Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "Why was the Qing Dynasty so weak? History of China 1644-1839 Documentary 1/10" video.
-
I suggest reading Upton's report on China from the 1870s. One China had a saying you don't use good iron to make a nail and good men to make a soldier. The officers were qualified by tests that had no place in a modern army. Yes, the lack of strong central government meant the provincial armies and navies didn't work together. As far as corruption, officials weren't actually paid. They were allowed to keep a portion of the taxes raised. An honest official might only keep 10%. The problem was that each official kept 10%. So for simplicity sake, the local official raised 100 (put the coin that you want there), he sent to the next level 90, that person kept 9, so the next official got 81, it kept going from there. It seems like the higher official really wasn't getting much; but let's say he had 10 subordinates. With 10 subordinates each sending 90, he actually got 90 that he kept while only sending 810 forward. The same worked in reverse. Let's say a project directed at the imperial level sent 100,000 for the project, the first official keeps 10,000. The next official gets 90,000, of which he keeps 9,000 sending 81,000 to the next. It continues like this until the one who has to do the job has what's left to do the job. He gets his cut bcheaper material. material and pocketing what he didn't spend. All this is if you consider that the official keeps no more than what is considered honest. The procedure was ca.led the "squeeze" in many of the early European documents.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1