Comments by "Mint" (@mint8648) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Mongols, tatars, poles: yes
    36
  2. Because indians are the largest demographic with access to internet
    26
  3. Ukraine already captured moscow
    23
  4. No ukraine already captured moscow
    18
  5. they needed other resources too tho...
    16
  6.  @captaindak5119  ok but the poles held the title of czar for two years and the mongols conquered every russian state. also the germans in ww1 invaded russia successfully
    15
  7. Eu supports france! 🇪🇺🇫🇷
    14
  8.  @therock5944  sweden might have joined too
    12
  9. china did invade tibet, indian territories, vietnam, and they also want siberia
    10
  10.  Dimitry Chernoff  no they won’t using nukes is not within any nation’s self-interest
    7
  11. @John Higgins nato at this point only includes us and canada, they will side with britian.
    7
  12.  @leomessiindia  saudi has friends with russia, america,
    7
  13. i agree that western media is full of propaganda, but saying china is not expansionist is bs
    7
  14. Copium
    6
  15.  Dimitry Chernoff  they’ll just retaliate, making russia’s situation even worse
    6
  16. the chinese know this too. that’s why belt-and-road exists...
    6
  17.  @环球猎奇  ok, but does china really have claim to tibet and those indian territories? they were conquered by the manchus/ mongols, not the han chinese
    6
  18. Useless comment
    5
  19.  Juan Frede  france and germany are the best of brothers
    5
  20.  @josh-kg1rb  japan might not have even attacked pearl harbor bc soviets could supply them with oil
    5
  21. even with allies? elaborate plz
    5
  22. Any links to those films? Thanks
    5
  23. @John Higgins eu is obliged to defend france
    5
  24. Iran wins
    5
  25. Germany would win if Soviets weren't in the war.
    5
  26.  @nazmoonnahar2489  👍🇨🇳🇵🇰🇧🇩🤜🇮🇳
    4
  27.  @casewhite-954  that same wikipedia article also says “There have been many attempts by historians to apply the term superpower retrospectively, and sometimes very loosely, to a variety of entities in the past. Recognition by historians of these older states as superpowers may focus on various superlative traits exhibited by them. Examples of these ancient or historical superpowers include the British Empire,[6] Ancient Egypt,[14] the Hittite Empire,[15] the Achaemenid Empire,[16] the Hellenistic Empire of Alexander the Great,[17] the Roman Empire,[18] the Sasanid Empire, the Maratha Empire, the Maurya Empire,[19][20] the Dutch Empire, the Mughal Empire, the Delhi Sultanate, the Qin Dynasty, the Yuan Dynasty, the Chola Empire, the Russian Empire,[21] the Tang Empire,[22] the Gupta Empire, the Umayyad Caliphate,[23] the Mongol Empire, the Ottoman Empire,[24] the French colonial Empire,[25][26] the Spanish Empire,[27] the Qing Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty, Iberian Union, and the First French Empire of Napoleon.[28]”
    4
  28. nukes
    4
  29.  Dimitry Chernoff  what? america almost won in the vietnam war, they only withdrew because of political pressure at home. they can destroy vietnam's military with ease again, though they would face another guerilla war. plus, its not worth it bc vietnam is friendly with usa anyways
