Comments by "BunzeeBear" (@bunzeebear2973) on "Real Royalty" channel.

Watch the Tudors mini series on YouTube...this is Henry 8th time so he is related to Elizabeth if you know the family tree. So you understand the mindset of the Royal family. King Henry was following rules already formulated and fought some of them because he was King. Still, they have this set up so Royal families marry into other Royal families so sooner or later they are all related to each other to keep the royal blood line. We now know today that this is unhealthy as they get the royal blood disease (purple blood). Purple is the color of royalty...the blood is red but they are more likely to suffer from anemia(they bleed easily) from a bruise. The continuous intermarrying within the family could lead to other diseases. There HAD to be a mixture with a non relative. (Chuck & Diana) as the Spencer family was not related in any way as a cousin, 22 in line to the throne. Diana also HAD TO BE A VIRGIN. Chuck & Diana got married and had 2 sons to carry on the Royal blood line. Now it had been revealed that Charles did not love Diana.(she was just the vessel...to be used) Charles was in love with Camila Parker(who was more in touch with what the royals do=absolutely nothing) Just sit and be pampered on. She might also be related in some way to a royal family but too old to have children and she was also a divorced. (which is a no-no in HRH rule book) and Chucky could not marry Camila because he could not divorce Diana.(which I find unusual because Henry the 8th created the Church of England so he could do that as he had it as allowable by that church. AFAIK they still are affiliated to that church...so divorce was possible.) I am thinking some jealousy is involved as Diana found another Prince....so something had to be done to ruin both their lives.)>it is weird< However, if she died then Chucky & Camel could wed. It is all so suspicious and all were involved. Personally I think Charles had a "babe" when he was married to Diana. Why would he want to marry one (who's face looked like a Camel?) Just to follow some outdated tradition? Only the Royal house cared about tradition. The common people saw the good works Diana was trying to do with her place of "the priviledged." . That is "how she was embarrassing them"
14
What was wrong with Diana - she does not come from a royal house but was closer to a "commoner". . HRH has their "antiquated rules"...she is NOT TO "touch the common people. She was doing that....helping with AIDS BABIES in 3 world countries by actually touching them...and consoling them. The Royal family would never do that. They live in their own world of prestige and comfort. Diana could not do that with all the money she had she used it to help the less fortunate. This is something the "Royals" could not understand...they have been out of touch with the common people. . (Basically they are "stuck up"= think they are better than other people.) Queen Elizabeth wondered why there was so many flowers, placed there by common people after Diana death. The people were in mourning. (talk about being "out of touch") There is definitely a sickness in the mindset of HRH. They took care of themselves & spit on the people. . Well, you reap what you sow. When the Queen died after serving for 75 years, there was no emotional outpouring for her SERVICE. I don't remember her funeral. Short & sweet. Done. . I had more feelings when my dog died.
1
The driver was not intoxicated. Intoxicated people can't see their feet, let alone tie their shoelaces. 60KPH? In a Mercedes. Try 100KPH in a VW Van and in a "head on collision" with another car going +130KPH. Me driving, not a chauffeur. Emergency personnel are not there immediately. So that would be 40 minutes before I am in the hospital. Emergency responders do what they can to stabilize the person while on route to hospital. NO MATTER WHO THEY ARE. >that is "their training" With that kind of accident...I lived. To continue to drink & drive/but not like the younger youthful days. Now it is more conservative. I have driven a car drunk (double the legal limit and also on medication so now it is 3 or 4 times the legal amount. Did not worry about shoe laces because I had slip on shoes. Tunnel driving is no worse than a dark road with NO street LIGHTS. Had there been a hit on another car, a tail light is hardly a hit. Definitely would have gotten out and directed the other car to get out of the tunnel and we exchange insurance info. Still not drunk enough not to know what I am suppose to do. Still there is way more damage than what would occur. Had you taken a second Mercedes and repeat the crash.(this is what you do when researching a case properly) when there is no witnesses. The fact the tunnel was cleaned up by a wash down (instead of closing off the site until blood samples could be taken shows some one had ORDERED THAT CLEAN UP. SO SUSPICIOUS. I don't even need to be there to know that much already. HRH are involved.
1