Comments by "Mint" (@mint8648) on "PragerU" channel.

  1. You turks tried and failed to reform islam
    23
  2.  @ryanski6343  ottoman rule was good
    9
  3. China and india and islamic world were all ahead of west until 1750
    6
  4. Ottoman empire was lbgt friendly, very woke empire 😱
    6
  5. no
    5
  6. democracy is from chinese kongsi and hamburger is german right?
    5
  7. The data says so
    5
  8. Fascism is far right. Right-wing politics are defined by defense of hierarchy. Fascists believed in the great inequalities of mankind. It’s just that the hierarchy they promoted differed from traditionalist or liberal conservatives.
    4
  9.  @DAsAngel1960  there is barely anything oppressive about ottoman rule. this is evident in the fact that greeks still have their religion intact and turkish colonists are nowhere seen. while mexico doesn’t practice aztec religion anymore, and is 90% latino. actually, during ottoman era it was serbians and bulgarians that felt opressed by greeks, since initially the ottomans put greeks in charge of orthodox millet which meant the bulgarian and serbian churches were subservient to greek church.
    4
  10. eastern civilization and values are better
    4
  11. I love saddam
    4
  12. hi i will convert to islam and abandon buddhism
    4
  13.  @icemaster9728  cope
    4
  14. no, usa is the main threat to the stability of the world
    4
  15.  Cake Yummy  says the one whose country already invaded afghanistan iraq syria and has unnecessary military bases all over the world
    4
  16. no it was the wealth they stole form india
    3
  17.  liam Millman  remained part of british empire
    3
  18.  @Historia_Magistra_Vitae.  Right-wing ideologies can be collectivist too. In fact, when the right-left distinction first emerged in post- Enlightenment Europe, right-wing politics started out as religiously collectivist monarchist conservatism, in contrast to left-wing individualist liberalism. The word “libertarian” was left-wing in origin. Only until liberalism was subsumed into conservatism, in opposition to radicals and socialists, were mainstream right-wing politics considered more “individualist.” Collectivist right-wing ideologies and political parties still exist, however, in the Islamic world, and in East Asia.
    3
  19. ottomans actually freed greeks from their oppressive nobility that abused peasantry, that’s why ottomans took over greece so easily, since the greeks/romans chose to side with ottomans rather than their masters.
    3
  20.  @DAsAngel1960  no i actually read ottoman history
    3
  21. stfu, you self-hater
    3
  22.  @Anthony_Gx  wow you liked your own comment
    3
  23. yes
    3
  24. conservatives: sweden denmark norway arent socialist they are capitalist liberals: well then why dont we copy their economic systems conservatives: no no thats socialist!
    3
  25.  liam Millman  yemen, iraq, egypt, sudan, zimbabwe, pakistan, nigeria, myanmar
    3
  26. troll
    3
  27.  @justacommonman6010  it didn’t help them that much bc spain was still poor, britain and france lost their colonies, portugal lost their colonies. german and italian and austrian states did just fine without colonies. gdp per capita was relatively same among european countries with or without american colonies. same with african colonies. only netherlands had significant gdp per capita.. and that’s because most of their wealth came from spice trade in. indonesia not america. europeans only started to industrialize by deindustrializing india which was about to industrialize before british took over
    2
  28. honestly the usa should’ve never been a country
    2
  29.  @반디컷성애자  no
    2
  30. btw slavery was eventually brought back in both persia and haiti
    2
  31. serfs often felt protected, not abused, by their lords
    2
  32. troll
    2
  33. I really hate people who scorn their own culture
    2
  34. Chinese civilisation is superior, slavery/serfdom was the least prevalent in their society unlike europe, islamic world, india, africa, central asia, russia, americas.
    2
  35. they forgot france abolished slavery in 1790s too
    2
  36. based
    2
  37.  liam Millman  qing dynasty, and post-mughal india were top 1 and 2 economies before british showed up, gdp per capita was similar to western european average, safavide empire was also very prosperous. none of these empires needed britain.
