Youtube comments of Hallow334 (@Hallow334).

  1. 73
  2. 59
  3. 56
  4. 42
  5. 27
  6. 26
  7. 20
  8. 20
  9. 18
  10. 18
  11. 15
  12. 14
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 12
  18. 10
  19. 10
  20. 9
  21. 9
  22. 8
  23. 7
  24. 6
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32.  @jimeatscorn6628  A number of things. First is the accusation that the Church was trying to get the poor to spend all their money on indulgences and second, that indulgences were easy to get if you were rich and not if you were poor. Both claims are untrue. The book "Religion and Devotion in Europe 1215-1515" explains the Church first wanted people to do acts of worship and faith. Indulgences were used as an incentive to help people grow, spiritually. This is something everyone could do. It didn't cost anything. The indulgences that were associated with money, cost about 4 pence, which would not cost anyone all their money. To give you an idea of what 4 pence was worth, the book "Worlds Within Worlds: Structured of Life in Sixteenth Century London" says 4 pence was the equivalence of two rabbits. Once again, not very much at all. At the time, there was also a sliding scale of how much things cost, according to how much you earned. This was put in place by Henry VIII when he came into power in 1509. The more expensive plenary indulgences cost 16 pence for a rich person. While these books detail life in England, the costs of living in Germany weren't much different. So they were much less for the poor. Another thing wrong is that Luther was against indulgences. He actually wasn't. The next big thing is the 95 theses. He never nailed it on the door of the church. He sent it in the mail to the archbishop (a search on Google with show that most experts refute the story about the nailing of the document). What is true is there was a rogue priest, Johan Tetzel, that was going against the archbishop's wishes and charging wrongly for indulgences. Let me pause right here because I will end up writing a book explaining all this to you. Search YouTube for a video named "8 Myths about Martin Luther and The Reformation". It would be much faster for you to watch the video than it would be for me to type everything out. He has the same information I am typing, but he goes into more detail. I believed the story of Martin Luther my whole life. When I took the time to look into it, I was very surprised. None of the story actually came from Martin Luther, himself.
    4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. I had heard about this. They are from Holland. This is coming to a state near you, if you don't start speaking up. There are so many Americans that have been brainwashed by liberals, progressives, marxists and the abc's, it's pathetic. 30-40 years ago, none of the stuff you see today would have been tolerated. Why? Because it was and is unacceptable. To people, who have morals and values, it's still unacceptable. We haven't changed. The people, who have been brainwashed into believing it's normal, have changed. They are pretty much morally bankrupt. The teachings of what is right and what is wrong haven't changed. The people, who have been brainwashed, have changed. They have flipped what's right and wrong, upside down. They try to make evil things good and good things evil. These are the people, who no longer think. They just "feel". There is nothing righteous or good about supporting their agendas. So they like to fly rainbow flags? A rainbow is a gift from God. Not a sign of pride. What a depraved fantasy world they live in. And they expect normal people to participate in their fantasy word. Sorry. Ain't gonna happen. The adults on that show have a mental illness called Gender Dysphoria and instead of encouraging them to get help with their mental illness, liberals make it worse by validating the mental illness and treating it like it's normal. There is nothing normal about what they have become. You have elementary teaches with these mental illnesses teaching their students that it is normal and encouraging the children to be like them. If you don't see a problem with that, maybe you are mentally ill as well. These are the people, who are educating your children. Do not tolerate them! Do not back down from them or from school administrators and school boards, who support them! https://youtu.be/fseKo344QEA We have got to vote the people, who support this "way of life" and this evil out of power. It is nearing the point where it is almost too late.
