Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Why Trump Wants to Normalise Relations with Russia" video.

@ShahrulJohan Had Ukraine actually got in NATO, then this war wouldn't have even started.
64
@dez00023 oh like it was ww3 when estonia joined nato? Or Finland? Lol
47
@dez00023 both estonia and Finland are right next to second biggest city and can destroy fresh water ports within hours.
10
@MohammedAlShammari-q4i Not really, they had huge loses and relied on support of USA and intel of the british. Not just that but German fought in multiple fronts and didn't have enough resources for it's vehicles (thanks to Britain)
9
@MohammedAlShammari-q4i how is current events related to "capitalism collapsing"?
9
@C3l3bi1 no they didn't. They had huge loses because the tactics they used were terrible. This is well recorded fact. They literally would've lost without help of the allied forces
8
@MohammedAlShammari-q4i the hell you have been smoking? Every neighbor which isn't direct satellite state hates Ruzsia with deep passion.
3
@dez00023 Not really, this is the assumption that it's entire allience in the war. Ruz struggled with Finland in ww2 already and Finland has been prepping for next encounter for around 80-years. Their artillery is literally on range of ST.Petersburg. Not just that but they are both in reach of major nuclear W facilities... in fact they could rush them within hour and ensure that Ruz can't use them against Europe.
3
@krashme997 IT does unless you want them to leave all together
1
@ 1. We literally have actual examples of rich people leaving the country when taxes are too high. It happens in fact every time. Also it's bad for business to make company/shop when taxation makes them collapse. 2. You clearly don't understand what wealth is... Sorry to break this to you... but wealth isn't just the money in your bankaccount, and wealth tax would ensure that people would stop investing or buying houses. Plus we already tried that in soviets... didn't work out so well did it? 3. Nah you can't. Issue is inefficient spending where money goes to pockets of bureocrats instead of to the services.
1
@maxion5109 Car is considered wealth. Painting is considered as wealth. Literally anything with trade value is considered as wealth. With your policies you would be penalizing people who prepare for future and instead force everyone to live in hedonistic manner where they have to spend all of their money in single month on consumables or be penalized for it. This would destroy your nation and ensure that everyone suffers. " On top of progressive income taxation, which was a historical success during the 20th-century" Rich people don't have income. Worst part of your argument is... that even if you taxed 100% or even liquidated all of their wealth and took it all... IT still wouldn't be enough to cover the spending your government is doing for a single year. Not just that but there is consensus among economists from both wings that too much taxation will actually see reduction in tax income. "No the Soviets didn't do that they had central economic planning and no one is suggesting that we implement a system like that. " They had central planned economy that did exactly what you just said that should be done. This was too easy, I bet you're not even full grown adult yet.
1
@maxion5109 there is such thing as concensus since it's backed up by actual data. At certain point the tax income decrease when taxes are raised. And it's also objective fact that even with 100% of taxation and taking all of their wealth... it still wouldn't be enough to fix your budget
1
He single handedly ensured that USA has no allies anymore.
1
@galatheumbreon6862 Biden's domestic policies were trash but his diplomacy was still better than what Trump had.
1
No, the second round was simply people got sick and tired of the lunacy that democrats had. Trumps domestic policies were spot on but his foreign policy is pure trashfire.
1
@Silver_Prussian ruz would attack and threaten to attack them unless submitting to them. That is why ruz wants them to be without any allies. I live next go rus and i know that this is how they operate. They don't want neutral, they want someone they can intimidate
1
@Silver_Prussian not really, ruz was desperate for peace so it could focus on pushing to Berlin. Finland humiliated ruz, 1 finnish man was proven worth of 10 ruz. Which is why ruz women desire them highly. Also Finland was poor country at the time and just came out of civil war. Now we have prepared for 80-years for next conflict. Our army sixe combined with reserve is almost the same as ruz and now we're allied with other nations as well. You don't stand a chance
1
@dalecrocker3213 You don't get it do you? If R gets UA then that will automatically lead into ww3.
1