    2
  38.  @リンゴ酢-b8g  they did, search up islamic golden age
    2
  39.  @zfg07  some greek, but mostly persian
    2
  40. Rodan The Fire Demon according to your logic, anglo americans should get out of the americas, it’s native land
    1
  41.  @Historia_Magistra_Vitae.  Yes, classical liberalism is on the right because it prioritizes individual liberty over equality, in the form of not just political and social liberalism, but economic liberalism. This naturally creates hierarchies that are economic in nature, not based off feudal privileges. Equality is promoted only insofar as it maximizes this “liberalism” for everyone. Whereas socialism tends to prioritize equality over freedom, through social ownership of the means of production. So equality/inequality is still the determinant of the left/right split.
    1
  42.  @Historia_Magistra_Vitae.  Would you consider the Taliban, Muslim brotherhood, Wahhabism not to be right-wing? As well as the LDP of Japan, and the KMT? Would you consider anarchism, commonly regarded as left-wing, to be right-wing instead?
    1
  43.  @Historia_Magistra_Vitae.  Care to explain how Islamist extremists believe in egalitarianism, if they are so left-wing?
    1
  44.  @vcxz5248  Classical liberalism doesn’t have clearcut stances on sociocultural issues, I believe. I would say it’s more centre-right owing simply to the emphasis on economic liberty.
    1
  45.  @Historia_Magistra_Vitae.  And we should trust your definition of left-wing = collectivism, right-wing = individualism, based off what?
    1
  46.  @regisglass5464  You would be more right about classical liberalism, it is rather apathetic towards the individual rights debated today. Libertarianism, on the other hand, prioritizes liberty above everything else, regardless of the demands of the state and market. It can either be collectivist (libertarian socialist) or individualist (right-libertarian).
    1
  47.  @regisglass5464  Fascists were palingenetic ultranationalists, so they spoke of a non-existent, idealized past, and the “national rebirth” of it. In that sense, they were sometimes considered revolutionary as well as reactionary, borrowing futurist/modernist themes in their art and architecture, as they wanted to upend the entire social order. Some of their “progressive” policies, like eugenics, crackdown on organized religion, experimentations with polygamy, anti-regionalism, and economic interventionism, would be anathema to conservatives of then and now.
    1
  48. please, nobody believes europeans started slavery
    1
  49. Reply
    1
  50.  @throwawaythrowaway3345  history teachers are notorious for promoting mainstream history
    1
  51. islamophobic bakht caught. indian nationalists are the worst.
    1
  52.  @revolutionaryape7568  🤣exposed
    1
  53.  @revolutionaryape7568  four months later i realized i responded to the wrong person
    1
  54.  @itr8247  i am buddhist
    1
  55.  Harun Musa  death to israel
    1
  56.  @mohamedgalal8301  based
    1
  57. 💕🇨🇳💕🇩🇿🇯🇴🇰🇼🇮🇷🇮🇶🇳🇫🇸🇦
    1
  58. indians don’t care about the european situation. why should the lives of millions of jews be any more valuable than the lives of millions of bengalis.
    1
  59.  @rmp_gamez7260  hitler only wanted to expand as far as the urals. maybe get some colonies in africa too, but he always mistrusted the hordes of tartary (inner asia) and didn’t want anything to do with the continent.
    1
  60.  @rmp_gamez7260  well i think in mein kampf he specifically said he would stop at urals. brits and french probably expected he wouldn’t apply his insane ideas from mein kampf to actual geopolitics.
    1
  61. unbased
    1
  62.  @dexterjettster3683  until armenian genocide, ottoman rule was good for armenians
    1
  63. Nazism is not conservative at all. It’s anti-monarchy, anti-religion, anti-capitalist, anti-individualism. It never branded itself as conservative, as it wanted a rebirth of the nation
    1
  64. Other civilizations used to be greater
    1
  65.  Harlood Rick  uh, chinese, indian, islamic civilizations are still around
    1
  66.  Harlood Rick  hm i guess you are right
    1
  67.  @dubuyajay9964  muslims paid a zakat which christians and jews didn’t, people always forget this
    1
  68.  @Admiral45-10  bro slavery is not exclusive to ottomans
    1
  69. balkaners living under ottoman rule had better lives than average western european
    1
  70. no its because jews are rich and uneducated poor people who work hard don’t understand how economics work so they automatically assume the jews get their wealth from stealing
    1
  71. tru
    1
  72. It was france
    1
  73. Chinese civilisation is superior. For most of history, slavery/serfdom/caste was the least prevalent in their society unlike europe, islamic world, india, africa, central asia, russia, americas. There is no equivalent to chattel slavery in china.
