Comments by "Andre Falksmen" (@andrefalksmen1264) on "LegalEagle"
channel.
-
18
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
@donald12998 authoritarian regimes are always clean, safe, and orderly relative to their peers. The relative economic development of a regime has nothing to do whether it is authoritarian or not, but with the level of capital invested per capita. That's why Democratic India is in poverty while authoritarian China is economically dominant. As for tyranny, I know the Bete Noir of westerners, and Americans in particular, is some all-pervasive tyrannical State, but for most peoples in the world a functional, even if tyrannical state, it would be a dream, the real tyranny they suffer is lawlessness and chaos daily fearing rape and robbery at the hands of criminal gangs and Rebel groups in possession of small arms.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
@mrreyes5004 well now you're just making stuff up , you're putting together a mishmash of propagandic talking points. Neither Saddam Hussein's Iraq, nor the Soviet Union, nor North Korea, nor Singapore, nor China, are Rife with crime or dangerous streets. That's just stupid, you obviously have no sense whatsoever. As for their level of cleanliness, it varies to their level of economic development, but it is always higher than a Democratic Society of the same level of development.
Furthermore you clearly have never spoken to anyone who's actually lived under an authoritarian regime and then saw it collapse, then saw the decline in security and functionality after it collapsed.
There may be many faults with authoritarian governments, but as the name would suggest, lawlessness is not one of them.
3
-
1
-
1