Comments by "" (@random6809) on "The Times and The Sunday Times" channel.

  1. More laws for the gangs to ignore. Well done Starmer, you are a genius.
    64
  2.  @alastairjhunter3666  Does back-handers come under a different budget ;-)
    4
  3. It was alleged that the family wanted the information released due to somebody close being about to sell it to the media.
    4
  4. "The ministry statement did not say if the frigate had launched a missile" In other words, there are no missiles.
    4
  5. The British Empire that Albania was part of?
    3
  6.  @GiantRock62  The paypal fees are a killer.
    3
  7. The police considered it necessary, hence why it is not in breach of the DPA.
    3
  8. Meloni is demonstrating her inexperience. She also looked like a grumpy teen walking that way.
    2
  9.  @badgermcspoon11  What actually happened is that the police were asked in a press conference why the level of response was so high in this case. The officer replied that when a person is classed as being vulnerable the response is higher, allowing more resources to be allocated to it. It was only vulnerable that was used initially, no further detail. In a later conference, it was expanded out to be menopausal and issues with alcohol (if I recall the wording correctly). It was then later alleged that this was done at the request of the family who feared somebody was going to profit from exposing what "vulnerable" meant. The point is that the police got a load of flak from people who have not bothered to put it into context. Typical social media.
    2
  10. "$80m? How come the UK MOD allocate £180m for one f35b?" Aircraft plus maintenance costs over X years maybe?
    1
  11. @niallmackenzie99 Your parents illegally entered the UK on a dingy? ;)
    1
  12.  @niallmackenzie99  LOL
    1
  13.  @darraghmcelroy9698  The point being that illegal immigration is nothing to do with Empire, it is everything to do with the poor government and the economy of the country they leave. It is not Britain's faulty that these country are run by idi0ts.
    1
  14.  @lee9650  The police did consider it necessary, hence why they did so. Still butt-hurt that I called you out on the use of information by the police I see. LMFAO! Are you going to follow me around like a little lost sheep now?
    1
  15.  @lee9650  The police at the time. Duh!
    1
  16. "anyone who knows anything about GDPR knows that sharing personal data is not allowed without consent." Which certainly demonstrates that you know nothing about GDPR, as you are incorrect. The police are legally entitled to release personal data in connection to an investigation when operationally required. Don't comment on a subject that YOU clearly know nothing about. Irony.
    1
  17.  @lee9650  You stated, "anyone who knows anything about GDPR knows that sharing personal data is not allowed without consent." You have now backtracked and agree with me that the police can in fact do so without consent.
    1
  18.  @lee9650  I am quoting you verbatim. You stated, "anyone who knows anything about GDPR knows that sharing personal data is not allowed without consent." You are wrong.
    1
  19.  @lee9650  It is hilarious that you have been proved wrong but you continue to duck and dive. It is LITERALLY in your own comment. "I support the police and what they do but sorry anyone who knows anything about GDPR knows that sharing personal data is not allowed without consent." You are incorrect.
    1
  20.  @lee9650  How is quoting you verbatim and pointing out that you are incorrect, "obtuse"? You made the categoric statement that, " sharing personal data is not allowed without consent". Is what you categorically stated correct or not? Well?
    1
  21.  @lee9650  It is a categoric statement and incorrect.
    1
  22.  @lee9650  Yes a comment that is a categoric statement that is incorrect.
    1
  23. Immigration worries those looking for a home to rent.
    1
  24. "one of the plane also disappeared too but that was covered up." Why didn't they just remove the cover to find it?
    1
  25. Because Paul had an alibi, there was and still is ZERO evidence of criminality.
    1
  26.  @melgrant7404  You get a higher level of response from the police when a missing person is classed as vulnerable. It is why missing children or adults with learning disability get an instant response. As would somebody who may be suicidal.
    1
  27.  @richie6921  "They"? You do realise that there are over 140,000 officers in England and Wales? You seriously suggest that "they" are all scumbags?
    1
  28.  @badgermcspoon11  Thank you for the kind response, if only this was the norm on social media. Have a good weekend.
    1
  29.  @HazyNova420  Then the purpose of their video was what? This is standard Putin playbook, show the ship, show the door opened, but not have any operation missile in it.
    1