Comments by "barkmaker" (@barkmaker) on "Trump asks the U.S. Supreme Court to stop his sentencing in his 'hush money' case" video.

  1. He's saved us millions.
    14
  2. First of all, it's a Non Disclosure or NDA case. Secondly, an appeal to the SCOTUS was always expected as this case was wholly unwarranted.
    12
  3. Not going to happen.
    5
  4. Consider just the billion he saved us on the new Air Force One jets. He didn't walk out the door with 8 trillion. Give me some of whatever you're smoking, please.
    3
  5.  @maresnite  marbles.
    2
  6.  @CCFONESOL , one felony. 34 counts. Now, can you tell us what law was purportedly violated? We'll wait.
    2
  7.  @CCFONESOL , tell me you don't know without telling me you don't know. 🤦🏿‍♀
    2
  8.  @CCFONESOL , I know but you obviously do not. Pathetic. You've been muted. Enjoy responding to yourself.
    2
  9.  @HalfBackCrack , before you call someone else a dope, you might want to study up. All state cases can be appealed to the SCOTUS.
    1
  10.  @HalfBackCrack , state cases can be appealed to the SCOTUS, Einstein.
    1
  11.  @CCFONESOL , I do. A federal infraction that Hillary and other Democrats were only fined for. It will be overturned on appeal eventually. Trump correctly listed the NDA payment as a legal expense. It had nothing to do with the election.
    1
  12.  @HalfBackCrack , apparently you don't know that any case can be appealed all the way to the SCOTUS.
    1
  13.  @MM81-e1m , huh is exactly what we'd expect out of you. Go watch an interview with a constitutional scholar on this case. You want him locked up for a federal offense brought at the state level for a purported campaign finance violation that, as James accurately pointed out, Hillary was only fined for. You know nothing and should be ashamed.
    1