Republican president to call for war (Iraq). Clinton was ready to play (Kosovo), Bush 2 was in on the game (Iraq and Afghanistan), and Obama was fine with it as well (Libya, Syria, ISIS). Hillary was supposed to get elected next, but Trump accidentally got in, and he tried to end the "forever wars." So they couldn't let him get a second term. The deep state's man is now Joe Biden.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SusanYeske701 They tend not to disclose the medical histories of patients, as that's private information. But that's the type of mental illness that you see in situations like this, in that it seems to affect more males than females, it tends to hit in the late teen years, and it can create a mental state of violent delusional superiority. Often the patient is a fairly smart young man. Those suffering from it can have violent outbreaks where family members are threatened and the police are called, and the police - not familiar with mental illness - may describe the words and behavior of the person as "pure evil." But if they are on the proper meds, or just not suffering an episode, they're generally functional. The problem is getting them onto the right meds and getting them to stick with the meds and not be using recreational drugs.
So for those shooters who are young adult males whose mental state has been widely observed to be deteriorating for a year or two ... that's generally what this is. The Aurora theater shooter, the Gabby Giffords shooter, the Sandy Hook shooter, etc. are all of this type.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think it's much of a comfort, perhaps, but we have been in possibly worse situations before, and have pulled through. Yes, this one is looking bad, and it is frustrating that we should get challenged like this when it's so obvious we should be doing so many things differently ... better.
But keep in mind that in the beginning of the 1900s we imprisoned thousands of innocent people in camps, we censored the mail, we segregated our gov't offices, and we turned over our Treasury operations to a cabal of the most powerful banks. We lost many people in a disastrous war, after which we said "Never again!" The FBI was enlarged. That was under Wilson.
A generation after that, we "elected" FDR four times (probably not really). Again, we put thousands of innocent people in camps, with all the collateral damage associated with that (dead pets, ruined businesses, lost homes, etc.). FDR made it illegal for citizens to own gold. We created the CIA. We dropped the bomb.
And that's before the JFK assassination, the assassination of his brother, and of MLK. And so many, many other things, like the revelation of the COINTELPRO and MK-Ultra programs. Nothing much has changed. We're still fighting against the domestic deep state and foreign communism. And we have had the 1st and 2nd amendment throughout.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The left was born with the French Revolution, and they were the revolutionaries. Their creed was that a person could either be enthusiastically WITH the revolution, or against it. And that's when the political right wing was born, as the opposition. The right was anyone who was against the revolution. Keep in mind that while the revolution promised "liberty, brotherhood, and equality," and a social utopia, what they delivered was a period of time known as the Reign of Terror, which was followed by a tyrannical empire (Napoleon) that was perpetually at war. The revolutionaries were mobs with torches and pitchforks, looking for those who did not want to comply with the revolution. Any of this sound familiar? The philosophies of the French Revolution have been circling the world like hungry ghosts ever since, and every decade or two they rise up and try to overthrow society and govt. In the US, the battle has been going on since the 1800s, and it has been worse than what we're seeing today, but if you're not with the revolution, you're a target of the revolution, and you will have to push back in at least some modest ways if we are to prevent the revolution from growing in strength. Places that didn't fight back hard enough include Mussolini's Italy, Hitler's Germany, the USSR, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Vietnam, and North Korea. Iran and Afghanistan are probably an Islamic variant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marcuspi999 Oh, okay. That's cool. :)
My impression is that In America they followed a sort of Christian Progressivism, putting God and the gifted rights of men before the state. This was the tradition from the start of the nation till about Teddy Roosevelt. What was growing in Europe, and with American elites who looked to Europe, was the idea of Progressivism that dropped Christian morality and spirituality in favor of the Utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a British contemporary of the French Revolution, and sort of helped translate that political movement into British and colonial society.
This Utilitarian Progressivism we can see in modern figures like Bill Maher, for instance, with the emphasis on hedonism and pseudo-science, including atheism. We can see it as a guiding principle for the Communist revolutions, and the pseudo-scientific dystopias of writers Orwell and Huxley.
With Christian Progressivism ending with Teddy Roosevelt, Utilitarian Progressivism came in with Woodrow Wilson, and it had a huge effect, causing a reworking of the US federal relationship with the people, and influencing the next generation in Europe, which took its cues from Wilson. (Wilson was more popular abroad than in the US.) The people of the US are currently divided between the two principles.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
China's actual #1 priority is gaining control over Russia, not Taiwan. And gaining control over Myanmar is #2. Sure, China also wants Taiwan, but at this point Taiwan is more of the obvious thing the magician is waving around, while secretly doing something with the other hand. As a consequence of the Ukraine War, both the west and Russia have been weakened, and Russia's alliances have been pared down to pretty much sole dependence upon China. Huh, funny how that developed, almost as though it had been wargamed and planned out. Oh, and now Houthis are firing missiles they somehow acquired, shutting down the Suez Canal traffic to Europe. Now ships must sail past South Africa, a proxy of China. And Venezuela is threatening war ...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Modern war is nearly always part of the Great Game, an outgrowth of empire building since about 1600. This includes the era of communism, which is simply a continuation of the Game. I'm not sure who began the narco state, but I think all states are aware that this is how NK gets along.
IMO, China is responsible for a lot of the current chaos. I think they killed the president of Haiti. I think they killed Abe in Japan. They support Hamas, Venezuela, make "charitable donations" to the Houthis, etc. The western media rarely says a thing about this because the CCP is a major financial partner of the western media and the various think tanks that run western opinion. Myanmar is China's #2 target, as they want it as a puppet state such that it provides a secure port in the Bay of Bengal and railway into China. This would make them less vulnerable to being trapped in island shipping channels.
Russia is part of this as well, and the attacks near the Suez are aimed at impairing shipping to Europe, hurting European economies without going to war. Russia is also responsible for the Sahel strife in Africa. Russia is linked to all of the same groups as China, with the exception of a friendly relationship with India, a consequence of their role in dividing India from Britain.
Turkey under Erdogan is reviving pre-WW1 era empire dreams. They're responsible for the war against Armenia. They're a player in Syria, which was originally a pipeline war. Turkey ended up accepting the pipeline from Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Anybody remember how the Democrats accused Trump of all these things, none of which were true, yet THEY ARE ALL TRUE for Joe Biden, and the Democrats don't seem to care. Joe is senile, a few years back he grabbed a co-worker by the p#ssy, and he's made money from shady dealings with Russia (China too).
BTW, China gave millions to the Biden foundation, it has recently been revealed. IIRC, Biden actually has 2 foundations, while the Clintons only had the one. Oh, and Obama somehow went from a net worth of $1.3 million before he became president, to $135 million. Huh. That's a wealth increase of 100x.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rand is the closest so far to saying what needs to be done: get rid of every federal agency. The federal govt is NOT supposed to have all of these agencies where the staff are not only making rules with the weight of law, but also charged with enforcing the law, AND with ZERO OVERSIGHT. It's completely contrary to the spirit of the Constitution, which said that all power had to derive from the people, with the consent of the people, and within a system of checks and balances. NONE of this is true for the swampy state. So all of those agencies, which were added in the 20th century, need to go. Whatever valid missions exist for agencies, that should be handled at the state level, because with 50 state, then you've got natural checks and balances.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeffs6081 All due respect to you, but I don't see how that could work.
In terms of written language, it looks like the Greek alphabet was adopted by the Etruscans, and the Latins got it from them. Possibly the Latins didn't have a written language before that, or possibly they adopted the local alphabet so they could more easily communicate with their more numerous neighbors.
The legends of the Latins say they got the alphabet from the Greeks, and it was adopted for Latin by a sybil living near Lake Avernus.
Officially, the Latins are thought to have migrated to Italy in the 1200-900 BC period, which is also the time of the Sea Peoples invasion in the Mediterranean.
Apparently the oldest sample of written Latin we have is from 700 BC. The spoken language surely existed well before that. 700 BC is around the time of the founding of Rome. (Other Latin cities existed before that, with the first thought to be Latium.)