    4
  30. China supports iran 🇨🇳🇮🇷
    4
  31. Go saudi arabia
    3
  32. Why don’t you, an experienced keyboard warrior, join the ukrainian military?
    3
  33. i hate india
    3
  34.  @onodera387  i would be if i know how to apply
    3
  35. Midway was actually very closely fought, though I don’t think the Japanese could permanently occupy the islands
    3
  36. Proof?
    3
  37. Nigeria will collapse soon
    3
  38. Lol look at the comments below and above yours
    3
  39.  Juan Frede  canada is weak af
    3
  40. Egypt vs Ethiopia
    3
  41.  @w0mblemania  china has not invaded japan or philippines in 2000 years
    3
  42. i hate switzerland
    3
  43. Why don’t you move to Ukraine if you love it so much?
    3
  44.  @zikbmgo4887  except for the terrorist attack part
    3
  45. Mongols attacking martyrs
    3
  46. there would be no nuclear war, even if there was, about 75% of humanity would still survive
    2
  47.  @asiberiantiger188  yep
    2
  48. No, main us contribution was morale
    2
  49. its iran that controls iraq not usa
    2
  50. Ukraine already captured moscow and they are marching on vladivostok
    2
  51.  @Bananaking23424  turkey has the numbers and saudis have low discipline and morale. so i think this goes to turkey
    2
  52. Well said
    2
  53. Biden doesn’t want war with russia, much less china
    2
  54. i love pakistan
    2
  55.  @undercoverchief9158  🇧🇩🇵🇰🇨🇳
    2
  56. 🇵🇰🇨🇳🇧🇩
    2
  57. Good comment
    2
  58. Azeris are loyal
    2
  59. But Rommel will have more reinforcements and supplies as well, they can't possibly be defeated that quickly.
    2
  60.  @Fiddling_while_Rome_burns  ok but Rommel and the Italians would just retake Libya.
    2
  61. air power alone has never won a war
    2
  62.  @shootermacgavin1  only the west, japan, korea, taiwan, and latin america are outraged. saudi arabia, iraq, iran, uae, israel, armenia, kazakhstan, kyrgyzstan, tajikistan, pakistan, india, china, myanmar, north korea, vietnam, malaysia, indonesia, bangladesh, mexico, nicaragua, venezuela, cuba, serbia, brazil, and africa couldn’t care less about the ukraine invasion, they even have good ties with russia. stop your eurocentrism and americentrism
    2
  63. India and russia are friends because of politics
    2
  64. Why?
    2
  65. Russia will win
    2
  66.  Juan Frede  you need a mental health test. scandinavia mostly part of eu, so only norway would have the possibiltiy of supporting britain. Plus, experience isn't everything. Eu will have the numbers, there would be technological parity, and canada would have logistical issues. french fleet won't be destroyed as easily as it was in tragalgar. and wtf the the british royal family being german would prevent german and austria from fighting britain? was that the case in ww1 or ww2?
    2
  67. ​ Juan Frede  france has the numbers, britain has slightly better experience, id say its equal without spain
    2
  68.  Juan Frede  scottish-english tensions have been growing in uk since brexit, most scots want to remain in eu. they may not rebel, but they won't be willing to fight either.
    2
  69.  Juan Frede  list of countries spain defended: -belgium (from french invasion in 1670s) -catholic germany (thirty years war) -malta (from ottoman siege) -catholic bohemia (thirty years war) -austria (thirty years war) list of countries france defended: -poland (polish civil war, ww2, and napoleonic wars) -turkey (crimean war) -spain (spanish succession war) -belgium (ww1 and ww2) -denmark (napoleonic wars) -sweden (napoleonic wars) -austria (seven years war) -portugal (funded money to during thirty years war) -netherlands (ww2) -italy (ww1 caporetto) -serbia (ww1) -greece (ww1)
    2
  70. 🇪🇺🇫🇷
    2
  71. No ukraine already captured moscow and vladivostok
    2
  72.  @环球猎奇  but did china historically include manchuria, tibet, xinjiang, etc
    2
  73. why is youtube deleting my comments
    2
  74.  @w0mblemania  name a time china invaded those countries
    2
  75.  @w0mblemania  name one. i don’t have much time. hurry up
    2
  76. Ukraine already captured vladivostok
    2
  77.  @jimmymartino5433  source?
    2
  78. explain
    1
  79. This is only hypothetical 1v1, chill bro
    1
  80.  @crippleddepression1142  i stopped a month ago
    1
  81.  @crippleddepression1142  im not
    1
  82.  @crippleddepression1142  where did i
    1
  83. China would win against russia alone if no nukes are used
    1
  84. good luck to iran from old ally china
    1
  85. Robert Gittings india and china never really were neighbors, you’re probably talking about india and tibet
    1
  86. war!
    1
  87.  @mohamadrezaahmadpour4184  saudi arabia will be conquered by iran and turkey
    1
  88. ?
