Comments by "Frida Kahlo" (@Blanka1100) on "‘Unusual’: Vladimir Putin has ‘historical obsession’ over territorial claim of Ukraine" video.

  1. Other country's pact choice is none of Russia's decision. Nato never invaded Russia. Russia did invade non Nato neighbour because it could and wanted to annex it.If Ukraine had been in Nato, Putin would have never started this war. He Russia's victims for their will to be secured. Russia has nukes so who is Russia afraid of? It is not about Nato. It is about Ukraine and Putin's legacy. Nato is an excuse, not a reason to invade Ukraine. .  @gdiwolverinemale4th 
    2
  2. Russia always needs excuses to annex somebody else's land. They love playing the victim card whle being anything but victim. They always act as if we owe them something. They never had any respest for its smaller neighbours and their independence culture, right to decide on their own. It is not a matter of one Putin. It was always the same. Ask average Pole, Finn, Latvian, Estonian and a few others. They know best.
    1
  3. turn russian state media off. Russia simply loves annexing with every excuse possible.
    1
  4. Tucker has no clue about history of Poland or Latvia. He proved it. He did not even oppose Putin's fakes.
    1
  5. Tucker did not even try to oppose Putin's false claims because he has no clue about Eastern Europe's history. He did not even know what was true and what was not.
    1
  6. Nobody invaded Russia. Putin needed excuse to feed his ego. He wants Ukraine.
    1
  7. Nato never romised not to expand and there is no paper signed that yu can show me. Who gave Russia any right to decide about its neighbour's pact choice? Who does Russia think it is? Stop blaming your victims for calling the police!  @kevinlee7678 
    1
  8. How many countries did Nato invade in order to annex? Oh,, wait  @SvenErik_Lindstrom3 
    1