Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "Black Conservative Perspective"
channel.
-
57
-
28
-
22
-
@DieselRamcharger Sorry, about firearms, I own several and have for years; and none cave ever attacked me or anyone else. Shootings are conducted by people, not firearms. When plea bargains by local prosecutors drop firearms related charges routinely (Chicago's Kim Foxx who recently refused to charge anyone on either side because it was mutual conflict) you signal illegal use of firearms is condoned. Even if all firearms vanished tomorrow, violence world remain. There have mass injuries from knife and axe attacks in the PRC; recently an archer in Canada killed and injured 7 people; the UK and New Zealand have gone after knife sales. This is just as useless, because of my military duties I learned how many deadly things are available in almost every home if someone researches and wishes to do harm. So, drop the firearm nonsense and concentrate on criminals.
As to the wall, how often was progress stymied by Congress (via funding) or lawsuits in front of friendly (mostly Democrat judges); yet then Wall was being built. Remember that was one of the first thing President Boden stopped, for months the Feds paid the contractors for doing nothing, and recently came to a settlement to end the contracts; leaving the materials piled to rust. Contrary to the Dems and leftists; President Trump didn't play dictator and ignore the courts, by the way our current President has played fast and loose ignoring the courts.
Again unless you wanted him to act as a dictator, he couldn't try or jail Ms. Clinton. Remember the same people who lied about him in the DOJ protected her and the Bidens. Hunter anyone?
So, as I suspect that I am actually dealing with an anti-law type pretending to equally damn both sides; try dealing in facts not talking points.
16
-
15
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mikeinmd915 While the idea has merit, I think it infeasible. The Government has grown too large and interconnected (not necessarily a good thing). The increased inefficiency of trying to run scattered sites will only increase costs and make effective management more difficult while leading superiors in distant locations more apt to act on their own beliefs because of relative isolation. I also question if local governments won't exercise undue influence on those separate branches (think Portland, Chicago, etc.. style beliefs on the DOJ), or try to tax Federal property. I agree the representation and group think questions are real problems; but just giving them to a state isn't a real answer either. The group think comes from education/indoctrination that occurs rather than real education. Couple this with the effect of ideologically driven people moving up the hierarchy and slowly insuring the promotion of like minded people into senior positions. One of the 60's radicals (Abby Hoffman, if my memory is right) told his followers that their attempt to take the country had failed; and that they should infiltrate the establishment to prepare for the next revolt. In the 1970's book, Survival Is Not Enough, a professor whose expertise was Impetial and Soviet Russia, stated that the communists had chosen, media and education to infiltrate to weaken and defeat the US. Several of the key players who helped continue the Russia Gate Hoax have acknowledged early ties to socialist or communist groups; including a Director of a major intelligence agency and Comi (sp?) In the FBI. Also for consideration, there was a book in the last couple of years which described what happened in Eastern Europe after WWII; the chapter on Romania looks very similar on what is happening today here, including the crimanization of opposition leaders. Another thing is to look at how the NAZIs (actually a socialist movement, Stalin was the one who called them right wing - they were only the right wing of socialism though) used von Hindenberg, a popular and moderate leader who was very ill, to gain power. Look at history, and you may see the present.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First, I am White, an former military officer/commander; so these are my opinions. First, more Blacks that I knew believed in working hard studying and getting ahead. However, younger people often felt more entitled. Most of my Black NCOs and older Black officers did not like affirmative action because it took away from all the work they did to get where they were. One Black Senior Master Sergeant said it best, he felt that affirmative action made him suspect when he transferred bases, this from one of the sharpest NCOs in the organization. One of the best Lieutenant Colonels that I worked for was a Black man who started as an Enlisted Airman, and went to college while serving, and eventually was commissioned. He was harder on young Black airmen than most officers. He could have been a full Colonel if he wanted, he was satisfied with where he was, his family was his priority when I knew him. In other words, like all other groups there is no commonality among Black men except for meaningless skin color.