    1
  89.  @josh-kg1rb  soviet on japanese side
    1
  90.  @michaelharris679  it wouldnt. look up kargil war
    1
  91.  @davidsprague6578  lol
    1
  92. Love russia from iraq
    1
  93.  @cassius_eu5970  yeah
    1
  94. DeputyDawg_53 you have no idea what you are talking about. China is far more technologically advanced than india.
    1
  95. DeputyDawg_53 i’m implying china’s tank force is superior to india’s, its not the crap material you think it is. even if it is, india’s would be way worse
    1
  96. Source?
    1
  97. Neither like the usa
    1
  98.  @amirmohammadmirfazli543  yea
    1
  99. That means turkey wins?
    1
  100.  @MW-3002  turkey hates ksa
    1
  101.  @MW-3002  turkey hates israel
    1
  102. 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇿
    1
  103.  @IblameBlame  so is it easier for russia to hold territory than to take territory?
    1
  104. You underestimate the power of propaganda
    1
  105. Racists from who to who?
    1
  106. Death to israel 🔥🇮🇱🔥
    1
  107. china was backstabbed by their own people both times
    1
  108. Proof?
    1
  109. Also biden, he said he would invade iran today if they get nukes
    1
  110. No but i like russia
    1
  111. no
    1
  112. south korea is slowly becoming pro-china
    1
  113. Lol
    1
  114. ask israel what those millions of arabs could do
    1
  115. Algeria? You mean southern France?
    1
  116. Why is ukraine three times poorer than the russian shthole?
    1
  117. wat
    1
  118. @Dan oz ikr its annoying
    1
  119. Usa is too scared to fight russia, much less china
    1
  120. source?
    1
  121. Don’t you know the Turkish Occupation is over? You don’t have to be Muslim anymore!!!
    1
  122. Vir Silvam Survival are you ok?
    1
  123. no
    1
  124. Tamils
    1
  125. Muslims
    1
  126. Prince sharma wars are more than just food and public opinion
    1
  127.  @Fiddling_while_Rome_burns  they would retreat to tunisa
    1
  128.  @yaz2928  bruh poles held the title of czar for two years, and when they left russia didn’t immediately become dominant. it was only until the deluge that russia started becoming more powerful. during deluge poland had to face invasions from the russians, prussians, swedes, moldovans, and a serf/cossack revolt; more than anything russians suffered during time of troubles
    1
  129.  @yaz2928  tatars, mongols, and germans during ww1 successfully defeated russia
    1
  130.  @yaz2928  tatars ruled russia for two centuries and crushed all opposition. when russia finally broke free they successfully sacked russia under ivan the terrible. and russia would have capitulated anyways in ww1 if revolution didn't occur. the failure of the kerensky offensive pretty much doomed them either way
    1
  131.  @yaz2928  poland also lost one-third of its population during the deluge. over 90% of warsaw's population died during it, and swedes looted much of poland's economy and destroyed 300 towns, castles, and churches much of its infrastructure.
    1
  132.  @attilahun77  even if russia didn't have a civil war, they would have lost anyways. after kerensky offensive there was no real way for russia to win
    1
  133.  @Skytech92  we are talking about invasions
    1
  134.  @Skytech92  doesn't matter. russian civilization was successfully invaded several times
    1
  135. @Hannibal Sulla ?
    1
  136. Raison, vous etes
    1
  137. Hi
    1
  138. Yea
    1
  139. Actually iran is pretty ethnically divided. But yes they all have a common iranian identity.
    1
  140. as if its neighboring countries have experienced crewmembers too
    1
  141.  @walk_spin_glide  lost what war? russia usually wins its wars
    1
  142.  @tremedar  are you dumb? ussr did not outnumber axis, axis army outnumbered ussr initially. otherwise they wouldnt have invaded.