Anyway, around 600 BC Rome and the Latin lands were conquered by Etruscan princes. The Etruscans made many improvements, and Rome is said to have become the most prominent city. However, the Latins resented Etruscan rule, and around 500 BC they expelled the Etruscans and started the Roman republic.
Battles between the Romans and Etruscans ensued. The story of Horatio at the bridge occurs at this time.
With a population of about 150,000, Rome and their allies (the Latin League) in the centuries thereafter went on to conquer neighbor after neighbor. It seems like in time, everybody fought everybody. The last to fall were the Greek colonies in the far south of Italy, and that was around 275 BC.
And that's basically the history of the Latins, in short form. So they really were an outsider people - IE speakers - who set up a colony during the Sea Peoples era, and after an early subjugation by the Etruscans, they rose up, made allies, and dominated the whole region. That's the history.
So I guess I have my explanation. I needed a refresher, but I don't know why this wasn't cited, as surely Metatron knows Roman history 101.
Oh well. Have a good one, everybody!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theblindprogrammer Look, I don't think anybody is perfect or any two people agree on much. I'm sure there were some policy positions he took or was said to have taken that I wouldn't agree with. I can't think of anything offhand though. Trump for instance wanted to bring back manufacturing to America, but ultimately it wasn't up to him. He wanted a stronger southern border, to stop illegal immigration - which was the Democrat position back in the days of Cesar Chavez - but again, it wasn't within his power to get it done. So you could say I disagree with his ineffectuality on those fronts, but it's not a one-person gov't, and there are deeply entrenched powers that are trying to destroy the middle class and the freedoms of the common people. He also tried to get the JFK papers released, but the CIA pushed back, and only some of the papers are released. He wanted to end the various wars, but the US is still everywhere except Afghanistan, which was vacated in the worst possible way by Biden. He wanted NATO members to be more responsible for their own safety. All of that seems very reasonable to me.
So what bothers you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hopefully Joe will have a rare moment of competence and get everyone safely out. I'm afraid the Taliban may end up with American captives.
As for pulling out of Afghanistan, that was set up by Trump, and it was the right thing to do. Afghanistan is ringed with nations that oppose the US. China, Russia, and Pakistan are allied to take Afghanistan, with the Taliban as a proxy. It was an untenable position for the US, and historians should heavily weight this consideration. There was no way to defeat Russia, China, and Pakistan, especially while lacking easy access to the country.
The US never should have been in Afghanistan for so long, but this deployment was done by the deep state and corrupt military industrial complex.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steventurnsk I don't think those are actually that close to the core of leftism. The left isn't interested in REAL science or any form of truth. Marx, Malthus, Hegel, and Bentham were peddling selfishness and lies.
So eugenics, for example, which has a form of scientific basis, was not used in that way, but was applied as a rationale to excuse mass sterilizations and "eliminations" of people. Which comes from Malthus. Malthus was really pushing the idea that we'd have more resources if there were fewer people, and that's the part that appeals to the left: having more resources by getting rid of the rest of the people.
They would make pseudo-scientific claims, like "Jews are intellectually inferior," "the Irish have small brains," "the Italians are hairy, which shows they are more bestial in nature," etc. It was all BS concocted to provide an excuse for what they wanted to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chirantanbiswas9330 I think it's very hard for people for people to pierce the veil of narratives and find the truth. Capitalism is indeed what lifted people out of poverty, and it is based on fair play and fair treatment. You can only have functional capitalism in a nation where the people are attempting to be truthful and moral.
Communism is based on hedonism, which is selfish, impatient, imprudent, and greedy. The typical story you hear of capitalist fat cats is more about hedonists and what you find in a communist society than it is about capitalism.
Hedonism and morality are based on the nature of the human brain and its development. Hedonism is how the immature brain, the brain of a child, operates. A part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex, is late to develop, and it is reponsible for various forms of advanced thinking. As the prefrontal cortex comes online, a person mentally matures. As with IQ, which is to some extent tied to this same part of the brain, the development of maturity doesn't seem to happen to the same degree or at the same time in all individuals. But the purpose is to prepare an individual to be a parent. So instead of impatience, they become patient. Instead of being imprudent and impulsive, they exercise forethought, and look ahead with accuracy. Instead of following pleasure and avoiding pain, they accept pain and sacrifice in order to serve a greater goal, which may not even benefit themselves. Those are all things that a good parent does naturally, regardless of religion or social context.
Capitalism is an outgrowth of parents working together. Communism (and all other forms of corruption and tyranny) are rooted in hedonism.
Modern "liberal" philosophy changed from being moral at the time of the American Revolution to being hedonist at the time of the French Revolution. America's founders sought to create a moral society with a level playing field, while the French Revolution occurred in the era where Marx, Hegel, Malthus, and Bentham lived, and quite a different thing was sought. This is why the French Revolution followed the classic pattern of revolt / coup, reign of terror, empire, which we see reflected in every communist / socialist revolution since then.
As for the US and CIA, at roughly the same time as the communist revolution in Russia, the US suffered a quiet internal takeover, by the Democrats, turning DC into a corrupt, hedonist cesspool. DC is over 90% Democrat, the federal expansion they authorized and funded with the income tax is also over 90% Democrat, and the Democrats were allied with big business, big money, big media, and the military industrial complex at the time. This is why America looks and acts like it does. The Democrats, having lost the Civil War, once they returned to power, were determined to never be out of power again.
This is when the US began to resemble Napoleon's France.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Democrat platform: "We elect the differently abled ... specifically, the mentally differently abled. We're for increasing spending, increasing taxes, defunding police, letting criminals be free, dropping our borders, forced injection of untested medicines, raising the price of gas, raising the price of food, suppressing the consumption of meat and promoting the consumption of bugs, eliminating free speech, confiscating guns, WW3, and openly promoting racism. And we're just getting started."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russell is indeed happy to complain about the oligarchs, the Count Draculas, but he doesn't have much to say about the legions of subservient Renfields, the henchmen who enable the schemes of the elite. The problem in WW2 Germany wasn't just the small mustache guy. It was the legions who lined up behind him to enforce his will. With the recent virus, it was an excessively compliant media, medical establishment, police administrations, and fearful, credulous, mask-wearing mobs who were willing to go along with very bad policies. Russell, like Rogan and Dore, is still a Progressive socialist. Don't be thinking he's red pilled at all. He's blue pill all the way, like Maher.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Flipper-r8m Hey lefty ... you have a screwball view of history. One of the things you fail to acknowledge is that GHW Bush was CIA, and the CIA is Democrat. Reagan was shot, and Bush was elevated in a deep state takeover of the Republican establishment. Perot was the true voice of Republicans warning against shipping jobs overseas, but he was steamrolled with the feds wanting either Bush or Clinton. With the Republican vote split, Clinton won, and what did he do? He signed Bush's trade agreements, like NAFTA. Clinton removed the depression era protections on the market, allowed hedge funds like Goldman Sachs to trade in commodities, created the subprime bubble for the banking cartel, and invited China into the WTO. To YOU that's the Republicans. 🙄 FWIW, Carter opposed the shoe unions and sent those jobs overseas before all of the above. In fact, IIRC, it all began with Truman sending fabric making overseas after WW2.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This video is FAR from the only video on this subject, exposing ignorance, and people have been making these videos for decades with the same results. Please understand that our educational system is not merely broken. It's a system of exploitation, not education, and the taxpayers and communities are being exploited. We need a completely different educational system. This is like a medical system that keeps people sick, and a welfare system that keeps people poor, a defense system that keeps us at war, a justice system that keeps making criminals. Basically, we have an administrative system that keeps itself in power, looting the people they are supposed to serve, and creating the very problems they are supposed to fix.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prohibition of alcohol had been a fairly serious political matter in America for about 100 years before Prohibition passed. Around the time that Prohibition passed in the US, Iceland, Russia, Canada, Finland, and Norway all passed laws prohibiting alcohol. This was a Progressive concern, and there was the belief that elimination of alcohol would greatly curtail the amount of violence, crime, abuse of women and children, and poverty in the country. It was also thought it would be better for the general health of the populace. When it came to a vote to have a Constitutional amendment in December of 1917, there were slightly more Democrats in Congress than Republicans, and the Democrats were 140 to 64 in favor of Prohibition. In the Republican party the numbers were almost identical, 138 in favor to 62 against. So Prohibition had overwhelming support in Congress, despite the fact neither presidential candidate (Wilson and Hughes) included the issue in their campaign. After Congress passed the resolution, it was up to the states to ratify the new amendment. In the end, only two states - Connecticut and Rhode Island - failed to ratify it. A sufficient number of states had ratified the amendment by January of 1919, and in October of 1919 the Volstead Act was written to enforce the new amendment. Prohibition became enforced law on January 17, 1920. It was enforced by federal agents.
