Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

  1. One years ago a 13 year old was caught after a carjacking which resulted in the murder (by a firearm). The thing that I haven't mentioned that that was the 65th car that he carjacked. He was underage for serious penalties.
    6
  2. Democrat Policy, protect aback criminals from incarceration due to White Supremacy, and ignore that most of their offenses impact law abiding Black citizens. A very blind and foolish policy.
    4
  3. Stop the threat is the actual thing that they are trained to do. Why center mass, less chance of a miss or through and through that woold endanger others. I guess the concept that bullets keep going if they miss or go through something that doesn't stop them is just too difficult for the liberal/left mind to comprehend.
    4
  4. Wait for the first law suits for health issues or injuries to customers due to the smoke causing falls or other acc8dents; or the chemicals that make the smoke. Also, pre-planned thefts will already know what to grab. Insane logic.
    3
  5. I am opposed to visiting vigilantism; however I agree that it may be coming because there may be no other e r option.
    3
  6. Why the idea of remote computer control of your house or car(s) is so bad. You can lose control of your own property at the whim of a business, a government official, or some hacker for either ransom or fun.
    2
  7. Besides being racist and discriminatory, it is unconstitutional as "H". Obviously this Councilwoman either skipped or slept through her classes on the Constitution.
    2
  8. Pole taxes also blocked poor Whites as well. In most of early States, people without money or property from voting, because they feared people without money would vote to take others money and property. This was years before Marx wrote his thoughts; by the way, what are we faced with at least 50% of the population either not paying taxes but receiving benefits or governmental employees, and these vote to elect people promising them more. Perhaps, there was logic in their concerns.
    2
  9. 😢Eric Adam try to resuscitate his tough on cri m e persona . How many of the police on the raid were there to protect him. Each officer there for his protection was one who couldn't be out to protect the public.
    2
  10. It also could endanger people moving in the lot; so, she was not only a danger to the officers, but also the public.
    2
  11.  @zakbutz8226  Yes, it is hypothetical, but the officer had this concrete fact to work from; she drove into him trying to escape thereby showing a willingness to flee regardless of the consequences. Remember besides being aware that she had been shoplifting, she was aware that she violated an order of protection which would have been discovered if she was arrested for shoplifting, additionally she was operating an unregistered/unlicensed vehicle parked illegally in a handicapped zone. She had every reason to fear arrest, not the police, facing two possib,e felonies and two potentially large fines, it doesn't taken a genius to see that she wasn't particularly worried about the results of her driving if it took her away from the police.
    2
  12. I agree that there is one very different aspect. This man used a deadly weapon, which risked severe injury or death to the other man; while the other may have misused a restraint technique, but did not intend to permanently harm the man. If both dead men behaved the same way, then the man and Penny were acting in a lawful manner.
    2
  13.  @darrekworkman8685  Sorry, but that is an opinion. I have a much different opinion based on a couple of practical realities. 1. When you fire a bullet in a non-military situation; you are responsible for where the bullet ends up. This means if you miss, or if the bullet goes through what you aimed at, you are responsible for who or what is finally hit. Shooting at something or someplace where the bullet won't be stopped, by the target, or you miss a realitively small and frequently moving target like an arm or leg; and you hit someone behind that person it is possible to be held responsible especially with the attacks on qualified immunity. 2. Even if you hit an arm or a leg, there is a good chance of causing death. This is especially true in the leg where the femoral artery can bled a person out in minutes; while the main artery in an arm is somewhat slower, the death is just as likely. Beyond bleeding out, the chance of permanent injury if a bone is hit is highly possible. Depending on the caliber and overall damage, the loss of a limb is even possible. Allow this also omits considering infection. Again, legal issues abound. 3. Despite the movies, a person hit (even leathally) could still potentially fire a round back striking by the officer.m the main reason for the .45 ACP round was to increase the chance of stopping an attacker; since in the early 1900s US troops were killed or injured by insurgents hit with the .38 caliber weapons than used. So, the so.ution than was not only aim at a location that would increase the chance of stopping the attacker (center mass) but heavy enough to provide stopping power. 4. The greatest chance of stopping an attacker or preventing the attacker from further using or using a weapon in a threatening position is center mass. What is you suggestion? I will added that stun devices require personal contact which may be impossible in the situation. I own a Taser, and it is useless under most conditions, the area that you can target is limited for safety reasons, both prongs must make contact which may not happen in a fluid situation, and clothing thickness (winter jackets especially) may prevent effective use, and finally some drugs make it less effective. So, what is or are your solution/solutions?