    1
  143. Both countries will collapse again
    1
  144. no, majority support him even without rigging
    1
  145. Cuz theyre russian
    1
  146. Qatar too
    1
  147. Cope
    1
  148.  @isa-lp5rn  china barely has any nukes but russia can definitely destroy usa
    1
  149.  @akriegguardsman  tru
    1
  150. Go kmt! Go kmt! Go kmt!
    1
  151.  @台灣是一個國家  bruh
    1
  152.  Juan Frede  are you ok? britain is not even in the eu, meaning those countries you mentioned are gonna be on france's side.
    1
  153.  Juan Frede  spain was not saved, it was being invaded by the royalists with british support.
    1
  154.  Juan Frede  canada with only half of the population of britain won't be able to give the degree of support to britain the eu will give to france.
    1
  155.  Juan Frede  spain wasn't a colony, it was its own nation under french king. spain was always under foreign leaders, even today the king is french, historically they were french or austrians. and no spain did not fight in ww1 or ww2, so go read some more history before presenting inaccurate information.
    1
  156.  Juan Frede  theres a difference between colony and ally, joseph was king of spain, but the royalists tried to overthrow him. how tf would ottomans or japanese colonize spain? france didn't even want to colonize spain, they only wanted to influence it and take catalonia.
    1
  157.  Juan Frede  explain
    1
  158.  Juan Frede  bro france has stronger military than britain, and there's always a nuclear option, which france would still win with a pyrrhic victory.
    1
  159.  Juan Frede  you are forgetting that the dutch and scandinavians also allied with france until france fell.
    1
  160.  Juan Frede  today's germany's policy is not based on the germanic race, but more about continental politics. which means france is closer to germany. both merkel and macron have dissed the uk for leaving brexit.
    1
  161.  Juan Frede  ok so lets compare the distance from canada to england to the distance of europe to england. even if britain has naval and air superiority (which they don't) logistics would completely negate that. just look at how long it took d-day to be planned.
    1
  162.  Juan Frede  again, sweden, holland, spain, and poland are not the same countries they are in 1648. historical rivalries have long since been gone, and they are all part of eu.
    1
  163.  Juan Frede  french and british air power are equally matched, british has slightly better planes and recon while france has the numbers, on the seas the french and british are equally matched as well, french have a massive aircraft carrier. so transport ships would be disrupted, further emphasizing the logistical problem.
    1
  164.  Juan Frede  that doesn't mean anything. poland saved austria in 1683, did austria help poland later on? no, they annexed poland. also, poland and hungary weren't saved by the british in ww2, they were conquered by the soviets.
    1
  165.  Juan Frede  one can't look at history alone. france, spain, and uk are not the same countries today as they are in the past.
    1
  166.  Juan Frede  major wars uk has won since 1700 (excluding colonial conflicts) -war of spanish succession (debatable) -war of austrian succession (debatable) -seven years war -war of sixth coalition -war of seventh coalition -crimean war -world war one -world war two major wars france has won since 1700 (excluding colonial conflicts) -war of quadruple alliance -war of first coalition -war of second coalition -war of third coalition -war of fourth coalition -war of fifth coalition -crimean war -world war one
    1
  167.  Juan Frede  all colonial wars fought against weaker nations.
    1
  168.  Juan Frede  so has france, they are currently fighting four wars in africa.
    1
  169.  Juan Frede  france captured sevastopool and committed three times as many forces as britain to the war.
    1
  170.  Juan Frede  technically yes, since the french army would destroy any commonwealth invasion. but eu will be on france's side.
    1
  171.  Juan Frede  experience isn't everything, plus there is always the nuclear option if things go wrong for france, which it won't.
    1
  172.  Juan Frede  there is also -logistics -numbers -tech -morale -leadership -organization -geography
    1
  173.  Juan Frede  if france starts losing (which they won't) they'll nuke uk and they can lose less than the uk in nuclear war warhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwxjN2w1sZo
    1
  174.  Juan Frede  source? spain's army should be closer to france and germany than uk.
    1
  175. ​ Juan Frede  no way british troops will take out two french for one brit, british experience and technology isn't that much higher.. and morale will be low considering all of europe would be against uk. english ppl don't see europeans as bitter enemies either, might sue for peace. especially with growing unrest in scotland and ireland.
