Comments by "Winsome Martinez" (@winsomemartinez) on "NBC caves to liberal hosts, fires ex-RNC chair" video.

  1. Are you being ironic by posting this on Fox?
    22
  2. Hahaha, you guys can't even handle Jessica.
    5
  3.  @Hbrown1770  Yeah, can't post truth on a site called "Truth". That's some Putin logic there. 🙃
    4
  4. When did they have the DNC chair employed at Fox?
    3
  5.  @goldbud2287  Only Pravda is good, eh goldbug?
    2
  6.  @zerkfitting  Hypocritical, how?
    1
  7.  @lovedadonald.  Sure. If we don't buy into this crap we must be bots. 🙃
    1
  8.  @Hbrown1770  Yeah, pretty much. No intelligent American wonders why he'd say that. Ukraine is still getting the help, though. They're siphoning off frozen oligarch money now. Oops.
    1
  9. ​ @vincentyoung8472  They've had Rona on as a guest many times. When did Fox hire the DNC chair? Heck NBC has Michael Steele employed.
    1
  10.  @vincentyoung8472  Right. Fox hires liberals like Allen Combes or Jessica Tarlov. Even vastly outnumbered and usually talked over even Jessica Tarlov makes the Five cast members wilt.
    1
  11.  @vincentyoung8472  Get Jon Stewart in a roundtable with Hannity, Ingraham, and Watters. He'd shred them so badly that Fox wouldn't air it.
    1
  12.  @vincentyoung8472  Well that was the expected brilliant retort. 👏
    1
  13.  @vincentyoung8472  Again with the astute, well thought out retort? Do you have anything but ad hominem? Yes, Jon Stewart would pick apart every single right wing talking point (shred) to the extent that those three would be babbling nonsense and pounding shoes on the table. Conservatives have no F. Lee Bailey anymore, and if there was one he wouldn't defend this version of the GOP.
    1
  14.  @vincentyoung8472  argumentum ad hominem refers to several types of arguments, all of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
    1