Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "" video.

I believe it was fraud; not because he said it. My family was deep in Democrat Party politics, and I am very familiar with the manner in which they cheat the system. All those seem to be in play in this election. Remember whe n observers are prohibited from reviewing the votes, when a count is closed and the restarted after the observers were sent home. The statistics for this election are ridiculous compared to previous elects; so you can't claim stats support you if you if you refuse to acknowlrdge the stats this election don't match those from the past.
1
Roger Wilco Like the incorrect call sign, you are wrong. There have been many who have signed sworn testimony about that issue. The mainstream media doesn' report it; just it incorrectly reports the reason for at least some the court refusals to take cases. I know of no case w here the courts got to the point of reslly hearing evidence. Try doing research, not listening to blind supporters of either side. The people that they talked to aren't the only ones who believe that way. I no more consider them typical of Democrat voters, who have the same manic subset who believe President Trump is a Russian agent or responsible for the nursing home deaths caused by the New York a governor for example.
1
Roger Wilco Answering two of your posts with one intelligent one. Democrat Party judges at state level have never allowed cases to get to an evidentiary hearing, claiming no standing among other things. No standing at the Federal level has blocked hearings. If you can't have a case heard, no evidencecan be presented. At state legislative levels there have been hearings, just not honestly reported. Take a look at the Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court dissent, and tell me why you think she was wrong. The coverage of this election was on a par with the media's attacks on President Trump for the last four years, biased and hostile.
1
Roger Wilco Back to ignoring why most of these cases weren't heard, lack of standing. You also ignore the legislative hearings and sworn affidavits. Just because you don't like a person or his policies is not an excuse to turn a blind eye to unethical conduct.
1
Roger Wilco For the third time research what court rulings actually say. It isn't a judges role to decide when evidence is presented. Affidavits are sworn testimony, so you are saying all these statements are false, so why has no legal action been taken for perjury? Oh, that means the court has to hear evidence which is the last things Democrat leadership wants. Also for the third time, you haven't commented on the legislstive hearings. You are very selective in your comments, to use a Biden statements (not an exact quote since I am working from memory) "You are a one trick pony" or "a lying ponhy soldier".
1
Roger Wilco Let's see, you find one thing that attacks President Trump by looking up a foolish term in a hostile source. Have you looked up affidavits on election fraud, election irregularities, statistical anomalies, or the various software/hardware questions. No you haven't. You now want to change the subject with this post. I don't play the game of defending against accusations. Show me where a court actually looked at evidence. As usual no comment on legislative hearings, strange how you chose to ignore what goes against your position.
1
Roger Wilco No embarrassment on my part, plenty on yours though. You still don't want to recognize evidence and sworn affidavits and legislative hearings. Too afraid an honest answer would shake the house of lies. My Granduncle was a Democrat alderman in a Cook County suburb for 28 year; an c was deep into the party. I remember him at a Thanksgiving table after a Presidential election chuckling on how they stole Chicago, Cook County and thereby the state of Illionis for the Democrat. Nothing except the voting machines are different from what is being charged, these are things straight out his stories and the Democrat machine playbook, only who is running the machine is different.
1