Comments by "Robert A" (@RobertAmer) on "DW News" channel.

It is apparent that many Australian politicians have lost the ability of international diplomacy, opening their mouths before thinking.
9
Perhaps he could also do a factual background on how this war came about, commencing pre 2014 and including America's role in the Ukraine election, the later Minsk agreements, and all other agreements made since and agreements proposed but rejected, to date. It would give a much clearer picture of why this is happening.
6
I am surprised by this woman's use of adjectives, which give rise to her responses being scripted. This is endemic throughout her interview.
5
Where do they find these lunatics? Why does the rest of the world want to impose their ideologies on a country which has its own? Isn't that just Political interference, the very complaint every other nation makes about China and Russia, in respect to their own elections? Every country has the right to its own sovereignty and determination, without external influence.
2
@PR0GRAMMING what you need to understand about China is that it also does not care so much for outside interference, as are also the claims of other nations including the USA and Australia. This has been highlighted with the USA claiming everything to be of national security interest, and wanting to stop foreign interference. I will contend that what is constantly happening in respect to China is foreign interference, being no different. If you want to be critical of China, do so with a range of solutions, but do not do so for the sake of criticism. China will accept criticism if accompanied with solutions which are better or more beneficial. This is diplomacy!
2
The reason and existence of NATO is to protect all countries from attack by an enemy. It is and has always been held that Russia is the enemy. So why not find a way to make your enemy your friend, and lessen the need for an alliance which as we all know is run by a non european nation. It will be amazing how much more peace there will be in the world, and bring about a new sense of world order no longer controlled by a single self serving nation.
2
If the virus was circulating elsewhere in the world before its discovery in Wuhan, then that is factual information that needs to be known and investigated. This is also the World Health Organization, not the American Health Organization, as it seems that America who had already announced in March 2020 of its withdrawal from WHO, is being singularly upset by this investigation, but seems to want the world to only listen to it. Of course the world has already seen how this virus was dealt with in USA. The WHO investigation is non political, but appears to be made political on this interview, by Tim who can be seen to be attempting the use of the American narrative which was used for deflection purposes. In short, Tim is trying to turn a purely scientific investigation into a political issue.
2
@VFPn96kQT obviously a TROLL comment!
1
@PR0GRAMMING think carefully about what i say. The same as, it is not what you say that matters, but the way you say it.
1
@leviathansnemesis3742 you do some honest pros and cons of allowing this, and then tell me your conclusion. I believe i know what that conclusion would be.
1
@leviathansnemesis3742 they already see it, as little of that is censored. Censorship on the internet is more about deterring political influence and behaviour, like you see in Hong Kong. The violence and damage seen there, which the chinese people get to see in any event, is bad enough for a population of 7 million. Imagine if that was to happen with a population of 1.347 billion people. It would be anarchy. Of course Hong Kong has been heavily influenced by America, and its covert financing there. This was initially the problem in Xinjiang, which was heavily influenced and infiltrated by terrorist organizations, which led to the events of today, being detention centres and re-education. Do your own research, and you will see the problems there pre 2016. America is demonstrating to the world at the moment, how divided and even intolerant their style of democracy can be. China pushes the elements of peace and harmony amongst all people, which really is not such a bad thing. Oh, it is the CPC, not CCP.
1
@leviathansnemesis3742 they were not stabbing, there were many terrorist bomb attacks, but not restricted to Xinjiang, also Guangzhou, Kunming and Beijing, apart from those in the major cities in Xinjiang. It had little to do with CPC not bringing prosperity, but was well orchestrated with the assistance of al-Qaeda, with its use of the internet and in particular Facebook. This organisation also used the internet and Facebook to stage the attacks on the two towers in New York. So maybe you have a greater understanding of some if the restrictions imposed. Many internet sitesm including USA news services can be freely connected to via the internet, without a VPN. A lot is not blocked.
1
OMG, where do you people get off? So much misinformation! Why are there so many war mongers on the panel. Who creates a threat? Only your own people, as Russia does not hold the same thought. And then you talk about nuclear weapons, which in the end have no meaning, let alone Germany does not have. So what you are talking about is threatening a future self destruction.
1