I haven't studied Prohibition; that's just from Wikipedia. I'm pretty sure that's what they were saying, but if someone knows the whole thing in and out, feel free to correct the record. Basically, alcohol was seen as a demon from the past that needed to be exorcised in order for humanity to fully proceed into the modern world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry, but it's pathetic that the left continues to push this idea that it's always the US pushing the UK and European countries around. Brain dead. Sure, the US has some influence on European countries, but it's not near as big as you think it is. They have just as much influence upon the US, and they use it. Dummies think these oil wars are being called for by the US for the purposes of the US. They aren't. It's been a battle for decades where Russia is trying to control energy supplies to Europe. That's what the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was about, what Libya and Syria were about, and what Ukraine is about. Russia and Europe are fighting over oil and gas. Spain, for instance, imports 70-75% of their energy. They don't have oil of their own. On average, the EU countries import over half their fossil fuels. That's what these oil wars are about. The US is fine on energy, producing its own fossil fuels, and buying what it wants from Canada and Mexico. The US is as energy secure as they want to be. These oil wars are about Russia - an imperial power ever since the days of Peter the Great - and their battle to control Europe and other strategic lands (India, Iran, Turkey, etc.) has been largely against the British Empire. It is known as "the Great Game" or "Tournament of Shadows." Please learn some history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bluemarlin8138 You've clearly convinced yourself that you know what's going on, but you don't. All you're doing is repeating headlines from media propaganda.
Many in India were converted to socialism and specifically Soviet "religion" as part of their national identity in the struggle against the British "colonizers." Though generations have passed, they still don't realize they were pawns being played by Russia in "the Great Game" between the Russian Empire and the British Empire. Socialism and Russia are still seen as morally right and heroic by many so-called intellectuals and social leaders in India, and they guide the opinions of the poorer and less educated.
Obviously people in India have a plurality of opinions, but anyone should be aware of the enduring support for Russia / the USSR among many in that country. You can see it rise up in any comment section for any Indian news channel. Putin is their Chuck Norris.
As for China, they run the WEF, and the WEF in turn runs NATO. China has been engaged in elite capture for decades, and has been extremely successful. The WEF boasts they have infiltrated every cabinet and parliament in the west, and the CCP adds to that with the acquisitions they've made outside that structure, like with the Bidens and Soros. WEF was brought into the CCP fold by Kissinger, who is an old ally of the CCP, just like Justin Trudeau's father, Pierre.
The Biden family has been purchased by the CCP, just as other leaders, like Bill Clinton, were purchased before. Biden has recommended that the next head of NATO be Chrystia Freeland, who is Justin Trudeau's partner in crime and a fellow WEF graduate.
As for China's strategic developments, they did a soft coup in Myanmar, giving them a railroad passage through Myanmar to at least one port on the Bay of Bengal, bypassing all of the complications of the eastern sea lanes. They have long been active in destabilizing South Africa, in order to control the sea lanes around that point. They have a base in Djibouti to help control access to the Red Sea, and have recently completed "diplomatic" discussions with Iran and Saudi Arabia, giving them a measure of control over both sides of the Persian Gulf. They are also positioned near the Panama Canal and strengthening ties with Ecuador and Colombia.
But the main goal, since Mao's revolution, has been to take Russia. Just like Hitler, they loathe the Russians and believe they can easily take their valuable resources, especially the oil. Taking Russia solves a lot of problems for China, and they may see it as making them unbeatable.
The CCP will not wage war with Russia. They will do a soft takeover, as in Myanmar. So it will appear that Russia is still ruled by Russians after Putin, but it will in truth be entirely controlled by the CCP.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
With all the complaints about Trump, that he's a corrupt, mobbed-up, compromised, senile, sex abusive, racist old white man, the Democrat solution is ... Joe Biden? I guess their response has to be something like, "Yeah, but he's OUR corrupt, mobbed-up, compromised, senile, sex abusing, racist old white man."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@carissima_illuminatio That's not true. As has been observed by so many over such a long time, women overvalue themselves and aim too high for their man, completely overlooking the men at their level. They are focused on getting a man above their worth instead of looking for a man who would be a good one to marry. Consequently, the small group of men these women are looking for are not the ones who want to marry, and they are constantly receiving offers from women seeking to get a man above their own value.
You know this is true, because so many of the marriages that stick are the ones between high school and college sweethearts. They saw and married a friend, as opposed to trying to climb the ladder.
So, the first thing a woman must do is understand her own value, and realize that in most cases she's just average. It's a bell curve. Second, limit your interviews to men who want to marry, and don't have sex before marriage. You're not serious about marriage at all if you're sleeping around. It's the same for men: if he's sleeping around, he's not marriage material.
An enormously helpful guide for the modern woman is the 12 step program. It's based on traditional wisdom. Modern women are haunted by insecurity, and they try to cope by using neurotic strategies of control and delusion. That doesn't work. Men demand peace in life, and neurotic, dramatic women constantly challenging and seizing control do not provide peace. Guys don't want to marry a woman like that, though they will sleep with a woman like that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FWIW, the notion of the "crazed lone gunman" started in the 1800s, after Lincoln (R) was assassinated by a "conspiracy." After him, Garfield (R), McKinley (R), and Teddy Roosevelt (R) were all shot by crazy lone gunmen. The first two assassins were executed, IIRC, and the third - who failed to kill Teddy - was put in a mental facility for the rest of his life. So to me, it looks like the US already had a mind-control program, and this would be just around the time that Freud became interested in the theories of hypnosis. I'm thinking the US, UK, and other intelligence services of the era already had mind-control programs, probably using substances like cocaine and heroin to accelerate the process of breaking the psyche, and Freud was one of many brought into the program.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pushing the time frame earlier, I think we see a general movement westward. I think the Celtic culture is very similar, but forming around 2500 BC. I think that eastern Baltic influences moved west as well, into what we now see as the Germanic world.
If you go back thousands of years, like to 6000 BC, I think the original culture is the Narva culture, which was Siberian (and probably blonde), coming west, and flowing all around the shores of the many lobes of the Baltic seas. This group is formally thought to have resided in the vast land between the Narva river in Estonia and the Oder. And they would have been met by tribes wandering north from the Black Sea, Carpathians, and Alps. My impression is that the Celtic culture formed first, and dispersed in all directions at 2500 BC, spreading Indo-European language among groups of people we tend to think of as being Mediterranean, Persian, and Himalayan in heritage. At a later point, maybe around 1400-800 BC, a fresh migration from the eastern Baltic, westward, into Germany and Scandinavia occurred. And this would become what we now see as Germanic or Gothic. I think a likely driver of migrations is the climate, affected primarily by eruptions in Iceland, but also by any eruption, as these affect the northern temperate / Arctic region more than any other spot on the globe, causing famine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Federal govt and media: "Hmm, looks like the Biden family is crooked. So ... let's go arrest TRUMP!!!"
BTW, I fully agree with Trump about the DOJ, etc. being part of the Democrat Party. I've been trying to point this out for years. The swamp was created by the Wilson administration, because the Democrats lost power after the Civil War, and having lost it once, they were determined - in true "Gone With the Wind" fashion - to never be out of power again. And it worked. They've been in power ever since the early 1900s, with most elections since then making about zero difference. And their control of the media, education, and society has been such that most people have no idea that we're no longer free in America. Even when the Kennedys were killed and the Watergate scam happened, most people remained blissfully asleep, sucking on the blue pill.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bashbekersjiw There's nothing about spirituality that makes people want to dominate other people.