    1
  176.  Juan Frede  clearly your claims are false or biased. and even if that were the case, which isn't, the governments would have to support france anyways. germany has abandoned all historical rivalries with france, they now have very good relationship that is further binded after brexit. im starting to think you're just trolling.
    1
  177.  Juan Frede  polish people always side with britain? no, they depend too much on the eu, especially france and germany. they can't afford to help britain. and they haven't always sided with britain, in ww2 they sided with france, not just britain, and remember that it was french that liberated poland during the napoleonic wars, not britain... poland even mentions the french in their anthem.
    1
  178.  Juan Frede  spanish terrain would repel the brits, the commonwealth conquering spain would be a hard task even without french help. eu would help france, and nato would label uk as agressor. plus, france would also have international forces from polynesia to guiana to reunion.
    1
  179.  Juan Frede  nepal is under too much indian and chinese influence, they won't help the brits just because they did in the world wars.
    1
  180.  Juan Frede  lmao australians could barely handle the emus, they are not the same people as they were at gallipolli.
    1
  181.  Juan Frede  how would puny new zealand have any impact on the war?
    1
  182.  Juan Frede  ghanaian public may side with britain but that does not mean they officially will, ghana is facing rebellion in west togoland and it isn't part of commonwealth.
    1
  183. ​ Juan Frede  canada will be the only significant commonwealth help to uk, but france has all of eu on its side.
    1
  184.  Juan Frede  i'm not an expert at british politics but polls say that the snp still have a plurality. and uk has no electoral college.
    1
  185.  Juan Frede  bro you have to be trolling at this point, there is literally no historical, economical, or military reason for those countries to side with britain. and britain only won those 1v5s because russia or american had to step in and defeat the enemy for them, if the brits are gonna have higher morale because they want a challenge then they're all delusionsal, this is war, not a game.
    1
  186.  Juan Frede  alliances aren't dictated by historical ties today those countries are closer to spain because of eu. poland saved austria but austria repaid them with partition, so how does your logic work? and going by your logic, what did britain do to those countries you mentioned? scandinavia was traditionally hostile to britain ever since the vikings, and britain was at war with denmark and sweden during napoleonic wars, and britain was upset that norway and sweden wouldnt let them help finland during ww2... holland may be similar to england, but they had their fair share of war too, look up anglo-dutch wars and the seizure of ceylon and cape colony. as for those eastern european countries britain let them into soviet influence and let them into decades of ruin when they agreed with stalin to let eastern europe to him.
    1
  187.  Juan Frede  they may not have asked for peace, but they needed the russians or americans to do their work.
    1
  188.  Juan Frede  you serious? spain was europe's most effective military power in 17th century, and france doesn't just have more battles won than england, but they have the most battles won out of all countries in the world.
    1
  189.  Juan Frede  they were forced to side with the british because the germans were invading.
    1
  190.  Juan Frede  denmark is historically more friendlier to france... they cooperated in ww2 and napoleonic wars. while england and denmark were enemies since viking times up till british invasion of copenhagen.
    1
  191.  Juan Frede  what i mean is that by default, denmark was on britain’s side because they were both fighting against germany, but there was no formal alliance between them. and remember, denmark surrendered to the germans in only a few hours.
    1
  192.  Juan Frede  spain never interacted with denmark, but did britain ever help denmark? denmark is friendlier with france, they both allied against britain during napolenic wars. honestly you should stop repeating your arguments each time i shoot them down.
    1
  193.  Juan Frede  uk is dominated by england. whats the formal language of scotland and ireland? english.
    1
  194.  Juan Frede  haha denmark surrendered in two hours while france surrendered in nine months.
    1
  195.  Juan Frede  stop repeating the claims that the norwegians would support britain, they don’t they are closer to germany.
    1
  196.  Juan Frede  also, where are you from? your name sounds spanish, are you perhaps a salty latin american?
    1
  197.  Juan Frede  and that was the last time i heard from you...
    1
  198.  Juan Frede  only a small percentage of british troops have had experience in the afghan mountains and other global operations; they are not as committed to those places as the usa... what harsh british hills are you talking about? and why would gurkhas fight for britain? this isn’t ww2, britain has no influence in india anymore and therefore has no influence over nepal either. there are very few gurkhas left in britain, they won’t make a difference.