    2
  14. How about the 6 year old and her father were shot because the girl and her friends were playing basketball in the street and their ball went into the shooter's yard. The shooter was a convicted felon with an illegal firearm, and a domestic violence situation pending. The shooter than ran. The shooter was Black, how much press has been provided about this one.
    2
  15. A suspect is some believed to have committed a crime. A perpetrator is a person caught committing a crime or had been caight on video or film committing a crime. We look at the left blurring the line between someone suspected rather than someone actually identified or caughtcommitting the crime. Tne same people complaining about the need for mental health years ago went to court to close mental health hospitals because they amounted to imprisonment.
    2
  16.  @Darthdoodoo  Vote or recall not giolence. Violence or calls for violence makes great propaganda for their side, especially if the criminal and/or the prosecutor is Black. Yes, rally (not at the court house), push for recall petitions (In the case of minority prosecutors, in that minority community as well, since usually they are the most common victims of these repeat actors), and in general do whatever you can do peacefully to remove them from office.
    2
  17. The Moorish Movement just as I suspected. A form of soverign citizen movement. Time for concern over their history of crime, they should be a Federal law enforcement radar; especially since this is a multi-state criminal operation.
    2
  18. I disagree, he might have been helped long ago if he wasn't given passes on his actions. I will agree that he is probably beyond help now.
    2
  19. Check out Critical Legal Theory and its origin in communist Critical Theory. Then think how this throry is meant to help communists to destroy society.
    1
  20. Venezuela is in the condition that it is because of the socialist takeover the nation. How was this done, by undermining its Constitution, strange it looks alot like what the Dems/Progressives are doing.
    1
  21. Anything odd here; the criminal must be safe from unfair incarceration. You know incarceration is part of "White Supremacy" and Black Americans need to be protected from "White Supremacy". Of course, no one needs to protect Black Americans from other Black Americans since protecting Black people must be "White Supremacy"
    1
  22. Don't trust the minor crime stats. As the police can do less, people stop reporting minor crime or non-violent crime, so the stats show less crime than there is.
    1
  23. When the police no longer do anything about reports or there aren't enough police to respond, people don't bother to report minor crimes or assaults. An example my wife, a teacher, received a concussion (two weeks off work) trying to stop two students fighting had no report made since that would indicate a problem in the school. In other words, the school insured no report.
    1
  24. Remember the pop tart gun incident was a White kid, if I remember. Remembet there seems to be two standards.
    1
  25. I am aware of at least two cases where this project either paid off witnesses or in other ways created false evidence. I'm not saying that there aren't some innocent people in jail; however, this organization doesn't really care about truth
    1
  26. Cities have a great deal of autonomy, State governments can't take action without creating a political crisis.
    1
  27. Illinois has mandated CRT in grad, middle and high school. She seems unaware of reality.
    1
  28. Yes, Virginia there is a Santa Claus. The new comment should be "Yes, Virginia liberals calling for riots isn't calling for violence and property.". Liberals like little children too often accept the words of a politically acceptable authority.
    1
  29. Amber Alert is not tied to Whites, this new Ebony Alert is truly racist, since it is aimed at only one racc. A form of justifiable racism.ĺ
    1
  30. All those who want non-lethal force. A stun gun must make direct contact at reaching range; he could have reached the attacker in time to stop it. Pepper spray has to hit the face, which was facing away, so no go. A taser is even more problematic. Read the safety instructions on a taser. You are limited in safe areas to target, and they are ineffective if both electrodes aren't firm contact. The girl with tbe knife was near the maximum range of the taser, partially turned reducing the target area. Even if the taser was already out, the chances were high that it would be ineffective or worse case be dangerous to the young womsn with the knife. Please realize movies and TV aren't reality, and research.
    1
  31. It should have begun "Some years ago".
    1
  32. Are these people possibly a variant of the Sovereign Citizen Movement? It fits that behavior pattern.
    1
  33. No concern over the military being used to return control, what else will the left will use military style response to solve. Was that a goal, making the people willing to accept something like martial law as needed.