However, people who want to dominate others typically lie to others about what they're doing. So they'll say they're very spiritual, or that they're trying to save the world, or something ... when in fact they are simply grabbing power for themselves.
That's because if you come out and say, "Hey, I'm a thief and a murderer, and I plan to do this on a very large scale," you tend to run into opposition.
In the French Revolution, for example, they promised the people that they would be freed from their oppressive overlords and live peaceful, prosperous, and enlightened lives of "liberty, brotherhood, and equality." But what they created instead was a Reign of Terror followed by an Empire, totalitarian tyranny, injustice, and constant ruinous warfare.
So ... do you see the pattern now? The bad guys tend to promise sweet things, and what they deliver is far different. Bad guys run scams.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nord 1 and 2 went directly from Russia to Germany. They were turned off at the time they were destroyed. But there are two more pipelines that go from Russia to Germany, and they are fine. Just to clear up what the journalists often omit in their story. Also, while Biden did brag about taking out the Nord 2, he said he'd do it as soon as the tanks rolled across into Ukraine, and he didn't. So, did some other actor take out the pipelines, knowing that the US would be blamed? We don't know. Some point to Poland. Poland is also asking for nukes. It could be that Poland would like to have the nukes before it becomes revealed that they're the ones who took out the pipeline. Who knows? As with so many things, we may never know exactly what happened.
FWIW, the other pipelines that go to Germany pass over land, and it would be much more difficult for Poland to blow them up. Also, no Russian pipeline in the Black Sea was hit, which again would be presumably out of Poland's reach. Only the 2 pipelines that pass directly in front of Poland were hit. As for the helicopters mentioned by Jeffrey Sachs, would they be carrying and dropping depth charges capable of taking out the pipeline? IDK. Maybe we lost our ability to think critically and investigate matters when covid hit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Honestly, Democrats would rather vote for Hillary or Obama or Biden, just not Trump. So don't try to say that Democrats are the good guys. They are physically ushering in destruction.
People know about RINOs, but apparently Democratic voters are still in the dark. It's only a portion of the Republicans who play the deep state game, while it's nearly 100% of the Democrats, with exceptions of conscience being maybe Gabbard (retired), Manchin (a villified "traitor"), and maybe occasionally Synema (harassed in the bathroom by you guys). You've got Democrats protesting at Supreme Court justices' homes. You run the FBI, so that no Democrats ever get prosecuted for corruption. If Democrat voters ever actually cared, and were honest, they'd LEAVE THE DAMN PARTY. And in California you would have elected Larry Elder.
FWIW, that was top notch rant by Jimmy, and I was glad to hear it. But why in the world are people still with the Democratic Party? So much delusion in the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The UK and EU like to pretend the US dominates them, but from what I see, the US acts as the UK/EU's lap dog, over and over. The US is repeatedly drawn into oil wars, when the US is already energy secure. It's EUROPE that has to import more than 50% of their energy from all of these different places, like the Middle East, Russia, Libya, and potentially Ukraine. And yet these same European countries don't pay their fair share to NATO. It should be clear to any onlooker - who isn't HOODWINKED by "the narrative" of the US dominating the EU - that the US is the obedient servant of the UK and Europe, sending our soldiers to die, and paying trillions of taxpayer dollars, for THEIR energy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I find unfortunate is that so many people can't parse the media to figure out what is truth and what isn't, because they don't know much about what has been going on the world for the last hundred years or so.
There's almost always some truth in what is being said. For instance, "Think of the children!" That IS an appropriate sentiment. It's not false. And there are good people in Ukraine who are under threat or already dead. It's sad that JP used Tulsi Gabbard to smear the country. The people of Ukraine AND Russia are not bad people, though bad people have floated to the top. Of course, I've heard similar things about the US and Canada. Do the people of the US and Canada deserve to be defended, or just sacrificed in an attempt to appease the forces of evil?
Do you really think Putin is a great guy? Just imagine Trudeau or Biden in his place, as the head of Russia. Putin wasn't forced by the west into attacking Ukraine as his only way out. He's gone to war because he sees an opportunity, an opportunity he created. He has been pushing the sales of Russian energy to the US and EU, and now that they're dependent on it, and it's winter, he strikes. He's been working on this since he was stopped by the west in 2014.
We should try to avoid war, always. But is this going to be another "Peace in our time!" moment, where we sacrifice someone else for our own comfort, only to end up in war anyway? Additionally, Ukraine is an agricultural country, and other countries are dependent upon Ukraine wheat. It looks like that crop is not going to materialize. On top of that, natgas is used to make fertilizer, and even before this Russian gas embargo, it was anticipated that this year was going to be hard on agriculture due to the high price of natgas / fertilizer. So we'll see what happens. I expect there will be virtually no news about this in the US or EU, because the wealthy countries will be able to buy food. It's the poorer countries where people will have to go without.
What we need is an end to the conflict, a protection of the people, and a return to normalcy. Allowing Putin to take Ukraine isn't likely to provide that. Neither is just blundering into war. Cutting off purchases of Russian gas is a help, because that was a weapon being used against the west anyway. But pressure needs to be brought to bear to force Putin out of Ukraine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh, drop the "mystical reasons for countries being unable to conquer Afghanistan" arguments. Use your brains. The country is landlocked and bordered by nearly every evil country in the world: Iran, Pakistan, China, and Russia. The US has to pay for permission to fly over countries to reach Afghanistan. There's no way the US can stay, and they should have left long ago.
As for getting good people out of Afghanistan, that was resisted by the US state department for decades, because the Afghanis were deemed politically conservative, like Cubans. The state department, as policy, only wants immigrants whom they believe will support communism.
As for why the US was in Afghanistan for so long, the whole purpose was to drain the treasury. It was a money grab, just like the federal reserve policies. The US is destroying itself, draining the middle class and preparing for communism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
President Hoover was a member of the Wilson administration who wanted to run for president but couldn't get endorsed by the Democratic Party. He declared himself a Republican in 1920, but having alienated farmers during his service with Wilson, he lost the nomination to Harding, a newspaper man. Hoover was for a minimum wage, a limited hour work week, and against child labor. A Progressive, he supported Wilson's League of Nations. Serving under Harding and then Coolidge, Hoover was regarded as a "light" socialist. He favored infrastructure spending, especially in an economic downturn, and a progressive income tax, including an estate tax. Hoover advocated for govt control of radio. He had govt subsidize the travel industry and pushed for federal regulation of airplanes. Hoover promoted Hollywood films overseas and promoted the American dream of each family owning their own home. He oversaw the production of the Colorado River Compact, which settled water rights for the states with access to the Colorado River. Hoover essentially started the program of federal disaster relief when he used govt resources to address the effects of the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 (the event that inspired the Led Zeppelin song, "When the Levee Breaks"). This set up Hoover's reputation for a win in the presidential election of 1928. At his inauguration, he expressed a hope that poverty would finally be eliminated, but in his first year, the stock market collapsed and the worldwide Great Depression began. Hoover believed the economy of the US and world was being dragged down by the economies of Europe, which was indeed traveling down the path to WW2. While it was believed there would be a rapid recovery from this depression, year after year it dragged on, and scholars still debate the causes for the Great Depression. Republicans, seeing how bad the economic situation was getting, backed out of the next election, essentially handing it to the Democratic candidate, FDR.
I mention this, because Max always makes a hash of his American political history. (Get it? "Makes a hash.")
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@No-wo8ri I don't know why you're so dim and angry. I didn't attack renewables. I said, "Sure, when we have steady, reliable renewables that are cost effective, we should use them. Tidal, biomass, geothermal are possibilities in certain places. But having energy shortages because of an elitist attitude ... that's nutty."
I'm all for renewables that work. Maybe you should attack someone else?
Denmark is a tiny coastal country that is taking good advantage of what they've got. Since they are essentially at the end point of the Gulf Stream and they are coastal with many small islands, they benefit from fairly continuous wind and they can tap it, so it makes sense to do so. Not many places have this sort of advantage.
