Comments by "JamesT" (@Parawingdelta2) on "Starmer arrives in Washington" video.

  1. It may be noted that despite President Trump's hyperbolic rhetoric, it's only since he's been back that anyone has been talking about any move towards peace. In fact, it's been quite the contrary. Despite some commentary about provocation and reneging on 'deals' on behalf of the Western alliance, it's unlikely that anyone disputes that Russia is the aggressor. One may argue that it's a pre-emptive defence strategy? Interestingly, when Israel was attacked, the whole world deemed them as the aggressor, or at least the justification for the incursion into Israeli territory and the murder of innocent people. I see Prime Minister Starmer has cut foreign aid to finance an increase in defence spending. Something welcomed by those who have observed the decline of British defence forces. It would, however, be quite naive to not see where that defence spending will ultimately be deployed. Meanwhile, the invasion of England continues, supported by criminal organisations on the shores of France.
    6