    1
  34.  @darrekworkman8685  The implication was that police are trained to kill because they are ex-military, Try to avoid that you said that fine, but that was the jestof your initial post. I notice no ideas for effective non-leathal options just a desire for them. Own what you say.
    1
  35.  @darrekworkman8685  There are no standard rules of engagement; so why train on them first. Rules of engagement are determined by the nature of operations, and should not be political. One real problem is that unrealistic rules actually increase the violence. Under former President Obama rules of engagement included that fire couldn't be returned unless they could clearly see the shooter. The result dead and injured US troops because the shooters either hide among civilians or civilian occupied areas or sniped and dropped from sight and searching fire was not allowed. War and policing are two very different activities; and it is a disaster that peace keeping operations have made too many forget the objective of war is to kill or render impotent the enemy. Rules like those under Obama render our forces impotent while allowing weaker forces a stronger hand. Yes, I know that this veered of the subject; but, policingand military operations are two distinctly different worlds.
    1
  36. Even the entire video doesn't show why the fight started. The problem means no video actually shows who started the issue. One thing that you can see is the fact that the White girl is a fraction of the size of the Black girl. I taught high school for awhile, and I seldom saw a smaller student start a fight with a larger student. That isn't to say the Black girl is either guilty or innocent; just that much more data is needed.
    1
  37. Ta'Kiya was to be the latest George Floyd. This story fell apart fast. By the way, the officers had been assisting the other car in the parking lot.
    1
  38. If this keeps up; I am afraid respect for law will end. The day of modern vigilantes is rapidly approaching, God help us.
    1
  39. David seems to be an expert at making statistics lie. He may have a sociology degree.
    1
  40. The only difference between racists and Black activists is that one openly tr r as a group as having more rights then others while the other cloaks the attitude in c laims of fighting racism while practicing 8t.
    1
  41. My wife is a naturalized US citizen. She and I both support preventing illegals from entering. Do it legally or stay out. By the way, she was a teacher here for 30 plus years. She had graduated college in her country of ot I gin and was already an English speaker. At no point was she using resources taken from tax payers even before I met her.
    1
  42. Question, the KKKbelieved races should be separate and one race was evil or inferior; today the Democrat Progressives push for or support for separate proms, graduations, rooms at college, safe spaces by race and demonize one race in the 1619 Project and Critical Race Theory. The White Progressives seem to feel special and lesser standards are needed for a specific ethnic group because they can't make it on their own. It seems that perhaps the modern Democrats aren't much different than those of 100 years ago.
    1
  43. a Constitution. Forgot to add, that this an effort to create a new slave class; however, this time the races will be reversed from that existed before the conclusion of the Civil War.
    1
  44. Vigilantism is the outcome of how many cities and states are handling crime. Why are the left doing this? One possible reason, I am not saying that this the reason, is to get people willing to accept abusive enforcement tactics which can be used against political enemies as well.
    1
  45. DA Alvin Bragg has a very strange value system. Criminals (including violent crimes) are either not charged or not jailed; while White man who responded to one of these released fools. All the stops were released to go after President Trump. Do you notice that DA Bragg seems only to charge one ethnic group. I would call him a racist since he seems to use a single factor in his decisions on one factor that no one can control; skin color.
    1
  46. Doing that only provides fuel to extremists. DAs like this will be the real reason that we are heading into a Wild West era, not guns. The Wild West occurred because of either no law or way to enforce it. These DAs are recreating those conditions.
    1
  47. Who were the attackers, and was the person Moslem? I suspect that the attackers were not White Supremacist or anti-Moslem Whites. Purhaps,Perhaps, is a reason for uneven racial prison populations. As to disparities in sentencing, remember many have had multiple previous convictions with no real punishment.
    1
  48. He has been here illegally; how did he get a Social Aecurity Number to work so he could get loan to buy a house,get a job, and pay taxes. Did he steal someone else's ID or a FALSE. ID? By the way doing either by a US citizen it is a crime under Federal law. The crime is using a false ID.
    1
  49. This guy ignores reality. The gangs have moved into the business, as he stated; however he ignores psychiatric facts about Marijuana.
    1
  50. The TYTs seem to be so biased that they could have worked the Third Reich's propaganda apparatus.
    1