Comments by "Tespri" (@Tespri) on "The Philosophy of THE PURGE (with Rick u0026 Morty!) – Wisecrack Edition" video.

  1. Only by retards who don't understand economy and think that without government the prices would be high as fuck... PS: Stop being socialist and get educated on history of mankind and economy.
    4
  2. ***** Actually I know what socialism is. I have checked that defination over 100 times by now and read history of it. Socialism is where government either controls or manipulates the market. Basically it's very opposite of freedom. In socialism you're not allowed to make business without government interfering with it.
    4
  3. Nothing to do with neoliberalism. Prices would be down due competition. It would be retarded to raise prices high when your competition sells it cheaper.
    3
  4. taliesin garland Only government monopoly is problem. Any other monopoly is easy to destroy through creating competition.
    1
  5. Ivan olivas why would they do same thing? It's pointless and doesn't give as much profit.
    1
  6. snatchadams69 There is always competition.
    1
  7. VlRGlL Patents are rule made by government.
    1
  8. Ever Flores "There are say 3 companies providing insurance. An oligopoly. Say there are 100 people buying it. The companies decide to put the prices up to 1000 each 24 hours before the Purge." Then no one would buy anything from those companies or buy medicine beforehand in that case. Plus no point to kill your customers. Which it would inherently do. No offence but please never become business man. Your incapable of thinking how to make good profit.
    1
  9. Ever Flores  No you're not pointing anything. You're saying that in libertarianism this would somehow even be problem. Without realizing that it would be foolish to do so.
    1
  10. Ever Flores I don't see that as relevant. Your argument itself was flawed. It wouldn't happen in real life nor in world of purge.
    1
  11. Ever Flores And I don't think you understood mine.
    1
  12. Zarathustra No socialism is about government controlling them. Communism is where workers do by themselves.
    1
  13. Zarathustra Exactly what Marx said. Socialism was simply stepping stone for communism.
    1
  14. Zarathustra marx. Also you're arguing against every history book and dictionary defination. Here let me help you. Socialism: "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies" Merriam-webster as source.
    1
  15. Zarathustra And how do you think COMMUNITY will do that distribution? Via government. Fucking idiot.
    1
  16. Juggernaut Dota Awww seems like sociliast got triggered. Need more newspeech to make your orwellian nightmare to come true? "So..... yeah.... try to speak like an adult and maybe I can take you serious." Actually adults insult more than kids. The more you learn...
    1
  17. Zarathustra "No, the ideology claims that the community does this through direct democracy where everyone dictates how the community should be ran without a centralised body of aggression." Now this is communism. Also direct democracy doesn't remove existance of government. IT would be non-sensical to have vote every day over how to run business X.
    1
  18. Zarathustra "It would be communism if the society was classless and money-less however that defies economic reality," Literally exactly the way you described socialism. "A government exists through a representative democracy not a direct democracy." False, seems like you're just a little kid who doesn't know jack shit. You know that Switzerland is direct democratic country? "I guess it would but then again I'm not a communist." Doesn't matter, socialism is as retarded as communism.
    1
  19. Juggernaut Dota Nah, I'm just an adult who realizes that insults have nothing to do with strenght of one's argument. Hence I can ignore insults done to me and focus on the arguments themselves. Something which you are unable to do.
    1
  20. Zarathustra "No I said socialism is where the workers control the means of production, communism is socialism in a money-less and classless society." Again that is communism. "No not completely, Switzerland holds local elections voting for representatives. What separates Switzerland from most western democracies is that people in Switzerland are obligated to vote on a policy but not create it. A direct democracy would have to remove the central body of authority so that the people can decide what policies they want to introduce" No that would be outright retarded on what you suggest. Again you would be forced to vote every single time someone even makes suggestion.
    1
  21. Zarathustra Again, in socialism it's government making the decision. Overhwelming majority of dictionaries state this .Whatever it's direct democracy or not. In communism everything is owned by workers. "That's why all western countries have a representative democracy because pure democracy cannot work." Expect it can. There is no reason to create new laws constantly.
    1
  22. Juggernaut Dota I'm calm. Only one raging here has been you. "You won't change anything with that attitude." Implying that you have moral dignity to even admit when you're wrong...
    1
  23. Hollis Awww did I hurt your feelings for pointing out historical facts about socialism? Did it hurt you deep when someone pointed out that it isn't the utopia you believed it woudl be? "Socialism is a economic and social system in which the workers (people) own the means of production, there is workplace democracy, democracy in the economy, no private property, and no capitalism." Provide sources for your claim. Oh wait you can't... Since it's all in your head.
