Comments by "" (@salland12) on "Bloomberg Technology" channel.

  1. Rocket reuse exists since the early 80s, but are referring to Falcon 9 i suppose. Falcon 9 is only partially re-usable and this stil takes over a month. The 2nd stage of falcon 9 is expandable even though spaceX promised 10 years ago it would be re-usable. Also re-usability reduces your payload capacity significantly because u need fuel to land the stage. In the the end with reuse it only cuts cost by less than 10%.
    2
  2. Given their recent announcement that Starship/superheavy is only able to deliver 40 of the promised 100 tons payload capacity i doubt it. And even then there is really no commercial use for such heavy payloads to LEO.
    2