    1
  74.  @matts6816  ?
    1
  75.  @kingmuddy5898  debatable but im just pointing out how conservatives also keep changing the definition of socialism and communism
    1
  76. he is bad
    1
  77. i agree ut hcina did more
    1
  78. agreed
    1
  79. delete tiktok
    1
  80.  @authenticallykennedy1870  ok
    1
  81. based
    1
  82. i hate hong kong, glory to cpc
    1
  83.  @amihart9269  true but hong kong is disgrace to chinese people
    1
  84.  Cake Yummy  love and support cpc
    1
  85.  Cake Yummy  no americans don't give a sht about hong kong
    1
  86.  Cake Yummy  ok
    1
  87.  @MW-3002  no one gives a sht about democracy, the west and the rest of the world are as flawed in human rights
    1
  88. Imagine if the United States was invaded and capitalism was fully exposed
    1
  89. Britain brought failed democracies to most of its colonies
    1
  90.  liam Millman  there is no other country that tried so hard to bring democracy to its colonies. that is what makes britain truly evil. because traditional form of government and certain cultures don’t work with democracy, a foreign concept imposed by an imperialist power.
    1
  91.  liam Millman  i am not a socialist. i am simply an anti-universalist and anti-universalist. it's true that certain cultures don't work with democracy. mainland china doesn't work with democracy; neither kmt, ccp, or any of those cliques were democratic. arab world doesn't have a history of democracy and so it won't work there either, mainly because islam. tell me, how democratic are iraq, afghanistan, libya - all those countries invaded by western powers - today? even tunisia, which is supposedly the most democratic arab state, is a flawed democracy. also, countries that are full of arab and muslim immigrants are becoming increasingly non-democratic as well, france especially comes to mind.
    1
  92.  @icemaster9728  https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf
    1
  93. No, universalism sucks
    1
  94.  @Bc232klm  ethnicity is irrelevant in islam unlike the west. the ummah and tribal identities are more important.
    1
  95. most russians and eastern europeans loved ussr
    1
  96. @MCADHD666 VOL2 search “what was life like in ussr” and you find a lot of interviews with people nostalgic for ussr
    1
  97. there's a difference between french liberalism and anglo liberalism
    1
  98. Britain ruined india by looting india of wealth equal to three times the gdp of the usa. Britain put a stop the proto-industrialization of bengal and mysore. Britain committed straight genocide on the natives of north america unlike spanish catholics who tried to protect them.
    1
  99.  liam Millman  spanish priests tried to protect natives from enslavement, in north america the brits and dutch just committed straight genocide. there’s a reason why most latin americans have native blood unlike most anglo americans.
    1
  100. ​ liam Millman  natives did not genocide each other to the extent british did. that is what matters. enough nonsense about how "natives aren't actually native," or "natives were peaceful." stop your strawmanning. people aren't as stupid as you think. it doesn't matter. what matters is that britain was more likely to commit genocide on the natives because their society was less religious than spain and france's - it's why many native tribes supported france during the seven years' war, and why the natives rebelled after the british won. good thing britain finally stopped their atrocities after the 1763 proclamation, however it's unfortunate that the americans inherited their genocidal tendicies.
    1
  101. hi
    1
  102. Napoleon>Trump>Hitler
    1
  103. when does she say persians were murderous? i’m pretty sure everyone knows they were the most benevolent rulers of the ancient and medieval world
    1
  104. how is slavery still legal? aside from that i agree with everything you say
    1