Denmark also uses cogeneration - which is efficient - they use biomass, biofuels, and biogas, they use centralized heat distribution in their cities ... they do a lot of good things. Biomass is very practical for them, because their country is a flat marsh, thus they have lots of biomass that must be continually harvested.
The wind and the biofuels provide an enormous amount of energy for Denmark. They are NOT in a situation where they must use coal. I'm not saying they should. Only those regions lacking suitable renewable opportunities should use coal.
OBVIOUSLY.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Back in the Trump administration, when the Democrats were afraid Zelensky was going to expose all the corruption linked to Washington, DC, Democrats spent all their time telling the public that Ukraine was utterly corrupt and you shouldn't believe anything you hear from their dirty, lying mouths. Like, you know, anything about Burisma. But now, according to the Democrats, the Ukrainians are pure and can do no wrong. The people that the CIA put in place to fight the Russians (as was done before with the Mujahadin / Taliban in Afghanistan) are these neo-Nazi guys, and the Democrats are busy covering up, because that was done on Obama's watch.
Basically, the Azov Battalion are the Ukraine version of the Taliban or ISIS.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tomastomastomas1521 No, I'm not out of my mind. You appear to be completely clueless, though. Did you think the CCP was Christian, or Muslim, or Jewish? Buddhist? Taoist? No, they are born of "the Age of Enlightenment," which was the era of pseudo-scientific hedonism, which was the same era as the French Revolution. You know, when Marx lived ... the communism guy? Other popular philosophers of the day - who are still influential - were Hegel, Malthus (overpopulation), and Bentham. Bentham is basically the origin of the viewpoint we now think of as "Orwellian." The core of his belief was hedonism. Look him up on wiki.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The "trust the science" people are still there. They continue to push for "protection" from the fictional manmade climate change, which of course is also the excuse for ending farms and meat, and switching to a diet of bugs. They also believe that we can power everything with batteries, apparently failing to realize that batteries are like an expensive, environmentally harmful gas tank. Batteries don't generate energy, they just hold it. They also believe that our electrical infrastructure is going to be able to supply the electricity for the electric vehicles, when - if we could generate that much - it would actually cause power blackouts and melt power cables. It necessitate the rebuilding of the entire grid down to the house level. Every gas powered car is an energy generator, but every electric car only sucks up energy, some of which is lost in running it to the house. It would be a huge technological and financial challenge to shift this, and it makes little sense to do so now. But the people believing in fake science - which is a cult - are afraid, and raging that this technological shift must happen now. Coincidentally, as with the vaccine industry, this climate cult is being pushed by the people who make batteries and other products that they label as "green," but really they're not green at all. Green energy is less efficient and more expensive that the current gas powered approach. But there are those who believe we can just "print more money" to cover the expense, and what can a rational person say to that?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pooh's ominous message: "We have copied ALL your DATA, including who works where, who lives where, and where they bank, and account numbers, card numbers, etc. We have all your DNA, and are making viruses targeted at specific DNA. We have compromised your officials from the local level all the way to the White House, and they are ours to control. We have broken your military from within. Your media spouts nothing but lies, again guided by us. And we do all of your manufacturing, including baby food." As for the alliance of Russia and China, what we're seeing is China EATING UP a Russia that has been weakened by war and cut off from the west. Russia has all the natural resources China very desperately needs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is not the first time this has happened. We repeatedly see the federal govt acting against rivals, and it's always coming from the same group of notorious characters and their support network. What nearly all Americans fail to realize is that this has been happening for 100 years, and it's institutionalized. To truly correct this, not only would we have to act against obvious offenders like the Bidens, Clintons, Obamas, etc., but the whole federal bureaucracy is a corrupt crime organization that was tacked onto the legitimate, Constitutional, US govt during the Wilson administration. They implemented the federal income tax in order to pay for this bureaucracy that exists to control us and skim off our wealth and put it into their pockets. You're familiar with the military industrial complex. Well, this is when it formally started, along with controls over medicine (the medical industrial complex) and the utter corruption of banking (the Federal Reserve system).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brantleyfoster021 Actually, I don't think China feels ready for war, despite their bluster. They are mostly concerned about intervention by America, even with Biden in the presidency. But with the Quad, America is not their sole opponent. They have been very successful with the bribes, though to some extent this is blowing up in their faces as some of those companies may be running into business trouble (Disney, NBA, US media, Democratic Party). China is being increasingly challenged on trade fronts, and their international engineering effort has gone on long enough that they're getting exposed as terrible engineers. If more nations start isolating China and not paying them back on the construction loans, and denying China's claims to the promised collateral (usually prime national resources), China will find themselves seriously overextended. The CCP could collapse from the in-fighting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wokeness is Marxism, and I believe it's coming mainly from the CCP. It has taken over the whole west, including the MSM / Democratic Party / deep state in the US. Trudeau, for example, is a CCP stooge.
That's the real story here, though it's fine to talk about how MI6 guides the CIA in operations. For example, the Brits have been fighting the Russians for centuries, in the "Great Game." The British Empire and Russian Empire were rivals, fighting over all the land between them, and that has continued to the present. Since WW1, the US has been getting roped into conflicts that relate mainly to the Great Game. Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine ... all are pipeline wars. The US doesn't need the energy. It's Europe that is chronically energy insufficient, and Russia who has been attempting to control Europe by controlling the flow of energy into Europe. Stalin, for instance, was selling oil to Hitler, and using him as a proxy until Hitler turned on him. It's been going on for a long time. But nobody talks about it. Even Europeans are completely unaware of their energy insufficiency, and all the poor people around the world who are being killed in the wars to control the flow of energy into Europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let me try to get closer to the truth: the desert is dry. Where it has had wetlands in the past, these have been drained, making it hotter and drier. Agricultural water use, which in cooler areas would normally soak through the soil and return to aquifers, tends to evaporate in the dry hot air. Most of the wells are deep, tapping ancient water that is not easily replenished. So yes, agriculture IS pumping water out of the ground which can't be replaced, and wetlands and rivers are being drained for agricultural water which then evaporates. As for mountain snow, it's not steady. Some years a weather pattern shifts it northward, dumping moisture in the Dakotas and in the midwest, where they have severe flooding as a consequence, as it did this year. Maybe next year there will be more snow in the southwest mountains. As for a giant desalinization plant project between AZ and Mexico, I've been hoping for such a thing for decades. As you may know, the Colorado River no longer runs to sea, in that it is all used / evaporated long before it reaches Mexico, destroying the river delta swamp that used to exist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Precisely because the CCP is NOT capitalist, I don't believe the debt problem affects them at all. The CCP could have a monetary value of zero, or negative infinity, and they'd still have absolute power over everyone in China. I think Deng realized this, and figured ... why not run up the debt and buy the rest of the world? We're the absolute rulers of China. We can't go out of business. Others will take the losses, not us.
As for printing money to cover debts, that plays into China's usual strategy of devaluing their currency. When their currency is lower, everything they make gets cheaper relative to other currencies, and other currencies stronger, relatively. This means China can keep on being the factory of the world, at least as far as money goes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gregr1154 Yup, women have a lot of confusion and overconfidence, and routinely misrepresent situations. You can't even talk to them about it, because it makes them frantic. IMO, the root cause is chronic feelings of insecurity brought by estrogen (which gives them all the neurotic behavior), whereas men have faith brought by testosterone. Women's insecurity ought to be addressed by them using a discipline of faith, and they did this in older generations, but moderns who reject faith - confusing it with religion - build up delusional confidence instead, which makes them behave in a crazy way. A person can't cope with insecurity using anything except faith. It's like a 12 step program: admit you can't control things and submit to higher power. Do your best to stay out of trouble, but otherwise live in faith that things will be the best they can be, with some suffering and failure as part of the natural world.
So when you see a woman attracted to a "confident man," that's them misunderstanding. They're attracted to faith, which brings them feelings of security. And when they insist on being in control all the time, that's them trying to be confident instead of faithful. It never works and it drives them insane.
