General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Robert A
South China Morning Post
comments
Comments by "Robert A" (@RobertAmer) on "Tennis star Peng Shuai denies making sexual assault allegations against former government official" video.
Read her Weibo post and you will see the misrepresentation of what she said, especially when she used a question mark. She asked a question, did not make a statement! The narrative changes immensely! That is manipulation of the truth for uncouth purposes. Translated question as i stated is as follows: "why do you come back to me and take me to your house, to force me to have a relationship with you?". Take away the question mark and punctuation, it becomes an accusation of an event! Leave the question mark and punctuation and it is a question about possible intentions that could have occurred, but not said to have occurred.
41
@primeHeretic she has said she has been misunderstood by what she said. This is caused by translating the chinese Weibo post to English. I have shown that translated question above.
6
@MrGong55 it is quite apparent that you are the brainwashed one, not me. No one in the world is totally free, as we must all show acceptable behaviour, and her only mistake here is showing what is not acceptable. The New York Post or Times manipulated the context of what she said, for their own purposes being part of the anti China conspiracy currently narrated by mainly the U.S.A. and Great Britain. They have just repeated similar false narratives about pro China YouTubers, all to create a fictional story. Perhaps you should focus on the CIA's concern about a civil war looming in the U.S.A. in the next two years, which would be a much better story to follow. Oh yes, i can read your chinese which has absolutely nothing to do with her post. It is a typical course of action to take to distract from debate, just like American propagandists do. Fact remains fact! What she said in her interview supports what she says, being misunderstood.
2
@truthboom she asked a question, not make an accusation of an event. She did not come unwillingly. You need to understand the meaning of coercion, as none is implied.
2
@lny4170 America does not care about collateral damage. Look at Susan Rice being asked about 500,000 or more children dying in Iraq as a result of American sanctions, to which she confirmed, it was worth it. Collateral damage means nothing to them, as long as it fits their agenda. They appear to be following The Rand Report to the letter.
2
@MrGong55 i have the Weibo posting and there is no accusation, only a question. Read it again, as i have stated, one way with the punctuation and one way without, and there is a change in context. American translation to English is often different to Chinese translation to English. One also needs to account for this to have been a concensual relationship, going back ten years. You also say, this is basic grammar. I will point out that she was also poorly educated, which can be seen quite clearly when you read the whole post.
1
@primeHeretic incorrect, the original post was removed after some of her followers copied it. It still remains as her original post, but no longer on Weibo. Additionally, she withdrew the post; it was not censored; more misinformation!
1
@MrGong55 you have said a lot about nothing, and obviously do not keep up with current news. About the CIA report and it's assessment of civil war risk in the U.S.A. being extremely high within the next two years is in an interview on CNN with a University Professor who was part of an invesrigative team. Check it out. Oh, and i don't read the Global Times because i know it would not give me a balanced narrative.
1
@truthboom coercion implies consequences.
1
@rozenkurosei3995 did it? It was a question about intent, but no mention of what resulted. Do not assume.
1
@rozenkurosei3995 i will make a point of saying that her original text is full of commas, to pause between the comments. This was written more as a letter to him, rather then as a blog. The only thing i can agree on is that he showed interest in coaxing her, but no coercion. Additionally, as a 36 year old woman, as well as not being very well educated, she is also extremely naive.
1
@natebusch2266 A very typical moronic question. Zilch, zero, nothing!
1
@Anonnonner9546 check out moon of alabama, of transcribed. Get educated! So you are a troll?
1