Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "Atheists Can Now Go To Heaven" video.

  1. part 2. In another words atheism is nothing more and nothing less than you don't believe any deity. How most people take this stance? Simply because how burden of proof works. You say that there is a god, and we ask for evidences for it. You haven't granted any evidence therefore it's much safer assume that there is no suchs being as a god.
    1
  2. Actually nope, I did later point out that you didn't read those words. Since you obviously can't understand what SET and what does S means in words like cats, dogs. It just seems that you are either bad loser or simply a troll. I think you are both.
    1
  3. Part 2 Oh yeah and WORD SET is always used in form of describing many things. You know set of laws, set of rules, etc.
    1
  4. I wish Christopher Hitchens would've been alive to see this :<
    1
  5. Depends how you determine atheist, but why not ask what atheists actually think about it. For us it's rejection of theist claim that god exists. Nothing more nothing less. I'm sorry but I don't know a single religion which doesn't have dogma or worshipping. Also I asked you to point out what is atheist dogma, sinced I still haven't heard any. Again I'm not saying that atheist can't be in any religion. I'm saying THAT ATHEISM ISN'T A RELIGION. Learn to read what others say before talking crap.
    1
  6. do you even realize how illogical your reasoning is? First of you say that "rejecting claim of that deities exists" is a dogma when word ATHEIST means that they are rejecting claim of a deity. it describes the what athesim means. that isn't dogma. Atheism isn't set of beliefs there is only one belief and that technically can't even called as believe since IT'S DISBELIEF in it's very definition.
    1
  7. Ok then please tell me what is dodgma of atheism? Please tell me how do atheist worship in their religion. Since there are no dogma and no worshipping and you still say it as religion? It would be more correct to say that atheism is getting organized now days than say that they are religion. Einstein was agnostic. Also believe that no gods exists isn't that important to us. It's the fact that your claims for divinity doesn't fit with facts and reality. So it's not about belief.
    1
  8. or better just ignore those other replies to this comment. Since you probably are too stupid to understand them. Let me put this so simple that even you should be able to understand it. Is theism a religion? No it's not, theist can belong to religion but he doesn't need to. Same goes for atheists. Atheist can belong to religion or be without it. In fact many buddhists are atheists. but not all atheist are buddhist. See my point, if not then don't bother to comment.
    1
  9. You are using word religion wrong. I did already give you link for definition of a religion. It just seems that you can't admit that you are wrong. According to your logic not believing flying spagethi monster is a religion. According to your logic not beleaving in bigfoot is a religion. According to your logic not believing to pink unicorn is a religion.
    1
  10. I were making case where atheism is a default position. No one believes in god when they are born. Their parents teach them that, not to mention that their parents teaches their children to believe in particular god. Which they haven't proven. So how can you say that default position needs to be proven? Beside you can't disprove negative. I never said that atheism isn't religion because gods doesn't exist. That is a strawman fallacy you are using here.
    1
  11. Not in this case. Since there was no spot where it would describe only single belief. Not to mention that if we would use your logic that believing into something or disbelieving makes it religion then by your definition there is no such thing as non-religious. As I mentioned before you would be forced to say that you are religious if you don't believe in big foot. Now go troll somewhere else. You're not as smart as you think you are.
    1
  12. Again my latest comment. Are you saying that theism is a religion? Wow you mean hindus, muslims, jew and christianity are all the same religion. Well done genius. Theist can be without religion and it can be in religion and so can atheist too. Theism and atheism has nothing to with are they religious or not. By your stantards not believing in pink unicorn is a religion. Logic, can you use it?
    1
  13. True atheist can be part of a religion, but atheism itself has nothing to do with religion. It is just philosophical stand point where they don't believe in claim of that god exists. Believing in something when you don't have evidence for it is far from being intellectual person. Also this is important discussion simply because religions affects all of us. In fact we could fix few things that are in wrong in world by doing this.
    1
  14. Wrong they are not beliefs system. Theism is a belief that there are god/s while atheist doesn't accept that claim. Not to mention that you are putting burden of proof on atheism when again it's your job to prove god first. Person can follow only one religion? Actually it depends on what religion he is following. Facts > opinions, get used to it? Only one not used to it is you. dictionary(dot)reference(dot)com/browse/religion your definition of a religion is far from fact.
    1
  15. "the body of persons adhering to a particular SET of beliefS and practiceS" Good job reading the definitions I listed. SET means more than one, BELIEVES means more than one belief. PRACTICES means more than one practice.
    1
  16. What rejection isn't dogma. IT'S WHAT DESCRIBES WHAT ATHEISM MEANS. How fucking stupid are you. It's same as you would say that gay people's dogma is being attracted to same sex. Now you are trying to move burden of proof on me instead of explaining why atheism is a religion. Atheism is as much religion as much as being gay is being religion. It only describes does that person believe in deity. Nothing else. It doesn't include any other belief or codes of conducts.
    1