    1
  24. Juggernaut Dota So it's always other reflecting themselves but never you? :D This is too fucking easy. Seriously why don't you just quit using internet? :D
    1
  25. Oh and for both of you idiots. Even your view of what socialism is, wouldn't work. ;)
    1
  26. Juggernaut Dota Clearly older than you since you still believe that socialism is good idea. 28. If you're still socialists during your 40 then you're qualified as an idiot.
    1
  27. Hollis I'm not even right wing, but I like how you attempt to discredit something with ad hominems. "I doubt you're 28 with the way you write and considering how pathetically ignorant you are on this subject. We're all laughing at you." You mean two of you who support socialism. You're idealogue there is no reason with people like you. Also wikipedia? You do realize that wikipedia can be manipulated by anyone to say anything? You're mixing democratic socialism here to socialism.
    1
  28. Juggernaut Dota  3 years difference is a lot when it comes to knowledge. Especially when dealing with idealogue as yourself who has very little knowledge over history of mankind and economics.
    1
  29. Hollis "What are you then? You hate leftism, so it's pretty reasonable to call you a rightist. Besides, you still refuse to understand leftism." Concept of left and right in political spectrum are retarded. Tell me, what does it tell about person that he is left or right? Does tell do they believe in god? What sort economic system etc? You see those two labels are trying to trow people into two categories based on few things they believe in. Anti-religion is usually connnected with left, but same time there are plenty in the left who defend Islam to their death, while mocking christianity. Some in left believe in capitalism. "who believes in leftism is laughing at you, simply because you're such an uneducated dumbass childish dickhead."! guess I were right. You're actually crying at your home now. How does it feel to be so angry? just look at you. Almost every second word you spew is attempt to insult. :D OH look at this. From the sources you copied and pasted without reading: "This term is harder to define, since socialists disagree among themselves about what socialism ‘really is.’" See :D "It would seem that everyone (socialists and nonsocialists alike) could at least agree that it is not a system in which there is widespread private ownership of the means of production" My point exactly. So no matter what you suggest, your system will fail because it's against private ownership of the means of production. Whetever it's democratic, or done by workers or by dictator. Results will be the same.
    1
  30. Hollis Oh and btw.. Sargon is left winger and he is socialist.. Just saying...
    1
  31. Hollis You mean the same thrash which pointed out that even your sources were disagreeing with you? :D This is too easy. You're so butthurt, and it seems that you're subscribed to SJW line of thinking.
    1
  32. Juggernaut Dota So you admit I were right?
    1
  33. Hollis "Half of the shit you just posted is too hard to understand considering you're a dumbass and can't write in English, but I'll try to respond." Not my fault that you're literally too stupid to connect the dots for not having perfect grammar. Points are obvious for those who have even half of their brains left. "Leftism includes Social Democrats, Socialists, Syndicalists, Communists, and Anarchists." Actually there are anarchists in the right as well, and some right wingers support some socialist policies. "Each of these has some basis on the idea of equality (including equal opportunity)," It's no longer equality when you're giving special priviledges to some and taking from others. In fact it has been long time right wing view to have liberty and equality to all. Historically it has always been right wingers who fought for individuals freedom. For example republicans were the ones who abolished slavery in USA and fought for rights of the black people. While democrats in both cases were against of this. "Capitalism is a Rightist ideology." And capitalism is based on idea of equality and freedom of each individual. "How am I angry? I'm angry because you're a dumbass? Nah, that doesn't make sense. Oh wait, you're just a shitty troll. Oh, okay." The fact that you feel like insulting in almost every sentence you make, proves that you're angry. "Libertarian (meaning less state or no state)" Did you just say that libertarians are left wing? You do realize that all libertarians are for capitalism? Holy shit you don't even know history of libertarianism and what liberalism original was. Left as you think of it, stands against everything you claimed. "Yes, Leftists dislike private property. Your opinion doesn't mean shit. You're a pathetic sad loser who argues with or trolls people consistently on the internet. What a joke." How about you send your computer to africa since you don't like to own private stuff.
    1
  34. Hollis  SJW is reference to a stupid person who thinks that he is fighting for social justice even though everything they do is actually the opposite. Also putting radical like Malcolm X into that group is just outright retarded. He was total opposite of Martin Luther king.
    1