1
-
@obaroaluya3762 It seems like there is a language problem here. I didn't offer a reason for why they are considered "complicated," but I think it's a combination of two things: a form of infantilism, where society doesn't seem to really expect women to grow up, and fails to hold them properly accountable, and two, I think the root is hormonal, where females are hormonally wired to be highly insecure compared to their male counterparts. The lack of safety causes all sorts of behaviors, like chronically avoiding accountability, avoiding reality (picking delusions instead), and coping with insecurities about their looks by applying makeup, hair dye, padded bras, and so on. Female anger comes from defensiveness due to insecurity, and from entitlement, due to immaturity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The left has just one core message: "Anyone who opposes us, who is not with the Revolution, is evil." This was the message used by Mao, Stalin, Mussolini, small mustache guy, Castro, Kim, and all the rest. And Obama, Biden, etc., in America. As for Spain ... I think you have it wrong, Dave. The entire West is going through all of the same stuff in real time, simultaneously. That's because it's being orchestrated by a single nation: China. China has been buying influencers for decades, and that's why the West looks a lot like China now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"The View" is basically run by the CIA to construct "the narrative" they want you to believe. In this episode, they want you to believe Trump favors children in fetish bondage. At the same time, they don't want to hurt the image of left wing elites involved with Balenciaga, so they refer to the situation as "distasteful," and blame the low level people called in to do work for Balenciaga. Notice how it's always "the rogue employee" ... even when the company is calling for the production of the ad, approving it, paying for it, and publishing it. So, really, it's the photographer's fault? If you believe that, you probably believe all the other claims of misdeeds by "rogue employees," instead of accepting that they were working for bosses who demanded unsavory or illegal acts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Biden is preparing for gas to go to $10+ before the election. Half of the Strategic Reserve is already gone. It will be completely gone by October, and it's a DEFENSE asset.
Vanguard + BlackRock (which Vanguard owns) is the top investor in all the major American corporations, and they have turned them woke, and turned them away from the US to China. Name any company ... Vanguard / BlackRock is the top investor. Apple, Nike, Starbucks, Costco, Kroger, Walmart, Dick's, Levi Strauss, Twitter, Facebook, Disney, Netflix, and on and on. Vanguard / BlackRock have favored status in China.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LOL ... no. It's no secret that Russia intends to expand west as far as France, and throughout Central Asia. If the gov'ts of Turkey, Syria, Iran, China, or North Korea happen to falter, Russia is happy to step in, to "stabilize." Russia has petroleum reserves and lots of rubles these days. They can buy a lot of politicians. The last holdouts would logically be the Baltic states that were formerly of the USSR. Russia is going to patiently extend its reach because rubles are greasing palms and the leaders of many countries don't give a damn about their people. It's going to be a "frog in slowly warming water" sort of scenario. But not likely any type of war aside from the sort you see in Ukraine today. Russia's only opponent in this quest is China, which has spent the last 30 years greasing palms on every continent, and positioning itself near every global strategic point. They are funding the conflict in South Africa, for instance, in order to control the waters around the tip of Africa.
As for Biden ... he's not going to do a thing except collect checks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andybrice2711 IMO, it's obvious, because the WEF as a whole and individually praise China, and China joined the WEF back when it was the Economic Management Forum, in 1979. They flew Klaus to China where he signed a memorandum of understanding, and ever since the organization has promoted CCP interest and policies. The WEF is just a western face for the CCP, or a consultancy in the west that promotes CCP policy. This includes bringing western industry to China, which undoubtedly was the original aim of the agreement. It's thought that similar agreements were made with other groups, like Kissinger Associates. Anyway, a few years after China joined, the EMF changed its name to the WEF and began "penetrating" govt cabinets with their young leaders program.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's about time the Democrat voters learned that the Democratic Party is the traditional party of WAR in the US. It always has been. Sure, the Kennedy brothers were anti-war, but JFK and RFK were killed by the military industrial complex. Jimmy Carter was anti-war, but they made sure he wouldn't serve a second term. That's about it. Who are the REAL anti-war people? The Republicans ... not the RINOs, like Bush, Bush, McCain, Romney ... but the real Republicans. No Republican president called for war before Bush. (Unless you want to count McKinley, who clearly didn't want war, but who was hemmed into it by the Democratic Congress and Hearst.) Wars the Democratic Party wanted: the Mexican-American War, the US Civil War, the Spanish American War, WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, and Obama's quasi wars in Libya, Syria, and Yemen. (The RINO wars, also supported by Democrats, were: Persian Gulf 1&2, and Afghanistan.)
If you don't believe it, at least look it up. You will see that the Democratic Party and media lies about which party is the real party of war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Biden is trying to get something started for the MIC. This is how Vietnam began. So predictable! The Democrats have always been the party of war. Sure, the Kennedys were anti-war, but they were both killed by the military industrial complex / deep state. Democrats called for the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Spanish American War, WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and Kosovo. That's pretty much every war up till Bush, the first deep state Republican (RINO) president, and his son, who did Persian Gulf 1 & 2, plus Afghanistan. Under Obama we had the quasi-wars of Libya, Syria, and Yemen. It's amazing to me how people think Republicans or conservatives are pro-war. What a re-write of history! And what gullibility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hkfoo3333 Well, everyone gets their opinion, but this is totally wrong. lol
China sees Australia as a vast land of mineral resources and virtually no people. It would be easy to take it over by elite capture, and then, if desired, ship so many Chinese workers over that the local population is overwhelmed. And it's a strategic land too, by location. Easy pickings! Low hanging fruit!
PNG is the same way. Hardly any population, but a ton of mineral wealth. That's what China wants.
Probably China would not liquidate all of the local populations, at least not right away. They'd use them as labor for the mines. It would be like the Uighurs in Xinjiang.
Australia is virtually the same size as China, but with about 3/5s of the population of Ukraine.
PNG has about a third as many people as Australia.
As I said, easy pickings, with HUGE reward.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump was correct, and everybody knew it. But they were taking money from Russia, and knew they couldn't be exposed, because their voters - completely under the sway of propaganda - would never believe that the political leaders had sold them out. They'd already made "greenness" a religion in Europe. And they'd convinced the simple folk that it the US that needed energy, not Europe. That the endless wars were for the US, not for Europe. All lies, of course. Libya, Syria, and Ukraine were all wars about Russia trying to lock down Europe's option for energy, forcing them to deal with Russia, and making them DEPENDENT. Russia has been an imperial power since Peter the Great. They want to take Europe. That's what's coming next.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prior to 2014, the Russians were running Ukraine as a corrupt client state. They were abusing the Ukrainians and trying to rob them of all their treasure. What happened in 2014, or a little earlier? Large natural gas fields were discovered. Most people don't know this, but Europe is DESPERATE for energy, importing more than 50% of the energy they need. So when natgas was discovered in Ukraine, finally Ukraine had the possibility of earning good money and getting out from under Russia's abusive thumb. So Ukraine and the west created a coup to evict the Russian kleptocrat who was running / ruining the country.
Putin's response to this was to mount an invasion and steal back the specific lands that had the natgas reserves. That was all of Ukraine that he wanted: the gas. He had no use for the regular people, whom he'd already impoverished.
As happened before in Afghanistan and in Syria, the west mobilized, armed, and trained fighters to enter into the lands Putin stole from Ukraine, and they acted as terrorists or freedom fighters, depending on your point of view.
Putin wants to control and profit from the Ukrainian gas reserves, and he doesn't want Europe to get them. So he set up a plan by which he would use elite capture - bribes - to get Europeans to cut back on their own energy production in favor of Russian energy sources. Once the US and Russia were dependent on Russian oil, gas, and coal, they waited till winter ... the time of greatest dependency for Europe. And that's when they invaded Ukraine, with the goal of solidifying Russian control of the gas fields.
