Comments by "Robert A" (@RobertAmer) on "The debate over COVID-19's origin | Media Watch" video.

I suggest Media Watch have a really good look at Sky News and its so called News reporting. It is apparent to me that it behaves like a political organisation, being a creator of news, not a reporter of news. You need only look at their headlines, and once you hear the essence of the topic, it is quite easy to understand the biased position they hold. Their media licence should come into question.
29
@terrythetuffkunt9215 they are a news media organisation, holding a licence under australian law, and are not a political organisation. As such that is what they should do, wirhout clear biases
5
keith gould no media outlet is beyond reproach, be it Murdoch (who is not even Australian anymore) or anyone else. I do think there should be at the minimum a senate enquiry into media broadcasting in Australia, including fitness to hold a licence.
3
keith gould according to me both Trump and Pompeo have a condition called Diarrhea of the mouth, that is in serious need of disinfectant to clean them. Perhaps bleach would do the job. LOL
3
Whatever you read on the internet treat with a grain of salt. There is no censorship, masses of misinformation and to put it bluntly, a lot of crap. Such a pity. Do your own research and try to come up with an unbiased opinion, but remember to base it on hard evidence, not "someone said"!
2
@minibrownliger the evidence is getting more and more muddy. France has now confirmed cases being hospitalised between 2nd and 16th December, having just tested samples taken at the time, which they retained in a frozen state. Italy also has claims of similar pneumonia in August 2019, long before China and France. Only time will tell, but my opinion is that now it is looking unlikely to have come from Wuhan.
2
@terrythetuffkunt9215 it is also clear from your message that you have a bias against the ABC.
2
@minibrownliger i received the same "Addendum" in my inbox, but nothing shown here. Maybe he looked again and deleted it. After all, even the secretary of state, now admits it was not lab engineered, and not likely to have come from the lab. As ex CIA, he knows how to lie.
1
@travelpanda7267 so with all these six points you listed above, what if it was known thst the virus did not come from Wuhan? You keep watching tge news. Trump and Pompei are demonstrating themselves to be prolific liars and instigators of false news, so lets not go there.
1
@travelpanda7267 keep watching the news! You are going to be shocked!
1
@travelpanda7267 the USA has enough cronies for its media follow through on, and to have field days on misrepresentation and misinformation, thus Paul Barry has a greater focus on Australian Media, being part if the ABC. There nothing in the 6 points you have made validate anything, as they are all either nonsense or allegations based without fact. Very quickly, bats are not sold in China, the lab is a research centre just as the CSIRO in Australia has one in Geelong. There was a massive spread of misinformation on the chinese internet which brought about censorship. The human to human transmission was known and advised to the world by both china and the WHO, in spite of USA claims. If information is known about the virus and its origin by any country, it should be shared. There is a president and his secretary of state spreading absolute garble, without evidence, while their own intelligence agencies publicly announce that there is no such information. This is the type of rhetoric which has been coming from these pretentious leaders since January, and see where America is now!
1
keith gould according to news from France, they have given indications it may have started there, according to Associated Professor Sanjaya Senanyake of the ANU.
1