Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "NBC News" channel.

I am not convinced by her speech. Obviously, she later says there is an ungoing investigation, so it is not a final evaluation. No license plates, and the car incinerated, so how do they know one of the names? Lets keep people calm is the real purpose of this briefing.
27
Question, 14,000 hours of video, where is the video of these teams. A screen shot of a document of unknown origin, and not produced. No video of the verbal assault of this officer. Is this a glorified Smolette moment. Where are the videos of this melee?
7
@Thomas-jl3gn No, not crying disaster is upon us; rather, give an honest we don't know answer and we are investigating. One time during a training exercise, I had the simulated reporter pushing a report that the briefer was told about. The report was erroneous but the briefer made up an answer. If the event was had happened the briefer apologizing for the event would have been hard pressed to change the narrative. When you. Don't know for sure, the correct answer is some variation of I will check or its under investigation. Bdon't push a narrative that will under mine your credibility later.
2
I just watched the man said that he didn't recant. So, only a newspaper is the only source. This post is Democrat propaganda.
2
@kylaarmstrong-benjamin8066 I I believe a certain counterfeit passing, drug using ( in his system), awaiting trial on a major felony died under what a jury said was murder saw a police officer sentenced. No conduct attributed to this woman without a criminal or drug record warranted a death sentence. So why was one a murder and the other justified? Name me one case where the officer accused of killing an unarmed Black man wasn't officially identified, and with 14,000 hours of video why has none been released on this shooting? Ddmocrats' seem to have a corner oh the hypocrasy market.
2
@shirleywilliams-lewis1520 Let's see, three separate investigation proved Trump Russian Cullusion was false. Some members of this panel kept saying it was true and they had evidence but didn't have any; so does the fact that consistently lied about former President Trump show that they are unbiased going into this hearing. The greatest harm to me was covering up questions of President Biden and his son misusing his office when he was VP in order to help him to be elected; and guess what that has been acknowledged by organizations that did it. I can name other examples provided in official, not just right wing sources, showing clear interference in this election and President Trump's term in office, why was that not treadonous
2
@alysonturcin-weller7443 There is danger in this however; 1. People believe her and become complacent and thereby ignore warning signs 9f an arrack; 2. A complete lose of faith in her comments if this turns out to be a terrorist attack or another attack. My own opinion right now is on it was either an attack or an part of a planned attack (either gone wrong or yet to have occurred). Reason for my comment: 1. No license plates (they could get them off a camera or video shot of the car. 2. The violence of the explosion (large explosions usually require an oxygen (air) mixture with the gasoline; so, while I could be wrong (unless the fuel air mixture was by chance righ), fuel leakage and fire should have resulted n an explosion later after an initial fire. Reasons for delaying acknowledgement is if they got the license plate number from video or still camera shots; there would be no reason for withholding the name (unless family notification was delayed, which I would doubt in this case). By withholding the name, it prevents people from reviewing his electronic accounts until they can view scrubbed allowing the authorities to control the narrative. Also, by ot acknowledging it as a terrorist activities gives the authorities a chance to find others who might have been involved.
1
@ndo533 It does matter, the car incinerated means the bodies were exposed to blast from forces and severe fire which normally makes identification a matter of DNA or dental analysis which can take days. So either on the initial stop there was a match between the driver's license and the driver or they used the license plate information (since it has been claimed there were no plates), exactly how did they get the driver's name? In an accident, unless notification of next of kin is involved, their is no reason not to release the name. So. How they got the name is important, as well as it not being released. She also did not mention the name not being released due to notification concerns. This raises questions. Additionally, why was the car ordered over for closer inspection and why did the driver try to speed away? Other questions that shape events that really don't fit strictly a. Non-terrorist event. The car was entering the US from Canada, so smuggling is also on the table; and could provide a reason for the behavior but not the explosiveness of the event.
1
@ar4203 The car went airborne be cause of something it hit. As to not saying it was a terrorist event; she said just the opposite in her opening remarks. Given the fact that New York City has been warned to watch out for terror attacks, and the US in general has been acknowledged to be under a higher than normal terrorist risk; it is irresponsible to say anything one way or another. Perhaps, saying the event is still under investigation at this time and providing no clear statement one way or another would have been a better comment; than saying that it wasn`t and then later really saying they weren't sure.
1
She opened pushing it wasn't a terrorist attsck; then later weasel worded in that they weren't sure if wasn't a terrorist attack and it was still under investigation. There are better ways of saying that. You don't push either narrative at this time.
1
@Thomas-jl3gn We don't share the same opinion. While subsequent facts lend credibility to the non-terrorist narrative there is behavior that makes to sense. I still feel she opened too strongly with it not being terrorist related before she said still under investigation. Now, we are being told a man and a woman were in the car, how was that determined since the car was completely burned. Was it by some video or camera check when it was first stopped (original reports) or by a document check at a check point. Looking at the remains of the vehicle there couldn't be much of the bodies to check? I am still not convinced that we have an accurate account.
1
Have you seen the document where recanted? The news item says they got a message is it valid or fake as so many anti-Tr u mp items have been shown to be in the past.
1
@alexcook2206 Not for armed assault.
1
@jamesa77522 I can research, but I also have learned long ago how to edit and splice. I want the official. Material starting at the beginning. This like the officer saying he saw attackers wearing Trump items; I hate to tell you that in 1939 the NAZIs attacked a radio station in Germany and left corpses in Polish army uniforms to justify the invasion of Poland. False flag operations have a long history, a recent example was Jessie Smolette hiring people to simulate Trump attackers. How many claims of racist posts have been proven to be actually have been done by Black activitists? Reality time proof is needed. Testimony only covers what one person saw at a particular moment in time; it says nothing of what led up to the incident and what occurred before the individual's arrival. I once had an airman referred to me for disciplinary action for raising his hand to strike an officer. On the surface, it was valid, but the airman said the office was insulting and raised his fist first and he only made a move to block it. He then named several witnesses that confirmed his story and who the officer agreed were there. It also came out that this officer showed clear bias against civilian employees of a certain racial background which was the same as the airman's; no action was taken. Why all evidence needs to be dispassionately reviewed. By the way, I would have loved if the charge was valid, the airman had two article 15's and a letter of reprimand already plus multiple counseling by both his supervisor, the First Sergeant and myself; but in this case my own feelings aside he was innocent. That is objective justice.
1
@jamesa77522 Let's see, Maxim Waters for one, I guess she is White according to you. I could go down the list of influential Blacks in the Democrat Party. I could do the same with the Republicans; but I guess you consider all the Blacks in both parties as White. By the way, what was Barrack Obama or what is VP Harris (I will agree of very mixed ancestry including slave owners)?
1
@jamesa77522 Where do I blame Blacks? People who claim everyone is racist say more about how their mind processes data then the person they insult. They are the ones in lens that only see race. My wife is Asian, my brother's is of Mexican heritage, one sister was married to a Native American and other is married to a Black American, we all get along well. You see race matters for nothing, behavior counts for everything. Time for you to take a good look at your own beliefs.
1
@jaydel3 VP Harris was raising funds to get last years rioters out of jail.
1
@jamesa77522 Senators and Congress people make no decisions, you better go back and review your civic lessons and Constitution.
1
@johnwiggins8535 You entitled to your own opinions, but he didn't run all three investigations. Just because a lie is frequently repeated by the Democrats and media doesn't make it true.
1