This is 100% what's going on. All the stuff in the media is smoke.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robo2901 It's not a uniparty. It's the federal bureaucracy, run by the CIA. If you remember your history, the Democrats, big money, big media, and the military industrial complex came together in the late 1800s (Hearst era) to force war. Once they made income tax legal (around 1913), they used it to fund the growth of a federal bureaucracy loyal only to them, and waged continual warfare as just one of many schemes to enrich themselves off the now-captured taxpayer. RINOs are Republicans who have allegiance to the CIA, like former CIA Director GHW Bush, Romney, McCain, Graham, Cheney, Crenshaw, etc. FOX News has been a shining example of CIA-captured media, along with CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, etc. That's the CIA's Mockingbird program. Truman signed the CIA into law, and it has been attempting to seize power ever after, with Eisenhower warning, JFK and Bobby fighting them, Nixon being taken down by the CIA's operation against him as reprisal for ending Vietnam, Ford fought the CIA until they made it clear they would kill him, Carter was a one-termer because he avoided war with Iran, Reagan was shot out of the gate to put CIA Bush in charge, and the CIA has been running the WH ever since, except for Trump. The CIA is running the WH right now.
1
-
@ericmorrison8772 No, populism is not linked to socialism. Socialism is feudalism with Orwellian surveillance and propaganda. Populism is simply a concern for the welfare of the people, giving the people a voice, as in the days of our Founders. Saying populism is linked to socialism is like saying all communities are linked to communism. The left is against populism now, after riding it like they were saints of populism for decades (they were of course big liars). We definitely need a return to Constitutional roots, and it begins by axing the income tax, the federal reserve, and all of the federal bureaucracy.
BTW, the French Revolution is often cited by the left as a great event for democracy, but it was not. It was the beginnings of socialism. They used the power of the mob to engineer a coup, and then after a Reign of Terror they installed an emperor and immediately went into forever war mode.
1
-
1
-
1
-
It would be great if some of the voices in media can find a way to bridge gaps and unify in a more meaningful way. Who all resists the establishment and supports invidividual freedoms?
As for the companies ... corporate raider CEOs for decades have been taking over legacy, once family-owned businesses, they're taking enormous salaries, driving up debt, breaking the company, selling the assets. It's so much easier - and more rewarding for the CEO in the short term - to cheat and destroy companies from within than it is to compete every day. In the 80s, the model concluded specifically with selling the assets to China. If China doesn't have money right now, maybe they can't sell, and this system will break.
Basically, what the businesses have been doing was outlined by Mel Brooks in "The Producers," back in the 60s. And in entertainment, that was the model for the CW, and it has spread everywhere now, and that's why entertainment is crap ... of the same quality and nature as what they were doing on the CW. They're milking investors who are brought to them by ESG rules, and stealing the investor money and destroying the companies. It's vampiric capitalism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Introverted100 Not sure what your point is. The video is titled "Self-sabotage and then blame all men," which is what I addressed. If a person is attracted to crime, addiction, and all sorts of self-destructive behaviors, your comment would be ... "Well, they were attracted to it, so they should do it." I guess you would excuse theft because, "Well, it was shiny, and they wanted it, so they had to take it." Which I guess is how children think, and that's exactly the problem. Modern women behave like children, impulsively, without forethought, heedless of the consequences. 🤷♂🤦
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a way, long long long before video games, music was like a video game. You could follow along with it as someone else played, or you could play the game of music yourself. When you play the game of music, you try to find the right notes in a sequence, and "right" is defined by the sound you want to hear, the sound you think sounds most interesting or proper for that moment. But you have to find it, and play it correctly, which takes practice. As you continue playing the instrument, you get better and better at both playing in an interesting way and finding the right notes. It's a fair bit like a game. When you have a good segment of music, then you want to save it, and maybe choose your next new mission or level to play. Or you might find a friend who plays the game of music, and play together.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AnzuBrief You are wrong about so much. Ignorance is expected in a child, but in an adult it's just stupidity.
As usual, the Ukraine war is about energy, and Europe's lack of energy independence. Everyone was ignoring Ukraine until vast natural gas fields were found. Then the west deposed the Russian aligned corruptocracy and installed their own client, with the aid of a local extremist group. The idea was to have a Europe-aligned country that was selling the gas to Europe.
But Russia wants to control Europe, and it uses Europe's energy insufficiency to control it. So Putin invaded in 2014 and coincidentally took all of the lands that had the natural gas reserves.
At the same time, war was going on in Syria, because a backroom deal was negotiated between the west and Qatar to try to run a pipeline through Syria to Turkey, and thus supply Europe with natural gas. This required a regime change in Syria, which was a foolish move, because Syria is a client state of Russia, and Russia has a naval base there. At the same time, Russia wanted to run a pipeline across the Black Sea to Turkey, to supply Europe with natural gas. Turkey refused, because they were going to get a cut of Qatar pipeline. ISIS was created as the local extremist group to destabilize Syria.
Ultimately, the coup attempt in Syria failed, and Turkey accepted a generous deal from Putin, and the Russian pipeline goes through Turkey. Qatar adjusted expectations and is working on a pipeline that will go through Israel to Cyprus, and from Cyprus to Europe, IIRC.
This is just the current state of the Great Game or Tournament of Shadows, which has been running since roughly the era of Peter the Great and the East India Company. If you don't know about the history of this, you really have no idea of what's going on.
1
-
@AnzuBrief Maybe I didn't make something clear. ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Mujahadin, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Azov Battalion ... all appear to have been created by, or - more accurately - found and strengthened by, western powers, including elements within the US, like the CIA. But also European organizations like MI6. Very little of what has been done was for the direct needs of the US. The US doesn't need Middle East oil. It doesn't need Russian oil or gas. It's Europe, including Catalonia, that DOES need it. Europe is energy poor, and that is the source of the problem.
Well, it is one source. There's of course a lot going on.
So you think I'm saying the US had nothing to do with those various vile organizations. But I am telling you they did, and I'm also telling you why. It is indeed a geopolitical power game, but stop thinking it started recently. It started a long time ago.
I suspect you may have completely ignored my reference to the Great Game. It looks like you ignore everything that relates to history before 1900. Possibly that's because you weren't taught much about it in school ...? If you are indeed an adult, you need to educate yourself.
Open your eyes, ears, heart, and brain. Go educate yourself and stop lazily filling your head with media narratives. The impression I get of you is that you are used to being the smart person in your group, because you can recite the media narratives better than the others.
1
-
@AnzuBrief BTW, in 2020 the US was a net exporter of oil, while Spain was only able to provide 30% of its own energy and had to import about 70%.
On average, in 2020 the EU imported 56% of its energy products.
Russia accounted for about 30% of the energy coming into the EU in 2020, far ahead of any other nation. Norway and the UK contributed like 7% and 5% respectively.
Those numbers may not be 100% accurate in that sometimes they're talking about oil specifically, sometimes about energy (which could include coal or gas, etc.), and so on, but I think I've kept it truthful in terms of the main proportions or scale of the problem.
The US is not going around trying to get oil for itself. These oil and gas wars are about Europe's chronic energy dependence, and those who would take advantage of that weakness. So stop blaming the wars on the US, and start looking at your own corrupt and inept politicians, plus the fact of natural resources not being evenly distributed around the world.
As I probably said before in this long thread, Putin wanted to block other sources of foreign energy coming into Europe, so he can better control Europe. So when the big gas fields were discovered in Ukraine, he moved his military into Ukraine and took specifically those lands that would have supplied Europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think this is entirely accurate. I think Russia spent bribe money from 2014 to the present to get western countries to use Russian oil, gas, and coal. Then as soon as they were hooked, Putin waited for winter and resumed his war in the Ukraine.
All the rest of the commentary on this situation, like that Russia cares about the fate of people who speak Russian in Ukraine, or that they they care about NATO, etc., is just BS. 1) Russia doesn't care about people, period. Russia is an authoritarian regime. Wake up! 2) Russia already has countries on its border who are NATO members, including the US. WTF would they care if Ukraine is NATO? The ONLY reason they would care is because Putin WANTS UKRAINE absorbed into Russia, so he has to act before that happens. Putin wants Belarus and probably a few other countries as well, like Moldova. He doesn't need them, he just wants them. And taking Ukraine and adding it to Russia does what? It puts more of Poland, a NATO country, on the new border. Clearly having NATO countries on the border isn't a problem, but if you listen to the yokels in the news and the commenters on YT, it's a biiiig deal.