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@derrick4544 Again, the "scientist" referenced the report as the reason for his sction and stated that it was proof of the problem. So yes, it was a short video, but the "scientist" stated this himself not the person making the YouTube video. Nothing was stated about additional training on climatology or hard sciences. Courses don't always need to be in a college. For example, my case. I started out to be an engineer, but found that people using what was built never figures into the classes. Changed majors to psychology, no minor since I had physics, biology, chemistry and various math classes (trig, calculus, etc.). Picked up statistical analysis in the psychology program and took 500 level courses in Human Factors/Industrial Psychology (Industrial engineers took the same classes but called it something 3lse in their catalogue). The Air Force provided additional training in administrative management before I ended up in emergency planning which gave me equivalent to two years of college on chemical, biological and radiological warfare and accidents as well as training on volcanology, earthquakes, meteorology and several other issues. I have been through several tropical storms, one typhoon, one hurricane (really the same as the typhoon), one major earthquake, and assorted other issues. When I got out, I went to work for a nuclear utility and had continuing health physics courses and training on BWR and PWR reactor types. Those unrelated to graduate level class taken after that in management, international relations, and addition industrial psychology classes. There were several other military schools along the way. Am I an expert on the climate; no, but I am knowledgeable enough to understand that the issue is far more complex than any one factor. I do know that modeling without including all factors is an exercise in futility. There are several cycles that exist from axial tilt, to orbital excentricity, to the world wide ocean current that takes around 1,000 years to complete. I do know there is geological evidence for extremely long droughts in the US (at least) on both about an average of 50 years for a multiple year drought in he Great Plains and Southwest and a multi-decade long one on around a 500 year cycle (strangely the last occurred around the gtime of the Little Ice Age). There is archeological evidence that areas of the Greenland coast were in fact ice free before the Little Ice Age, there are medieval documents discussing the rapid growth of glaciers during that time, just as there is written evidence that cyclic extreme cold periods have occurred with a peak to trough interval of around 500 years or in other word a complete cycle of around 1,000 years. Guess what using the historical record, we are reaching the peak of the warm part of the cycle, that started in the first decades of the 1800s (exact date is debated). Can man effect the cycle or cause local climate/weather affects, yes. In Chicago, the wall of very tall buildings have diverted weather that used to come straight down Lake Michigan either to the southeast or southwest of the city and the winter storms that used to go straight down the lake and sometimes down to Kentucky don't happen. Heat islands exist around major urban areas which provide a very phony appearance of global warming because too many readings from measuring stations around them are the evidence for global warming; while world wide weather satellite measurements have only around 50 years of data. In other words, realize that the world is a very complex environment controlled by many factors, man can control them; but only add to or mitigate them. The money spent on the global climate change concept would be better spent on mitigation of climate change on human populations and their food supplies.
1
-
Baby K probably could have been rehabilitated if the first time he did something that warranted police/law enforcement involvement appreciate action was taken. All too often these juveniles have multiple incidents that weren't reported or got minimum sentences, until they do something so bad it can't be ignored, and then they are punished to the maximum (seemingly unfairly, but actually due to the totality of their records including events for which didn't receive punishment). Not the same, but similar the commander and first sergeant of a unit were relieved on the same day. I and a new first sergeant took over and found unacted upon incident reports and charges over a year old. The unit had the highest number of incidents and issues on the base. Over the next year, we discharged 22 out of 220 people; but by the end of that time, we had the least incidents on base. Besides discharging people, the other thing that we did was stay after the close of duty hours and had a side door unlocked. People learned that if they had a problem, knocking on the side door and getting help actually resulted in getting help, not punishment. They learned that they didn't want us to call them to the orderly room during duty hours because it was too late for help. Based on what we saw, more than half those discharged could have finished their enlistment and if they desired got reenlisted, but the previous commander and first sergeant let too many bad bebhaviors become unacceptable habits. If you want people to behave well, they have to know what behavior is expected; and punish unacceptable behavior. Hand in hand with that, you reward positive behavior and provide a safe way to get help if needed. Right now, none of that is done in too many cities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1