Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "" video.
-
5
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@LancesArmorStriking
"he tends to amplify their negative consequences."
Does he? And how does he amplify? And what negative consequences?
"But Obama kept families together and sent them back across"
False, you just didn't care about the subject so you were unaware of this.
Also they are not breaking up families. They are saving those kids from people who are trying to sell them to the black markets for pedophiles to play around.
Also on june 20, 2018 Trump had sign executive order to keep families in custody together.
However what you should know, by laws of the USA if children parent is detained while having a child with him/her the children are to be separated from their criminal parent. This law applies to all in USA.
" You've got the whole family on lockdown, why would you rip a mother from her child at that point?"
Because she is not her mom, but a human trafficker about to sell a child to pedophiles.
Makes me wonder why democrats are against this... It's as if they like their lovers to be old as wine.
"Obama and Trump both continued wars, but only Trump has a childish love of them. "
Loves them? Obama literally caused mess in Libya and Syria. Not to mention that they gave arms to ISIS.
Name a new country in which Trump has caused any mess. Aka country that USA wasn't meddling with military affairs before. If something Trump has actually done more toward peace than Obama had.
" Trade war with China, war with Iran, loves waterboarding, the whole thing. He's a hawk, and he even hired Bolton."
Hawk who refuses to go to war in Syria. Hawk who refuses to start a war with Korea or Russia.
Trade war with China is purely based on China breaking international IP laws. His whole goal is to have fair trade with both sides. Loves waterboarding? So does Obama.
"Obama tried to make amends with countries, while Trump aggravates them"
Was Obama first American president to cross border of North Korea? So far it seems that Trump is doing more to amend than Obama.
"the Iran deal got Iran to stop building a nuclear bomb"
Objectively speaking.. False. Iran deal did let iran to have one facility to enrich and study nuclear. In return USA would basically give them billions.
"They could have been an ally in the Middle East, but no!"
Ah, you love to ally with people who throw gay people from the roof? Who stone women for not wearing appropriate dress? Very feminist and intersectional from you.
"It's a "bad deal" because we're not making money. "
It's a bad deal since you gave billions to tyrannical government.
"Politics is not business"
Actually it's. If you don't treat it as such, then you're bound to bankrupt your whole country.
"Short-term profits never beat long-term strategic gains."
You just proved that you don't even understand business. Long term gains are goal of most successful business enterprises. In fact short-term profits are near impossible in many of the industries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@twistedsista8661
You just proved my point.
27-57 is the estimate. Average is lower than 50. Hence most of them comes from the land.
"Hidden in plain sight: Much of the illegal drug trafficking intercepted by U.S. "
Much, but could be more.
"Also, for years corporations have come said the same bs when it comes to increasing wages"
It's not bs, it's pure math. Learn it.
"Companies have cut most in many ways and never lowered the price of a product what so ever."
Because they can't cut the price. Otherwise they would be selling on loss. In order for prices to go down, regulations and taxes needs to be cut. Or bringing up new method to produce in cheaper way.
"You need to learn supply and demand and read history with that."
You don't even know what supply and demand means. Which is why you think that companies can easily just increase wages.
"Also with corporations increasing wages and keeping the price the same, buying power will increase and corporate profits will increase as well. "
No it doesn't.
Let's address this ridiculously childish logic of yours:
1. It creates inflation, which means the value of the wage goes down. You might get bigger pay check but you can buy less with it than before.
2. You totally ignore the foreign competition.
3. Money already circulates all the time. You are more focused on the money instead of the resources, which is why you're obsessed over wage instead of what you can get with it.
4. You will outright kill some industries with this.
"nationwide we need low income housing, but the only new construction are relatively large homes, also most investors are buying homes when they are low which is causing inflation in our housing prices. "
False, it's well proven that in case of California for example. The regulations have made it impossible to make new houses. There was case where group of people provided small houses for free to homeless people, and then the state did take them away since they didn't follow regulations. Simply put... Large homes are only way to make profit out of it due the heavy regulations.
"The biggest increase in crimes comes from a populace that has no hope so they do whatever"
You clearly suck in rational thinking. Here in Finland we have high welfare. You live like a king while being unemployed, actually we get less money than your minimum wage while unemployed but that's beside the point. People don't need to resort into crimes to survive, but weirdly enough we still have crime. Sorry to break this to you... But you are either born to be more prone to criminal activity or not. Anyone who has actually lived in the hoods knows this. You could see it during childhood that some people will grow up to live of crime.
"The people here can be just as horrible as anybody anywhere else. "
Your ship is sinking. Will you throw more water inside of your ship? Or will you rather focus on finding the hole and do something to it?
1
-
1
-
@johncronin9540
Obama lost popular vote against Hillary in democratics own primary.
"Do you EVER fact check before you post?"
I do, unlike you I actually know what I'm talking about.
"Obama had to deport so many undocumented aliens because it’s the function of the Executive Branch to enforce the law."
Yeah I know, how does this make my memory poor?
"But for six of the eight years of Obama’s two terms, Congress was controlled by Republicans,"
Excuses, also with your own reasoning... Obamacare is republcian thing in that case.
" US Presidents cannot rule by edict, though Trump tries"
Actually they can. By the laws that democrats implemented. Emergency laws that give president lot of power.
"What the Democratic Members in the House are doing is refusing to finance a wall that doesn’t work, and WON’T work. "
Worked pretty well with Israel. Also they refused to finance border patrols and those holding areas for illegals. Then they complain about them being underfunded same time.
" They ARE trying to reform the system"
Yeah, reforming it in to worse.
Why would they co-operate with democrats crazy idea of open borders?
"ven the Republicans knew it was a waste of money, and would create more problems than it solves. "
That's funny. Since literally every other candidate in before Trump election. WAS FOR THE WALL.
"When you are talking more generally about democracy, such as my claim that the Electoral College is anti-democratic, you use the lower case."
Don't care, you are crazy one who doesn't even understand politics.
1
-
1
-
1