Please people ... I know you're not used to it. But USE YOUR BRAINS!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I do think Ukrainians need to be careful about creeping authoritarian / socialist tendencies within their own country, some of which may be imposed by the EU, which is itself very left-leaning, as it was during WW2. WW2 was pretty much a battle between different socialist nations. Specifically, Ukraine needs to avoid a national ID and a digital currency. They need to get a guaranteed RIGHT, not permission, to own and bear arms that would be effective in battle. They need to have rights to free speech, assembly, and religion that cannot be taken away by the state. What point is there in this war, for the average person, if Ukrainians fall under Ukrainian socialism instead of Russian socialism?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm waiting to see their hybrid solution, because right now the mileage is amazingly poor. I agree that their model names are confusing. I would call the CX-5 the "Carbon" and the CX-50 the "Meridian." To me, it's better branding to use names that correspond to the car identities, like "Miata." I know the Miata is the little two-seater. I know the Meridian is the Mazda version of an outdoors vehicle, though that identity is not strongly reflected in the model yet. The Carbon seems to roughly fill the role of a combination of Toyota's Cross and Venza, in that it's a slightly smaller SUV for urban and highway use (at least compared to other Mazda models). I like Mazda's stitching on the interior, and I hope thay can continue to improve their hard and soft surfaces in the cabin. To me, the CX-5 has too much chrome and piano black, where I would prefer to see minimal chrome, maybe some more muted silvery metal, and possibly some cleverly textured black plastic where needed (like a faux carbon fiber). Also, I hear Mazda needs to pick up their accent lighting game. I hope they are able to hit solid home runs with the hybrids for the CX-5 and CX-50, with some new features like electrical outlets and accent lighting, in addition to vastly better mileage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Beijing is at war with the West, and that definitely includes America. It's stealthy, using things that won't lead to open war, like drugs, spying, cyber crime, and bribed officials. With fentanyl, fentanyl has already ended more people than covid did, and every year it ends more people than the entire Vietnam War did. The Vietnam War ended about 58k US troops, and fentanyl ends about 71k every year. The Democrats, BTW, have been in bed with organized crime since the early 1800s. Through Tammany Hall, which they created in the late 1700s, they ran street gangs and other forms of organized crime, right through to the era of Al Capone. They created and ran organized crime in the US. IMO, they are still doing it, which is why the cartels have an open border.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Men should be more terrified of women, IMO. They're nuts and quite dangerous. They don't acknowledge things like fair play or morality.
Men are raised with the heroic ideal everywhere in cinema, games, literature. It tells them to be noble, sacrifice, be a hard worker, be a good dad, etc. Women are raised with the message that they are born to rule, and that everything that's yours is theirs. They're raised as villains, with parents thinking, "Oh, this is so cute!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not sure what the point of this video has been. It was published years ago that when the Ukraine gov't was destabilized, the US and Israel appeared to be involved, and yes, they had decided to partner up with these Azov people. It seems very similar to situations like starting the mujahadin in Afghanistan and ISIS in Syria, right? Arming a faction with a toxic ideology for the apparent purpose of fueling endless war.
Azov's actions within Ukraine's borders are not a justification for a Russian invasion. And that's not what's happening. First of all, Putin doesn't care a whit about the fate of people in Ukraine, or people anywhere. When he wants a pretext to provide cover for what he wants to do, it's a handy thing for him to grab onto and use as a shield. But it's not his motivation at all. Furthermore, if Russia really wanted to end Azov, they would do it by covert means. It's easy for Russian agents to penetrate Ukraine, and with the Azov guys so visible, it would be relatively easy to break up their organization. In fact, I'll bet there are already Russian agents embedded with Azov, and Putin probably has the keys to every Azov lock.
As we've seen elsewhere (with ISIS, the Taliban), Azov is probably playing both powers against each other for profit. They are probably getting covert cash from the CIA and other western groups, while at the same time Putin is using them as an excuse for invasion.
It's almost like this has turned into an agreed upon game. The Mujahadin get Russia out, turn into the Taliban, which then fights the US, and then the US leaves, giving the Taliban billions in military equipment, and the Taliban partners with China. In Syria, ISIS is created to fight Assad, then kills Christians in Iraq, takes billions of dollars of US military equipment, gets chased by the US back into Syria, where Russia ends up supporting Assad against the US, ISIS, and Israel. Now here we are in Ukraine, apparently doing a version of the same thing. Is everybody profiting off of this except for the poor people living where the wars are fought?
If the lotus eaters are trying to say all Ukrainians are Azov, that's not true.
If the lotus eaters are trying to say that all of NATO's friends in Ukraine are Azov ... that might be closer to the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crestinglight Perhaps. I'm not sure women really want that AND role. Yes, there can be the good woman who is a scientist, doctor, businesswoman, or whatever. But I don't think most women naturally lean that direction. I think they go that way out of fear, because they are naturally fear-based instead of faith based, for hormonal reasons, and feminism has taught them to fear men. Part of the feminine ideal has to be learning to be faithful, and approaching life with faith, because that is a big part the elderly female advice to all of the children. "Be faithful, allow yourself to grow and mature, and exit the cocoon as the butterfly you were meant to be." Isn't that something an ideal female Merlin (mentor) would say?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rw0050 IMO, they need to eliminate the whole idea of federal agencies, because they are used to get around the Constitution and make a new more powerful UNELECTED power that is corrupt and can control the 3 branches with intimidation and real power.
Pretty much everything the feds do is already duplicated at the state level. So just get rid of the federal agencies, and if there's anything that isn't duplicated at the state level ... that state needs to make their own new department to fulfill that function (if needed).
If you have 50 states running separate departments, it's much harder to corrupt them all in the same way. When you have just one federal department, it is so easily corrupted and almost impossible to fix. Especially after getting protected by the Administrative Procedures Act, which prevents the WH and Congress from interfering with the agencies.
IMO, the founders were clear about each state being sovereign and acting as independent entities in the laboratory of democracy, such that if any state was being poorly run, residents could move to a better run state. But if the problem is with a federal bureaucracy, where can citizens go to?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The working class used to benefit from the acts of the Republicans / Whigs. It used to be Republican / Whig policy to protect American jobs and resources from foreign predators, like the UK. With Bush 1, the idea has been to not only sell the farm, but also to destroy the farmer. IMO, both Bushes were RINOs. We really needed to elect Perot, as he was the Trump of his era. He saw the danger to America of policies like NAFTA, and he wanted to protect us from them. Bush wanted NAFTA, and - surprise! - it was so in line with Democratic Party goals, they approved of it when Clinton won. The RINOs screwed America with Bush 1, and continued to offer nothing but RINOs like Bush 2, McCain, and Romney ever after. America needs to make RINOs extinct.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is not it. The problem is an age old one: hedonism v moralism. Hedonists believe pleasure is that obvious and natural goal, and they laugh at moralists, whom they think are stupid. Moralist value virtue, and while pleasure is fine, it's not the ultimate goal. So in marriage, it is important that neither partner be a hedonist, because they will become unhappy and leave or seek someone else while still in the marriage. A hedonist looks at a marriage as a thing to "win." A moralist, on the other hand, just wants to do the right thing. They want to love each other, be loyal, to raise the kids right, and are willing to make sacrifices for the good of the family. Feminism and other libertine philosophies are what has wrecked marriage for the last several generations.
1
-
1
-
Rubin still has one foot in blue pill land, thinking the Democrats were at some point the party of peace. The closest they ever got was under JFK and RFK, and both of them were killed for it. At most half the party ever believed in peace. Meanwhile, Nixon campaigned on peace, won, and once elected, he ended the war. The Republicans have always been for peace ... with the very notable exceptions of the CIA's GHW Bush and his son, who are RINOs, who believe in the CIA way. As for the Democrats, they are led by Soros, and a plan put forth by Soros was to use eastern Europeans as cannon fodder in war against Russia. And that's what's been happening. Russia is being softened up and prepared for a takeover by China, which is who Soros works for.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1