    1
  199.  Juan Frede  they aren’t colonies, guiana martinique and reunion are still part of france.
    1
  200.  Juan Frede  if the eu is not a family, then why do you even think those countries will support britain just because of the past?
    1
  201.  Juan Frede  i never said anything about public opinon in nepal. the people there might love britain with all their heart, but it doesn’t matter because nepal is india and china’s soccer ball... nepal is too inconsequential to care about european affairs.
    1
  202.  Juan Frede  most of those operations are led entirely by the us; commonwealth countries there are simply junior partners so barely any troops will have experience.
    1
  203.  Juan Frede  not commonwealth realm, ghana is not tied to britain the same way as canada or nz is
    1
  204.  Juan Frede  “always?” seems like you forgot the troubles, the irish war of independence, and easter rising... the uk is more divided than you think...
    1
  205.  Juan Frede  if they resent them, why do they join? most countries are better off in the eu than out (britain is debatable). small countries have as much political saying in eu affairs as a big country like germany
    1
  206.  Juan Frede  you say “the fraction of the British forces out in the 13 colonies surrender to the French.. not US.” you basically shot down your own argument of french cowardice.
    1
  207.  Juan Frede  bro in 1812 britain had three times as many people as usa, of course they had the upper hand... and they were not fighting all over the world; they had to pay russia and austria and prussia to do their dirty work against france.
    1
  208.  Juan Frede  us empire? it existed, it just wasn’t called an empire. they colonized the ohio, louisiana, california, oregon, alaska, the carribean, hawaii, the philippines, and occupied most of western europe and japan. when has the us won a war alone? mexican war, spanish-american war, etc. let me ask you this: when has britain won a war alone?
    1
  209.  Juan Frede  britain, usa, and FRANCE fought against germany, and one reason why france wasn’t fighting in those middle eastern wars was because they were busy with their own wars in west africa.
    1
  210.  Juan Frede  “german war dodgers?” you know that germany can’t just go to war and remilitarise like that, or else all of europe will lose the trust they have in germany and remember the ww2 days unless germany is fighting for them.
    1
  211.  Juan Frede  debt doesn’t matter. china can’t militarily force the us to pay up.
    1
  212.  Juan Frede  yes, british blood will bind australia canada uk and nz together, but will it bind nepal and ghana together with the uk? no.
    1
  213.  Juan Frede  france is literally the founder of the eu along with germany.
    1
  214.  Juan Frede  france letting the world burn? you are so ignorant its not even funny... france stopped the germans in ww1 and in ww2 the free french resistance continued to fight in occupied colonies.
    1
  215.  Juan Frede  yes british and scandinavian militaries train together because they are part of nato, not because of some “ww2 friendship.” that friendship never even existed. britain let norway and denmark fall to the germans, while souring relations with sweden by demanding them stop trade with germany... iceland isn’t too happy with britain either since iceland was occupied by the brits in ww2 and the two countries fought three cod wars, which by the way, britain lost.
    1
  216.  Liam 96  spanish civil war, spanish american war, colonization of morocco, etc.
    1
  217.  @The1Bozkurt1  more like europe to asia: russia, france, britain, portugal, spain, netherlands asia to europe: persia, arabia, mongolia, tartarstan, turkey, khazaria
    1
  218. you need to be educated
    1
  219. france
    1
  220. russia
    1
  221.  @kvanckadoglu1845  so would usa
    1
  222. cry about it
    1
  223.  @w0mblemania  well?
    1
  224.  @w0mblemania  just because i am stating historical facts, you call me a ccp puppet? stop being such an ideologue and strawmanner. not everyone who isn’t pro-western is pro-ccp.