    2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. The pride flag represents sin, IMO. Pride itself is a sin so they could not have picked a better name for it. With that being said, I watched a video that Dallas, the producer, made where he explained how it came about. The flag that was flown wasnt there as a representative of The Chosen. I saw some silly comments below throwing their own spin on things. The Chosen, as a company, was not celebrating anything. They are a for profit company. They are not a ministry or church of any kind. As with any company, the beliefs of their employees do not reflect the beliefs of the company, itself. The equipment it was attached to belonged to an independent contractor, who works on the show. Had I been in charge, it would have never been there in the first place. I would not allow anything that would be divisive. That video never should have made it past the video editor's desk. I was glad to hear Dallas say he did not agree with, nor support the alphabet community, but I would not have let anyone display something like that, even if it was on their personal property. If they did not agree with me, they would be free to look elsewhere for employment. If you look at it from a completely different perspective; is it possible God put that independent contractor in that position to expose him/her to the story of Jesus in order to save them? Everything happens for a reason and its all part of God's plan. Jesus said he was not sent to call the righteous, but the sinner. Am I going to stop watching The Chosen? Absolutely not. Why would I allow the sinful beliefs or lifestyle of one person dictate whether or not I continue to follow a show about Jesus Christ? To think people would stop watching the show because of one person is laughable. If that is the case, then you let satan drive you away. He would love to know he did that.
    2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. He was chosen because he "is widely regarded as a supporter of the progressive policies of Francis". This includes being in favor of giving communion to politicians, who endorse the killing of the unborn child and euthanasia. He then favored giving communion to sexually active lgbt people. That, by definition, is heretical. In an article in America, McElroy called for a change in sacramental discipline related to the reception of communion by sexually active LGBT people. He emphasized "the privileged place" of conscience and that sexual activity does not lie at the heart of the hierarchy of truths. He also said: "The distinction between orientation and activity cannot be the principal focus for such a pastoral embrace because it inevitably suggests dividing the L.G.B.T. community into those who refrain from sexual activity and those who do not." Reacting to the article, Stephen White, executive director of The Catholic Project at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., noted that he did not see any discussion of sin, "the very thing Christ died to save us from," nor confession, "a remedy for even the gravest of sins," and thus "the fundamental drama of salvation – the very substance of the Good News – is obscured." He pointed out Jesus' teaching "If you love me, you will keep my commandments" as the basis for saying that "the reason God gives us the moral law is precisely to guide us toward those actions and habits that bring us closer to Him and to our neighbor." Reverend Raymond de Souza, writing for National Catholic Register, considered McElroy's article "an attack on Church teaching on sexuality" which is "a pastoral disaster," because McElroy's position that sexual activity outside marriage (for instance, same-sex sexual acts) should not be an impediment to the reception of communion means "the abolition of chastity." "Jettisoning the distinction between 'orientation and activity' in sexual matters means the end of chastity as a virtue to be strived for. Or, at the very least, implies a view that 'the L.B.G.T. community' is not capable of chastity and should therefore be preached a lesser gospel." George Weigel and Archbishop Samuel Aquila criticized McElroy's idea of inclusion since Jesus "practiced some serious exclusion" and demanded radical discipleship that allowed people to refuse it and thus are distinguished from the true disciples. Weigel pointed out Jesus' "exclusion" of the blasphemers against the Holy Spirit (Mark 3:29), the pitiless (Matthew 25:41) and those who tempt the innocent (Luke 17:2);[32] while Aquila referred to the rich young man (cf. Mk 10:17–22), the people who did not welcome the Gospel brought by the visiting disciples (Mt 10:14) and those who did not accept the teaching on the Bread of Life and left Jesus (cf. Jn 6:66).[33] In 2023 Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, quoted Cardinal McElroy as an example of a church leader whose public pronouncement contradicted a “truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith”. Paprocki took issue with remarks made by Cardinal McElroy in which he appeared to reject teaching that a person must be in a state of grace to receive Holy Communion. Paprocki also posed the question of an unnamed cardinal stating publicly that “homosexual acts are not sinful and same-sex unions should be blessed by the Church” as a further example of heterodox thought among Catholic leaders. “Until recently, it would be hard to imagine any successor of the apostles making such heterodox statements,” wrote Bishop Paprocki in First Things. When another Bishop calls McElroy heretical. That holds more weight than when I say it. Check out the article below. https://catholicherald.co.uk/paprocki-calls-views-of-us-cardinal-heretical/
    2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1