Comments by "Hindu Rashtra" (@hindurashtra63) on "‘Destructive’: Indian officer counters Rahul Gandhi's 'India not a nation' theory at Cambridge event" video.

  1. When you get your Informatin from British made Documentaries on India on National Geographics Channel..
    2
  2. Entire Europe has Constitutions based on Judeo - Christian Values which are based on Myth of a Man named Jesus doing Miracles and claiming to be God. Entire Arab Nations in Middle East have Sharia Law, Based on Myth of their Prophet being a Messenger of God. All that is fine ? Entire SOuth East Asia is based on Buddhist Myth. Why pick on Hindus for being Proud of their Mythology in this case ?
    1
  3. Someone should have asked Rahul Gandhi to translate "Rashtra Pathi Bhavan".. LOL
    1
  4. The only reason we are even debating this Topic is because of Hindus being unfortunate victims of Foreign Invaders - Christians from Europe and Muslims from Middle East. Otherwise this Entire Nation would have been called a Hindu Nation casually and without any hesitation, Just like we say - Buddhist Nation of Bhutan or Chrisitian Nation of Spain or Islamic Nation of Saud Arabia. I don't see any Arabs or Buddhists debating Secularism and Definition of their Natons. Why only Hindus are made to carry the Burden of Secularism and Diversity entirely on their Shoulders and Dis-associate with their Proud History, Kings, Mythology and Religion ?
    1
  5. No one crificized MM Singh when he was Prime Minister.
    1
  6. Maybe watchng British Documentaries on India on National Geographic Channel..
    1
  7. India is diverse because its Original Inhabitants accepted and welcomed Diversity. Haryana and Nagaland can be included in Bhaarat, If you have read "Mahabharat" - They were called "Kurukshetra" and "Naga Lok" in the Epic. Not just this, You will get to know the Hero Arjuna's Adventure in the North Eastern States where he meets Naga Princess Ulupi and has a Son with her. Thus, Nagaland was the Land of Naga Tribes mentioned in Mahabharat, Which eventually was still considered a part of Bhaarat in Ancient times. Every Naton is associated with Mythology if you think about it. Japanese are Proud of their Mythology where First Fishermen Couple - Iazanagi and Izanami created the Islands of Japan with a Spear, They named their first Child - Jomon. Jomon became Nippin which becamee Japan. Similarly, India gets its name from Bharata, The Son of Dushyanta, A Descendant of Hindu God King - Ram, Mentioned in Hindu Epics. It also goes on to clearly descibe the Geographic Boundaries of Bhaarat - The Land beginning from the Sindhu River in the West, Stretching out to Himalayas in the North, That extends till the Neela Samudra (Indian Ocean) in the South. With such clear definitions, It is hard to ignore the Ancient definitions of our Nation. The only reason we are even debating this Topic is because of Hindus being unfortunate victims of Foreign Invaders - Europooans and Muslims, otherwise this Entire Nation would have been called a Hindu Nation casually, Just like we say - Buddhist Nation of Sri Lanka or Chrisitian Nation of Spain or Islamic Nation of Qatar. I don;t see any Arabs debating Secularism and Definition of their Natons there. Why only Hindus are made ot carry the Burden of Secularism and Dis-associate with their Proud History, Kings, Mytho0lgoy and Religion ?
    1