    1
  225.  @merrickdials  yuan dynasty isnt chinese
    1
  226.  @w0mblemania  i am still waiting for you to name one time china invaded the philippines of japan (pirate or mongol invasions dont count)
    1
  227.  @w0mblemania  name the invasion please
    1
  228.  @w0mblemania  stop stalling
    1
  229.  @w0mblemania  another strawman, saying ccp guaranteed freedom of hk. we all know they are authoritarian
    1
  230.  @w0mblemania  did you quit this argument? do you concede?
    1
  231.  @merrickdials  it ruled china but was mongol
    1
  232.  @merrickdials  that is just chinese nationalist propaganda
    1
  233.  @merrickdials  yea forcibly accepted after mongols killed 50% of china’s population then imposed caste system where chinese were lowest rank
    1
  234.  @merrickdials chinese were at the bottom, mongols were at the top. mongols did the invasion of japan
    1
  235.  @w0mblemania  ok using ad hominems means you concede. thanks
    1
  236.  @merrickdials  they didn’t adopt or decide to choose that dynasty, it was forced down their throats.
    1
  237.  @merrickdials  it doesn’t matter. any ethnic group can claim another ethnic group is the same as them, doesn’t make it true though.
    1
  238.  @merrickdials  back then the concept of chinese referring to all 58 ethnicities did not exist. it was only a product of the qing era.
    1
  239.  @merrickdials its not fair judgment when that “legitimate dynasty” was installed with force by outsiders.
    1
  240.  @merrickdials  did italy invade britain because rome invaded britain? did germany invade russia in 1812 because the french-dominated confederation of the rhine sent 100k troops to russia? no, so china did not invade japan because mongol-dominated yuan invaded japan.
    1
  241.  @merrickdials  does modern china claim to be yuan?
    1
  242.  @merrickdials  read my other comment
    1
  243. however, its unlikely that alone will force china to surrenderr. just like with vietnam, public opinion as the war prolongs may force the us to withdraw
    1
  244.  @travelearthwithme1699 Without ussr support israel would have conquered egypt and syria
    1
  245.  @chairde  i’m not russian
    1
  246. I wonder if the average American would want a war right now
    1
  247.  @ragglefraggle9111  also why are there five deleted replies
    1
  248.  @cookiesaregood4800  iran is also bombing kurdish civilians, but that isn’t the reason usa invaded iraq in 2003
    1
  249. Prince sharma china is (though barely) self sufficient in food, and it is the worlds largest manufacturer/exporter. I really don’t know what you’re getting at.
    1
  250. Prince sharma china is superior to usa in ground hardware and numbers, no amount of american training can alone take down china. and its not like india can help much due to the himalayas and tibetan plateau
    1
  251. Prince sharma china’s hardware will be superior to the american invasion force, because of american logistic problems.
    1
  252. How are the prices. Btw i checked and iran has 20k gdp per capita according to wikipedia. Which is higher than almost every third and second world country including china
    1
  253. Ottomans did invade italy during the 16th century, several times
    1
  254. What?
    1
  255.  @tzenzhongguo  yeah but whyd you mention trump
    1
  256. ?
    1
  257. Hi rus
    1
  258. Belarus, armenia, tajikistan, kyrgyzstan, and kazakhstan are russias allies
    1
  259.  @seagie382  iran controls half of iraq though
    1
  260. uninformed teen here
    1
  261. you are using the terms “logistics, corruption, training deficiencies” which are always used in mainstream criticisms of any military, yet you have no proof, only prejudice and propaganda.
    1
  262.  @alderwolf7687  you have your own prejudice, making assumptions without proof. how do i know you’re not bluffing, saying i would find that you are not wrong anyways if research is done just so you don’t have to go through the effort of actually backing your claims?
    1
  263.  @alderwolf7687  military readiness is not based off overall conditions of a country. sometimes people live in poverty yet the military is doing just fine, like in most early modern societies and the ussr during the later stages of ww2. despite the internal situation of the usa, its military is still the best in the world…
    1
  264.  @alderwolf7687  “the condition never lasts forever” you are mixing up correlation with causation, many militaries take a long time to collapse, so there’s no way of knowing its because of the internal situation
    1
  265.  @alderwolf7687  so are you saying i shouldn’t trust you either?
    1